What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jeremy Hill will be the #1 fantasy RB this year (1 Viewer)

Hill put the ball on the ground twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.

The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a Hill owner, I am disturbed too.

But knowing how I roll with early RB picks, I was smart enough to draft Gio Bernard as well....why would anyone not have gotten him in addition to Hill is beyond me? (if you drafted Hill that is)

I bet its going to be hard to pick which is the better play for the next few weeks as it is now. :(

Not too stoked here, and it looks like I am going to lose a close one because of this.

TZM

 
Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.

The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Wait....what?
Wait....what? Wait.... what?

That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?

Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.

 
Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.

The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Wait....what?
Wait....what? Wait.... what?

That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?

Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.
Serious question: did you watch the game?

If you did, you would know that Bernard is a threat to Hill's touches. :shrug:

 
Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.

The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
I claimed all off season that due to where Hill will be drafted you are going to be upset having to deal with inconsistency due to Gio being not your typical back up rb. GIo was also hurt last year and when healthy he is an above average RB himself. I said the Hill owners will be in here claiming Gio is to involved all year and this is why I stayed away from this situation.

 
It was the AFC game carried in LA because of the Chargers.

You know for certain what the distribution would have been like if not for the two fumbles? Do you see that happening on a regular basis?

All I'm saying is these exact same objections were said last year and ended up being wrong? There were actually critiques based on the great Jermaine Gresham. :)

 
As a Hill owner, I am disturbed too.

But knowing how I roll with early RB picks, I was smart enough to draft Gio Bernard as well....why would anyone not have gotten him in addition to Hill is beyond me? (if you drafted Hill that is)

I bet its going to be hard to pick which is the better play for the next few weeks as it is now. :(

Not too stoked here, and it looks like I am going to lose a close one because of

TZM
Tried but Gio went 2 full rounds ahead of his adp so I didn't get him in the 1 league I have Hill. Just going to ride it out with Hill I guess.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The second fumble was after. The dog house seems to me a face value and straightforward explanation.

Bernard ran well, but in his first two seasons, he averaged 4.1 and 4.0 Y/C. There is a perception by some that he is special, but it isn't really supported by the numbers. It wasn't an accident that Hill beat him out decisively in the second half of the season. I think he is the only rookie in league history with four 150+ yard rushing games, and that was basically starting half a season. There are very few VET RBs who have surpassed that, with five or more 150+ yard rushing games, almost all of them are Hall of Famers, started significantly more games, and didn't do it for the most part until being in the league for 4-5-6 seasons.

Bernard is only about 207 lbs, Hill about 237 lbs., he is built much better to carry the load. Bernard has shown signs of wearing down with heavy usage, so they may want to preserve him for a long season and to avoid another early playoff exit if they make it (2-0 = 63%).

If Hill keeps coughing it up multiple times that will be very problematic, but he had 5 fumbles as a rookie (though again, only started half the season).

For perspective, some fumble numbers for other RBs early in their career:

Peterson - 20 first three years

Sanders - 19 first three years

Smith - 15 first two years

Campbell - 31 first four years

Dickerson - 49 first four years!!! (and he had the best first two season rushing totals in NFL history)

Walter Payton - 30 first three years

Gale Sayers - 19 first three years

Jim Brown - 23 first four years

In the offseason, OC Jackson alluded to Hill having star potential, I'm not sure he said that about Bernard.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.

The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Wait....what?
Wait....what? Wait.... what?

That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?

Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.
Maybe he was asking about your first post about putting the ground on the ball.

 
I was at the skins game. What happened?
Just a disaster for Hill. First he got banged up and left for a little bit. Came back in and fumbled twice in a pretty short time span. Bernard took over and looked great.

 
Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.

The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Wait....what?
Wait....what? Wait.... what?That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?

Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.
Maybe he was asking about your first post about putting the ground on the ball.
I was, I guess he didn't understand what I was asking just like I didn't understand his post but unlike him I will remain professional.Thanks for the post.

Tex

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.

