LaMont Jordan - Can he keep this up? (1 Viewer)

[ceo3west]

Jordan is playing at another level right now. Anyone think he can keep this up and have a career year? The way he looks, barring injury a top 5 or 10 finish looks realistic. I know it's early, but every year there are guys that emerge from the depths to have surprise top 10 finishes. Jordan certainly looks like a candidate. Yes, I am a Jordan owner, but I am curious about other's thoughts on this. Anyone else think this isn't a fluke? FYI, I will not be selling him high. One thing I've learned is it isn't wise to trade guys that look like they could be in for a career year.

Oh, and for those that think Rhodes will be stepping in and taking this guy's job, good luck with that.

 

[Rounders]

I hope so. My 10th round pick is looking good!

On a serious side he has had some luck against some poor defenses (DET, DEN, & CLE). I'm not sure it will continue, but I'm liking him in my lineup! Gotta ride the wave!

 

[Carter_Can_Fly]

Jordan is playing at another level right now. Anyone think he can keep this up and have a career year? The way he looks, barring injury a top 5 or 10 finish looks realistic. I know it's early, but every year there are guys that emerge from the depths to have surprise top 10 finishes. Jordan certainly looks like a candidate. Yes, I am a Jordan owner, but I am curious about other's thoughts on this. Anyone else think this isn't a fluke? FYI, I will not be selling him high. One thing I've learned is it isn't wise to trade guys that look like they could be in for a career year.Oh, and for those that think Rhodes will be stepping in and taking this guy's job, good luck with that.

I believe Jordan was always a descent starting RB in the NFL and he already proved it 2 years ago both in real and in fantasy with his top 10 finish. Last year was a disaster in Oak and nothing should be taken in context from last year.

 

[Thumper]

Jordan is playing at another level right now. Anyone think he can keep this up and have a career year? The way he looks, barring injury a top 5 or 10 finish looks realistic. I know it's early, but every year there are guys that emerge from the depths to have surprise top 10 finishes. Jordan certainly looks like a candidate. Yes, I am a Jordan owner, but I am curious about other's thoughts on this. Anyone else think this isn't a fluke? FYI, I will not be selling him high. One thing I've learned is it isn't wise to trade guys that look like they could be in for a career year.Oh, and for those that think Rhodes will be stepping in and taking this guy's job, good luck with that.

I believe Jordan was always a descent starting RB in the NFL and he already proved it 2 years ago both in real and in fantasy with his top 10 finish. Last year was a disaster in Oak and nothing should be taken in context from last year.

Lamont Jordan is a quality back who was in a very bad situation in 2006.

 

[Dt's Mules]

i think he will be serviceable this year and probably wind up around rb18 when all is said and done. His value won't get any higher as he has played a relatively weak schedule thus far. That being said, he's made the most of his scheduling opportunity.

 

[Thumper]

i think he will be serviceable this year and probably wind up around rb18 when all is said and done. His value won't get any higher as he has played a relatively weak schedule thus far. That being said, he's made the most of his scheduling opportunity.

Jordan thus far has been a solid #1 option. I think after all is said and done he will be a very solid #2 rb.

 

[CalBear]

i think he will be serviceable this year and probably wind up around rb18 when all is said and done. His value won't get any higher as he has played a relatively weak schedule thus far. That being said, he's made the most of his scheduling opportunity.

Do you have any idea what RB18 means? Last year, RB18 had less than 1400 total yards and 6 TDs. Jordan already has 471 total yards and 2 TDs. You think he'll only average 71 combined yards and only score 4 TDs in the next 13 games? Really? How many touches do you think he'll have?He won't go for 150/1 every week, but he is extremely likely to finish the year in the top 10, with top 5 potential.

 

[Chaka]

I am shocked that I am going to say this but the Raiders offensive line has looked very good, if they keep playing at a high level I seen no reason why Lamont wont make a run at a top 10 finish. The solid O-line play bodes well for the whole Raiders offense.

