What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is Chester Taylor gonna be the new Westbrook (1 Viewer)

Very solid, but he doesn't have Westbrook's versatility.
:goodposting: Seriously. We are not going to see Chester Taylor line up in the slot and run a skinny post down the middle of the field.
Exactly.
C'mon you guys, you are missing the point. They are similar players but Westbrook is better. They are both under 215 so they are lighter backs. They both catch the ball very well, they are both quicker type backs and neither is a pile mover. Westbrook is a little bit better at probably everyting and thus my comment of Chester being a Westbrook light is accurate. LHucks you through out Taylor being 3 inches taller? C'Mon he is still not a tall back at 5' 11". Are you saying you can only compare guys based on height? That is silly because the attributes are similar. You say that Chester Taylor is a better inside runner and "goal line back." Is that based on his ZERO rushing TD's last year? You need to watch guys to make opinions about them. I think Taylor is an average back who has very good receiving skills. Westbrook is a good back with Great receiving skills. Your comment about Westbrook being quicker can be said about almost any back in the league as Westbrook is probably the hardest guy in the league to tackle one on one.Again, Westbrook is better but Chester is Westbrook light or a poor mans Westbrook as they have similar skill sets (even if Westbrook is better at almost all of them)

 
Very solid, but he doesn't have Westbrook's versatility.
:goodposting: Seriously. We are not going to see Chester Taylor line up in the slot and run a skinny post down the middle of the field.
Exactly.
C'mon you guys, you are missing the point. They are similar players but Westbrook is better. They are both under 215 so they are lighter backs. They both catch the ball very well, they are both quicker type backs and neither is a pile mover. Westbrook is a little bit better at probably everyting and thus my comment of Chester being a Westbrook light is accurate. LHucks you through out Taylor being 3 inches taller? C'Mon he is still not a tall back at 5' 11". Are you saying you can only compare guys based on height? That is silly because the attributes are similar. You say that Chester Taylor is a better inside runner and "goal line back." Is that based on his ZERO rushing TD's last year? You need to watch guys to make opinions about them. I think Taylor is an average back who has very good receiving skills. Westbrook is a good back with Great receiving skills. Your comment about Westbrook being quicker can be said about almost any back in the league as Westbrook is probably the hardest guy in the league to tackle one on one.Again, Westbrook is better but Chester is Westbrook light or a poor mans Westbrook as they have similar skill sets (even if Westbrook is better at almost all of them)
:shrug: this is like comparing Reuben Droughns and Priest Holmes.
 
MIN has lately seemed to be the place RBs go to die. HOw many do they have on that team anyway?

C Taylor

M Moore

Fason

Whizzinator

M Williams

They might even draft a guy knowing their track record.

The point is, I don't see anyone emerging out of this bunch as the sure fire starter. They probably all get touches.
What have the others done to deserve touch's? Williams barely got the ball at all last year, Whizz has tons of baggage, Moore looked decent in spots but even with an ineffective Bennett couldn't stay healthy and couldn't take the job and Fason who knows. What is known is that there is new management in place and one of the 1st moves they made (after assessing their talent pool or lack thereof) on the 1st days of free agency was that they paid starter money to Chester Taylor. Childress then followed up the signing by stating that they wanted to give him the ball 20-25 times a game. Whether he can handle the work is another question but I have read nothing to indicate that this will not be Taylors job.

There is a new coaching staff, new philosophy (emphasis on the run/line), bringing in their guy to carry the ball. To me the big question is whether he can handle it but the job is his.

