What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

kenbrell thompkins (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well...

Apparently not everyone is on the KT bandwagon yet.

He went undrafted in my buddies league yesterday - 10 teams.

Admittedly, it's a very casual ESPN work league, but I'm surprised he didn't get at least a late round flier. I asked him why KT was still available and he told me that he would have snagged him but there were a few other players that should have already been off the board that he couldn't pass.

It looks like the really casual leagues are still in the dark about him.
I see you live in Denver. I can almost guarantee you won't be getting any value on him if you live in the Northeast.

 
Well...

Apparently not everyone is on the KT bandwagon yet.

He went undrafted in my buddies league yesterday - 10 teams.

Admittedly, it's a very casual ESPN work league, but I'm surprised he didn't get at least a late round flier. I asked him why KT was still available and he told me that he would have snagged him but there were a few other players that should have already been off the board that he couldn't pass.

It looks like the really casual leagues are still in the dark about him.
I see you live in Denver. I can almost guarantee you won't be getting any value on him if you live in the Northeast.
East Coast Bias.

 
Tackling Dummies said:
Bayhawks said:
Tackling Dummies said:
We all know the deal about the change of NE WR/TEs this season. Let's try to clarify what would be Thompkins' floor/ceiling , assuming he is the every game starter.

Assuming Brady attempts 550-585 passes.

Noise aside, let's duplicate the Z targets from last season (130) and give them to Thompkins. I am ignoring Branch's 29 targets, they'd have torches and pitchforks if we give them to Thompkins.

A decent, but not outrageous catch ratio is 62%, giving him 80 receptions.

Lloyd avg 12.3 per last season, let's round it to 13 for the sake of this and go from there. 1040 yards (984 yards using 12.3 per).

TDs are random, picking a medium 6 TDs (not getting into slicing up Woodhead, Hernandez, etc. scoring plays).

It's never as simple and swapping out what was for what will be, but 80/1000/6 (to me) seems like a sweet spot and can be an attainable number.

Ceiling is bumping his avg to 14 and reception to 85 (around 1200) and TD to 9.

Somewhere between this (+1PPR 200 point season) and the current FBG projection is a big gap.

COME AT ME BRO!
OKAY, BRO!Let's start with your assumptions.

1) you are projecting Brady for 550-585 passes, when he threw 638 last year, yet you arbitrarily give him the "Z" receivers targets from last year. Nevermind that the percentage of the "Z" receivers targets could be closer to 112 targets than 130 (using your 550-585 pass attempts projection)

2) There were only 5 WRs last year who received the number of targets you are projecting for Thompkins (130) with the catch rate you're predicting (62%).

3) There were only 8 NFL WRs who recorded the number of catches (80) that you are projecting, to go along with the YPR that you projected (13.0).

4) Thompkins appears to be more of the underneath/intermediate type WR, based on reports, and his performance in pre-season. His YPR in preseason is 10.9, not 13.0.

**BTW, if you are "rounding" Lloyd's 12.3 YPR from last year, it would become 12.0, not 13.0**

So, if you are logical and consistent with your projections, and don't project Thompkins to be better than all but 5-8 NFL WRs in a couple of key stats, your "floor" projections could be off by a great deal. Assuming only 112 targets, and a more realistic catch rate of 58%, along with a more realistic YPR of 12.0 would lead to:

65 catches, 780 yards. Even if you give him the 6 TDs that you did, that's closer to a WR 4 than a WR 2.
2012 catch rate:

Calvin 60

A Johnson 69

D Thomas 67

Decker 69

L Moore 64

Colston 64

Bryant 67

Crabtree 67

M Floyd 67

R White 64

R Cobb 77

62% is more than fair.

Took Brady's attempt from current FBG numbers, Brady had 637 attempts last season, so smush them together, div by 2 and it's 600. Fair? Yep.

12 YPC is 960 yds, same ballpark as 14 YPC is 1120, still falling in the same tier.

:boxing:
Fair? You are comparing him to some of the most elite WRs in the NFL, and you think that is a fair comparison? Only 6 of those WRs had the targets, catch rate, and YPR you are predicting. That's not fair, nor is it reasonable. Seriously?

Smushinh numbers together? That is your idea of a rational, sound argument?

The fact is, you posted his "floor" as numbers that would require him to play like a top-10 NFL WR, to have the targets, catch rate, and YPR that you expect. That's not logical to expect from any rookie, no matter when he was drafted (or not).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tackling Dummies said:
Bayhawks said:
Tackling Dummies said:
We all know the deal about the change of NE WR/TEs this season. Let's try to clarify what would be Thompkins' floor/ceiling , assuming he is the every game starter.

Assuming Brady attempts 550-585 passes.

Noise aside, let's duplicate the Z targets from last season (130) and give them to Thompkins. I am ignoring Branch's 29 targets, they'd have torches and pitchforks if we give them to Thompkins.

A decent, but not outrageous catch ratio is 62%, giving him 80 receptions.

Lloyd avg 12.3 per last season, let's round it to 13 for the sake of this and go from there. 1040 yards (984 yards using 12.3 per).

TDs are random, picking a medium 6 TDs (not getting into slicing up Woodhead, Hernandez, etc. scoring plays).

It's never as simple and swapping out what was for what will be, but 80/1000/6 (to me) seems like a sweet spot and can be an attainable number.

Ceiling is bumping his avg to 14 and reception to 85 (around 1200) and TD to 9.

Somewhere between this (+1PPR 200 point season) and the current FBG projection is a big gap.

COME AT ME BRO!
OKAY, BRO!Let's start with your assumptions.

1) you are projecting Brady for 550-585 passes, when he threw 638 last year, yet you arbitrarily give him the "Z" receivers targets from last year. Nevermind that the percentage of the "Z" receivers targets could be closer to 112 targets than 130 (using your 550-585 pass attempts projection)

2) There were only 5 WRs last year who received the number of targets you are projecting for Thompkins (130) with the catch rate you're predicting (62%).