 

[ceo3west]

I am shocked that I am going to say this but the Raiders offensive line has looked very good, if they keep playing at a high level I seen no reason why Lamont wont make a run at a top 10 finish. The solid O-line play bodes well for the whole Raiders offense.

Agreed - the line has surprisingly looked MUCH better than last year. I hope they can keep this up.

 

[Whiplash Inc.]

They switched to a zone blocking system (like ATL and DEN), the whole running game has been better since.

I am wondering what Jordan is worth at this point.

 

[Varmint]

We have a BIG Raider fan in our league who has Adrian Peterson on his roster...

He's been beating me up for LaMont....

I'll offer LaMont for Adrian today and see what happens...

 

[sheerterror]

We have a BIG Raider fan in our league who has Adrian Peterson on his roster...He's been beating me up for LaMont....I'll offer LaMont for Adrian today and see what happens...

I'm assuming redraft? Not sure I would move Jordan for AP in a redraft at this point, especially PPR.

 

[Dt's Mules]

i think he will be serviceable this year and probably wind up around rb18 when all is said and done. His value won't get any higher as he has played a relatively weak schedule thus far. That being said, he's made the most of his scheduling opportunity.

Do you have any idea what RB18 means? Last year, RB18 had less than 1400 total yards and 6 TDs. Jordan already has 471 total yards and 2 TDs. You think he'll only average 71 combined yards and only score 4 TDs in the next 13 games? Really? How many touches do you think he'll have?He won't go for 150/1 every week, but he is extremely likely to finish the year in the top 10, with top 5 potential.

short answer yes...he has upcoming games against hou, chi, min, sd (twice), plus the return of rhodes to cut into his workloadthough he does get denver again.also, i believe russell sees the field the last half of the year which will limit his production as teams will try and force the rookie to beat them.and you'll notice I said around 18(feel very confident he doesn't crack the top 10)OP asked for opinions, i gave mine...why the incredulous tone of your post?i don't wade into the shark pool very often, but the times I have you are fairly ubiquitous with your condescending tone and general horses ### demeanor. Now sod off and please put me on ignore.

 

[ceo3west]

i think he will be serviceable this year and probably wind up around rb18 when all is said and done. His value won't get any higher as he has played a relatively weak schedule thus far. That being said, he's made the most of his scheduling opportunity.

Do you have any idea what RB18 means? Last year, RB18 had less than 1400 total yards and 6 TDs. Jordan already has 471 total yards and 2 TDs. You think he'll only average 71 combined yards and only score 4 TDs in the next 13 games? Really? How many touches do you think he'll have?He won't go for 150/1 every week, but he is extremely likely to finish the year in the top 10, with top 5 potential.

short answer yes...he has upcoming games against hou, chi, min, sd (twice), plus the return of rhodes to cut into his workloadthough he does get denver again.also, i believe russell sees the field the last half of the year which will limit his production as teams will try and force the rookie to beat them.and you'll notice I said around 18(feel very confident he doesn't crack the top 10)OP asked for opinions, i gave mine...why the incredulous tone of your post?i don't wade into the shark pool very often, but the times I have you are fairly ubiquitous with your condescending tone and general horses ### demeanor. Now sod off and please put me on ignore.

One of the SD games is week 17, most fantasy seasons are over by then. Also, Fargas got 7 carries yesterday - those will probably be Rhodes' carries when he gets back. The way Jordan is playing, no way in #### this is an RBBC. Jordan will see a minimum of 20 touches a game, with 25 more likely.

 

[Keys Myaths]

i think he will be serviceable this year and probably wind up around rb18 when all is said and done. His value won't get any higher as he has played a relatively weak schedule thus far. That being said, he's made the most of his scheduling opportunity.

LaMont has 59.1 points this year. Last year, RB18 (Fred Taylor) scored 174.8.(174.8-59.1)/13 games left=8.9 PPG.That's very, very low. PPG, that's right below where Cedric Houston scored last year at RB34.I really doubt that's happening.

