What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Knile Davis traded to Green Bay (1 Viewer)

How about Cedric Benson or Thomas Jones then? I don't think Dr. Brew was comparing Davis to Holmes as a talent (heck he's likely not even as talented as Benson or Jones), but sometimes these left for dead failed prospects resurface somewhere else and find success. It would be pretty cheap to find out if Davis could join that list, I'd imagine. Like I said, he's not a great back but he filled in nicely for Charles a few times and was productive (even in a playoff game).
Yeah Benson and Jones were pretty much left for dead and managed to be somewhat useful later. 

I guess I went to the first guy I could think of who switched teams after 2-3 years being buried on a depth chart. 

I even specifically mentioned I am not one to make bold predictions or comparisons. Apparently that part was missed and the reader focused on the player I was referencing. I even purposely left his name out to try and not go down that rabbit hole. The point is, many RBs fall out of favor, have a change of scenery and do well. I think in Davis' case this is a case where it wasn't he's no good rather RBs that fit the scheme better were drafted/brought in after him and seemed to flourish. If I remember correctly, Davis did quite well as Charles' handcuff and filled in quite well for him when needed. Didn't dazzle, but didn't play terrible. Had some fumbling issues which put him behind others. 

Given his youth, talent, and the opportunity he is entering, I don't see why people shouldn't pay attention to this and be slightly optimistic. I think Davis could have some decent value in PPR fairly soon. He is a great receiver out of the backfield. Lacy is okay but given his size I feel like he's more of a between the tackles kind of guy this season. I would say his immediate outlook is possibly better than 2 other rookie RBs highly touted on these message boards. Won't be someone to break the bank for by any means, but if you have a deep bench you could do much worse out there. 

 
I don't understand this. Are you saying Davis is old? 

Knile Davis was a 3rd round draft pick in 2013. He just turned 25 years old. Eddie Lacy turned 26 this last July. He is a year YOUNGER than Lacy

I'm not one to make bold predictions when it comes to situations like this, but another RB the Chiefs traded for from Baltimore after he fell out of favor during his first 3 years in the NFL in turned out to be quite the specimen in the early 2000s. My point is, weirder things have happened. To shrug this off as "nothing to see here" is really foolish IMO. Starks took over the RB duties practically last year. The RB situation has been a mess. Lacy has gotten fat and slow and just doesn't look the same as he did during his rookie season. 

My opinion, Davis is an upgrade to Starks (who had knee surgery, out probably 4 weeks). Davis is younger and has an opportunity to flourish in an offense that historically has been very good. Worth a stash IMO
No, I was saying no stone should be left unturned while you heard no left turns un-stoned.

My bad.  poor communication skills, apparently.

 
Yeah he doesn't really fit that profile but he actually has pretty good change of direction ability for such a big player and an excellent spin more to make defenders miss and help him break tackles.

It is a difficult combination to deal with, that is what makes him a good RB (as much as it pains me to say something positive about a Packers player).

Knile Davis on the other hand is more straight linish and doesn't give defenders poor angles the way Lacy can do at times. 

All of this is relative. James Starks is more of a slasher and so offers different skills than Lacy does, so to me more of a change of pace than what I think Knile Davis would be, as Davis shares more things in common with Lacy than I think Starks (or other players like him) does.
I am not one to comment on Lacy in any positive or flattering manner. 

Signed, 

~Eddy Lacy, 1.04, 2015 draft. 

 
How about Cedric Benson or Thomas Jones then? I don't think Dr. Brew was comparing Davis to Holmes as a talent (heck he's likely not even as talented as Benson or Jones), but sometimes these left for dead failed prospects resurface somewhere else and find success. It would be pretty cheap to find out if Davis could join that list, I'd imagine. Like I said, he's not a great back but he filled in nicely for Charles a few times and was productive (even in a playoff game).
Corey Dillon on the Pats comes to mind too....