3) There were only 8 NFL WRs who recorded the number of catches (80) that you are projecting, to go along with the YPR that you projected (13.0).

4) Thompkins appears to be more of the underneath/intermediate type WR, based on reports, and his performance in pre-season. His YPR in preseason is 10.9, not 13.0.

**BTW, if you are "rounding" Lloyd's 12.3 YPR from last year, it would become 12.0, not 13.0**

So, if you are logical and consistent with your projections, and don't project Thompkins to be better than all but 5-8 NFL WRs in a couple of key stats, your "floor" projections could be off by a great deal. Assuming only 112 targets, and a more realistic catch rate of 58%, along with a more realistic YPR of 12.0 would lead to:

65 catches, 780 yards. Even if you give him the 6 TDs that you did, that's closer to a WR 4 than a WR 2.
2012 catch rate:

Calvin 60

A Johnson 69

D Thomas 67

Decker 69

L Moore 64

Colston 64

Bryant 67

Crabtree 67

M Floyd 67

R White 64

R Cobb 77

62% is more than fair.

Took Brady's attempt from current FBG numbers, Brady had 637 attempts last season, so smush them together, div by 2 and it's 600. Fair? Yep.

12 YPC is 960 yds, same ballpark as 14 YPC is 1120, still falling in the same tier.

:boxing:
Fair? You are comparing him to some of the most elite WRs in the NFL, and you think that is a fair comparison? Only 6 of those WRs had the targets, catch rate, and YPR you are predicting. That's not fair, nor is it reasonable. Seriously?

Smushinh numbers together? That is your idea of a rational, sound argument?

The fact is, you posted his "floor" as numbers that would require him to play like a top-10 NFL WR, to have the targets, catch rate, and YPR that you expect. That's not logical to expect from any rookie, no matter when he was drafted (or not).
Stop being so rational. That is not what these people want to hear.

http://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/2013_overunder_kenbrell_thompkins/14275751

 
Tackling Dummies said:
Bayhawks said:
Tackling Dummies said:
We all know the deal about the change of NE WR/TEs this season. Let's try to clarify what would be Thompkins' floor/ceiling , assuming he is the every game starter.

Assuming Brady attempts 550-585 passes.

Noise aside, let's duplicate the Z targets from last season (130) and give them to Thompkins. I am ignoring Branch's 29 targets, they'd have torches and pitchforks if we give them to Thompkins.

A decent, but not outrageous catch ratio is 62%, giving him 80 receptions.

Lloyd avg 12.3 per last season, let's round it to 13 for the sake of this and go from there. 1040 yards (984 yards using 12.3 per).

TDs are random, picking a medium 6 TDs (not getting into slicing up Woodhead, Hernandez, etc. scoring plays).

It's never as simple and swapping out what was for what will be, but 80/1000/6 (to me) seems like a sweet spot and can be an attainable number.

Ceiling is bumping his avg to 14 and reception to 85 (around 1200) and TD to 9.

Somewhere between this (+1PPR 200 point season) and the current FBG projection is a big gap.

COME AT ME BRO!
OKAY, BRO!Let's start with your assumptions.

1) you are projecting Brady for 550-585 passes, when he threw 638 last year, yet you arbitrarily give him the "Z" receivers targets from last year. Nevermind that the percentage of the "Z" receivers targets could be closer to 112 targets than 130 (using your 550-585 pass attempts projection)

2) There were only 5 WRs last year who received the number of targets you are projecting for Thompkins (130) with the catch rate you're predicting (62%).

3) There were only 8 NFL WRs who recorded the number of catches (80) that you are projecting, to go along with the YPR that you projected (13.0).

4) Thompkins appears to be more of the underneath/intermediate type WR, based on reports, and his performance in pre-season. His YPR in preseason is 10.9, not 13.0.

**BTW, if you are "rounding" Lloyd's 12.3 YPR from last year, it would become 12.0, not 13.0**

So, if you are logical and consistent with your projections, and don't project Thompkins to be better than all but 5-8 NFL WRs in a couple of key stats, your "floor" projections could be off by a great deal. Assuming only 112 targets, and a more realistic catch rate of 58%, along with a more realistic YPR of 12.0 would lead to:

65 catches, 780 yards. Even if you give him the 6 TDs that you did, that's closer to a WR 4 than a WR 2.
2012 catch rate:

Calvin 60

A Johnson 69

D Thomas 67

Decker 69

L Moore 64

Colston 64

Bryant 67

Crabtree 67

M Floyd 67

R White 64

R Cobb 77

62% is more than fair.

Took Brady's attempt from current FBG numbers, Brady had 637 attempts last season, so smush them together, div by 2 and it's 600. Fair? Yep.

12 YPC is 960 yds, same ballpark as 14 YPC is 1120, still falling in the same tier.

:boxing:
Fair? You are comparing him to some of the most elite WRs in the NFL, and you think that is a fair comparison? Only 6 of those WRs had the targets, catch rate, and YPR you are predicting. That's not fair, nor is it reasonable. Seriously?

Smushinh numbers together? That is your idea of a rational, sound argument?

The fact is, you posted his "floor" as numbers that would require him to play like a top-10 NFL WR, to have the targets, catch rate, and YPR that you expect. That's not logical to expect from any rookie, no matter when he was drafted (or not).
First off, easy on the catch rate, there are TONS of WRs w/ higher than 62%

here-->http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr

Yes, averaging two recent season (Brady's attempt) is reasonable, rational and sound. Smushing.

Sit down with a beverage of your choice and figure out where 600 of Brady's attempts are going and get back with us. Brandon Lloyd got 130 targets last season and now it's a surprise if Thompkins is near that? Lloyd got 117 the year prior, so his ratio (see what I did there, just like Brady's attempts) was relatively the same.

