who were they referring to?On MLB network they were all talking about the buzz about Heyward, by his fellow players. Forgot who said it (Leiter?) but they were saying they hadn't seen anything like it except for two other times in the past 25 years. Once in 1989, once in 2001. I thought that statement to be quite incredible.
Griffey, Jr. and Pujols?who were they referring to?On MLB network they were all talking about the buzz about Heyward, by his fellow players. Forgot who said it (Leiter?) but they were saying they hadn't seen anything like it except for two other times in the past 25 years. Once in 1989, once in 2001. I thought that statement to be quite incredible.
YepGriffey, Jr. and Pujols?who were they referring to?On MLB network they were all talking about the buzz about Heyward, by his fellow players. Forgot who said it (Leiter?) but they were saying they hadn't seen anything like it except for two other times in the past 25 years. Once in 1989, once in 2001. I thought that statement to be quite incredible.
Damn that's good company. If Junior Griffey was healthy his whole career he sets all time HR record.YepGriffey, Jr. and Pujols?who were they referring to?On MLB network they were all talking about the buzz about Heyward, by his fellow players. Forgot who said it (Leiter?) but they were saying they hadn't seen anything like it except for two other times in the past 25 years. Once in 1989, once in 2001. I thought that statement to be quite incredible.
I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?Doctor Detroit said:YepDevilsTrifecta said:Griffey, Jr. and Pujols?Tiger Fan said:who were they referring to?Doctor Detroit said:On MLB network they were all talking about the buzz about Heyward, by his fellow players. Forgot who said it (Leiter?) but they were saying they hadn't seen anything like it except for two other times in the past 25 years. Once in 1989, once in 2001. I thought that statement to be quite incredible.
The media may not have known him but the players did.I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?Doctor Detroit said:YepDevilsTrifecta said:Griffey, Jr. and Pujols?Tiger Fan said:who were they referring to?Doctor Detroit said:On MLB network they were all talking about the buzz about Heyward, by his fellow players. Forgot who said it (Leiter?) but they were saying they hadn't seen anything like it except for two other times in the past 25 years. Once in 1989, once in 2001. I thought that statement to be quite incredible.
Ah, I thought Leiter was talking about media-hype. okThe media may not have known him but the players did.
Baseball America rated Pujols as the #42 prospect prior to his 2001 rookie campaign.Ah, I thought Leiter was talking about media-hype. okThe media may not have known him but the players did.
Exactly. He came out of nowhere.Baseball America rated Pujols as the #42 prospect prior to his 2001 rookie campaign.Ah, I thought Leiter was talking about media-hype. okThe media may not have known him but the players did.![]()
LaRussa gave the final spot on the roster that year to Chad Hutchinson, and only after Hutchinson blew out his elbow did Pujols get his shot.I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?
But remember how LaRussa manages. He is purely a stats guy. He is not a big raw talent guy. Players recognize raw talent far more than a guy like LaRussa would.LaRussa gave the final spot on the roster that year to Chad Hutchinson, and only after Hutchinson blew out his elbow did Pujols get his shot.I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?
I suspect some of the players in the Cardinals camp had an idea of Pujols' talent. He had climbed through three levels of the minors in 2000. But why would other players follow minor league prospects in other organizations?But remember how LaRussa manages. He is purely a stats guy. He is not a big raw talent guy. Players recognize raw talent far more than a guy like LaRussa would.LaRussa gave the final spot on the roster that year to Chad Hutchinson, and only after Hutchinson blew out his elbow did Pujols get his shot.I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?
You think players don't talk to their buddies?I suspect some of the players in the Cardinals camp had an idea of Pujols' talent. He had climbed through three levels of the minors in 2000. But why would other players follow minor league prospects in other organizations?But remember how LaRussa manages. He is purely a stats guy. He is not a big raw talent guy. Players recognize raw talent far more than a guy like LaRussa would.LaRussa gave the final spot on the roster that year to Chad Hutchinson, and only after Hutchinson blew out his elbow did Pujols get his shot.I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?
