I'm in, got him in the 13th round of my startup last year. TBH I was shocked just how much he did last year.2010 was the year of "Bump Finley"This year -- GO GET GRAHAM!!!11!![]()
60/750/5I understand it is early....but does anyone want to throw out some projections for next year? I am curious what some of the bandwagon starters are expecting as far as production. He is on the waiver wire in my dynasty league (no TE required).....18 man rosters.....12 teamer.
60/720/1060/750/5I understand it is early....but does anyone want to throw out some projections for next year? I am curious what some of the bandwagon starters are expecting as far as production. He is on the waiver wire in my dynasty league (no TE required).....18 man rosters.....12 teamer.
We will have none of that nonsense here. Double that. Minimum.60/750/5I understand it is early....but does anyone want to throw out some projections for next year? I am curious what some of the bandwagon starters are expecting as far as production. He is on the waiver wire in my dynasty league (no TE required).....18 man rosters.....12 teamer.
All kidding aside, he is still just a 2nd year player who was raw to begin with and playing in an offense with a lot of mouths to feed.Still. His arrow is trending up.We will have none of that nonsense here. Double that. Minimum.60/750/5I understand it is early....but does anyone want to throw out some projections for next year? I am curious what some of the bandwagon starters are expecting as far as production. He is on the waiver wire in my dynasty league (no TE required).....18 man rosters.....12 teamer.
x2I'm on board, depending on his ADP.
ummm.. lol60/720/1060/750/5I understand it is early....but does anyone want to throw out some projections for next year? I am curious what some of the bandwagon starters are expecting as far as production. He is on the waiver wire in my dynasty league (no TE required).....18 man rosters.....12 teamer.
X2I'm liking him as my developmental player behind the great Jermichael Finley![]()
Guessing you'd have to pony up the #6 or #7 rookie pick to land him. Keller and a third isn't going to get you much.12 team Dynasty ...Offered:Keller, 1.10, 2.10, and 3.10forGraham, 1.12, 2.12and got shot down.
Really? Why?If any part of that projection is accurate, it would be the TD portion. Learning to run routes may take more time but I think he has already figured out how to go get a rebound in the end zone. He had 5 TDs this year in the last 8 games.ummm.. lol60/720/1060/750/5I understand it is early....but does anyone want to throw out some projections for next year? I am curious what some of the bandwagon starters are expecting as far as production. He is on the waiver wire in my dynasty league (no TE required).....18 man rosters.....12 teamer.
4 of those were in the final four games, which were in a divisional championship chase, but whatever. nevermind the fact that the like to pass to their RBs but were unable to largely because of the injuries to Reggie (yes, I know he was around the final 5-6 games), Pierre, Ivory (who isn't much of a pass catcher, i guess?) and everyone else. they threw the ball around 650 times last year, which is about 150 more than the SB season, and 40 more times than the year before that. every saints fan will tell you that not having pierre and reggie limited their playcalling considerably. it took a dimension out of the entire offense, not just the passing offense. barring injury, i would not expect the 650 PA form to follow into next year.apparently, i am the one and only person that is hesitant to jump on this bandwagon. he's talented. i get that, but he's also raw. say what you will about the other TEs he saints have had in recent years - shockey, dave thomas, billy miller, campbell - they are could block. graham needs to get stronger and show his ability to block. OT bushrod is the weak link the line and teams came after bress over and over again from that side. graham will lose snaps to thomas because he is serviceable in both facets of the position. he's not sexy but whatever.i am not trying to be debbie downer here. as a saints fan, i have every reason to love this guy. his time will come but you all have to be more patient. he's still learning. the saints offense is so potent that they're not going to miss what he brings to the table just yet.Really? Why?If any part of that projection is accurate, it would be the TD portion. Learning to run routes may take more time but I think he has already figured out how to go get a rebound in the end zone. He had 5 TDs this year in the last 8 games.
Actually, if you watch all Saint's games (like I do) you would see that Brees uses his TEs......a great deal. Graham should put up better than average #'s for a TE. I own the guy in 2 dynasty leagues, and I must say that I'm excited. He could easily lead the team in TD receptions this next year. He was drafted to be a red zone target. Still, he is starting to be hyped like Finley was last year. If I could get a top 5 pick for Graham I'd jump on it in a heart beat. Especially since I got him in the 5th in both leagues last year.Seriously, they distribute the ball to everyone. And I'd say TE is Brees's last look. To expect anything more than average TE numbers (50 rec's for 500 yards and 3-5 Td's) from Graham is almost as silly as all the ridiculous Finley man slobbing. Let's see him build on his numbers for atleast 2 - 3 consecutive years before we start the anointing.