Last season, the incredible Brian Hartline averaged 14.6, Lance Moore over 16 and Grandpa Boldin was over 14, so simmer down on YPC.

130 targets, 80 receptions, 13 YPC and 6 TD.

:drive:

 
I personally projected KT for 760yds and 5TDs. Expecting much more than that is meaning he has a better season than the proven, pro bowl caliber Lloyd did last year and basically selling your soul to be on the hype train.

That has him end up as WR47 for me. Im guessing someone might pick him in my draft tonight before I would consider him, but I'll keep my eye on it. Where he was being drafted a couple weeks ago he was potentially a huge value. Now where he's going, you are pretty much taking away all his upside that he had to begin with. Im guessing there is a better chance Dobson ends up on my team than KT.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I personally projected KT for 760yds and 5TDs. Expecting much more than that is meaning he has a better season than the proven, pro bowl caliber Lloyd did last year and basically selling your soul to be on the hype train.
While I agree that the hype is almost guaranteed to be bigger than his production, I disagree with the comparisons to Lloyd.

Lloyd was a 1-time pro bowler and he has had one great year, and two okay years (one of which was with one of the best offenses in the NFL) in his 10 year career. He was never especially talented. Kenbrell has outperformed everyones expectations of himself AND everyones expectations of Dobson and Boyce. His catching radius is ridiculous and he gets separation on every route, hes not especially fast or big - but he is performing like an all-star, albeit in the preseason.

Most importantly of all, he gets the system; you could stick any stud you want in that receiving corp and if he doesn't get the system he will under perform.

 
Tackling Dummies said:
Bayhawks said:
Tackling Dummies said:
We all know the deal about the change of NE WR/TEs this season. Let's try to clarify what would be Thompkins' floor/ceiling , assuming he is the every game starter.

Assuming Brady attempts 550-585 passes.

Noise aside, let's duplicate the Z targets from last season (130) and give them to Thompkins. I am ignoring Branch's 29 targets, they'd have torches and pitchforks if we give them to Thompkins.

A decent, but not outrageous catch ratio is 62%, giving him 80 receptions.

Lloyd avg 12.3 per last season, let's round it to 13 for the sake of this and go from there. 1040 yards (984 yards using 12.3 per).

TDs are random, picking a medium 6 TDs (not getting into slicing up Woodhead, Hernandez, etc. scoring plays).

It's never as simple and swapping out what was for what will be, but 80/1000/6 (to me) seems like a sweet spot and can be an attainable number.

Ceiling is bumping his avg to 14 and reception to 85 (around 1200) and TD to 9.

Somewhere between this (+1PPR 200 point season) and the current FBG projection is a big gap.

COME AT ME BRO!
OKAY, BRO!Let's start with your assumptions.

1) you are projecting Brady for 550-585 passes, when he threw 638 last year, yet you arbitrarily give him the "Z" receivers targets from last year. Nevermind that the percentage of the "Z" receivers targets could be closer to 112 targets than 130 (using your 550-585 pass attempts projection)

2) There were only 5 WRs last year who received the number of targets you are projecting for Thompkins (130) with the catch rate you're predicting (62%).

3) There were only 8 NFL WRs who recorded the number of catches (80) that you are projecting, to go along with the YPR that you projected (13.0).

4) Thompkins appears to be more of the underneath/intermediate type WR, based on reports, and his performance in pre-season. His YPR in preseason is 10.9, not 13.0.

**BTW, if you are "rounding" Lloyd's 12.3 YPR from last year, it would become 12.0, not 13.0**

So, if you are logical and consistent with your projections, and don't project Thompkins to be better than all but 5-8 NFL WRs in a couple of key stats, your "floor" projections could be off by a great deal. Assuming only 112 targets, and a more realistic catch rate of 58%, along with a more realistic YPR of 12.0 would lead to:

65 catches, 780 yards. Even if you give him the 6 TDs that you did, that's closer to a WR 4 than a WR 2.
2012 catch rate:

Calvin 60

A Johnson 69

D Thomas 67

Decker 69

L Moore 64

Colston 64

Bryant 67

Crabtree 67

M Floyd 67

R White 64

R Cobb 77

62% is more than fair.

Took Brady's attempt from current FBG numbers, Brady had 637 attempts last season, so smush them together, div by 2 and it's 600. Fair? Yep.

12 YPC is 960 yds, same ballpark as 14 YPC is 1120, still falling in the same tier.

:boxing:
Fair? You are comparing him to some of the most elite WRs in the NFL, and you think that is a fair comparison? Only 6 of those WRs had the targets, catch rate, and YPR you are predicting. That's not fair, nor is it reasonable. Seriously?Smushinh numbers together? That is your idea of a rational, sound argument?

The fact is, you posted his "floor" as numbers that would require him to play like a top-10 NFL WR, to have the targets, catch rate, and YPR that you expect. That's not logical to expect from any rookie, no matter when he was drafted (or not).
First off, easy on the catch rate, there are TONS of WRs w/ higher than 62%here-->http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr

Yes, averaging two recent season (Brady's attempt) is reasonable, rational and sound. Smushing.

Sit down with a beverage of your choice and figure out where 600 of Brady's attempts are going and get back with us. Brandon Lloyd got 130 targets last season and now it's a surprise if Thompkins is near that? Lloyd got 117 the year prior, so his ratio (see what I did there, just like Brady's attempts) was relatively the same.

Last season, the incredible Brian Hartline averaged 14.6, Lance Moore over 16 and Grandpa Boldin was over 14, so simmer down on YPC.

130 targets, 80 receptions, 13 YPC and 6 TD.