The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Wait....what?
Wait....what? Wait.... what?That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?

Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.
Maybe he was asking about your first post about putting the ground on the ball.
I was, I guess he didn't understand what I was asking just like I didn't understand his post but unlike him I will remain professional.Thanks for the post.

Tex
Thanks for the correction on the descriptive dyslexia.I thought you had a question (just noticed your response, not the bolded part above), but wasn't sure it was about the first, second or both points. The first one was pretty straightforward, so I added some detail on the second point. Sorry if you found the phrasing objectionable, not my intent, was just trying to find out what you had a question about.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bob,

Unfortunately in fantasy football you can't get points from last year. What have you seen this year that has you excited about Hill?

 
I have both on one of my teams - and at least temporarily I'm shuked as to how things will be at least for a little while.

Bernard can't carry a huge load week in, week out though.

I think Hill gets a good share again next week - but that leash is not long at the moment. Too vital to the offense to be permadoghoused though.

-QG

 
I have both on one of my teams - and at least temporarily I'm shuked as to how things will be at least for a little while.

Bernard can't carry a huge load week in, week out though.

I think Hill gets a good share again next week - but that leash is not long at the moment. Too vital to the offense to be permadoghoused though.

-QG
:goodposting:

I'm a Hill owner without Gio (value went too high in auction), and I'm not panicking. He'll bounce back. This game was the worst case scenario we'll see from Hill (hurt, missed a drive or two, then got benched for two fumbles). If this happens again I'd be worried about Gio getting more looks, but as of right now, I just think it was a bad day for Hill.

 
The second fumble was after. The dog house seems to me a face value and straightforward explanation.

Bernard ran well, but in his first two seasons, he averaged 4.1 and 4.0 Y/C. There is a perception by some that he is special, but it isn't really supported by the numbers. It wasn't an accident that Hill beat him out decisively in the second half of the season. I think he is the only rookie in league history with four 150+ yard rushing games, and that was basically starting half a season. There are very few VET RBs who have surpassed that, with five or more 150+ yard rushing games, almost all of them are Hall of Famers, started significantly more games, and didn't do it for the most part until being in the league for 4-5-6 seasons.

Bernard is only about 207 lbs, Hill about 237 lbs., he is built much better to carry the load. Bernard has shown signs of wearing down with heavy usage, so they may want to preserve him for a long season and to avoid another early playoff exit if they make it (2-0 = 63%).

If Hill keeps coughing it up multiple times that will be very problematic, but he had 5 fumbles as a rookie (though again, only started half the season).

For perspective, some fumble numbers for other RBs early in their career:

Peterson - 20 first three years

Sanders - 19 first three years

Smith - 15 first two years

Campbell - 31 first four years

Dickerson - 49 first four years!!! (and he had the best first two season rushing totals in NFL history)

Walter Payton - 30 first three years

Gale Sayers - 19 first three years

Jim Brown - 23 first four years

In the offseason, OC Jackson alluded to Hill having star potential, I'm not sure he said that about Bernard.
So?

In a thread about being #1 RB for the year you bring up that many rookies have fumbling problems? How does this help his case? Unlike possibly some of those other teams they have another option that they can throw some carries on and split backfields are way more used in 2015 than in 2005/1995/1985....

In the end Bernard was hurt last year and to think he won't be involved is foolish. I never said Hill was a bum I simply have been on the side he is not #1 overall for RBs. Does anyone still really want to take that bet? I won't even go off points just if there is a redraft on December 1 are you going Hill at 1.01?

 
TDorBust said:
The second fumble was after. The dog house seems to me a face value and straightforward explanation.

Bernard ran well, but in his first two seasons, he averaged 4.1 and 4.0 Y/C. There is a perception by some that he is special, but it isn't really supported by the numbers. It wasn't an accident that Hill beat him out decisively in the second half of the season. I think he is the only rookie in league history with four 150+ yard rushing games, and that was basically starting half a season. There are very few VET RBs who have surpassed that, with five or more 150+ yard rushing games, almost all of them are Hall of Famers, started significantly more games, and didn't do it for the most part until being in the league for 4-5-6 seasons.