 
I can see Davis being an intriguing pickup -- Starks is a bust and Lacy can't seem to stay healthy. Definitely there is opportunity value there going forward.

But for immediate impact in week 7? Like Forsett last weekend, I just can't see how Davis goes out and gets the vast majority of carries off the bat less than one week in if Lacy can't go. 

 
Given his youth, talent, and the opportunity he is entering, I don't see why people shouldn't pay attention to this and be slightly optimistic. 
Personally, I wouldn't bother because the league I am still competing in I have good depth at the position.

But looking at it as though I had a dog in this fight, I'd suggest that at best Davis is a 1-2 week flier. 3 tops. Lacy played through the pain on Sunday, and was obviously hobbled, but this doesn't have the look of a high ankle sprain, or even a substantial one since he gave it a go and performed to some extent.  So Lacy should be back relatively quickly (unless this signing is saying something about Lacy's health that we don't yet know....a distinct possibility) 

So to me Davis = Cameron Artist-Payne while JStew was on the mend. And could definitely help someone in a bind or on the BYE. But I don't think Lacy will get Wally Pipp'd, so when Lacy comes back Davis will purely be a handcuff. 

Optimism would imply long-term value for FFB purposes, and unless as I suggested there's more to Lacy's ankle than we're presently aware, I'm not seeing more than a couple weeks of upside here. And until we see how the Packers use him, (and I suspect they'll go pass heavy) it's hard to be optimistic. 

 
Last word:  Try to cultivate a sense of humor. you will improve the quality of your life. 
Hey look it's Billy taking shots at other posters while he never makes a call on any players himself. It's what's wrong with this forum. How about you wait to attack any more posters until you've made one correct call yourself. We will likely never hear from you again. 

 
Personally, I wouldn't bother because the league I am still competing in I have good depth at the position.

But looking at it as though I had a dog in this fight, I'd suggest that at best Davis is a 1-2 week flier. 3 tops. Lacy played through the pain on Sunday, and was obviously hobbled, but this doesn't have the look of a high ankle sprain, or even a substantial one since he gave it a go and performed to some extent.  So Lacy should be back relatively quickly (unless this signing is saying something about Lacy's health that we don't yet know....a distinct possibility) 

So to me Davis = Cameron Artist-Payne while JStew was on the mend. And could definitely help someone in a bind or on the BYE. But I don't think Lacy will get Wally Pipp'd, so when Lacy comes back Davis will purely be a handcuff. 

Optimism would imply long-term value for FFB purposes, and unless as I suggested there's more to Lacy's ankle than we're presently aware, I'm not seeing more than a couple weeks of upside here. And until we see how the Packers use him, (and I suspect they'll go pass heavy) it's hard to be optimistic. 
Good points. I think unless Lacy really falls out of favor he is a decent 1-3 week fill in as well. As mentioned earlier, Lacy has done well with his YPC but I have not liked what I have seen for the most part. He is way better than last year however. Part of it is McCarthy's play calling. Part of it is Lacy just not running very well at times. Your assessment is probably right on for immediate outlook

Hey look it's Billy taking shots at other posters while he never makes a call on any players himself. It's what's wrong with this forum. How about you wait to attack any more posters until you've made one correct call yourself. We will likely never hear from you again. 
Eh he wants to be a tool let him. Guys like him will always come and go on these message boards

 
As a Lacy owner, I think a lot of people are undervaluing him this year. He's looked solid at worst this year. The problem seems to be that the playbook is still based on last year, when he was fatter, slower, and far less reliable than he is now.

Lacey just doesn't seem to factor into GB's offensive gamelans much these days. He's leading the league in yards per carry with ZERO TD's. I HATE how McCarthy has used Lacy this year. Tons of runs out of shotgun, sent to the sidelines in the red zone, terrible lack of rhythm to his carries, discordant. 

Lacey is a big power back on a team that wants to spread it out. Davis could work out better for that, but Lacey has plenty left. If GB doesn't want him then I wish they'd trade him to a team that would use him effectively. 