 

[Dt's Mules]

i'm very open to hear reason why people think he will continue to produce at a top 10 level.

just sheer number of touches?

possible qb transition doesn't worry anyone?

or is jordan an elite back who will continue to average 5.1 ypc even when his competition improves?

i left out the gb run defense as well.

 

[ceo3west]

i'm very open to hear reason why people think he will continue to produce at a top 10 level.just sheer number of touches?possible qb transition doesn't worry anyone?or is jordan an elite back who will continue to average 5.1 ypc even when his competition improves?i left out the gb run defense as well.

There are some difficult opponents coming up no doubt, but Jordan has proven he produces at a high level when healthy. Barring injury, I beleive top 10 is a lock IMO.

 

[Chaka]

i'm very open to hear reason why people think he will continue to produce at a top 10 level.just sheer number of touches?possible qb transition doesn't worry anyone?or is jordan an elite back who will continue to average 5.1 ypc even when his competition improves?i left out the gb run defense as well.

How about the simple issue of speculation vs. reality. You are speculating on things that simply may not be true when they happen. You point out Hou, Chi, Min & SD as being tough opponents, who knows how tough they will be by the time they face the Raiders? And the inclusion of Houston on that list is still laughable, despite how well they have played this year. Besides facing a tough defense does not necessarily indicate you will have a bad game, just ask Marion Barber.You speculate Rhodes will vulture touches. You speculate that Jamarcus despite missing ALL of training camp will play the last half of the year. First of all I doubt he will be ready before week 12 but since we are speculating, what if the raiders are 8-4? 7-5, 6-6 or even 5-7? Do you put the rookie in then? I doubt it.It's all guess work but the simple reality is that Lamont is second in the NFL in rushing and second in the NFL in total yards and has two scores in three games. He has great hands and is a legitimate every down back.There is also the reality that most people still doubt Lamont and the Raiders so if you try to trade him you won't get value in return that is equivalent to his production.Stick with reality.

 

[Misterdonut]

I'm planning on trading Lamont for Tory Holt after this weeks games. I've got Jordon, Portis, W. Parker, M. Lynch, and Chris Brown from Ten. So yes, I'm pretty f'ing loaded at running back (start 2). Somebody tell me I'm crazy to make that trade, Jordon will have a career year & that you read that Holt's knees are going to explode. Otherwise, I have to make the trade.

 

[fred_1_15301]

I'm planning on trading Lamont for Tory Holt after this weeks games. I've got Jordon, Portis, W. Parker, M. Lynch, and Chris Brown from Ten. So yes, I'm pretty f'ing loaded at running back (start 2). Somebody tell me I'm crazy to make that trade, Jordon will have a career year & that you read that Holt's knees are going to explode. Otherwise, I have to make the trade.

Probably shouldn't respond to this in this forum but I would not make that trade. Who are your current wrs? You know the situation in St. Louis right now so not sure why you would trade a stud rb for Holt at this point. If anything, I'd trade Lynch for a solid # 2 wr.

 

[gman8343]

I do not think he can keep up this pace. He's currently the #2 RB in a couple of my ppr leagues. I highly doubt he stays in the top 5, and wouldn't be shocked if he drops down to about the 10-12 range. Still, he should at the very least be a good #2 with #1 potential. So yes, I think he has a drop-off, though he'll still be a solid fantasy RB. I'm not afraid of Rhodes, but just think the running game will regress a bit down the stretch.

I have him in one league and there's no point in trading him because savvy owners do not think he'll keep it up either, so the value isn't there. Maybe in a few weeks if he keeps it up, but by then who'd want to trade him if he's that good?

 

[massraider]

This pace? No.

he could drop off this pace significantly, and still be a top 10 guy. 100 yds and a TD? Yeah, I think we can expect a drop off.

But he's gonna get his looks. Coach Kiffin is playing ball control, even in the passing game. Lamont should get a lot of touches all year. Even when Rhodes comes back, he should get the majority.

And this is coming from a Raiders fan that hated Lamont, and told anyone who would listen that he was worthless this summer.