Bernard is only about 207 lbs, Hill about 237 lbs., he is built much better to carry the load. Bernard has shown signs of wearing down with heavy usage, so they may want to preserve him for a long season and to avoid another early playoff exit if they make it (2-0 = 63%).

If Hill keeps coughing it up multiple times that will be very problematic, but he had 5 fumbles as a rookie (though again, only started half the season).

For perspective, some fumble numbers for other RBs early in their career:

Peterson - 20 first three years

Sanders - 19 first three years

Smith - 15 first two years

Campbell - 31 first four years

Dickerson - 49 first four years!!! (and he had the best first two season rushing totals in NFL history)

Walter Payton - 30 first three years

Gale Sayers - 19 first three years

Jim Brown - 23 first four years

In the offseason, OC Jackson alluded to Hill having star potential, I'm not sure he said that about Bernard.
So?In a thread about being #1 RB for the year you bring up that many rookies have fumbling problems? How does this help his case? Unlike possibly some of those other teams they have another option that they can throw some carries on and split backfields are way more used in 2015 than in 2005/1995/1985....

In the end Bernard was hurt last year and to think he won't be involved is foolish. I never said Hill was a bum I simply have been on the side he is not #1 overall for RBs. Does anyone still really want to take that bet? I won't even go off points just if there is a redraft on December 1 are you going Hill at 1.01?
So, fumbles are rarely a death blow to great RBs. Personally I don't advise slamming the brakes so hard your foot goes through the floorboard based on an off week. Every RB has off weeks.

Just because I'm posting in a Hill is #1 thread, doesn't mean I think he is #1. You may be addressing it, and it may be an important point to you, but I think most people are just posting in here as another Hill thread. I don't think most people are having the same conversation you are. If you check the very first post, it wasn't guaranteeing Hill would finish #1, it stated, tell me why he won't. I took the phrasing as intended to start a conversation, suggest that his upside could be greater than suspected, etc. There are no doubt lots of better and less indirect/oblique reasons to think you are right than because others aren't rushing to bet with a random internet stranger. Besides, assuming that bet would be far from even money, shouldn't you be offering appropriate odds to the board at large. :)

But there is plenty of room to finish short of #1 and do very well. Not just rookies, some of the best RBs ever overcame fumbling problems. If those RBs were playing today, in a RBBC era, and they happened to cede some carries in a game, I still wouldn't advise panicking.

Bernard has never looked as good as Hill at his best, at any point in his career. Not in his rookie year, not before he was hurt last year, not after he was hurt last year. Hill had four 147+ rushing yards in his last nine games as a rookie, something Bernard has failed to do once. He had one career 100 yard rushing game in 30 career games before today.

Bernard's presence would make it difficult to be #1, but again, I don't think that is the conversation most people are having if you look at some of the recent posts. Most seem to be discussing whether Gio will prevent him from being a RB1, not #1 overall. There were people last year that thought it was foolish to think Hill could do well despite Bernard's presence, but it turned out they were wrong.

 
I think he is the only rookie in league history with four 150+ yard rushing games, and that was basically starting half a season. There are very few VET RBs who have surpassed that, with five or more 150+ yard rushing games, almost all of them are Hall of Famers, started significantly more games, and didn't do it for the most part until being in the league for 4-5-6 seasons.
Hill had TWO 150-yard rushing games as a rookie. He had two others at 140+. That ties him with Curtis Martin. Eric Dickerson did it 5 times.

 
"Hill had four 147+ rushing yards in his last nine games as a rookie, something Bernard has failed to do once."

Thanks. I realized the oversight and corrected it in post #288 above. Maybe somewhat of an arbitrary cutoff, but it came up a lot in the other Hill thread, I'm pretty sure Hill is the only rookie RB with four games of 147+ rushing yards. Glad you brought up Dickerson. The fact that Hill did something even Dickerson* didn't, my favorite player at any position, or even if we use the lower 140+ threshold and say he came within one of Dickerson's five such games, is pretty suggestive to me, taking into account Dickerson was one of the greatest RBs ever, had one of the greatest rookie seasons ever at any position (arguably in the top 3, with Marino and Moss), AND Hill only started about half the season - Dickerson started 16.