:drive:
You didn't project JUST a 62% catch rate. You projected him to get 130 targets, 80 catches (62%), with a 13.0 YPR. There aren't "tons" of WRs who did this; there are a half dozen. You' re trying to make Thompkins unto the "$6 million" WR; "WR A had 130 targets, "WR B had 80 catches," WR C had a 62% catch rate," "WR D averaged 13.0 YPR," so Thompkins must be able to do it. That isn't how it works. Some WRs have a high YPR, some have a high catch rate, some see a lot of targets. Only 6 have done Them simultaneously, what you think is Thompkins' floor. Think about that, and maybe you should put down your beverage of choice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The skeptics arent wrong but something that wont show up in your stats are the possibility of being an elite QBs guy. IF that chemistry clicked Manning-Harrison Manning-Wayne Brees-Colston Brady-Welker... all bets are off. Comparing to guys with mortal QBs throwing to them in sub-olympian offenses isnt really the point. Im not intrested in his floor (cuz he'll be on my bench or off my roster considering how late I get him), its his ceiling that is relevant. Does Lance Moore have a realistic shot to make the top 10 and blow some minds? No (and I love LM). KT has the possibility, just based on proximity.

 
Tackling Dummies said:
Bayhawks said:
Tackling Dummies said:
We all know the deal about the change of NE WR/TEs this season. Let's try to clarify what would be Thompkins' floor/ceiling , assuming he is the every game starter.

Assuming Brady attempts 550-585 passes.

Noise aside, let's duplicate the Z targets from last season (130) and give them to Thompkins. I am ignoring Branch's 29 targets, they'd have torches and pitchforks if we give them to Thompkins.

A decent, but not outrageous catch ratio is 62%, giving him 80 receptions.

Lloyd avg 12.3 per last season, let's round it to 13 for the sake of this and go from there. 1040 yards (984 yards using 12.3 per).

TDs are random, picking a medium 6 TDs (not getting into slicing up Woodhead, Hernandez, etc. scoring plays).

It's never as simple and swapping out what was for what will be, but 80/1000/6 (to me) seems like a sweet spot and can be an attainable number.

Ceiling is bumping his avg to 14 and reception to 85 (around 1200) and TD to 9.

Somewhere between this (+1PPR 200 point season) and the current FBG projection is a big gap.

COME AT ME BRO!
OKAY, BRO!Let's start with your assumptions.

1) you are projecting Brady for 550-585 passes, when he threw 638 last year, yet you arbitrarily give him the "Z" receivers targets from last year. Nevermind that the percentage of the "Z" receivers targets could be closer to 112 targets than 130 (using your 550-585 pass attempts projection)

2) There were only 5 WRs last year who received the number of targets you are projecting for Thompkins (130) with the catch rate you're predicting (62%).

3) There were only 8 NFL WRs who recorded the number of catches (80) that you are projecting, to go along with the YPR that you projected (13.0).

4) Thompkins appears to be more of the underneath/intermediate type WR, based on reports, and his performance in pre-season. His YPR in preseason is 10.9, not 13.0.

**BTW, if you are "rounding" Lloyd's 12.3 YPR from last year, it would become 12.0, not 13.0**

So, if you are logical and consistent with your projections, and don't project Thompkins to be better than all but 5-8 NFL WRs in a couple of key stats, your "floor" projections could be off by a great deal. Assuming only 112 targets, and a more realistic catch rate of 58%, along with a more realistic YPR of 12.0 would lead to:

65 catches, 780 yards. Even if you give him the 6 TDs that you did, that's closer to a WR 4 than a WR 2.
2012 catch rate:

Calvin 60

A Johnson 69

D Thomas 67

Decker 69

L Moore 64

Colston 64

Bryant 67

Crabtree 67

M Floyd 67

R White 64

R Cobb 77

62% is more than fair.

Took Brady's attempt from current FBG numbers, Brady had 637 attempts last season, so smush them together, div by 2 and it's 600. Fair? Yep.

12 YPC is 960 yds, same ballpark as 14 YPC is 1120, still falling in the same tier.

:boxing:
No it isn't.
 
I personally projected KT for 760yds and 5TDs. Expecting much more than that is meaning he has a better season than the proven, pro bowl caliber Lloyd did last year and basically selling your soul to be on the hype train.
While I agree that the hype is almost guaranteed to be bigger than his production, I disagree with the comparisons to Lloyd.Lloyd was a 1-time pro bowler and he has had one great year, and two okay years (one of which was with one of the best offenses in the NFL) in his 10 year career. He was never especially talented. Kenbrell has outperformed everyones expectations of himself AND everyones expectations of Dobson and Boyce. His catching radius is ridiculous and he gets separation on every route, hes not especially fast or big - but he is performing like an all-star, albeit in the preseason.

Most importantly of all, he gets the system; you could stick any stud you want in that receiving corp and if he doesn't get the system he will under perform.
He gets seperation on every route because there is no game plan against him. I like the guy, and so does butch jones, but wr25 is upside this year.

 
Just took him at #100 overall tonight in a PPR., which seems to right around his ADP as of late per MFL drafts in the past 3 days. I'll take him all day as a WR4/5 type.

Ahead of likes of Britt, Givens, Blackmon, E.Sanders, Broyles.

I've found myself ending with both Amendola and Thompkins in a few leagues. A lot has to do with I think Amendola's injury history and/or if Thompkins does infact steal some of Danny's quick hitters.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
107th overall in my draft tonight. Considering that is almost exactly where yahoo has him ranked now, not surprised thats where he went.

Got picked over VBrown, Blackmon, Rice who I have all ahead of him.

 
I personally projected KT for 760yds and 5TDs. Expecting much more than that is meaning he has a better season than the proven, pro bowl caliber Lloyd did last year and basically selling your soul to be on the hype train.
While I agree that the hype is almost guaranteed to be bigger than his production, I disagree with the comparisons to Lloyd.Lloyd was a 1-time pro bowler and he has had one great year, and two okay years (one of which was with one of the best offenses in the NFL) in his 10 year career. He was never especially talented. Kenbrell has outperformed everyones expectations of himself AND everyones expectations of Dobson and Boyce. His catching radius is ridiculous and he gets separation on every route, hes not especially fast or big - but he is performing like an all-star, albeit in the preseason.