 
Last word:  Try to cultivate a sense of humor. you will improve the quality of your life. 
I'd tell you to take the jokes to the FFA, but if your posts in this thread are what you consider "humor", you'd get booed out of there too.  Pathetic.

As for Davis, if you have roster space and he's cheap you have to at least consider the possibility that he puts up a few points - either in the short term or long term.  Opportunity is everything.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can see Davis being an intriguing pickup -- Starks is a bust and Lacy can't seem to stay healthy. Definitely there is opportunity value there going forward.

But for immediate impact in week 7? Like Forsett last weekend, I just can't see how Davis goes out and gets the vast majority of carries off the bat less than one week in if Lacy can't go. 
Well, Dodds projections just came out. In my 0.5 PPR league K. Davis is ranked #21 RB.

For some perspective:

* 19: CJ Anderson

* 20: J. Charles

* 21: K. Davis (15-64-0.4; 2-13-0.1)

* 22: J. McKinnon

* 23: T. Coleman

That's pretty damn good.

For those of us scrambling every week for the Bookers, Dixons, D. Washington's...or J. Rodgers...K. Davis for 1-2 weeks is ok.

That said, I'm also having a hard time seeing Davis just walk right in here and be productive, but what else is GB going to do?

 
Well, Dodds projections just came out. In my 0.5 PPR league K. Davis is ranked #21 RB.

For some perspective:

* 19: CJ Anderson

* 20: J. Charles

* 21: K. Davis (15-64-0.4; 2-13-0.1)

* 22: J. McKinnon

* 23: T. Coleman

That's pretty damn good.

For those of us scrambling every week for the Bookers, Dixons, D. Washington's...or J. Rodgers...K. Davis for 1-2 weeks is ok.

That said, I'm also having a hard time seeing Davis just walk right in here and be productive, but what else is GB going to do?
With it being a Thursday game, will Davis even play this week?

 
If there is one skill position on offense where someone can step in right away, its RB. Also, Reid runs a similar WCO to GB. It's not that hard.

 
So.. Looks like he's at least going to get a 3-4 week run. Could be valuable through bye weeks etc. I think I'd try for him on waivers, sit him this Thursday and see where he's at for week 8

 
Knile Davis confident he can help running game

Tom Silverstein http://www.packersnews.com/staff/10051412/tom-silverstein/, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel7:36 p.m. CDT October 18, 2016
 

 




(Photo: John Rieger/USA TODAY Sports)


STORY HIGHLIGHTS


  • Packers give up 2018 conditional seventh-round pick in trade for Davis
  • Practice squad rookie Don Jackson still expected to be signed to 53-man roster
  • Eddie Lacy's ankle injury likely to sideline him against the Chicago Bears



GREEN BAY - On his first day as a member of the Green Bay Packers, running back Knile Davis spent his time playing with quarterback Brett Hundley on the scout team.

As much as the Packers would like to ease him into their offense, that's going to change quickly.

Davis should be running, blocking and receiving in the same backfield as Aaron Rodgers on Thursday night because the Packers' running back position has become a scrapheap of bruised and battered bodies and they desperately need help from the newcomer.

RELATEDCook no longer wearing walking boot

RELATEDStatus uncertain for Randall, Rollins

RELATEDShields to miss 8 weeks on IR

Not expecting starter Eddie Lacy to be available against the Chicago Bears due to a left ankle injury, the Packers agreed Monday night to deal a 2018 conditional seventh-round draft choice to the Kansas City Chiefs for the 5-10, 227-pound Davis. The fourth-year back becomes the first player acquired by the Packers in a trade since safety Anthony Smith was obtained from the Jacksonville Jaguars on Oct. 18, 2010, for a conditional seventh-round draft pick.

