Hendo said:
This post exemplifies just how over reacting this game is...
The problem with RB's is that they're not on top for very long, so you need to act quickly if you want them at their best. I can see all of the arguments, but ask yourself this- which RB in dynasty who qualifies as a starter (so, assuming you start 2 RB's you're looking at a minimum of top 20 to top 30 or so in most leagues) and fits all of the following criteria more so than Foster? 1) is young;
yep
2) has at least good talent;
yep, great talent
3) is on a team with a good offense, including both a good QB and WR;
certainly
4) is the primary ball-carrier for his team, meaning >65% of his team's carries and plays all 3 downs
looks like it now
5) is a good receiver out of the backfield; see the last drive of last week's game,
yes
6) is capable of putting up elite fantasy numbers in any given game;
proven
7) Doesn't have chronic health issues;
not yet
8) is presently obtainable in dynasty for non-elite player(s) in trade.
WAT? I wish.
I can't think of one such player who would qualify more than Foster. I can't rank him lower than 4th or 5th, and he may be higher given how good his situation is.
BTW, for those who put down on situation, that's like trying to see well when covering one eye. I seem to recall Emmitt Smith making a HOF career out of his situation and being at an elite FF level for around 7-8 seasons. I also see people exasperated over a talented guy like Stewart who is languishing in a God-awful situation. Foster's situation won't change any time soon, and it's genuinely good. This is after all a team sport.
I'm just having trouble identifying anyone who is in a better overall position given both his talent and his situation.
EDIT- as a quick aside, I would predict within a year that Best would rank high up if not at the top of such a list.