Most importantly of all, he gets the system; you could stick any stud you want in that receiving corp and if he doesn't get the system he will under perform.
He gets seperation on every route because there is no game plan against him. I like the guy, and so does butch jones, but wr25 is upside this year.
Game plan against him?

He's beating press and off coverage already. Are they holding back some super-secret ninja press coverage technique for the regular season?

You game plan against a QB, the RB1 and the WR1 for a team. Game planning to stop the 3rd or 4th most dangerous receiving option (after Gronk, Amendola and maybe Vereen) isn't going to happen. He's going to see some double coverage on the occasions where his route challenges deep, but that's route-biased coverage rather than player-biased coverage. The game planning done to counter him is going to consist of the DC telling the defensive squad not to sleep on the rookie WR because he's more polished than one would expect of a rookie. Then the DC will go back to talking about neutralizing Gronk and Amendola.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
107th overall in my draft tonight. Considering that is almost exactly where yahoo has him ranked now, not surprised thats where he went.

Got picked over VBrown, Blackmon, Rice who I have all ahead of him.
That's to rich for my blood as well, though taking him over Rice wouldn't offend me too much.

 
Dude, OG..

Quit with the bets already..

(your not even out of the last hole yet, an no one is going to want to bet you)

Delete your post, and leave this thread to talk about the wideout named for it.

-------------

As to Thompkins,

I'm in that 60-70rec 750-900yds an call it 6td category, that puts him at wr40-wr50 range.

That would be where I rank him "draft wise" and feel his Floor should be, Ceiling obviously

would be Higher, an if he becomes an Brady favourite I'd go 1000yds an 8tds, wr30 range.

That is my thinking on his floor/ceiling, for the regular season as it stands now in NE there.

(I did take him "near" my high Floor rankings in 1 league as I liked nothing left at that point)

.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK, for the target skeptics, the assignment is simple:

Assign 600 of Brady's pass attempts. For the sake of clarity, assume Gronk misses 3 games and Amendola is healthy for all 16.

Please report Thompkins targets.

TIA.

 
OK, for the target skeptics, the assignment is simple:

Assign 600 of Brady's pass attempts. For the sake of clarity, assume Gronk misses 3 games and Amendola is healthy for all 16.

Please report Thompkins targets.

TIA.
I don't think your projections are to totally "outrageous", just an little high, roughly 15% higher than mine..

An to be honest, if someone is "Really High" on this guy then to rank him where you have um is fine by me..

------

I'm a wuss, an can't rank an Unproven guy that high with others I like around that spot, and feel comfortable...

(to many other recievers ranked that high I would take before looking at Thompkins high side of my rankings)

 
OK, for the target skeptics, the assignment is simple:

Assign 600 of Brady's pass attempts. For the sake of clarity, assume Gronk misses 3 games and Amendola is healthy for all 16.

Please report Thompkins targets.

TIA.
It's not just your targets, as I previously posted. It's you arbitrarily projecting a rookie to have targets, catches, catch rate, and YPR numbers that only a handful of proven NFL WRs posted last year. Just like it's unwise to project career years for players, it's unwise to project a rookie to do what very few proven NFL players can do. To say it would be that rookie's floor is illogical.

As to your target question:

Brady-600 attempts, with Gronkowski for 13 games & Amendola for 16:

Amendola-150 targets (Welker had 180+ the last two years, but even though all reports suggest that Amendola and Brady seem to have a connection so far, I don't think it would be wise to expect Brady to lock onto Amendola to the degree he did Welker last year)

Gronkowski-100 targets (I actually think this is low; he averaged 8.3 targets/game the last 2 seasons; that would be 108 targets over 13 games. If he plays 13 games, with Hernandez gone, I wouldn't be surprised to see Gronk get close to 10 targets/game, but I under-projected here to show how out of whack the expectations for Thompkins are)

Sudfeld-80 targets (6/game). Hernandez actually averaged more targets/game than Gronk the last two years (9.2/game). I don't expect Sudfeld to see that many targets; probably something closer to Hernandez' rookie year (4.6/game). Let's call it 5 targets/game, since he might/should get more targets the first few weeks until Gronk gets back.

Ridley-20 targets (he had 16 last year, with the loss of Woodhead, Lloyd, Hernandez, etc, I'll give him 4 more.

Vereen-75 targets (Again, I think this is low, because Woodhead and Vereen had 74 combined targets last year, and based on reports from NE beat writers, Vereen's usage in the pre-season, and the loss of Hernandez, I expect Vereen to be more heavily involved this year. But I under-projected his targets anyway, for argument's sake)

Edelman-50 targets. (He had 32 in 9 games last year (3.6/game), and with all the receiving losses this year, I expect him to be more involved. That said, I can't count on him being healthy, so I only gave him 50 targets, which would only be 3.13/game if he played all 16).

Other WRs (Dobson, Boyce, etc)-20 targets (This could be way off; NE typically hasn't thrown a lot to their 4th, 5th, 6th WRs, but with all the new receivers this year, I can't be sure how that will play out)

That leaves 105 targets for Thompkins. Again, I think some of the target numbers for other guys are low, but for argument's sake, I purposely low-balled them.

If Brady only throws 600 passes, and Thompkins gets 105 targets, (instead of the 130 number you made up), and he catches 60% of them (instead of the 62% number you decided upon), he will have 63 catches, not 80. If you give him a more realistic YPR like 12.0 (his pre-season YPR is 10.9, BTW), then you are talking about 756 yards.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now, we're getting down to it.

13 YPC v 12 is small potatoes, as is the 62/60 catch ratio. This is not making a Thompkins-to-the-HOF stand, YPC and catch ratio are within reason.