 
Very solid, but he doesn't have Westbrook's versatility.
:goodposting: Seriously. We are not going to see Chester Taylor line up in the slot and run a skinny post down the middle of the field.
Exactly.
C'mon you guys, you are missing the point. They are similar players but Westbrook is better. They are both under 215 so they are lighter backs. They both catch the ball very well, they are both quicker type backs and neither is a pile mover. Westbrook is a little bit better at probably everyting and thus my comment of Chester being a Westbrook light is accurate. LHucks you through out Taylor being 3 inches taller? C'Mon he is still not a tall back at 5' 11". Are you saying you can only compare guys based on height? That is silly because the attributes are similar. You say that Chester Taylor is a better inside runner and "goal line back." Is that based on his ZERO rushing TD's last year? You need to watch guys to make opinions about them. I think Taylor is an average back who has very good receiving skills. Westbrook is a good back with Great receiving skills. Your comment about Westbrook being quicker can be said about almost any back in the league as Westbrook is probably the hardest guy in the league to tackle one on one.Again, Westbrook is better but Chester is Westbrook light or a poor mans Westbrook as they have similar skill sets (even if Westbrook is better at almost all of them)
:shrug: this is like comparing Reuben Droughns and Priest Holmes.
:rant: ??? Droughans can't catch the ball extremely well, droughans isn't quick like Priest and Droughans prefers to hit guys than go around them like Priest. They only have weight that is the same. Please look at the skill sets and the style and what they are good at. If you guys think the comp of Priest and Droughans is the same as Westbrook and Taylor than there is no reason to further the discussion :wall:
 
MIN has lately seemed to be the place RBs go to die. HOw many do they have on that team anyway?

C Taylor

M Moore

Fason

Whizzinator

M Williams

They might even draft a guy knowing their track record.

The point is, I don't see anyone emerging out of this bunch as the sure fire starter. They probably all get touches.
And now they have a new owner, a new coaching staff, are working on shuffling out malcontents. This not the same organization we've seen the past 10 years.
 
MIN has lately seemed to be the place RBs go to die. HOw many do they have on that team anyway?

C Taylor

M Moore

Fason

Whizzinator

M Williams

They might even draft a guy knowing their track record.

The point is, I don't see anyone emerging out of this bunch as the sure fire starter. They probably all get touches.
And now they have a new owner, a new coaching staff, are working on shuffling out malcontents. This not the same organization we've seen the past 10 years.
:goodposting: Not too hard to pick the primary RB out of this group:

C Taylor - Targeted by new regime to be agressively pursued and signed immediately at the beginning of free agency

M Moore - hasn't stayed healthy, didn't Tice question his willingness to play through pain?

Fason - averaged 1.9 YPC as a rookie

Whizzinator - Coming off a drug suspension on a team looking to clean up its image

M Williams - Questionable to even return to the team after injury and love boat scandal

 
Taylor running for Vikings could make the difference

March 24, 2006

By Clark Judge

CBS SportsLine.com Senior Writer

MINNEAPOLIS -- The Minnesota Vikings trade franchise quarterback Daunte Culpepper one week and sign guard Steve Hutchinson to a zillion-dollar contract the next. So whom do Vikings coach Brad Childress and I wind up talking about?

Chester Taylor's only 2005 TD came through the air, but that should improve in Minnesota. (Getty Images)

You got it. Chester Taylor.

He's the free-agent running back Minnesota pirated from Baltimore, and maybe he's Priest Holmes waiting to happen and maybe he's not. All I know is that Childress, the Vikings' first-year coach, is happy to have him and thinks he can make a difference with this year's team.

And I think I know why.

Let me take you back to last season, when Childress was offensive coordinator with the Philadelphia Eagles, and the Eagles took a pass -- and I mean that literally -- on the year. They threw 45 times the first game; 29 the second; 52 the third; and 48 the fourth.

When it was over, only Arizona threw or attempted to throw more -- though Green Bay was close -- and only Arizona was more unbalanced, with the Cards passing 66 percent of the time. Arizona ranked last in rushing; Green Bay was 30th and the Eagles 28th. More important, Arizona finished 5-11; Green Bay was 4-12 and Philadelphia was 6-10.

The message isn't lost on Childress.

"You have to run more than we ran at the Eagles," he said. "I know that sounds as if it's a slap at Andy (Reid, Philadelphia's head coach), but it's not. We kind of chuckled about it at Philadelphia when we were leading the league in passing after three weeks and throwing 53 times a game, but you live by the sword; you die by the sword.

