Exactly my thinking. They added all these pieces to the receiving game. They still have Moss on the outside and Welker/Edelman in the slot. If Manning can make Garcon and Collie into play makers, Brady can do the same with Hernandez, Tate, Price, Edelman.Brady's demise is greatly exaggerated.Read the tea leaves. The Patriots did not address their mediocre backfield and instead added three receiving options in the draft and signed Tory Holt. 5-wide all year in my opinion.
This is where I am and why I posed the question. Based on how my draft will likely play out, I will have a shot at Brady/Romo/Rivers and I am just having a hard time justifying the pick of Brady over the other two.I don't think it really matters if he is or isn't Top 5 in terms of his final ranking. The bottom line is that he likely will never put up TD numbers like he did in 2007. He should still post decent yardage numbers but there are many other QBs that can/have put up similar numbers to Brady. Last year was Brady's 2nd best fantasy scoring season and he ranked 8th. He has only been a Top 5 QB twice. He should be in the discussion for Top 5 but he won't lap the field of QBs like he did that one season.
Bottom line, he will probably go earlier than he should in redraft leagues to someone who has visions of his 50 TD seasons, but there will be other QBs available a little later on just as good and just as likely to put up big fantasy numbers.
And those whining about the Pats running game need to realize that the team's rushing totals have been fine and in the Top 5-10 range. They just don't get their production from one guy.
I'll switch Romo and Brady and maybe put Schaub ahead of Rivers depending on how well Mathews can carry the load, but it's still yes. I don't like Brady's weeks 13-16 on paper but I do like that he should get Welker back for the FF playoffs. Hard to call but I probably won't have him on many teams this year. 13 Dec 06 NYJ @ NE Gillette Stadium 8:30 PM14 Dec 12 NE @ CHI Soldier Field 1:00 PM 15 Dec 19 GB @ NE Gillette Stadium 8:20 PM16 Dec 26 NE @ BUF Ralph Wilson Stadium 1:00 PM1. Brees2. Rodgers3. Manning 4. Brady5. Romo6. RiversSo yay is my answer
Who in this thread whined? One person brought up a mediocre backfield, but they weren't whining.I can see Brady top 10, but not sure about top 5.And those whining about the Pats running game need to realize that the team's rushing totals have been fine and in the Top 5-10 range. They just don't get their production from one guy.
Seriously. Whining?All I said was they have a mediocre backfield (which they do) and they didn't address it this off-season (which they didn't). They get their yards from multiple guys because every RB they have is either not very good or injured due to age. Whatever their totals are, they'd be better with a better RB, and they didn't bring one in.Who in this thread whined? One person brought up a mediocre backfield, but they weren't whining.And those whining about the Pats running game need to realize that the team's rushing totals have been fine and in the Top 5-10 range. They just don't get their production from one guy.
I'm firmly on the side of yay, Brady is a top 5 QB this year.
Better values than Rodgers/Brees/Manning/Brady:RiversSchaubRomoCutlerall have just as much a chance as Brady to end up top 5.
People have been questioning the Pats running game for the past couple of years in many threads, including several this year already.Seriously. Whining?All I said was they have a mediocre backfield (which they do) and they didn't address it this off-season (which they didn't). They get their yards from multiple guys because every RB they have is either not very good or injured due to age. Whatever their totals are, they'd be better with a better RB, and they didn't bring one in.Who in this thread whined? One person brought up a mediocre backfield, but they weren't whining.And those whining about the Pats running game need to realize that the team's rushing totals have been fine and in the Top 5-10 range. They just don't get their production from one guy.![]()
In 2009, Brady had 800 more passing yards, 2 more TDs, and 13 fewer INTs than Cutler. In 2010, Brady will still be on a good offense, throwing to Randy Moss, and Cutler will still be on a crappy offense throwing to Devin Hester. So why would you think Cutler would do nearly as well in 2010 as Brady?Trivia: Cutler hasn't led any team to a winning season since his senior year of high school, 2001.I group him with the 25-28 TDs crew. That's good. Maybe not Top 5. Probably drafted too early. Like, I can't see him doing MUCH better than Cutler but I'm sure Brady will be drafted a round or two earlier.
