I don't see Vick getting suspended for the year. They are a long way from him getting suspended at all, and if he were suspended the duration I've seen being floated about is a game or two. Obviously that could change the more that comes out . . .So, when Vick get suspended for the yr.. what does Joey Harrington do to Norwoods numbers.
nittanylion said:I'm not quite 'calling a shot' here, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least, at this point, if Ovie Mughelli Jason Snelling winds up playing a bigger role in things before all is said and done, that's how much gray area surrounds this whole business right now...
![]()
Isn't Snelling most likely will just be the GL back for Petrino? I dont think that guy has what it takes to be an everydown back (slow). How about the UDFA Vincent? any chance he emerge this year? or too soon for that?nittanylion said:I'm not quite 'calling a shot' here, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least, at this point, if Ovie Mughelli Jason Snelling winds up playing a bigger role in things before all is said and done, that's how much gray area surrounds this whole business right now...
![]()
nittany, some great analysis there. I added my one edit to your thoughts.
The point is just that it's wide open enough that seemingly unlikely outcomes are not as remote as we think. Snelling seems like just a GL back type, but the opportunity will there for someone to seize... Dunn, Norwood, Snelling, Mughelli, I dunno, DJ Shockley converting to RB... It really was a headscratcher when Petrino did not take an RB with one of their many early 2nd day picks.Isn't Snelling most likely will just be the GL back for Petrino? I dont think that guy has what it takes to be an everydown back (slow). How about the UDFA Vincent? any chance he emerge this year? or too soon for that?nittanylion said:I'm not quite 'calling a shot' here, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least, at this point, if Ovie Mughelli Jason Snelling winds up playing a bigger role in things before all is said and done, that's how much gray area surrounds this whole business right now...
![]()
nittany, some great analysis there. I added my one edit to your thoughts.
OK. Explain this to me like I'm a one year old. What's to scratch your head about? If they like the stable of backs, why spend an early pick? Everyone's assuming Petrino just had to have a big back. Maybe that's not entirely true? Maybe the running scheme won't change as much as we're all expecting?The point is just that it's wide open enough that seemingly unlikely outcomes are not as remote as we think. It really was a headscratcher when Petrino did not take an RB with one of their many early 2nd day picks.Isn't Snelling most likely will just be the GL back for Petrino? I dont think that guy has what it takes to be an everydown back (slow). How about the UDFA Vincent? any chance he emerge this year? or too soon for that?nittanylion said:I'm not quite 'calling a shot' here, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least, at this point, if Ovie Mughelli Jason Snelling winds up playing a bigger role in things before all is said and done, that's how much gray area surrounds this whole business right now...
![]()
nittany, some great analysis there. I added my one edit to your thoughts.
I posted this in another Norwood thread. The Falcons not taking a RB has everything to do with McKay and nothing to do with Petrino, opinion. Fellow Norwood owner in multiple leagues...The point is just that it's wide open enough that seemingly unlikely outcomes are not as remote as we think. Snelling seems like just a GL back type, but the opportunity will there for someone to seize... Dunn, Norwood, Snelling, Mughelli, I dunno, DJ Shockley converting to RB... It really was a headscratcher when Petrino did not take an RB with one of their many early 2nd day picks.Isn't Snelling most likely will just be the GL back for Petrino? I dont think that guy has what it takes to be an everydown back (slow). How about the UDFA Vincent? any chance he emerge this year? or too soon for that?nittanylion said:I'm not quite 'calling a shot' here, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least, at this point, if Ovie Mughelli Jason Snelling winds up playing a bigger role in things before all is said and done, that's how much gray area surrounds this whole business right now...
![]()
nittany, some great analysis there. I added my one edit to your thoughts.
Uh...exsqueeze me...come again.What are you saying here?Sigmund Bloom said:The point is just that it's wide open enough that seemingly unlikely outcomes are not as remote as we think. Snelling seems like just a GL back type, but the opportunity will there for someone to seize... Dunn, Norwood, Snelling, Mughelli, I dunno, DJ Shockley converting to RB... It really was a headscratcher when Petrino did not take an RB with one of their many early 2nd day picks.
I pulled that out of my rear end to illustrate how baffling the situation is. I don't really think Shockley could convert, and ive certainly heard nothing that would lead me to believe that they would do that. Shockley could indeed become relevant if Vick is a character casualty.Uh...exsqueeze me...come again.What are you saying here?Sigmund Bloom said:The point is just that it's wide open enough that seemingly unlikely outcomes are not as remote as we think. Snelling seems like just a GL back type, but the opportunity will there for someone to seize... Dunn, Norwood, Snelling, Mughelli, I dunno, DJ Shockley converting to RB... It really was a headscratcher when Petrino did not take an RB with one of their many early 2nd day picks.
I've been watching this Vick thing with alterior motives. I know Harrington blows so I was thinking that maybe, just maybe Shockley might get a chance to take the reigns.
