There are countless other videos with NFL footage on YouTube that they don’t complain about.Lost me immediately when the title says NFL pulled it for thin copyright claims. No. The video is violating copyright and that’s what any content owner does when this happens. Rest is sour grapes.
Poetry. I don't recognize a game I used to love because of all the BS in games now.dschuler said:The NFL rules are just garbage in general, by far worse than any major sport. When a small penalty is the equivalent of an INT, it definitely alters games. They don’t know what a catch is, what is pass interference, roughing, a personal foul, etc. The lack of consistency from game to game and even play to play is frustrating.
The league has an identity crisis, not a cheating crisis. Lack of consistency even spotting the ball after a runner goes down is frustrating. Lack of consistency on when to let plays go and then they blow the whistle on a defensive TD and the other team scores on the same drive. Lack of consistency saying you need clear evidence to overturn it, and sometimes when it looks clear the call still doesn’t get overturned. It won’t be injuries that kill football, it will be themselves. Almost every game there are calls and mistakes that occur and still get missed in 2018 and change the outcome of games.
I think the NFL at one time wanted this chaos, as it generated buzz for people to talk about. More importantly, uncertainty and inconsistent officiating naturally creates parity, which is another thing the league is striving for.
Try and figure out the actual logistics of this and get back to me. It is nearly impossible to implement because of the rules on when the play is considered dead, which are a vital part of how all of football is played. The system has to determine the exact moment when the ballcarrier is down, which no chip can do.For what it's worth, I don't think the NFL is rigged but I do think there's plenty of room for improvement.
I didn't realize this but, according this article in the NY Times, the NFL already chips footballs. To me it defies logic why they wouldn't use that chip, that's already in the ball, to spot the ball. I know there's a lot to it but the NFL is a multi-billion dollar company, they could certainly afford to figure it out.
Well there you go then, everything is already perfect, cool.Try and figure out the actual logistics of this and get back to me. It is nearly impossible to implement because of the rules on when the play is considered dead, which are a vital part of how all of football is played. The system has to determine the exact moment when the ballcarrier is down, which no chip can do.
ETA: Spotting the ball in the NFL is actually incredibly accurate. Sure there are occasional mistakes, but those guys are remarkable at it.
Little known fact: Roger Goodell has an inside line to Vegas that tells them the results in advance so they can set the lines in their favor. Vegas then kicks him back millions which he then distributes to the officials that worked the games in little pink envelopes.Just let me know which side it'll be rigged for pre-kick so I can bet the other side :mansion:
I'm just saying what we have is pretty close to the best option at this point. There could be something better down the road, but a chipped ball doesn't know when the play is dead. Computers and technology still haven't reached the point of the computing speed of the human eye/brain combo.Well there you go then, everything is already perfect, cool.
Could we agree, though, that bringing out the chain gang is stupid?Try and figure out the actual logistics of this and get back to me. It is nearly impossible to implement because of the rules on when the play is considered dead, which are a vital part of how all of football is played. The system has to determine the exact moment when the ballcarrier is down, which no chip can do.
ETA: Spotting the ball in the NFL is actually incredibly accurate. Sure there are occasional mistakes, but those guys are remarkable at it.
Saw an article on player technology touting how they could tell where a player was at all times "to within 6 inches."For what it's worth, I don't think the NFL is rigged but I do think there's plenty of room for improvement.
I didn't realize this but, according this article in the NY Times, the NFL already chips footballs. To me it defies logic why they wouldn't use that chip, that's already in the ball, to spot the ball. I know there's a lot to it but the NFL is a multi-billion dollar company, they could certainly afford to figure it out.
The chain gang has always irritated the heck out of me. Doesnt somebody still have to estimate where to spot the start of the chain on the sideline?Could we agree, though, that bringing out the chain gang is stupid?
If you notice, most 1st downs start on a yard line. Makes measurements easier.The chain gang has always irritated the heck out of me. Doesnt somebody still have to estimate where to spot the start of the chain on the sideline?
Word that I have heard in reffing circles is that the NFL likes the drama of it.The chain gang has always irritated the heck out of me. Doesnt somebody still have to estimate where to spot the start of the chain on the sideline?
NFL knows it's just business.Joe fan thinks its a game. NFL knows its just entertainment.
I couldn't agree with this more.Rigged? No.
But that said, I never thought I'd see the day where NFL officiating became more laughable and outrageous than the NBA. I think that finally happened this season. It's because catching a damn ball is a 38 step process. Like wtf.