 

[Rounders]

Right now my plan with Jordan is to hope that we get one more good week out of him and then it's on the trading block he goes.

After their bye, he will have Rhodes taking a few touches, but more importantly his SOS is not good:

6 - 16.2 @ SD

7 - 16.1 vs KC

8 - 15.1 @ Ten

9 - 15.1 vs Hou

10 - 17.8 vs Chi

11 - 14.6 @ Min

12 - 16.1 @ KC

13 - 17.3 vs Den

I'm thinking that I may be able to package him and a WR for another RB. My early thoughts have been to target the teams that are 1-3, 0-4, and grab their stud in return. Those teams right now have LJ, Gore, Peterson, LT.

Who knows it's a worth a shot, right?

 

[North]

You all need to remember three things.

1. His back is bothering him.

2. Rhodes is coming back.

3. And this is the biggest, they have played 3 teams with poor rushing defenses. The Raiders schedule will get more difficult, they will continue to lose games and eventually they will start their rookie QB because, well because thats just the way Al Davis is. He spent a lot of money and he is going to want to see what the kid can do, the season will be lost anyway.

So, in summary they will have a rookie QB in there against tougher D's. These D's will be playing to stop the run to make Russell beat them and not the running game AND Rhodes will be back AND Jordan is already having back problems. What I'm getting at here is sell high if you can because this will NOT last.

 

[Duke1948]

They switched to a zone blocking system (like ATL and DEN), the whole running game has been better since.I am wondering what Jordan is worth at this point.

very suprised we haven't had a "is Lamont Jordan a sell high candidate" or maybe we already have......i get so tied of those threads. in response to the question, i think barring injury he is almost a lock for at least top 10, the line has looked exceptional.

 

[murzman]

Some of points have already been said, but here is my take on it:

1. Jordan will NOT keep this pace up.

- he is on pace for 1867 yds rushing, 59 for 592 receiving and 11 TDs. That would likely be top 3 production - no way he keeps up to finish with those numbers

- That being said, it shouldn't be a stretch why he shouldn't finish as a top RB2 or weaker RB1.

2. Jordan still has that stigma of being a bust on a woeful team, thus his trade value isn't where it rightfully should be.

- no one values him enough or has enough confidence in him to make a trade worth it. If he should finish as a top RB2 or weaker RB2, he would be equivalent to a mid-late 2nd round pick in most draft formats. That would be similar to the top ranked WRs like Owens, CJ, Harrison etc. How many of you could get one of these guys for Jordan right now??? I know I couldn't in either of the leagues I own him in

3. Be happy if you have Jordan, don't just see him as trade bait.

- I will gladly take top 15 RB production from a mid round pick. If you took Jordan as your 3rd RB, then count yourself lucky to have RB depth without wasting high picks in the draft.

- or, if you are confident in Jordan as your starter the rest of the year, trade one of your other 2 RBs that you drafted to be your starters at the start of the season. They would likely command more right now in the trade market

- so.... if you own him, keep him! If you don't own him, assume that the owner won't be getting any decent offers from othersso maybe you can get him on the cheap.

4. Jordan has some value in dynasty/keeper leagues.

- Jordan presents value in keeper formats if you acquired him just this past offseason. That is, value in the sense that he cost you close to nothing to acquire him

- considering the Raiders drafted Michael Bush this past year and if Jordan finishes with 1500-2000 total yards this year, there would be no reason why they would bring in another RB for next year.

- this would definitely give Jordan value for 2008 with 2009 being a bonus

 

[Fantaholic]

These are the decisions that separate the men from the boys year in and year out. The early to mid-season moves. To trade or not to trade. To buy high, buy low, sell high, etc.

Lamont Jordan, LT2, Larry Johnson among several others are either over-producing or severely under-producing and owners are vulnerable. The shark move in my opinion is to package Jordan in a deal to get guys like LT2 or Johnson down the stretch. Assuming that you beleiev Jordan is an overachiever thus far. I think when you factor in the schedule, Rhodes, and the inevitable move to Jamarcus that Jordan represents a moderate sell high at this point. A frustrated LJ owner may very well be willing to trade straight up, while not likely, you never know.