On Tuesday, Davis arrived from Kansas City around 10 a.m., giving him about 4½ hours to take his physical, meet with his coaches, get fitted for practice gear and get down to Clarke Hinkle Field. With Lacy on the field watching and lending support, Davis mostly just watched the No. 1 offense operate with practice squad running back Don Jackson and wide receiver Ty Montgomery at Lacy's position.

"I did scout team, that was good to get my feet wet," Davis said after practice. "I did special teams. It was cool. All day today, all day tomorrow, before the game, (I'll be) trying to learn as much as I can."

Newly acquired RB Knile Davis catches passes from a jugs machine at practice. (Photo: Tom Silverstein / Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)
In addition to Lacy being highly questionable for the Bears game, backup James Starks is out this week after having arthroscopic surgery Sunday to clean out debris in his knee. According to coach Mike McCarthy, Starks is expected to miss several weeks, leaving Davis, Montgomery and receiver Randall Cobb as the only running options on the 53-man roster.

Though McCarthy said Jackson was still a member of the practice squad, a source said he is expected to be signed to the active roster Wednesday. Because he took part in the offseason program and rejoined the team in Week 1 after being released just before training camp, Jackson has a solid working knowledge of the offense and may get the starting nod against the Bears.

"Don Jackson will actually work," McCarthy said, stopping himself before declaring him the starter. "He’ll work some, but he’s obviously still a practice-squad member. We’ve got to make sure he’s ready, if needed."

In order to make room for Davis, the Packers placed cornerback Sam Shields, out since suffering a concussion Week 1 against Jacksonville, on injured reserve. When Jackson is added to the 53-man roster, the Packers will have to make another roster move and may wind up putting someone else on injured reserve.

No one was saying that Lacy was a candidate to be placed there, but it's clear his ankle, first injured against the New York Giants on Oct. 9, got much worse during the Dallas game Sunday. McCarthy would only say that Lacy would not be available for practice Tuesday and was "very sore."

With just one more day of practice before playing the Bears, the Packers are going to try to find a suitable number of plays for Davis, who has experience as a third-down back and could help McCarthy get through the game. Having played for West Coast disciple Andy Reid in Kansas City, Davis has some basic understanding of McCarthy's system, but learning the protections and checks will be a challenge.

"There’s some things you can kind of bring him along (with)," offensive coordinator Edgar Bennett said. "The first part of it is truly the introduction to the playbook, how we go about doing certain things from a technique standpoint and a fundamental standpoint. Everything has been extremely positive as far as what you hear about him, and I think our guys have a good grasp on what he’s able to do for us."

Davis had fallen deep on the Chiefs’ depth chart with the emergence of Spencer Ware and Charcandrick West as capable backups to star running back Jamaal Charles, who recently returned from a torn anterior cruciate ligament suffered last season. Davis was once thought to be a successor to Charles, but Reid wasn't satisfied with Davis' performance as a blocker and receiver and began using him less and less.

Since the start of the 2015 season, Davis has played in 18 games, but he has only 29 carries for 70 yards (2.5 average). This season, he had only one carry for minus-2.  In three-plus years, he has carried 233 times for 775 yards (3.3 average) and four touchdowns. He has 31 catches for 260 yards (8.4) and a touchdown.

Davis started against the Packers in the final exhibition game Sept. 1 in Kansas City and had an impressive night, carrying 14 times for 58 yards and a touchdown. He also had one catch for seven yards.

"I feel like I'm off the reins," Davis said. "I've been on the sideline, I've been itching to get in the game, you know, be part of the team  — which I was in Kansas City. I did what I could. I'm just excited to be a part of Green Bay and do what I can here. Hopefully, my role is bigger."

Drafted in the third round out of Arkansas in 2013, Davis ran the 40-yard dash in 4.37 seconds. He had a vertical jump of 33.5 inches and benched 225 pounds a remarkable 31 times. Davis was part of Kansas City general manager John Dorsey's first draft class following his long stint in the Packers' front office.