"At some level you have to let your offensive line exert its will. (Tackle) Jon Runyan is a much better pass protector after he's been able to grab people, shake them, twist them and grind them. So, yeah, I want to be able to run the ball."

That's where Hutchinson comes in. The Vikings signed him to a seven-year, $49 million contract that makes him the most expensive guard in the business and makes the left side of Minnesota's offensive line -- with Hutchinson, tackle Bryant McKinnie and center Matt Birk -- one of the most intimidating in the game.

But that's precisely the point. Childress could have targeted free-agent running backs Shaun Alexander or Edgerrin James to improve the NFL's 27th-ranked rushing attack. Yet he chose Taylor before dropping the hammer with Hutchinson.

"You don't do anything without those guys in front," said Childress. "Everyone wants the receiver or the running back or the quarterback, but you have to make sure you're paying attention. You better take care of your lines."

Childress knows what he's doing here. He looks at Super Bowl champion Pittsburgh and sees the league's fifth-ranked rushing game. He looks at NFC champion Seattle and sees the third-ranked attack. Of the league's four playoff semifinalists only one -- Carolina -- wasn't in the top five, but the Panthers were so handicapped by injuries that, by the NFC Championship Game, they were forced to use their fourth-string back.

Which is where Chester Taylor comes in. He seldom played in Baltimore, though he was used more in the second half of last season as the Ravens grew frustrated with Jamal Lewis. He averages over four yards a carry. He hasn't run more than 160 times in any season. He can move a pile. He has the speed to turn a corner.

In short, he might be just what the Vikings need.

"I can remember him in college at Toledo," said Childress, "and he plays in the MAC championship game against (Marshall). They're down something like 21 at the half, and I remember talking about that game later with his coach. He told me, 'I grabbed him (Taylor) at halftime and told him, 'Chester, I'm going to give you the ball every way I know how to, and you're going to win the game for us.'

"So he has two touchdowns in the second half, and they beat Marshall. I remember that, and I remember him when he'd come by me on the sidelines when we played preseason games against Baltimore, and I'd say, 'Who in the heck is that?' He's a young, low-mileage back who is big and physical. I don't know if he's Priest Holmes, but you hope so. It's a good chance for him, and it's good for us, as well."

It could be great for the Vikings. Remember the last time Minnesota was a legitimate Super Bowl threat? The Vikings had Robert Smith to keep defenses honest. They haven't had anything like that in years, but maybe now they have a chance.

All I know is the gap between Minnesota and NFC North champ Chicago just got smaller, and the Bears better be careful. The Vikings are better, much better, than the club that won seven of its final nine a year ago.

"We're not rebuilding," Childress said. "We're remolding."

Whatever you call it, this much is certain: What happened with the Vikings last season won't happen again. It can't, not after the moves they have made. Not only do they have the weapons to improve their running game; they have a mandate from a head coach determined to make it work.

"I remember a great, great comment by (Denver safety) John Lynch after we played them last year," Childress said, thinking back to Philadelphia. "On defense, all you ever try to do is to make the other team one-dimensional, and he said, 'They already were one-dimensional.' You know what? It was a like a charge hit home. And we started to run the ball more."

Expect the Vikings to follow.

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/9334429

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, but this doesn't look like a situation where one guy is going to emerge with most of the touches.
The Eagles in 2004 and 2005 didn't either.2005: Westbrook 156 rushes, rest of team 209