Woo-Hoo! He'll step right into the same role that Jeremy Shockey had! I can just imagine all the passes and TD's he's gonna catch. I mean, he's the ONLY good receiver they have on that team. Colston, Moore, Henderson, Meachem, Arrington, Bush, Thomas, and Ivory are all gonna get traded away so Graham will be the only guy for Brees. Bank on it!Seriously, they distribute the ball to everyone. And I'd say TE is Brees's last look. To expect anything more than average TE numbers (50 rec's for 500 yards and 3-5 Td's) from Graham is almost as silly as all the ridiculous Finley man slobbing. Let's see him build on his numbers for atleast 2 - 3 consecutive years before we start the anointing.
I had a hard time reading that and I'm not really sure I understand your point. Was it that they only targeted Graham in the end zone during the last 3 games because all of their receivers (including Bush) were present during a divisonal championship chase? It really doesn't make any sense. Both payton and Brees have made comments about his end zone abilities. I don't know why they would stop using those abilities as he develops even further as a receiver.4 of those were in the final four games, which were in a divisional championship chase, but whatever. nevermind the fact that the like to pass to their RBs but were unable to largely because of the injuries to Reggie (yes, I know he was around the final 5-6 games), Pierre, Ivory (who isn't much of a pass catcher, i guess?) and everyone else. they threw the ball around 650 times last year, which is about 150 more than the SB season, and 40 more times than the year before that. every saints fan will tell you that not having pierre and reggie limited their playcalling considerably. it took a dimension out of the entire offense, not just the passing offense. barring injury, i would not expect the 650 PA form to follow into next year.apparently, i am the one and only person that is hesitant to jump on this bandwagon. he's talented. i get that, but he's also raw. say what you will about the other TEs he saints have had in recent years - shockey, dave thomas, billy miller, campbell - they are could block. graham needs to get stronger and show his ability to block. OT bushrod is the weak link the line and teams came after bress over and over again from that side. graham will lose snaps to thomas because he is serviceable in both facets of the position. he's not sexy but whatever.i am not trying to be debbie downer here. as a saints fan, i have every reason to love this guy. his time will come but you all have to be more patient. he's still learning. the saints offense is so potent that they're not going to miss what he brings to the table just yet.Really? Why?If any part of that projection is accurate, it would be the TD portion. Learning to run routes may take more time but I think he has already figured out how to go get a rebound in the end zone. He had 5 TDs this year in the last 8 games.
i'll hit the highlights:1. the saints threw the ball more than they ever did last year. that might not trend into next year.2. the saints running game was hampered by injuries to the RB position. whoever is back there at RB will see passes, likely at the expense of the TE. if ivory starts then it may be different but i wouldn't count on him starting.3. TE in the saints offense actually block. graham is still learning the finer points of this and could see less playing time as a result. less playing time could impact his totals.5. there are a ton of proven and effective weapons in the saints offense. they can afford to bring him along slowly. yes, brees and payton like his potential. that's why brees went out of his way to work with him. he recognized the learning curve for this kid is steep and he needs the help.'BuckeyeArt said:I had a hard time reading that and I'm not really sure I understand your point. Was it that they only targeted Graham in the end zone during the last 3 games because all of their receivers (including Bush) were present during a divisonal championship chase? It really doesn't make any sense. Both payton and Brees have made comments about his end zone abilities. I don't know why they would stop using those abilities as he develops even further as a receiver.
I'm not sure what any of that has to do with him being a red zone target over the last half or last 3 games of the season. He had 14 targets in the last 3 games and 37 over the last eight. Both project to 74 targets over a full season. You don't think he'll get at least 74 targets next year?i'll hit the highlights:1. the saints threw the ball more than they ever did last year. that might not trend into next year.2. the saints running game was hampered by injuries to the RB position. whoever is back there at RB will see passes, likely at the expense of the TE. if ivory starts then it may be different but i wouldn't count on him starting.3. TE in the saints offense actually block. graham is still learning the finer points of this and could see less playing time as a result. less playing time could impact his totals.5. there are a ton of proven and effective weapons in the saints offense. they can afford to bring him along slowly. yes, brees and payton like his potential. that's why brees went out of his way to work with him. he recognized the learning curve for this kid is steep and he needs the help.'BuckeyeArt said:I had a hard time reading that and I'm not really sure I understand your point. Was it that they only targeted Graham in the end zone during the last 3 games because all of their receivers (including Bush) were present during a divisonal championship chase? It really doesn't make any sense. Both payton and Brees have made comments about his end zone abilities. I don't know why they would stop using those abilities as he develops even further as a receiver.