During his three-plus years with the Chiefs, Davis scored three kickoff return touchdowns, including a memorable 106-yarder on the opening kick in a wild-card victory over the Houston Texans in January. Davis also had a 108-yard touchdown return as a rookie and a 99-yard touchdown return in 2014.

"He was a guy that we were always concerned about having played against him," special teams coach Ron Zook said. "A lot of talent. I’ve always felt like those guys are guys that either got or they don’t, and he’s got some natural ability and he’s obviously fast and he had one of the longer returns against us last year."

Davis, who is in the final year of his four-year, $2,751,016 contract, has a base salary of $675,000. The Packers will absorb 11/17th of that or $436,765 on their current salary cap and hope that he is worth every dime of it.

He's hoping to make their investment count.

"Really, just running the ball," Davis said of what he can add. "I feel like that’s what’s they’re stressing. ‘You’ve got to get the run game going,’ and I think I can help with that."


 
Lacy is terrible so there has to be some chance that Davis never even gives the job back... At least not to Lacy.  Crockett could even come off IR (not sure they use the IR return on him).  It is weird that they kept Crockett at all..  He could have easily been cut... He was put on IR with a shoulder so he could be recovered?

Toobad the passing down work goes to WRs in the backfield. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i thought they brought someone up from the practice squad. Don't remember where I saw the info. Pretty sure it was in the SP

 
Lacy is terrible so there has to be some chance that Davis never even gives the job back... At least not to Lacy.  Crockett could even come off IR (not sure they use the IR return on him).  It is weird that they kept Crockett at all..  He could have easily been cut... He was put on IR with a shoulder so he could be recovered?

Toobad the passing down work goes to WRs in the backfield. 
Lacy's been running pretty well this year.  He's a big loss (pun intended) for their offense.

 
Lacy's been running pretty well this year.  He's a big loss (pun intended) for their offense.
I respectfully don't agree.  

Sure, he gets what is blocked and looks better than James Starks... but then again what other team in the NFL does Eddie Lacy start for?  I'm not sure he even makes another 55 man roster if that team had him in camp and gave an unbiased evaluation...  maybe Washington or a backup in San Fran.

Maybe this is a really hot take but Eddie Lacy is not very good at real life football, and he's absolutely terrible relative to his perceived value at PPR fantasy football.

 
Lacy's been running pretty well this year.  He's a big loss (pun intended) for their offense.
Yup. It's a devastating blow. He's been the best player on offense without question and should've been the focal point of the offense this season. Only McCarthy's pig-headedness was preventing that from happening. Without him, I could see the Bears coming to Lambeau on Thursday and springing the upset. Wouldn't surprise me at all. This is an enormous blow to an offense that clearly was having major issues with him. Without him it's frightening to think what might happen. 

 
Well, as I'd suspected he Davis acquisition was a signal that Lacy's injury is worse than thought - "several weeks". 

Giod stash maybe, I'm not sure who will have value in that backfield while lacy is out. 

Short term whoever it is. this week I doubt it'll be Davis. 

 
Do we expect him to be better than Lacy? Lacy is averaging 77 total yards and hasn't scored this year. The whole GB offense looks in a funk.

 
I respectfully don't agree.  

Sure, he gets what is blocked and looks better than James Starks... but then again what other team in the NFL does Eddie Lacy start for?  I'm not sure he even makes another 55 man roster if that team had him in camp and gave an unbiased evaluation...  maybe Washington or a backup in San Fran.

Maybe this is a really hot take but Eddie Lacy is not very good at real life football, and he's absolutely terrible relative to his perceived value at PPR fantasy football.
He's averaging over 5 yards per carry and seldom goes down on first contact.  He's not great but has been running hard this year...much better than last year. I'd say his lack of TDs is a sign of the Packers offense struggling in general.  He's been the Packers best player on offense, by far, of the skill position guys. 

