Simon Shepherd
Footballguy
We're working night and day to make that happen. The difference is we program this software, whereas with the board, we can only make requests to invision.I'm sure it'll improve just as much as the board upgrade has.
We're working night and day to make that happen. The difference is we program this software, whereas with the board, we can only make requests to invision.I'm sure it'll improve just as much as the board upgrade has.
No; we have a new app coming soon that'll give subscribers full access to preseason content on their mobile devices.Is the Magazine App going to be released as well?
Hey Tom. On dynasty, the best thing you can do is setup a new rankings profile under the wrench icon above the players list, and call it "Dynasty". And then assign it to your team, and use the edit players option.Eh I disagree with many. Seems like all the relevant information you need is there. Old DD was almosttook much info at once.
My question is I have an inaugural dynasty draft and I don't see anywhere where I can set to dynasty rankings.
Do these need to be imported separately?
Ah. Dang. I knew switching to dynasty gonna mean more work for me.Hey Tom. On dynasty, the best thing you can do is setup a new rankings profile under the wrench icon above the players list, and call it "Dynasty". And then assign it to your team, and use the edit players option.
In the future, we'd like to spew out proper dynasty rankings. Because the app is projections based, though, we either need to do projections for 2017, 18, 19 - which seems kind of silly - or come up with a new model for adapting 2016 projections into the future based on a) your team's strategy, b) the age of the player, c) their career to date and d) norms at that player's position
I don't see how I can set a team to have an adp in position order. I don't want to list players. I want to tell it: Team 1 will draft RB, RB, WR, QB. Team 2 will go WR, RB, WR, WR, etc. Then during the draft DD will know how many of each position will go between my next pick, and also overlay that over the internal ADP.You can do this using the rankings profile feature - the wrench icon above the players list.
I'll add this as a feature request.I don't see how I can set a team to have an adp in position order. I don't want to list players. I want to tell it: Team 1 will draft RB, RB, WR, QB. Team 2 will go WR, RB, WR, WR, etc. Then during the draft DD will know how many of each position will go between my next pick, and also overlay that over the internal ADP.
I'm not talking about moving a slider to over value QBs for one team, nor do I want to rerank the entire player list 11 times. Just want to say 'round 1 will be RB, RB, WR, WR, QB, RB, WR, RB, QB, TE, RB, RB', etc.
Ok, well I'm going into Rankings > Team 1 > Edit Players and I can't seem to see how to drag & drop to re-rank players? If I click a Player I see the slider for Projected & Upside but there seems no way in UI to move it (I'm in OS El Capitan).It has to be manually edited. Because it's a projections powered system, so a list of players isn't something it can work off.
Ah yeah Ok i see how to do it now. Hm that's not super intuitive UX. Any reason you don't have the traditional slider bar there? Though I guess the invidual lines represent who is ahead/behind them in rankings?when the sliders show, just hold down on the mouse and move the whole slider left/right to move the player up/down
Rankings can't be uploaded into the app. The app is not rankings powered; it's projections powered. If we did this based on rankings, we don't know the difference for instance between Gronkowski and Olsen at TE. And we can't modify things as the draft progresses according to roster need, or any of the other flexible rankings systems in the app.
We will definitely look into importing projections. I'd be intrigued to know how many people do their own projections so we can get an idea of priority there. Do you, Tom?
Cool...because that was my next question. Good luck with the update.The new .exe is an installer that will install either the 32 or 64 bit version. The current installer has one or two issues and will be replaced with a new one soon.
This new version does support return scoring, and we do have projections for that too.Ah yeah Ok i see how to do it now. Hm that's not super intuitive UX. Any reason you don't have the traditional slider bar there? Though I guess the invidual lines represent who is ahead/behind them in rankings?
Do I need to bother doing both projected points as well as upside or can I just adjust the PP and that will be enough to move them up/down the board.
and yeah I totally get what you are saying about it being based on stats and not rankings. i actually don't do my own ranking at all, but i'm just trying to recall the previous functionality. I know that in the old DD we do return yardage and so I would go into an internal spreadsheet within the DD and adjust some players receiving yardage to approximate how much they would get for projected return yards, so I for sure know you could do that and change players stats within DD.
Oh yeah, I was only bringing up return yardage as an example of I know I could go in and manually adjust players stats in old DD (I mean, really old, like 10-years-I-was-still-on-a-Vaio-laptop-old )This new version does support return scoring, and we do have projections for that too.
We'll look at making the slider there clearer.
Just doing projected points will influence the start of drafts much more. Upside is only really important for players later in drafts. The app slowly switches the priority during drafts (but you can turn this off under the wrench menu above the players list)
OK, I did a couple mock drafts with it. Overall, IMO the UI is a significant downgrade from the 'classic' version. It is much less intuitive, and makes poor use of screen real estate on a laptop. I found myself having to toggle back and forth between views frequently, something I never had to do with the classic version.we're going to ask that people try this thing out before passing judgement
Ok thanks for trying it. I don't have any details there that we can action; I hear your general frustrations. But the more specific people can be the more we can adapt. A lot of people have said they like to have certain screens up and that's been noted. So the more specific you guys can be, the more we can adjust.OK, I did a couple mock drafts with it. Overall, IMO the UI is a significant downgrade from the 'classic' version. It is much less intuitive, and makes poor use of screen real estate on a laptop. I found myself having to toggle back and forth between views frequently, something I never had to do with the classic version.
the fix for this should land sometime tomorrowSimon, any update/ETA on 'Players not showing up' (Email reply stated working on touch screen laptop layers)?