Trivia: win-loss doesn't matter in fantasy, and sometimes it's actually helpful to pad a QBs yardage stats. It could easily be argued that Brady's WR corps got worse this offseason due to Welker, while Cutler's got better due to Martz (whose offenses are known for many things but not usually "crappy"). They are really virtually dead even in my opinion, which means I'll probably end up with Cutler in more leagues because I won't be drafting Brady at his current ADP in the late 3rd. (note: Cutler at 7.12)In 2009, Brady had 800 more passing yards, 2 more TDs, and 13 fewer INTs than Cutler. In 2010, Brady will still be on a good offense, throwing to Randy Moss, and Cutler will still be on a crappy offense throwing to Devin Hester. So why would you think Cutler would do nearly as well in 2010 as Brady?Trivia: Cutler hasn't led any team to a winning season since his senior year of high school, 2001.I group him with the 25-28 TDs crew. That's good. Maybe not Top 5. Probably drafted too early. Like, I can't see him doing MUCH better than Cutler but I'm sure Brady will be drafted a round or two earlier.
Certainly if you believe Cutler and Brady are equal, you will get Cutler and not Brady. I just don't see any sane reason to believe that. In Martz's years since he left the Rams, he led his teams to the #22, #19, and #23 offenses.Trivia: win-loss doesn't matter in fantasy, and sometimes it's actually helpful to pad a QBs yardage stats. It could easily be argued that Brady's WR corps got worse this offseason due to Welker, while Cutler's got better due to Martz (whose offenses are known for many things but not usually "crappy"). They are really virtually dead even in my opinion, which means I'll probably end up with Cutler in more leagues because I won't be drafting Brady at his current ADP in the late 3rd. (note: Cutler at 7.12)In 2009, Brady had 800 more passing yards, 2 more TDs, and 13 fewer INTs than Cutler. In 2010, Brady will still be on a good offense, throwing to Randy Moss, and Cutler will still be on a crappy offense throwing to Devin Hester. So why would you think Cutler would do nearly as well in 2010 as Brady?Trivia: Cutler hasn't led any team to a winning season since his senior year of high school, 2001.I group him with the 25-28 TDs crew. That's good. Maybe not Top 5. Probably drafted too early. Like, I can't see him doing MUCH better than Cutler but I'm sure Brady will be drafted a round or two earlier.
that's an excellent point and not one that I had considered before. as much as the Jets were a "steer clear" defense last season for QBs and WR1s, this year the figure to be even more so, including WR2s and RBs. Having to play them twice should be a downgrade to Brady, Moss, Henne, Marshall... everyone in the AFC East, unless you are confident in your backups.I don't like taking Brady in general because you'll have to spend a pretty solid draft pick to get him and I'm not sure you want to start him twice versus the Jets this season. If I'm going into the season thinking I may be looking to start elsewhere and I have to spend an early pick to get Brady, that turns me off. If I'm going to go QBBC, I may as well spend my first QB selection later in the draft and take my Qb 2 a little earlier than normal.
2nd game vs jets he was 310/1 -- that's not horrible.He's right around 5. I wouldn't reach to go and get him but if you're in a league where everyone is convinced that going QB late is the way to go and he's left sitting there, eventually he's worth taking. The last couple of seasons though, he's just been drafted way to high. This year he'll probably be drafted in most leagues right about where he should be, which is in that QB 4 to 6 area.I don't like taking Brady in general because you'll have to spend a pretty solid draft pick to get him and I'm not sure you want to start him twice versus the Jets this season. If I'm going into the season thinking I may be looking to start elsewhere and I have to spend an early pick to get Brady, that turns me off. If I'm going to go QBBC, I may as well spend my first QB selection later in the draft and take my Qb 2 a little earlier than normal.
Done.Put up a poll.
He's #1-#2 every year he's upright.
Brady has been #1 once and #2 once in 8 years as a starter (and thus upright). His best season other than those two was 7th.Put up a poll.He's #1-#2 every year he's upright.
Not necessarily equal, but scoring more vs. later draft position.Certainly if you believe Cutler and Brady are equal, you will get Cutler and not Brady. I just don't see any sane reason to believe that. In Martz's years since he left the Rams, he led his teams to the #22, #19, and #23 offenses.
az_prof said:Without Welker, and I doubt Welker contributes much this year, Brady will suffer. But they still don't have a HB so they will need to pass and Brady is still talented. He won't be top two but he should be top 5.