If we meet around 115 targets (very slight target bump over 16 games), you are roughly looking at 70/900 (12.85 YPC) and I'll take that any day that ends with "y".

 
I have him as my WR4-5 on my rosters. I think a starting UDFA is going to have pretty broad range as far as projections go. Guy got 12 targets the other night. The upside of being Brady's security blanket is well worth the risk. I admit I am chasing, but I believe if those numbers have ANY chance of caryying over to the reg season, then his upside is much higher than those being drafted around him.

 
OG_GF said:
I took Golden Tate as my WR5, instead of Thompkins who was already gone.

You wanna talk prop bets, Tate vs. Thompkins ... most FF points. PPR or non PPR. Any takers, PM me.

Note: I do not consider it a tabled bet, until you send me the money. Just FYI. If Golden Tate dies in a car accident tomorrow ... I'm no longer accepting bets that he will outperform Thompkins.

It's totally redic that I would hafta say that ... but apparently I do.
I got a prop bet too.

OG_GF pulls his Tate vs. Thompkins bet off the table before the weekend.

I'll take yes, who wants no?

 
OG_GF said:
I took Golden Tate as my WR5, instead of Thompkins who was already gone.

You wanna talk prop bets, Tate vs. Thompkins ... most FF points. PPR or non PPR. Any takers, PM me.

Note: I do not consider it a tabled bet, until you send me the money. Just FYI. If Golden Tate dies in a car accident tomorrow ... I'm no longer accepting bets that he will outperform Thompkins.

It's totally redic that I would hafta say that ... but apparently I do.
I got a prop bet too.

OG_GF pulls his Tate vs. Thompkins bet off the table before the weekend.

I'll take yes, who wants no?
You're going to have to lay odds

 
Now, we're getting down to it.

13 YPC v 12 is small potatoes, as is the 62/60 catch ratio. This is not making a Thompkins-to-the-HOF stand, YPC and catch ratio are within reason.

If we meet around 115 targets (very slight target bump over 16 games), you are roughly looking at 70/900 (12.85 YPC) and I'll take that any day that ends with "y".
They are not small potatoes; over the course of a season, they add up. Also, the YPR and catch ratio (as already demonstrated) aren't reasonable. You can keep saying that, it doesn't make it accurate.

Regardless, that doesn't exactly mesh with your "COME AT ME BRO!" post, though, where you said his FLOOR was 80/1000/6. The fact is that those "FLOOR" projections were very unrealistic (especially when you consider that during his two year college career, Thompkins scored a grand total of 4 TDs; calling 6 his floor seems absurd). A stat line of 70/900/4, which you'll take any day that ends with a "y" would basically make Thompkins a very weak WR3, in a 12-team league.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Annnnd we're back.

Anybody wanna talk about Thompkins performances? He looked smooth on the field, but is it my imagination that he seemed to chirp after every catch? He also seemed to actively look for the sideline... which i can excuse in preseason but for a rookie its a bit troubling.

The Chad Johnson similarities are a bit eerie. Anybody else see what im seeing?

 
but is it my imagination that he seemed to chirp after every catch? He also seemed to actively look for the sideline... /quote]I did notice him turning to the sideline a few times when he could have fought for more yards. I'm not worried about that until I see it in a regular season game.

I don't know what you mean by "chirp".
 
Just jumping in here, and not goin back into all the silly bet smack.

1st draft this year was WAY early, so KT undrafted. I just finally gulped down the koolaid and picked him up a few days ago as FA, dropping Jeffrey. Talking deep bench WR fliers, and while i do very much like Jeffrey, that deep on the bench i'm looking for home runs not singles (kept Rueben Randle and Vincent Brown over Jeffrey for the drop).

Lot of numbers thrown around in here for projections, but not a lot of who do you like better for bench fliers. So, thought's on ranking Thompkins vs some of these WR bench spots (just kinda picking out a few guys from varous slots in rankings):

Thompkins vs...

MIke Williams

TY Hilton

Chris Givens

Vencent Brown

Emmanuel Sanders

Alshon Jeffrey

Rueben Randle

Nate Washington

Others you've got your eye on?

any thoughts?

 
but is it my imagination that he seemed to chirp after every catch? He also seemed to actively look for the sideline... /quote]I did notice him turning to the sideline a few times when he could have fought for more yards. I'm not worried about that until I see it in a regular season game.

I don't know what you mean by "chirp".
You know what I retract that observation- I looked back and the one play against the Lions it was just as easily the defender getting in his face, and then the rest I realized the KT seems to have a ritual of tossing the ball to the ref after every catch, so it seems like he's looking around or pointing the ball at people but he's just trying to find a ref and toss it to him.

Still mildly, mildly concerned about the sideline thing, but something to keep in mind maybe.
 
OG_GF said:
I took Golden Tate as my WR5, instead of Thompkins who was already gone.

You wanna talk prop bets, Tate vs. Thompkins ... most FF points. PPR or non PPR. Any takers, PM me.

Note: I do not consider it a tabled bet, until you send me the money. Just FYI. If Golden Tate dies in a car accident tomorrow ... I'm no longer accepting bets that he will outperform Thompkins.

It's totally redic that I would hafta say that ... but apparently I do.
So we have to send you the money first to lock in the bet? Seems prudent.

 
Just took him at #100 overall tonight in a PPR., which seems to right around his ADP as of late per MFL drafts in the past 3 days. I'll take him all day as a WR4/5 type.

Ahead of likes of Britt, Givens, Blackmon, E.Sanders, Broyles.

I've found myself ending with both Amendola and Thompkins in a few leagues. A lot has to do with I think Amendola's injury history and/or if Thompkins does infact steal some of Danny's quick hitters.
I definitely wouldn't have taken him there. I think Blackmon as a WR4/5 is just about perfect because I actually think for his 12 games, he will be playing as low end WR1. I like Givens better and would probably also take Britt over him based on upside. I would probably take Sanders as well and only Broyles I wouldn't put above Thompkins.