What is this madness you speak of Shockley moving to RB? Hell, they should have done this with Vick years ago.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Whew! Some things you should just keep in your rear instead of pulling them out and sharing with others.I pulled that out of my rear end to illustrate how baffling the situation is. I don't really think Shockley could convert, and ive certainly heard nothing that would lead me to believe that they would do that. Shockley could indeed become relevant if Vick is a character casualty.Uh...exsqueeze me...come again.What are you saying here?Sigmund Bloom said:The point is just that it's wide open enough that seemingly unlikely outcomes are not as remote as we think. Snelling seems like just a GL back type, but the opportunity will there for someone to seize... Dunn, Norwood, Snelling, Mughelli, I dunno, DJ Shockley converting to RB... It really was a headscratcher when Petrino did not take an RB with one of their many early 2nd day picks.
I've been watching this Vick thing with alterior motives. I know Harrington blows so I was thinking that maybe, just maybe Shockley might get a chance to take the reigns.
What is this madness you speak of Shockley moving to RB? Hell, they should have done this with Vick years ago.
![]()
![]()
![]()
FWIW - I'm looking at both in the 5th round of a dynasty initial draft. Leaning towards Norwood. Maybe he's another year out from solid (dependable) production, but he doesn't have the nagging injuries and ?'able drive that LW aparently does. White's immediate opportunity looks better, but TEN also took C Henry in the 3rd - and are still allegedly shopping for a vet FA to bring in some competition - so that could turn into a RBBC on a avg. running team.Both have QBs that will vulture 'rushing' TDs on draws, broken plays, etc. - so that's about a wash.For me, it comes down to can you afford to wait one more year - for a RB that *could* be special. I'm not getting caught up in the 'skinny legs' and runs too upright for me opinions. Just watch that clip and think about what might be possible, if he were given even the 70% side of a RBBC - not to mention a shot at a FT back.Anyone else have a feeling on where Norwood is a good pick in a dynasty draft (s/u)?I've seen him go from R3 to R6 in the drafts I'm tracking.Not to hijack but - Norwood or Lendale White - who would you rather have for the next two years taking their entire situations into account.I think Norwood could be the better back but White has the better opportunity
He certainly has the talent to exceed that ADP. But he does have chicken legs and it's hard for me to imagine him holding up to 250+ carries a year. The best case scenario is probably that he becomes a poor man's Reggie Bush. His speed and moves are in the same class, but he has a very strange build for the position.FWIW - I'm looking at both in the 5th round of a dynasty initial draft. Leaning towards Norwood. Maybe he's another year out from solid (dependable) production, but he doesn't have the nagging injuries and ?'able drive that LW aparently does. White's immediate opportunity looks better, but TEN also took C Henry in the 3rd - and are still allegedly shopping for a vet FA to bring in some competition - so that could turn into a RBBC on a avg. running team.Both have QBs that will vulture 'rushing' TDs on draws, broken plays, etc. - so that's about a wash.For me, it comes down to can you afford to wait one more year - for a RB that *could* be special. I'm not getting caught up in the 'skinny legs' and runs too upright for me opinions. Just watch that clip and think about what might be possible, if he were given even the 70% side of a RBBC - not to mention a shot at a FT back.Anyone else have a feeling on where Norwood is a good pick in a dynasty draft (s/u)?I've seen him go from R3 to R6 in the drafts I'm tracking.Not to hijack but - Norwood or Lendale White - who would you rather have for the next two years taking their entire situations into account.I think Norwood could be the better back but White has the better opportunity
And BTW, in this brave new world of RBBC, I'm not in the business of sneezing at a goalline RB if he's scoring 6-10 TD's in that role. That has some big time bye week/injury start value.Man in the yellow hat said:OK. Explain this to me like I'm a one year old. What's to scratch your head about? If they like the stable of backs, why spend an early pick? Everyone's assuming Petrino just had to have a big back. Maybe that's not entirely true? Maybe the running scheme won't change as much as we're all expecting?Sigmund Bloom said:The point is just that it's wide open enough that seemingly unlikely outcomes are not as remote as we think. It really was a headscratcher when Petrino did not take an RB with one of their many early 2nd day picks.Isn't Snelling most likely will just be the GL back for Petrino? I dont think that guy has what it takes to be an everydown back (slow). How about the UDFA Vincent? any chance he emerge this year? or too soon for that?I'm not quite 'calling a shot' here, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least, at this point, if Ovie Mughelli Jason Snelling winds up playing a bigger role in things before all is said and done, that's how much gray area surrounds this whole business right now...
![]()
nittany, some great analysis there. I added my one edit to your thoughts.
Things are looking better and better for us Norwood owners
"The Falcons plan on passing to their tailbacks more often.
It will suit the skills of Warrick Dunn and Jerious Norwood, who both have the flexibility to line up wide if necessary. The old coaching staff barely threw to running backs."
http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-bl...d=blogs_falcons