2004: Westbrook 177 rushes, rest of team 199

That didn't stop Westbrook from putting up excellent numbers

 
Very solid, but he doesn't have Westbrook's versatility.
:goodposting: Seriously. We are not going to see Chester Taylor line up in the slot and run a skinny post down the middle of the field.
Exactly.
C'mon you guys, you are missing the point. They are similar players but Westbrook is better. They are both under 215 so they are lighter backs. They both catch the ball very well, they are both quicker type backs and neither is a pile mover. Westbrook is a little bit better at probably everyting and thus my comment of Chester being a Westbrook light is accurate. LHucks you through out Taylor being 3 inches taller? C'Mon he is still not a tall back at 5' 11". Are you saying you can only compare guys based on height? That is silly because the attributes are similar. You say that Chester Taylor is a better inside runner and "goal line back." Is that based on his ZERO rushing TD's last year? You need to watch guys to make opinions about them. I think Taylor is an average back who has very good receiving skills. Westbrook is a good back with Great receiving skills. Your comment about Westbrook being quicker can be said about almost any back in the league as Westbrook is probably the hardest guy in the league to tackle one on one.Again, Westbrook is better but Chester is Westbrook light or a poor mans Westbrook as they have similar skill sets (even if Westbrook is better at almost all of them)
:shrug: this is like comparing Reuben Droughns and Priest Holmes.
:rant: ??? Droughans can't catch the ball extremely well, droughans isn't quick like Priest and Droughans prefers to hit guys than go around them like Priest. They only have weight that is the same. Please look at the skill sets and the style and what they are good at. If you guys think the comp of Priest and Droughans is the same as Westbrook and Taylor than there is no reason to further the discussion :wall:
Nope, you're right. There isn't. Every difference you stated between Droughns and Priest applies to Westbrook vs. Taylor.
 
Very solid, but he doesn't have Westbrook's versatility.
:goodposting: Seriously. We are not going to see Chester Taylor line up in the slot and run a skinny post down the middle of the field.
Exactly.
C'mon you guys, you are missing the point. They are similar players but Westbrook is better. They are both under 215 so they are lighter backs. They both catch the ball very well, they are both quicker type backs and neither is a pile mover. Westbrook is a little bit better at probably everyting and thus my comment of Chester being a Westbrook light is accurate. LHucks you through out Taylor being 3 inches taller? C'Mon he is still not a tall back at 5' 11". Are you saying you can only compare guys based on height? That is silly because the attributes are similar. You say that Chester Taylor is a better inside runner and "goal line back." Is that based on his ZERO rushing TD's last year? You need to watch guys to make opinions about them. I think Taylor is an average back who has very good receiving skills. Westbrook is a good back with Great receiving skills. Your comment about Westbrook being quicker can be said about almost any back in the league as Westbrook is probably the hardest guy in the league to tackle one on one.Again, Westbrook is better but Chester is Westbrook light or a poor mans Westbrook as they have similar skill sets (even if Westbrook is better at almost all of them)
:shrug: this is like comparing Reuben Droughns and Priest Holmes.
:rant: ??? Droughans can't catch the ball extremely well, droughans isn't quick like Priest and Droughans prefers to hit guys than go around them like Priest. They only have weight that is the same. Please look at the skill sets and the style and what they are good at. If you guys think the comp of Priest and Droughans is the same as Westbrook and Taylor than there is no reason to further the discussion :wall:
Nope, you're right. There isn't. Every difference you stated between Droughns and Priest applies to Westbrook vs. Taylor.
This is my last comment, feel free to have the last word, but if you think that Holmes to Droughans is similar to Chester Taylor and Westbrook comparisons then you obviously only look at stats and don't see the way they play and what their attributes are. Priest is more like Westbrook and Chester while Droughans is the guy who doesn't belong in the comparisions. People are even saying now that Taylor is similar to Holmes as they came as a backup from Baltimore??? I respectively :wall:
 