But remember how LaRussa manages. He is purely a stats guy. He is not a big raw talent guy. Players recognize raw talent far more than a guy like LaRussa would.LaRussa gave the final spot on the roster that year to Chad Hutchinson, and only after Hutchinson blew out his elbow did Pujols get his shot.I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?
3K??I was thinking 4,257 hitsSomebody needs to get a count-up to 3,00 hits going...![]()
![]()
They were talking about spring training of 2001 and the talk around the league by players who watched him that spring. Please do not do a Shadyridr here.I suspect some of the players in the Cardinals camp had an idea of Pujols' talent. He had climbed through three levels of the minors in 2000. But why would other players follow minor league prospects in other organizations?But remember how LaRussa manages. He is purely a stats guy. He is not a big raw talent guy. Players recognize raw talent far more than a guy like LaRussa would.LaRussa gave the final spot on the roster that year to Chad Hutchinson, and only after Hutchinson blew out his elbow did Pujols get his shot.I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?
Revisionism like that would have you shoveling dung in the Cultural RevolutionThey were talking about spring training of 2001 and the talk around the league by players who watched him that spring. Please do not do a Shadyridr here.I suspect some of the players in the Cardinals camp had an idea of Pujols' talent. He had climbed through three levels of the minors in 2000. But why would other players follow minor league prospects in other organizations?But remember how LaRussa manages. He is purely a stats guy. He is not a big raw talent guy. Players recognize raw talent far more than a guy like LaRussa would.LaRussa gave the final spot on the roster that year to Chad Hutchinson, and only after Hutchinson blew out his elbow did Pujols get his shot.I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?
I doubt it, Pujols couldn't even speak English.Revisionism like that would have you shoveling dung in the Cultural Revolution
Yeah. I don't really think much of LaRussa. He is a pure statistics guy who has been blessed with some good teams.But remember how LaRussa manages. He is purely a stats guy. He is not a big raw talent guy. Players recognize raw talent far more than a guy like LaRussa would.LaRussa gave the final spot on the roster that year to Chad Hutchinson, and only after Hutchinson blew out his elbow did Pujols get his shot.I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?Seriously?
Many consider the 2006 WS Champion Cardinals to be the worst team to ever win the WSYeah. I don't really think much of LaRussa. He is a pure statistics guy who has been blessed with some good teams.But remember how LaRussa manages. He is purely a stats guy. He is not a big raw talent guy. Players recognize raw talent far more than a guy like LaRussa would.LaRussa gave the final spot on the roster that year to Chad Hutchinson, and only after Hutchinson blew out his elbow did Pujols get his shot.I dont remember Pujols having this much hype. Didnt he basically come out of nowhere his first year?Seriously?
Judging by their record you can make that case. But don't forget how hot that team started before injuries and Marquis's annual second half collapse.Helps they played the Tigers and their pitching really stepped it up in the playoffs.Wasn't Pujols MVP that year?Many consider the 2006 WS Champion Cardinals to be the worst team to ever win the WS![]()
The '06 Cardinals were wrecked with injuries for much of the second half of the season, but got healthy right when the playoffs started...and look what happened. The '06 team, at least at the core, was the same as the ones that won over 100 games in both '04 and '05, so while I can see someone pointing to their record and calling them the worst champion ever, if you dig beneath the surface, they weren't. Either way, I'll take being the worst champion over being a great team that didn't win the title (like the '04 and '05 teams) any day of the week.Judging by their record you can make that case. But don't forget how hot that team started before injuries and Marquis's annual second half collapse.Helps they played the Tigers and their pitching really stepped it up in the playoffs.Many consider the 2006 WS Champion Cardinals to be the worst team to ever win the WS![]()
They played pretty poorly at the end of the season.....but yeah you're right they were no slouch.The '06 Cardinals were wrecked with injuries for much of the second half of the season, but got healthy right when the playoffs started...and look what happened. The '06 team, at least at the core, was the same as the ones that won over 100 games in both '04 and '05, so while I can see someone pointing to their record and calling them the worst champion ever, if you dig beneath the surface, they weren't. Either way, I'll take being the worst champion over being a great team that didn't win the title (like the '04 and '05 teams) any day of the week.Judging by their record you can make that case. But don't forget how hot that team started before injuries and Marquis's annual second half collapse.Helps they played the Tigers and their pitching really stepped it up in the playoffs.Many consider the 2006 WS Champion Cardinals to be the worst team to ever win the WS![]()
And that Tigers team was no slouch, so I don't see how them being their WS opponent diminishes their achievement at all. You don't win 95 regular season games by accident.