Even while some are in the process of sussing out how special he might be (or not), there doesn't seem much debate he had a special rookie season, when looking at the scale/scope of his top end achievements, and the comp cohort group.

* His 3,913 yards and 32 TDs rushing the best first two season start ever (also 51-404-2 receiving as a rookie).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps the outlier nature of the stats you are talking about in regards to Hill last season are not good points of reference for what one should expect of him going forward Bob.

Just a thought.

 
Research by another poster (#1986 from the other thread)

jeremy hill played about half the snaps last year, in his rookie season

jeremy hill logged a mere 222 carries

jeremy hill played in 5 games with 20+ carries

jeremy hill put up 4 games of 145+ yards

who would you have to be to better that number?

who has put up 5+ games of 145+ yards in a single season?

Earl Campbell* 1980 - 373 carries (3rd yr)

Terrell Davis 1998 - 392 (4th yr)

Eric Dickerson* 1984 - 379 (2nd yr)

Adrian Peterson 2012 - 348 (6th yr)

Jim Brown* 1963 - 291 (7th yr)

Barry Sanders* 1994 - 331 (6th yr)

O.J. Simpson* 1973 - 332 (5th yr)

Shaun Alexander 2004 - 353 (5th yr)

Ahman Green 2003 - 355 (6th yr)

Walter Payton* 1977 - 339 (3rd yr)

Barry Sanders* 1997 - 335 (9th yr)

O.J. Simpson* 1975 - 329 (7th yr)



 
Research by another poster (#1986 from the other thread)

jeremy hill played about half the snaps last year, in his rookie season

jeremy hill logged a mere 222 carries

jeremy hill played in 5 games with 20+ carries

jeremy hill put up 4 games of 145+ yards

who would you have to be to better that number?

who has put up 5+ games of 145+ yards in a single season?

Earl Campbell* 1980 - 373 carries (3rd yr)

Terrell Davis 1998 - 392 (4th yr)

Eric Dickerson* 1984 - 379 (2nd yr)

Adrian Peterson 2012 - 348 (6th yr)

Jim Brown* 1963 - 291 (7th yr)

Barry Sanders* 1994 - 331 (6th yr)

O.J. Simpson* 1973 - 332 (5th yr)

Shaun Alexander 2004 - 353 (5th yr)

Ahman Green 2003 - 355 (6th yr)

Walter Payton* 1977 - 339 (3rd yr)

Barry Sanders* 1997 - 335 (9th yr)

O.J. Simpson* 1975 - 329 (7th yr)

Those guys have at least one of elite athleticism, vision, or elusiveness and that's why they were able to sustain their production. Imo Hill lacks all 3 of those.

 
Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.

The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Wait....what?
Wait....what? Wait.... what?

That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?

Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.
Serious question: did you watch the game?

If you did, you would know that Bernard is a threat to Hill's touches. :shrug:
Hill will get most of the goal line touches

Bernard will get most of the pass receptions

they will share carries between the 20's

Given their draft position, that will make the people who picked Bernard very happy and the people who picked Hill very sad.

 
How much $ you putting on the line that Hill is the #1 RB this season?
As noted in response above, I don't think he is #1, why bet in that case?

Other people are using this as a generic thread to discuss Hill's traits, attributes, prospects, etc. That is the conversation they are having. Heckling the thread with repeated, "Wanna bet, wanna bet, wanna bet?" challenges isn't part of that conversation.

BTW, As of 8-20, Bovada had Hill handicapped as 7th most likely, at 11/1. You seem keen on betting, why not try a sports book like most people? I'm not sure from previous exchanges if you grasped this isn't an even money proposition. If you aren't sure how the odds work, just ask the sports book. Good luck to you.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top