i dunno but i thought i had a set it and forget it rb1 and now i think i have to bench him.So is Gio a RB2 going forward and Hill a shaky flex play?
Seriously WTF. I'm pretty shell shocked right now by this.i dunno but i thought i had a set it and forget it rb1 and now i think i have to bench him.So is Gio a RB2 going forward and Hill a shaky flex play?
Shine young man. Shine. As a Hill owner I am highly disturbed. Maybe if he spent less time worrying about being on talk shows and dancing, this sort of day doesnt happen. Win for Bernard owners and Hill haters.X2at all the posters who dismissed Bernard in this thread.
Wait....what?Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.
The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Wait....what? Wait.... what?Wait....what?Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.
The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Serious question: did you watch the game?Wait....what? Wait.... what?Wait....what?Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.
The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?
Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.
I claimed all off season that due to where Hill will be drafted you are going to be upset having to deal with inconsistency due to Gio being not your typical back up rb. GIo was also hurt last year and when healthy he is an above average RB himself. I said the Hill owners will be in here claiming Gio is to involved all year and this is why I stayed away from this situation.Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.
The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Tried but Gio went 2 full rounds ahead of his adp so I didn't get him in the 1 league I have Hill. Just going to ride it out with Hill I guess.As a Hill owner, I am disturbed too.
But knowing how I roll with early RB picks, I was smart enough to draft Gio Bernard as well....why would anyone not have gotten him in addition to Hill is beyond me? (if you drafted Hill that is)
I bet its going to be hard to pick which is the better play for the next few weeks as it is now. :(
Not too stoked here, and it looks like I am going to lose a close one because of
TZM
X3X2at all the posters who dismissed Bernard in this thread.
Maybe he was asking about your first post about putting the ground on the ball.Wait....what? Wait.... what?Wait....what?Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.
The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?
Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.
Hill fumbled twice and got benched to humble him a bit.I was at the skins game. What happened?
Hill fumbled twice and was totally pulled out of the rotation. Gio was very good. 20 carries 123 yards, another 3 for 16 in the air.I was at the skins game. What happened?
Just a disaster for Hill. First he got banged up and left for a little bit. Came back in and fumbled twice in a pretty short time span. Bernard took over and looked great.I was at the skins game. What happened?
I was, I guess he didn't understand what I was asking just like I didn't understand his post but unlike him I will remain professional.Thanks for the post.Maybe he was asking about your first post about putting the ground on the ball.Wait....what? Wait.... what?That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?Wait....what?Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.
The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.
Thanks for the correction on the descriptive dyslexia.I thought you had a question (just noticed your response, not the bolded part above), but wasn't sure it was about the first, second or both points. The first one was pretty straightforward, so I added some detail on the second point. Sorry if you found the phrasing objectionable, not my intent, was just trying to find out what you had a question about.I was, I guess he didn't understand what I was asking just like I didn't understand his post but unlike him I will remain professional.Thanks for the post.Maybe he was asking about your first post about putting the ground on the ball.Wait....what? Wait.... what?That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?Wait....what?Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.
The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.
Tex
Update???Tell me why not.
Update? Not favorable.Update???Tell me why not.
We missed you last week bud!Update???Tell me why not.
I have both on one of my teams - and at least temporarily I'm shuked as to how things will be at least for a little while.
Bernard can't carry a huge load week in, week out though.
I think Hill gets a good share again next week - but that leash is not long at the moment. Too vital to the offense to be permadoghoused though.
-QG
So?The second fumble was after. The dog house seems to me a face value and straightforward explanation.
Bernard ran well, but in his first two seasons, he averaged 4.1 and 4.0 Y/C. There is a perception by some that he is special, but it isn't really supported by the numbers. It wasn't an accident that Hill beat him out decisively in the second half of the season. I think he is the only rookie in league history with four 150+ yard rushing games, and that was basically starting half a season. There are very few VET RBs who have surpassed that, with five or more 150+ yard rushing games, almost all of them are Hall of Famers, started significantly more games, and didn't do it for the most part until being in the league for 4-5-6 seasons.
Bernard is only about 207 lbs, Hill about 237 lbs., he is built much better to carry the load. Bernard has shown signs of wearing down with heavy usage, so they may want to preserve him for a long season and to avoid another early playoff exit if they make it (2-0 = 63%).
If Hill keeps coughing it up multiple times that will be very problematic, but he had 5 fumbles as a rookie (though again, only started half the season).
For perspective, some fumble numbers for other RBs early in their career:
Peterson - 20 first three years
Sanders - 19 first three years
Smith - 15 first two years
Campbell - 31 first four years
Dickerson - 49 first four years!!! (and he had the best first two season rushing totals in NFL history)
Walter Payton - 30 first three years
Gale Sayers - 19 first three years
Jim Brown - 23 first four years
In the offseason, OC Jackson alluded to Hill having star potential, I'm not sure he said that about Bernard.
Woods was bad prior to the ACL.Woods tore his ACL in his second year.
If Hill does, his numbers will suffer because of that, not Bernard?
So, fumbles are rarely a death blow to great RBs. Personally I don't advise slamming the brakes so hard your foot goes through the floorboard based on an off week. Every RB has off weeks.TDorBust said:So?In a thread about being #1 RB for the year you bring up that many rookies have fumbling problems? How does this help his case? Unlike possibly some of those other teams they have another option that they can throw some carries on and split backfields are way more used in 2015 than in 2005/1995/1985....The second fumble was after. The dog house seems to me a face value and straightforward explanation.