TE target leaders for 2010:Witten -- 128Cooley -- 126Pettigrew -- 110Shockey and Thomas combined for 117.And as a team, NO was 5th among teams in TE targets. Just sayin......'Warpig said:Woo-Hoo! He'll step right into the same role that Jeremy Shockey had! I can just imagine all the passes and TD's he's gonna catch. I mean, he's the ONLY good receiver they have on that team. Colston, Moore, Henderson, Meachem, Arrington, Bush, Thomas, and Ivory are all gonna get traded away so Graham will be the only guy for Brees. Bank on it!Seriously, they distribute the ball to everyone. And I'd say TE is Brees's last look. To expect anything more than average TE numbers (50 rec's for 500 yards and 3-5 Td's) from Graham is almost as silly as all the ridiculous Finley man slobbing. Let's see him build on his numbers for atleast 2 - 3 consecutive years before we start the anointing.
You may want to rethink that analysis. The gap isn't as wide as you suggest. Passing attempts by Saints QBs during the Sean Payton era:2006 - 5782007 - 6552008 - 6352009 - 5442010 - 661So, in 2010, they threw the ball 45 times more than the average or 26 times more than the median. Likely it doesn't get back to 660 but it's also just as likely it doesn't return to 540. Somewhere around 600 - 620 certainly wouldn't be out of the question.'saintfool said:they threw the ball around 650 times last year, which is about 150 more than the SB season, and 40 more times than the year before that. every saints fan will tell you that not having pierre and reggie limited their playcalling considerably. it took a dimension out of the entire offense, not just the passing offense. barring injury, i would not expect the 650 PA form to follow into next year.
attempts were trending down for three years in a row though before last season's rash of injuries to the RBs. just something to consider.You may want to rethink that analysis. The gap isn't as wide as you suggest. Passing attempts by Saints QBs during the Sean Payton era:2006 - 5782007 - 6552008 - 6352009 - 5442010 - 661So, in 2010, they threw the ball 45 times more than the average or 26 times more than the median. Likely it doesn't get back to 660 but it's also just as likely it doesn't return to 540. Somewhere around 600 - 620 certainly wouldn't be out of the question.'saintfool said:they threw the ball around 650 times last year, which is about 150 more than the SB season, and 40 more times than the year before that. every saints fan will tell you that not having pierre and reggie limited their playcalling considerably. it took a dimension out of the entire offense, not just the passing offense. barring injury, i would not expect the 650 PA form to follow into next year.
Actually, it went down two years in a row but I don't think I'd ever call something that happens twice a trend. Trends are easy to imagine if you are willing to overlook the rest of the data.attempts were trending down for three years in a row though before last season's rash of injuries to the RBs. just something to consider.You may want to rethink that analysis. The gap isn't as wide as you suggest. Passing attempts by Saints QBs during the Sean Payton era:2006 - 5782007 - 6552008 - 6352009 - 5442010 - 661So, in 2010, they threw the ball 45 times more than the average or 26 times more than the median. Likely it doesn't get back to 660 but it's also just as likely it doesn't return to 540. Somewhere around 600 - 620 certainly wouldn't be out of the question.'saintfool said:they threw the ball around 650 times last year, which is about 150 more than the SB season, and 40 more times than the year before that. every saints fan will tell you that not having pierre and reggie limited their playcalling considerably. it took a dimension out of the entire offense, not just the passing offense. barring injury, i would not expect the 650 PA form to follow into next year.
And if Reggie Bush isn't brought back?attempts were trending down for three years in a row though before last season's rash of injuries to the RBs. just something to consider.You may want to rethink that analysis. The gap isn't as wide as you suggest. Passing attempts by Saints QBs during the Sean Payton era:2006 - 5782007 - 6552008 - 6352009 - 5442010 - 661So, in 2010, they threw the ball 45 times more than the average or 26 times more than the median. Likely it doesn't get back to 660 but it's also just as likely it doesn't return to 540. Somewhere around 600 - 620 certainly wouldn't be out of the question.'saintfool said:they threw the ball around 650 times last year, which is about 150 more than the SB season, and 40 more times than the year before that. every saints fan will tell you that not having pierre and reggie limited their playcalling considerably. it took a dimension out of the entire offense, not just the passing offense. barring injury, i would not expect the 650 PA form to follow into next year.