 
Do we expect him to be better than Lacy? Lacy is averaging 77 total yards and hasn't scored this year. The whole GB offense looks in a funk.
Expect different. Honestly game script is going to dictate whether or not any of these running backs can be productive, and the leash will be much shorter. I can see Davis (by the the most skilled replacement of their bunch) getting a couple short-gain drives before they turn it over to Rodgers' arm. That said, I hope he gets to show off that talent that made him so intriguing before the Ware/West duo came to town. He was once THE KC handcuff, and like with Alfred Blue a couple years ago, he has the potential to go out and start for another team given the chance. Let's see if he can flash that and dominate the touches here.

 
Eddie Lacy is serviceable but by no means is he a solid running back. He is slow, looks like he is honestly not conditioned, he has no wiggle anymore, and is just a plodder.

I think Davis will be an improvement if you ask me....and could keep the job if he has a few solid outings back to back. He is hungry......He's been wasting away in KC for awhile....so here's his chance to get another shot. I'm picking up Davis with confidence.....(if I can get him)  They didn't trade for him to sit, I'll tell you that. He has a great chance to take the job for the rest of the season.

 
Yeah I remember when Davis was a high end must have handcuff. Suprised he's only 25. This could have some potential. Some of those kickoff returns ... man and good size too.

 
Eddie Lacy is serviceable but by no means is he a solid running back. He is slow, looks like he is honestly not conditioned, he has no wiggle anymore, and is just a plodder.

I think Davis will be an improvement if you ask me....and could keep the job if he has a few solid outings back to back. He is hungry......He's been wasting away in KC for awhile....so here's his chance to get another shot. I'm picking up Davis with confidence.....(if I can get him)  They didn't trade for him to sit, I'll tell you that. He has a great chance to take the job for the rest of the season.
On a bum ankle and possibly worse..he had a nice 25ish yard rin and hurdled guys at least 3 times this past week.

Davis is not an improvement over Lacy.  Reading this thread im positive very few have watched Lacy this year and are relying only in how many yards he got.

 
On a bum ankle and possibly worse..he had a nice 25ish yard rin and hurdled guys at least 3 times this past week.

Davis is not an improvement over Lacy.  Reading this thread im positive very few have watched Lacy this year and are relying only in how many yards he got.
I agree, he looked unstoppable against the Giants before the injury and actually looked decent vs the Cowboys. 5ypc on the season to boot.

 
Only McCarthy's pig-headedness was preventing that from happening. 




 
No, Lacy's fat ### gets hurt anytime they give him a lot of carries.  It's not the coaches fault he's completely out of shape and can't handle a lot of touches without his ankles being able to support his 265 lb fat body.

 
With a RB easy schedule the next few weeks, Chicago, Atlanta, Indy and Tennessee on deck there is a pretty good chance that Davis could put up some decent numbers and create a timeshare or completely take over the RB spot even when Lacy returns.  Much has been made of him needing to learn the playbook but besides the long downfield passes that GB likes to throw the offensive systems are not all that different since they are both West Coast style offenses. 

 
On a bum ankle and possibly worse..he had a nice 25ish yard rin and hurdled guys at least 3 times this past week.

Davis is not an improvement over Lacy.  Reading this thread im positive very few have watched Lacy this year and are relying only in how many yards he got.
I've watched him many times.....He is not the running back he use to be......Just because he hurdles defensive players trying to take him down low, doesn't mean he's OJ Simpson....a real slasher.....With that said....We can agree to disagree. Lacy is able to take advantage of defenses trying to stop Rodgers.....and Rodgers is stopping Rodgers right now....but they rather allow Lacy get 100 yards and a TD than let Rodgers shred them apart. It's all part of the defensive scheming against Green Bay.

Once again....He's not a bad running back.....he just isn't a stud......He's out of shape and he can't cut and wiggle to save his life. That's my only point. In today FF landscape....he's doable because so many running backs have gone down. I think Davis will be better than you think. Just my two cents. Thanks for your insight.