Bernard ran well, but in his first two seasons, he averaged 4.1 and 4.0 Y/C. There is a perception by some that he is special, but it isn't really supported by the numbers. It wasn't an accident that Hill beat him out decisively in the second half of the season. I think he is the only rookie in league history with four 150+ yard rushing games, and that was basically starting half a season. There are very few VET RBs who have surpassed that, with five or more 150+ yard rushing games, almost all of them are Hall of Famers, started significantly more games, and didn't do it for the most part until being in the league for 4-5-6 seasons.
Bernard is only about 207 lbs, Hill about 237 lbs., he is built much better to carry the load. Bernard has shown signs of wearing down with heavy usage, so they may want to preserve him for a long season and to avoid another early playoff exit if they make it (2-0 = 63%).
If Hill keeps coughing it up multiple times that will be very problematic, but he had 5 fumbles as a rookie (though again, only started half the season).
For perspective, some fumble numbers for other RBs early in their career:
Peterson - 20 first three years
Sanders - 19 first three years
Smith - 15 first two years
Campbell - 31 first four years
Dickerson - 49 first four years!!! (and he had the best first two season rushing totals in NFL history)
Walter Payton - 30 first three years
Gale Sayers - 19 first three years
Jim Brown - 23 first four years
In the offseason, OC Jackson alluded to Hill having star potential, I'm not sure he said that about Bernard.
In the end Bernard was hurt last year and to think he won't be involved is foolish. I never said Hill was a bum I simply have been on the side he is not #1 overall for RBs. Does anyone still really want to take that bet? I won't even go off points just if there is a redraft on December 1 are you going Hill at 1.01?
He had 2 TDs in two games, and I'm not sure if he finished that second game. Maybe we can agree 1-2 games isn't a significant enough sample to make a definitive statement about it. He did average 5.3 yards per carry as a rookie.Woods was bad prior to the ACL.Woods tore his ACL in his second year.
If Hill does, his numbers will suffer because of that, not Bernard?
Hill had TWO 150-yard rushing games as a rookie. He had two others at 140+. That ties him with Curtis Martin. Eric Dickerson did it 5 times.I think he is the only rookie in league history with four 150+ yard rushing games, and that was basically starting half a season. There are very few VET RBs who have surpassed that, with five or more 150+ yard rushing games, almost all of them are Hall of Famers, started significantly more games, and didn't do it for the most part until being in the league for 4-5-6 seasons.
Those guys have at least one of elite athleticism, vision, or elusiveness and that's why they were able to sustain their production. Imo Hill lacks all 3 of those.Research by another poster (#1986 from the other thread)
jeremy hill played about half the snaps last year, in his rookie season
jeremy hill logged a mere 222 carries
jeremy hill played in 5 games with 20+ carries
jeremy hill put up 4 games of 145+ yards
who would you have to be to better that number?
who has put up 5+ games of 145+ yards in a single season?
Earl Campbell* 1980 - 373 carries (3rd yr)
Terrell Davis 1998 - 392 (4th yr)
Eric Dickerson* 1984 - 379 (2nd yr)
Adrian Peterson 2012 - 348 (6th yr)
Jim Brown* 1963 - 291 (7th yr)
Barry Sanders* 1994 - 331 (6th yr)
O.J. Simpson* 1973 - 332 (5th yr)
Shaun Alexander 2004 - 353 (5th yr)
Ahman Green 2003 - 355 (6th yr)
Walter Payton* 1977 - 339 (3rd yr)
Barry Sanders* 1997 - 335 (9th yr)
O.J. Simpson* 1975 - 329 (7th yr)
Hill will get most of the goal line touchesSerious question: did you watch the game?Wait....what? Wait.... what?Wait....what?Hill put the ground on the ball twice, assuming that doesn't happen every week, he proved to be the more talented back last year.
The Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and was wrong then.
That he put the ball on the ground twice and that won't happen every week?
Or, the Bernard bogeyman was invoked all last year and ended up being wrong? Hill began the year as the backup, decisively beat out Bernard and led all NFL backs in yardage the last nine games of the season.
If you did, you would know that Bernard is a threat to Hill's touches.![]()
How much $ you putting on the line that Hill is the #1 RB this season?Chris Wesseling off-season scouting report.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000496517/article/jeremy-hill-bengals-offense-better-than-you-think
Rookie highlights
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M40Oysdsu_M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85cL1HisrNcChris Wesseling off-season scouting report.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000496517/article/jeremy-hill-bengals-offense-better-than-you-think
Rookie highlights
Yeah, I see capable NFL starter taking advantage of nice holes against bottom barrel defenses in those clips, not future HOFer.Chris Wesseling off-season scouting report.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000496517/article/jeremy-hill-bengals-offense-better-than-you-think
Rookie highlights
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M40Oysdsu_M
As noted in response above, I don't think he is #1, why bet in that case?How much $ you putting on the line that Hill is the #1 RB this season?Chris Wesseling off-season scouting report.http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000496517/article/jeremy-hill-bengals-offense-better-than-you-think
Rookie highlightshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M40Oysdsu_M
Perhaps the outlier nature of the stats you are talking about in regards to Hill last season are not good points of reference for what one should expect of him going forward Bob.
Just a thought.