Very solid, but he doesn't have Westbrook's versatility.
:goodposting: Seriously. We are not going to see Chester Taylor line up in the slot and run a skinny post down the middle of the field.
Exactly.
C'mon you guys, you are missing the point. They are similar players but Westbrook is better. They are both under 215 so they are lighter backs. They both catch the ball very well, they are both quicker type backs and neither is a pile mover. Westbrook is a little bit better at probably everyting and thus my comment of Chester being a Westbrook light is accurate. LHucks you through out Taylor being 3 inches taller? C'Mon he is still not a tall back at 5' 11". Are you saying you can only compare guys based on height? That is silly because the attributes are similar. You say that Chester Taylor is a better inside runner and "goal line back." Is that based on his ZERO rushing TD's last year? You need to watch guys to make opinions about them. I think Taylor is an average back who has very good receiving skills. Westbrook is a good back with Great receiving skills. Your comment about Westbrook being quicker can be said about almost any back in the league as Westbrook is probably the hardest guy in the league to tackle one on one.Again, Westbrook is better but Chester is Westbrook light or a poor mans Westbrook as they have similar skill sets (even if Westbrook is better at almost all of them)
:shrug: this is like comparing Reuben Droughns and Priest Holmes.
:rant: ??? Droughans can't catch the ball extremely well, droughans isn't quick like Priest and Droughans prefers to hit guys than go around them like Priest. They only have weight that is the same. Please look at the skill sets and the style and what they are good at. If you guys think the comp of Priest and Droughans is the same as Westbrook and Taylor than there is no reason to further the discussion :wall:
Nope, you're right. There isn't. Every difference you stated between Droughns and Priest applies to Westbrook vs. Taylor.
This is my last comment, feel free to have the last word, but if you think that Holmes to Droughans is similar to Chester Taylor and Westbrook comparisons then you obviously only look at stats and don't see the way they play and what their attributes are. Priest is more like Westbrook and Chester while Droughans is the guy who doesn't belong in the comparisions. People are even saying now that Taylor is similar to Holmes as they came as a backup from Baltimore??? I respectively :wall:
:shrug: I thought my point was simple. THEY (BW/CT) ARE NOT COMPARABLE
 
Very solid, but he doesn't have Westbrook's versatility.
:goodposting: Seriously. We are not going to see Chester Taylor line up in the slot and run a skinny post down the middle of the field.
Exactly.
C'mon you guys, you are missing the point. They are similar players but Westbrook is better. They are both under 215 so they are lighter backs. They both catch the ball very well, they are both quicker type backs and neither is a pile mover. Westbrook is a little bit better at probably everyting and thus my comment of Chester being a Westbrook light is accurate. LHucks you through out Taylor being 3 inches taller? C'Mon he is still not a tall back at 5' 11". Are you saying you can only compare guys based on height? That is silly because the attributes are similar. You say that Chester Taylor is a better inside runner and "goal line back." Is that based on his ZERO rushing TD's last year? You need to watch guys to make opinions about them. I think Taylor is an average back who has very good receiving skills. Westbrook is a good back with Great receiving skills. Your comment about Westbrook being quicker can be said about almost any back in the league as Westbrook is probably the hardest guy in the league to tackle one on one.Again, Westbrook is better but Chester is Westbrook light or a poor mans Westbrook as they have similar skill sets (even if Westbrook is better at almost all of them)
:shrug: this is like comparing Reuben Droughns and Priest Holmes.
:rant: ??? Droughans can't catch the ball extremely well, droughans isn't quick like Priest and Droughans prefers to hit guys than go around them like Priest. They only have weight that is the same. Please look at the skill sets and the style and what they are good at. If you guys think the comp of Priest and Droughans is the same as Westbrook and Taylor than there is no reason to further the discussion :wall:
Nope, you're right. There isn't. Every difference you stated between Droughns and Priest applies to Westbrook vs. Taylor.
This is my last comment, feel free to have the last word, but if you think that Holmes to Droughans is similar to Chester Taylor and Westbrook comparisons then you obviously only look at stats and don't see the way they play and what their attributes are. Priest is more like Westbrook and Chester while Droughans is the guy who doesn't belong in the comparisions. People are even saying now that Taylor is similar to Holmes as they came as a backup from Baltimore??? I respectively :wall:
:shrug: I thought my point was simple. THEY (BW/CT) ARE NOT COMPARABLE
:lmao: They're both horrible comparisons, although Taylor is closer to Westbrook, mostly because of the coach.

Who in their right mind is comparing Taylor to Priest? :loco:

 
HC Brad Childress: "...I remember that, and I remember him when he'd come by me on the sidelines when we played preseason games against Baltimore, and I'd say, 'Who in the heck is that?' He's a young, low-mileage back who is big and physical. I don't know if he's Priest Holmes, but you hope so. It's a good chance for him, and it's good for us, as well."
Well someone did mention that!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top