In a keeper league, where do you draw the line between keeping players that will help you NOW versus players that have the potential to help you in the FUTURE?
For example, if you have a choice between keeping a young WR with potential and an older, solid QB, what would you do? By WR with potential, I mean a WR who hasn't been a reliable (fantasy) WR2 yet, and by solid QB, I mean one who should be a weak QB1, or a good back-up QB.
I left out TEs, because unless you have the ability to keep Gates, I don't think they are worth keeping. I also don't count RBs in this discussion, because I believe a young RB with potential EASILY trumps a young WR or an older, solid QB.
This has been a problem for me several times, on both sides of the argument, whether it was keeping players who were younger because of the potential I felt they had, as well as trading away younger players for an older guy to try to "win this year."
What are the shark's opinions on this?
For example, if you have a choice between keeping a young WR with potential and an older, solid QB, what would you do? By WR with potential, I mean a WR who hasn't been a reliable (fantasy) WR2 yet, and by solid QB, I mean one who should be a weak QB1, or a good back-up QB.
I left out TEs, because unless you have the ability to keep Gates, I don't think they are worth keeping. I also don't count RBs in this discussion, because I believe a young RB with potential EASILY trumps a young WR or an older, solid QB.
This has been a problem for me several times, on both sides of the argument, whether it was keeping players who were younger because of the potential I felt they had, as well as trading away younger players for an older guy to try to "win this year."
What are the shark's opinions on this?