I'll see if I can replicate this. Do you get better behaviour if you first hit that wrench icon, and turn the Studs and Duds slider auto-toggle off? And then try adjusting the QBsI'd love to see the DD Classic replaced, but for an auction this app doesn't seem to cut it. There's just not enough control of how values are being calculated, and there are some clear problems with the magic algorithms.
For example, with my league's lineup setup and scoring, QBs are somewhat undervalued and RBs are severely undervalued ($24.25 for Gurley against a $100 cap: Cam Newton at $28, Antonio Brown at $30.75--in reality the values are probably ~$30 for Gurley, ~$30 for Newton, and ~$28 for Brown). But when I use "Position Adjustments" to move the QB weightings upward, Brown becomes even more expensive, which is the opposite of what should happen. Newton moves to $33.75 but Brown moves to $34, and Gurley to $26. Not only is increasing the QB ranking also increasing the cost of RBs and WRs, it's increasing them differentially. With the default setting, E.Elliott is worth $21.25 and D.Hopkins is worth $21, but after positional adjustment for QB, D.Hopkins is now worth more than E.Elliott ($22.50 to $22.25).
Whether I not I think these values are fair, changing the amount of money allocated to the QB position should not change the relative amount of money allocated to the RB and WR positions. RB rankings with respect to WRs should be unchanged.
Without being able to control these behaviors I'm stuck with DD Classic for my auction drafts. And that's no great shakes; having to edit the auction.csv file to tweak position fall-offs is pretty bad. But I need predictable behavior.
Turning off the auto-toggle doesn't have an effect. If I crank Studs and Duds all the way to the left, the numbers are the same as when the slider is at the midpoint. If I move it all the way to the right, it differentially values WRs over RBs, and RBs over QBs. Antonio Brown winds up worth $54.50 (out of $100) while Cam Newton is $33 and Todd Gurley is $33.50.I'll see if I can replicate this. Do you get better behaviour if you first hit that wrench icon, and turn the Studs and Duds slider auto-toggle off? And then try adjusting the QBs
While I completely agree that changing the QB slider shouldn't differentially affect other positions, there are serious difficulties with that suggested approach. I am an extremely serious auction drafter and confident that our algorithm is optimal. David Dodds uses it annually at the FFPC auctions. But I think you've discovered a bug here that I'm going to dig into and figure out. I understand that being able to make changes and see them reflected properly in the auction results is key to being able to trust the system. We'll get it fixed.CalBear said:Turning off the auto-toggle doesn't have an effect. If I crank Studs and Duds all the way to the left, the numbers are the same as when the slider is at the midpoint. If I move it all the way to the right, it differentially values WRs over RBs, and RBs over QBs. Antonio Brown winds up worth $54.50 (out of $100) while Cam Newton is $33 and Todd Gurley is $33.50.
With Studs and Duds at the right, and no position adjustments, WR VBD points from #1 to #3 at the position cost ~$0.67, RB VBD points cost ~$0.65, and QB VBD points cost ~$0.57. With Studs and Duds in the middle (or at the left), it's WR ~$0.29, RB ~$0.29, QB ~$0.28. Those numbers are close enough that you can probably attribute the differences to rounding.
Moving the QB position slider halfway to the right with Studs and Duds at the left results in WR ~$0.33, RB ~$0.35, QB ~$0.36. Different values for these two sliders produce what to me look like unpredictable results. I don't see why adjusting QBs to be more important should ever increase the price of RBs or WRs, and certainly it shouldn't increase them differentially.
I think the way to set auction values is to have a custom point-based VBD baseline for each position, and then create a custom curve for each position to value high VBD points over low VBD points. The cost difference between a baseline RB and one projected to score 10 VBD points should be less than the difference between one projected to score 90 and one projected to score 100, but the differential may be different at different positions. Without having control over any of this I don't think the tool can be useful for serious auction drafters.
I don't know what you mean by this - could you give me an example?my projected stats, in relation to the other teams during the draft
this is something I hope we can get to for next year. Since we will have that functionality in house for this season, it shouldn't be too tough.Is there a way, or will there be a way to do a MFL import of rosters for keeper/dynasty leagues? That would be a nice bonus. Otherwise I love this app!
new installer coming soon. that should resolve that issue.I have an Asus Transformer tablet running Windows 10, it's about three years old & it has plenty of room to add this app. I've already been running classic DD on it, but it won't install the new app. Have any idea why?
I think it's just rounding all the numbers up erroneously. Don't worry - it won't affect the final numbers (it's an individual display error; it doesn't mean that you're running 104% of projections)First, thanks for all of the work on the app, much appreciated.
One problem I'm encountering is that the percentages in the Projections Used section are adding up to more than 100%. For example, if I try to get the player rankings to use all 4 projections equally it displays 26% for each projector.
Specifically the "Team Strengths" window of the classic version.I don't know what you mean by this - could you give me an example?
that's there. Check on the list of teams on the roster tab - that list has tabs above it, By Pos and Schedule.
I am trying to install on Win10 and get "The setup files are corrupted. Please obtain a new copy of the program."The new .exe is an installer that will install either the 32 or 64 bit version. The current installer has one or two issues and will be replaced with a new one soon.
Thanks for that. ETA?new installer coming soon. that should resolve that issue.
Thank you Simon! Go home have a beer. tomorrow is another day.ok try the link now. this shouldn't be corrupt, and the empty player screen issue should be solved. I'll wait around in this thread and hopefully someone can confirm the windows download now works.
http://appdownload.footballguys.com/fbgdraft2016/Footballguys Draft Dominator Setup.exe
thanks man. It's 10.30pm here. I'll get to that beer if not soon then September!Thank you Simon! Go home have a beer. tomorrow is another day.
Thank you!that's there. Check on the list of teams on the roster tab - that list has tabs above it, By Pos and Schedule.