They were caught.. the camera man was asked to cease and was ejected from the stadium.
Reportedly by the Pats...who did not take the camera and have no clue what was really on that.
The only difference here is, as was so eloquently stated by Road Warriors just a few posts above this, is that the Pats didn't go to the league office and raise a stink.
The difference is we have a report of what they may have done...vs. a ruling on what the Pats actually did.
Those who were TRULY motivated by a breach in the league's integrity would CLEARLY be as upset over this as they would be over the Pats breach.
If the Jets were have found to have actually done this...yes, they should be punished.That this comes out now...right before they play...and not after the spygate thing is not the least bit puzzling to you?The league apparently has not seen this or found anything to show what happened.
Those who were solely using the violation as a means to attempt to knock a successful team down a peg (and therefore motivated not by league integrity, but by hate for the success of the Pats)... would obviously seek to brush this under the rug seeings as the hapless Jets haven't shown much successs since Namath left.
At the time, the Pats were 1-0. So people hate that the Pats got knocked out of the playoffs last year but had won one game?Not at all. That is a terrible argument.
THAT is the issue at hand. If this is TRULY about fair and balanced enforcement of league rules then that's what it is. Let's treat it that way.
Ok...if the NFL finds they did cheat...we will treat it that way. Until then, the fact remains all you have is a report that this guy was kicked out...no tape, no NFL action...nothing more. Which is how it is being treated by posters here.