I guess it depends on the respective rosters but I'm pretty sure I would never make that trade either.man, i offered morneau and marmol for heyward and hamels and was shot down.
It's a seller's market for Heyward right now. Redraft owners are people who have bought into the hype and dynasty owners have been waiting for him and want to see some return. I'm in the latter group.If you want him now, you'll either have to overpay now or wait to see if he hits a rookie wall and put together a deal then.I guess it depends on the respective rosters but I'm pretty sure I would never make that trade either.man, i offered morneau and marmol for heyward and hamels and was shot down.
I agree. Thats why I think he needs to give up more than Morneau and Marmol for Heyward and Hamels. Of course I also believe that Hamels is going to have a bounce back year.It's a seller's market for Heyward right now. Redraft owners are people who have bought into the hype and dynasty owners have been waiting for him and want to see some return. I'm in the latter group.If you want him now, you'll either have to overpay now or wait to see if he hits a rookie wall and put together a deal then.I guess it depends on the respective rosters but I'm pretty sure I would never make that trade either.man, i offered morneau and marmol for heyward and hamels and was shot down.
in my league heyward could be kept for about 2-3 more years before hes too expensive. that being said, i countered with: A Rod and Marmol for Halladay and Heywardhe needs hitting, i need a starter. A Rod is keepable next year, Halladay is not. this was also shot down.I agree. Thats why I think he needs to give up more than Morneau and Marmol for Heyward and Hamels. Of course I also believe that Hamels is going to have a bounce back year.It's a seller's market for Heyward right now. Redraft owners are people who have bought into the hype and dynasty owners have been waiting for him and want to see some return. I'm in the latter group.If you want him now, you'll either have to overpay now or wait to see if he hits a rookie wall and put together a deal then.I guess it depends on the respective rosters but I'm pretty sure I would never make that trade either.man, i offered morneau and marmol for heyward and hamels and was shot down.
Your first offer was beyond horrible. So is your second one.in my league heyward could be kept for about 2-3 more years before hes too expensive. that being said, i countered with: A Rod and Marmol for Halladay and Heywardhe needs hitting, i need a starter. A Rod is keepable next year, Halladay is not. this was also shot down.I agree. Thats why I think he needs to give up more than Morneau and Marmol for Heyward and Hamels. Of course I also believe that Hamels is going to have a bounce back year.It's a seller's market for Heyward right now. Redraft owners are people who have bought into the hype and dynasty owners have been waiting for him and want to see some return. I'm in the latter group.If you want him now, you'll either have to overpay now or wait to see if he hits a rookie wall and put together a deal then.I guess it depends on the respective rosters but I'm pretty sure I would never make that trade either.man, i offered morneau and marmol for heyward and hamels and was shot down.
not really considering this guy has beltre at 3rd and has hamels, halladay, cain, gallardo, and lester. guy is obviously horribly weak on offense and needs Arod to contend this year. not to mention hamels blows and his only closers are nunez and fran. cordero.Your first offer was beyond horrible. So is your second one.
i wouldnt offer this trade again, myself. Arod is still keepable next year.not really considering this guy has beltre at 3rd and has hamels, halladay, cain, gallardo, and lester. guy is obviously horribly weak on offense and needs Arod to contend this year. not to mention hamels blows and his only closers are nunez and fran. cordero.Your first offer was beyond horrible. So is your second one.