Thompkins went way too high in a draft I had last night (5th) by a Pats homer. I took Miles Austin with my 6th to give you an idea of how ridiculous that pick was. I took Blackmon as my WR4 3 rounds later. This is a team that usually makes a few boneheaded moves, so it is a little extreme but does show the hype.

 
Just took him at #100 overall tonight in a PPR., which seems to right around his ADP as of late per MFL drafts in the past 3 days. I'll take him all day as a WR4/5 type.

Ahead of likes of Britt, Givens, Blackmon, E.Sanders, Broyles.

I've found myself ending with both Amendola and Thompkins in a few leagues. A lot has to do with I think Amendola's injury history and/or if Thompkins does infact steal some of Danny's quick hitters.
I definitely wouldn't have taken him there. I think Blackmon as a WR4/5 is just about perfect because I actually think for his 12 games, he will be playing as low end WR1. I like Givens better and would probably also take Britt over him based on upside. I would probably take Sanders as well and only Broyles I wouldn't put above Thompkins.

Thompkins went way too high in a draft I had last night (5th) by a Pats homer. I took Miles Austin with my 6th to give you an idea of how ridiculous that pick was. I took Blackmon as my WR4 3 rounds later. This is a team that usually makes a few boneheaded moves, so it is a little extreme but does show the hype.
Blackmon's being criminally underrated in every draft i've been in. Anybody missing even game 1 is being badly underrated. I think pulling a game or two out of the projections is dropping people off the radar screen.

 
Just took him at #100 overall tonight in a PPR., which seems to right around his ADP as of late per MFL drafts in the past 3 days. I'll take him all day as a WR4/5 type.

Ahead of likes of Britt, Givens, Blackmon, E.Sanders, Broyles.

I've found myself ending with both Amendola and Thompkins in a few leagues. A lot has to do with I think Amendola's injury history and/or if Thompkins does infact steal some of Danny's quick hitters.
I definitely wouldn't have taken him there. I think Blackmon as a WR4/5 is just about perfect because I actually think for his 12 games, he will be playing as low end WR1. I like Givens better and would probably also take Britt over him based on upside. I would probably take Sanders as well and only Broyles I wouldn't put above Thompkins.

Thompkins went way too high in a draft I had last night (5th) by a Pats homer. I took Miles Austin with my 6th to give you an idea of how ridiculous that pick was. I took Blackmon as my WR4 3 rounds later. This is a team that usually makes a few boneheaded moves, so it is a little extreme but does show the hype.
Blackmon's being criminally underrated in every draft i've been in. Anybody missing even game 1 is being badly underrated. I think pulling a game or two out of the projections is dropping people off the radar screen.
agree completely. I usually snag 2 to 3 good wr's, then maybe grab a flyer like Givens/Thompkins or someone in that range and then at the end Blackmon is still usually sitting there. Yes, he'll miss some games but he looked awful good and Dez like in the preseason. He has that "my ball" mentaility and plays angry. Ya, he's a knucklehead and may blow himself up but with a price of a 12th/13th round he's too good to pass up.

The only problem I forsee is if there's a hot pickup and the other guys on my roster are working out that I may be "forced" to drop him to get another high flyer in the first couple weeks.

Coincidentally, I feel the same about Gordon and he's ending up on most of my teams...when he explodes when he returns it's going to enable me to package up my more well known wr like a Steve Smith and plug Gordon into his spot.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just jumping in here, and not goin back into all the silly bet smack.

1st draft this year was WAY early, so KT undrafted. I just finally gulped down the koolaid and picked him up a few days ago as FA, dropping Jeffrey. Talking deep bench WR fliers, and while i do very much like Jeffrey, that deep on the bench i'm looking for home runs not singles (kept Rueben Randle and Vincent Brown over Jeffrey for the drop).

Lot of numbers thrown around in here for projections, but not a lot of who do you like better for bench fliers. So, thought's on ranking Thompkins vs some of these WR bench spots (just kinda picking out a few guys from varous slots in rankings):

Thompkins vs...

MIke Williams

TY Hilton

Chris Givens

Vencent Brown

Emmanuel Sanders

Alshon Jeffrey

Rueben Randle

Nate Washington

Others you've got your eye on?

any thoughts?
I have seen Blackmon mentioned a few times as well, so I will throw him in the mix. Here's my ranking of those guys with *s next to the guys who are ranked higher if you want a consistent bye week fill in versus a higher risk/higher reward.

Blackmon (if you can stomach the suspension, his schedule and talent should make him a solid starter for the last 12)

Hilton

Givens

Sanders*

Thompkins

Brown (not sold on him at all)

Williams

Washington*

Jeffrey

Randle

 
Just took him at #100 overall tonight in a PPR., which seems to right around his ADP as of late per MFL drafts in the past 3 days. I'll take him all day as a WR4/5 type.

Ahead of likes of Britt, Givens, Blackmon, E.Sanders, Broyles.

I've found myself ending with both Amendola and Thompkins in a few leagues. A lot has to do with I think Amendola's injury history and/or if Thompkins does infact steal some of Danny's quick hitters.
I definitely wouldn't have taken him there. I think Blackmon as a WR4/5 is just about perfect because I actually think for his 12 games, he will be playing as low end WR1. I like Givens better and would probably also take Britt over him based on upside. I would probably take Sanders as well and only Broyles I wouldn't put above Thompkins.