 
The Lacy hate in here is out of control. He's averaging 5.1 ypc this year and other than Jordy in the RZ, he seems to be the only functioning part of the offense. I know the trendy thing is to make jokes about how fat he is but the idea that he wouldn't start for another team is insane. The guy is hard to bring down and way more nimble on his feet than people think. 

Anyone who think Lacy has looked out of shape this year isn't watching games and it just parroting what the talking heads said in the offseason. NYG, Min and Jax all have really solid run defenses this year and he looked great against all of them. Yeah maybe Davis sets the world on fire, but even if he's talented and lost his job in KC for no reason, I don't think McCarthy will use him correctly or enough for it to matter.

 
I've watched him many times.....He is not the running back he use to be......Just because he hurdles defensive players trying to take him down low, doesn't mean he's OJ Simpson....a real slasher.....With that said....We can agree to disagree. Lacy is able to take advantage of defenses trying to stop Rodgers.....and Rodgers is stopping Rodgers right now....but they rather allow Lacy get 100 yards and a TD than let Rodgers shred them apart. It's all part of the defensive scheming against Green Bay.

Once again....He's not a bad running back.....he just isn't a stud......He's out of shape and he can't cut and wiggle to save his life. That's my only point. In today FF landscape....he's doable because so many running backs have gone down. I think Davis will be better than you think. Just my two cents. Thanks for your insight.
I can't believe I've become a Lacy apologist. I've never owned the dude and I feel like I've never been involved in a real discussion about him through-out his career.

No one was "letting" Lacy run on them, he was running through them. Again, I need to mention this again, going into last week he was leading all RBs in yards after contact. Bad RBs can't do that. Bad RBs get taken down by weak arm tackles like Jeremy Langford and force 1 missed tackle on 36 touches.

He's also been a much better real life than fantasy RB this year. For whatever reason, McCarthy never really fed him despite the fact that he was running for a career best 5.1ypc and again, he was running through defenders.

He was clearly valuable to the team.

Is he overweight still? Hell yeah, the dude has a gut but the shade that people are throwing on him in this thread is astounding. I find the narrative that Lacy is bad as laughable as I find the talent chasm between him and Davis.

 
Jerome Bettis always looked like a fat tub too...and was awfully effective anyway.

Anyone hating on Lacy is free to trade him to me cheap. :)

 
I can't believe I've become a Lacy apologist. I've never owned the dude and I feel like I've never been involved in a real discussion about him through-out his career.

No one was "letting" Lacy run on them, he was running through them. Again, I need to mention this again, going into last week he was leading all RBs in yards after contact. Bad RBs can't do that. Bad RBs get taken down by weak arm tackles like Jeremy Langford and force 1 missed tackle on 36 touches.

He's also been a much better real life than fantasy RB this year. For whatever reason, McCarthy never really fed him despite the fact that he was running for a career best 5.1ypc and again, he was running through defenders.

He was clearly valuable to the team.

Is he overweight still? Hell yeah, the dude has a gut but the shade that people are throwing on him in this thread is astounding. I find the narrative that Lacy is bad as laughable as I find the talent chasm between him and Davis.
Best ability is availability. From what I'm hearing he might even go on IR.

With that said....I never, ever said he isn't good.....I just said he's not the same running back he use to be.....he's not a stud, he looks out of shape, and I think he's over-rated. Speaking of fantasy football.....How many TDs does he have this season? EXACTLY! ZERO!

Such a stud.....I said this is my two cents, take it or leave it. Throw out his 100 yard game against Detroit....and he's barely averaging 50 yards a game! With no touchdowns....and in the passing game, he's sucked. What are you guys talking about? For goodness sake Jacquizz Rodgers has better numbers against the Panthers, and the dude came in off the street.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, Dodds projections just came out. In my 0.5 PPR league K. Davis is ranked #21 RB.