Good to see some sanity introduced here. He could be all that in a few years but not this quickly.All kidding aside, he is still just a 2nd year player who was raw to begin with and playing in an offense with a lot of mouths to feed.Still. His arrow is trending up.We will have none of that nonsense here. Double that. Minimum.60/750/5I understand it is early....but does anyone want to throw out some projections for next year? I am curious what some of the bandwagon starters are expecting as far as production. He is on the waiver wire in my dynasty league (no TE required).....18 man rosters.....12 teamer.
it wasn't just Reggie catching balls. Pierre Thomas got his share too. I expect Reggie to come back. He said he would be willing to re-negotiate his contract, likely signing a multiyear extension, and he is a Payton player. pierre was just tendered an offer for $1.8 million but i doubt he'll take it. he thinks he can do better and most fans will tell you that they hate how pierre's been treated. ivory is the only viable starter that has proven effective with playing time. problem is, the dude has shown no ability to catch the ball. 1 target and a single catch resulting from it. i won't even mention his recovering from "minor" lisfranc surgery. if ivory returns then more passes to TE and WRs. keep in mind that colston is in a contract year, IIRC. i can't even begin to speculate what the saints passing game will look like if they get a RB in draft. yes, they have found players off the waiver wire and undrafted but this is also the team that came very close to trading up for beanie wells 2 years ago. they could very well do something similar if ingram tumbles or a prospect - dion lewis, for example - falls to them late in R1. i'm not saying lewis is R1 talent necessarily but you never know how these things take shape.And if Reggie Bush isn't brought back?
Other than angering some loyal NO area residents I don't see a single impact. Here is a detailed article about the move: http://www.neworleans.com/sports/saints/saints-news/559118-saints-coach-sean-payton-family-move-to-westlake-subdivision.htmlI'll add this. For at least the past 4 years Donal Driver has lived near the same city the Payton family is moving to and his kids attend the same school the Payton's just enrolled their kids. Near as I can tell Driver intends to play for the Packers until he can't play any longer and recently suggested he thinks he can play until he's 40. He has zero ties as a player or family members to this area but chooses to reside here so it's not as if him living here means he wants to play for the Cowboys anymore than it means Payton wants to coach him.Think that I heard on Sirius radio that Coach Payton was moving back to Dallas. Does anyone think that this relocation will affect the Saints in any way?
Just seems like an extra challenge (living apart from his family) that a head coach does not need to add in my opinion, but thanks for the reply. Who knows, it might be an improvement so that he can fully focus on the Saints?Other than angering some loyal NO area residents I don't see a single impact. Here is a detailed article about the move: http://www.neworleans.com/sports/saints/saints-news/559118-saints-coach-sean-payton-family-move-to-westlake-subdivision.htmlI'll add this. For at least the past 4 years Donal Driver has lived near the same city the Payton family is moving to and his kids attend the same school the Payton's just enrolled their kids. Near as I can tell Driver intends to play for the Packers until he can't play any longer and recently suggested he thinks he can play until he's 40. He has zero ties as a player or family members to this area but chooses to reside here so it's not as if him living here means he wants to play for the Cowboys anymore than it means Payton wants to coach him.Think that I heard on Sirius radio that Coach Payton was moving back to Dallas. Does anyone think that this relocation will affect the Saints in any way?
How much time does a coach spend with his family during the season anyway? Jim Schwartz said that he had Friday night from around 6-10 and that was about it.Just seems like an extra challenge (living apart from his family) that a head coach does not need to add in my opinion, but thanks for the reply. Who knows, it might be an improvement so that he can fully focus on the Saints?Other than angering some loyal NO area residents I don't see a single impact. Here is a detailed article about the move: http://www.neworleans.com/sports/saints/saints-news/559118-saints-coach-sean-payton-family-move-to-westlake-subdivision.htmlI'll add this. For at least the past 4 years Donal Driver has lived near the same city the Payton family is moving to and his kids attend the same school the Payton's just enrolled their kids. Near as I can tell Driver intends to play for the Packers until he can't play any longer and recently suggested he thinks he can play until he's 40. He has zero ties as a player or family members to this area but chooses to reside here so it's not as if him living here means he wants to play for the Cowboys anymore than it means Payton wants to coach him.Think that I heard on Sirius radio that Coach Payton was moving back to Dallas. Does anyone think that this relocation will affect the Saints in any way?