Thompkins went way too high in a draft I had last night (5th) by a Pats homer. I took Miles Austin with my 6th to give you an idea of how ridiculous that pick was. I took Blackmon as my WR4 3 rounds later. This is a team that usually makes a few boneheaded moves, so it is a little extreme but does show the hype.
Blackmon's being criminally underrated in every draft i've been in. Anybody missing even game 1 is being badly underrated. I think pulling a game or two out of the projections is dropping people off the radar screen.
agree completely. I usually snag 2 to 3 good wr's, then maybe grab a flyer like Givens/Thompkins or someone in that range and then at the end Blackmon is still usually sitting there. Yes, he'll miss some games but he looked awful good and Dez like in the preseason. He has that "my ball" mentaility and plays angry. Ya, he's a knucklehead and may blow himself up but with a price of a 12th/13th round he's too good to pass up.

The only problem I forsee is if there's a hot pickup and the other guys on my roster are working out that I may be "forced" to drop him to get another high flyer in the first couple weeks.

Coincidentally, I feel the same about Gordon and he's ending up on most of my teams...when he explodes when he returns it's going to enable me to package up my more well known wr like a Steve Smith and plug Gordon into his spot.
I don't think you will get Blackmon in the 12/13 in start 3WR PPR leagues. He has gone 8th in both leagues I am in like that (I got him once, had an 8th round keeper in the other). I do agree that he is is very underrated.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just took him at #100 overall tonight in a PPR., which seems to right around his ADP as of late per MFL drafts in the past 3 days. I'll take him all day as a WR4/5 type.

Ahead of likes of Britt, Givens, Blackmon, E.Sanders, Broyles.

I've found myself ending with both Amendola and Thompkins in a few leagues. A lot has to do with I think Amendola's injury history and/or if Thompkins does infact steal some of Danny's quick hitters.
I definitely wouldn't have taken him there. I think Blackmon as a WR4/5 is just about perfect because I actually think for his 12 games, he will be playing as low end WR1. I like Givens better and would probably also take Britt over him based on upside. I would probably take Sanders as well and only Broyles I wouldn't put above Thompkins.

Thompkins went way too high in a draft I had last night (5th) by a Pats homer. I took Miles Austin with my 6th to give you an idea of how ridiculous that pick was. I took Blackmon as my WR4 3 rounds later. This is a team that usually makes a few boneheaded moves, so it is a little extreme but does show the hype.
Blackmon's being criminally underrated in every draft i've been in. Anybody missing even game 1 is being badly underrated. I think pulling a game or two out of the projections is dropping people off the radar screen.
agree completely. I usually snag 2 to 3 good wr's, then maybe grab a flyer like Givens/Thompkins or someone in that range and then at the end Blackmon is still usually sitting there. Yes, he'll miss some games but he looked awful good and Dez like in the preseason. He has that "my ball" mentaility and plays angry. Ya, he's a knucklehead and may blow himself up but with a price of a 12th/13th round he's too good to pass up.

The only problem I forsee is if there's a hot pickup and the other guys on my roster are working out that I may be "forced" to drop him to get another high flyer in the first couple weeks.

Coincidentally, I feel the same about Gordon and he's ending up on most of my teams...when he explodes when he returns it's going to enable me to package up my more well known wr like a Steve Smith and plug Gordon into his spot.
I don't think you will get Blackmon in the 12/13 in start 3WR PPR leagues. He has gone 8th in both leagues I am in like that (I got him once, had an 8th round keeper in the other). I do agree that he is is very underrated.
you're right..both were start 2 wr non-ppr

 
Annnnd we're back.

He also seemed to actively look for the sideline... which i can excuse in preseason but for a rookie its a bit troubling.
I noticed this too. On his fade routes he tends to go to the sideline regardless of the coverage or what shoulder the pass is coming to. There was one ball (week 3) I thought he could have turned into an easy TD. The ball was thrown to his inside shoulder, so it's not like Brady was leading him outside. For whatever reason instead of continuing his route up the field through the catch, he angled outside and went out of bounds. I couldn't figure this out either.

 
I personally projected KT for 760yds and 5TDs. Expecting much more than that is meaning he has a better season than the proven, pro bowl caliber Lloyd did last year and basically selling your soul to be on the hype train.

That has him end up as WR47 for me. Im guessing someone might pick him in my draft tonight before I would consider him, but I'll keep my eye on it. Where he was being drafted a couple weeks ago he was potentially a huge value. Now where he's going, you are pretty much taking away all his upside that he had to begin with. Im guessing there is a better chance Dobson ends up on my team than KT.
What?!?!? to the bolded. Lloyd was an inconsistant as they come imo.
 
OG_GF said:
I took Golden Tate as my WR5, instead of Thompkins who was already gone.

You wanna talk prop bets, Tate vs. Thompkins ... most FF points. PPR or non PPR. Any takers, PM me.

Note: I do not consider it a tabled bet, until you send me the money. Just FYI. If Golden Tate dies in a car accident tomorrow ... I'm no longer accepting bets that he will outperform Thompkins.

It's totally redic that I would hafta say that ... but apparently I do.
:lol:

Riiiiiiight.

 
I'm putting you on ignore.
I love how you feel the need to tell him he's on ignore...you know...rather than just ignoring him.

I bet you walk away from fights and then yell over your shoulder about how you're the being the bigger man by walking away.

 
I personally projected KT for 760yds and 5TDs. Expecting much more than that is meaning he has a better season than the proven, pro bowl caliber Lloyd did last year and basically selling your soul to be on the hype train.

That has him end up as WR47 for me. Im guessing someone might pick him in my draft tonight before I would consider him, but I'll keep my eye on it. Where he was being drafted a couple weeks ago he was potentially a huge value. Now where he's going, you are pretty much taking away all his upside that he had to begin with. Im guessing there is a better chance Dobson ends up on my team than KT.
What?!?!? to the bolded. Lloyd was an inconsistant as they come imo.
Early in his career, sure, but not the last few years when he finished WR1, WR25, and WR34. People in here are projecting him to be better than Lloyd last year. I'll believe it when I see it.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top