For some perspective:

* 19: CJ Anderson

* 20: J. Charles

* 21: K. Davis (15-64-0.4; 2-13-0.1)

* 22: J. McKinnon

* 23: T. Coleman

That's pretty damn good.

For those of us scrambling every week for the Bookers, Dixons, D. Washington's...or J. Rodgers...K. Davis for 1-2 weeks is ok.

That said, I'm also having a hard time seeing Davis just walk right in here and be productive, but what else is GB going to do?
Super surprising to see that ranking. In my 0.6 PPR, Davis ranks 57th on what I assume are the same projections (4/16/0.1 on ground, 1/7 receiving), among the likes of Carey, Dixon, and Smallwood. Top 200 forward, he's ranked 111 in RBs between Rex Burhead and Derek Watt. 

So have a hard time believing that he's that prominently ranked for you.

Things may (and probably will) change -- especially if Davis looks good in the carries he does get over the next week+. As a longer term opportunity  stash, absolutely he has value but I think he's in the same value/opportunity tier as a Dixon or Forsett. 

But if anything, this cements my opinion that he won't get lions share of carries off the bat having just stepped onto the team. We've seen this play out before with Forsett.

 
Super surprising to see that ranking. In my 0.6 PPR, Davis ranks 57th on what I assume are the same projections (4/16/0.1 on ground, 1/7 receiving), among the likes of Carey, Dixon, and Smallwood. Top 200 forward, he's ranked 111 in RBs between Rex Burhead and Derek Watt. 

So have a hard time believing that he's that prominently ranked for you.

Things may (and probably will) change -- especially if Davis looks good in the carries he does get over the next week+. As a longer term opportunity  stash, absolutely he has value but I think he's in the same value/opportunity tier as a Dixon or Forsett. 

But if anything, this cements my opinion that he won't get lions share of carries off the bat having just stepped onto the team. We've seen this play out before with Forsett.
Idk.  Detroit was a totally different situation.  DT had 3 RB **edit** 2 RB (Washington and Zenner) on their active roster even before bringing in a 31 yr. old Forsett.  GB doesn't have this luxury (no other RB on their active roster).  GB is going to have to activate a practice squad RB to even have a backup for Davis.  So, I don't see how he does not get the lion's share of the carries.  I think the question is how many carries will there be or if GB lets Rodgers throw the whole game.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
davis has a steep learning curve but I'd think we are looking at another week of ty montgomery in the backfield. Davis taking goal line/easy carries 

 
I can't believe I've become a Lacy apologist. I've never owned the dude and I feel like I've never been involved in a real discussion about him through-out his career.

No one was "letting" Lacy run on them, he was running through them. Again, I need to mention this again, going into last week he was leading all RBs in yards after contact. Bad RBs can't do that. Bad RBs get taken down by weak arm tackles like Jeremy Langford and force 1 missed tackle on 36 touches.

He's also been a much better real life than fantasy RB this year. For whatever reason, McCarthy never really fed him despite the fact that he was running for a career best 5.1ypc and again, he was running through defenders.

He was clearly valuable to the team.

Is he overweight still? Hell yeah, the dude has a gut but the shade that people are throwing on him in this thread is astounding. I find the narrative that Lacy is bad as laughable as I find the talent chasm between him and Davis.
I watched Lacy play a few times this season.  The yards were not there but he was running well.  GB should have fed the ball to Lacy and instead was trying to fix their broken passing game on the fly. 

I am desperate for RB help and will try to snag Davis as well just because he is going to get touches.  I am not sure how Davis is going to do but he is worth a shot. 

 
He's averaging over 5 yards per carry and seldom goes down on first contact.  He's not great but has been running hard this year...much better than last year. I'd say his lack of TDs is a sign of the Packers offense struggling in general.  He's been the Packers best player on offense, by far, of the skill position guys. 
From the Green Bay games that I've watched his lack of TDs is also a result of the Packers passing most of the time they are inside of five yards.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top