 

[murzman]

These are the decisions that separate the men from the boys year in and year out. The early to mid-season moves. To trade or not to trade. To buy high, buy low, sell high, etc.

Lamont Jordan, LT2, Larry Johnson among several others are either over-producing or severely under-producing and owners are vulnerable. The shark move in my opinion is to package Jordan in a deal to get guys like LT2 or Johnson down the stretch. Assuming that you beleiev Jordan is an overachiever thus far. I think when you factor in the schedule, Rhodes, and the inevitable move to Jamarcus that Jordan represents a moderate sell high at this point. A frustrated LJ owner may very well be willing to trade straight up, while not likely, you never know.

Anyone have any trades involving Jordan in their leagues thus far? Who did he fetch? In spite of what Jordan may really be worth, I am highly skeptical that anyone could get a top 10 RB (pre-season rankings) for him straight up or even a top 5 RB in a package.

 

[CalBear]

i'm very open to hear reason why people think he will continue to produce at a top 10 level.just sheer number of touches?possible qb transition doesn't worry anyone?or is jordan an elite back who will continue to average 5.1 ypc even when his competition improves?i left out the gb run defense as well.

Jordan probably won't continue to produce at the elite level he has in the first three weeks. But clearly he can produce in the Oakland zone blocking scheme. He's averaging 27 touches per game right now; let's be conservative and say that drops to 20 for the rest of the season. And let's say his 5.1 ypc and 11.0 ypr drops to his career averages of 4.3 and 8.3. That would leave him at the end of the season with something like 1700 total yards. Give him 5 more TDs in 13 games and you're still looking at top-10 RB numbers.And that's with some very conservative assumptions.

 

[Ghoti]

Anyone have any trades involving Jordan in their leagues thus far? Who did he fetch? In spite of what Jordan may really be worth, I am highly skeptical that anyone could get a top 10 RB (pre-season rankings) for him straight up or even a top 5 RB in a package.

I was just offered Laurence Maroney for him straight up. A couple weeks ago an offer like this was insane. Now you can actually make good points for either side.

 

[bonesman]

You all need to remember three things.

1. His back is bothering him.

2. Rhodes is coming back.

3. And this is the biggest, they have played 3 teams with poor rushing defenses. The Raiders schedule will get more difficult, they will continue to lose games and eventually they will start their rookie QB because, well because thats just the way Al Davis is. He spent a lot of money and he is going to want to see what the kid can do, the season will be lost anyway.

Isn't that a "chronic" back problem that has been bothering him on and off, forcing him to miss games, for the last couple of years?

 

[Whiplash Inc.]

i'm very open to hear reason why people think he will continue to produce at a top 10 level.just sheer number of touches?possible qb transition doesn't worry anyone?or is jordan an elite back who will continue to average 5.1 ypc even when his competition improves?i left out the gb run defense as well.

Jordan probably won't continue to produce at the elite level he has in the first three weeks. But clearly he can produce in the Oakland zone blocking scheme. He's averaging 27 touches per game right now; let's be conservative and say that drops to 20 for the rest of the season. And let's say his 5.1 ypc and 11.0 ypr drops to his career averages of 4.3 and 8.3. That would leave him at the end of the season with something like 1700 total yards. Give him 5 more TDs in 13 games and you're still looking at top-10 RB numbers.And that's with some very conservative assumptions.

Maybe people are overanalyzing this situation.Jordan and the Raiders rushing game as a whole is performing better than it has in recent years. Obviously, a part of their succes can be attributed to the new offensive philosophy and the new zone blocking scheme implemented by new OL coach Tom Cable. It's a fact that Jordan put up great numbers while being the #1 RB in an offense that was decent in 2005. It's also a fact that he was a huge bust last year in an offense that was, well, horrendous.Kiffin's offense is clearly built around the running game and it's been pretty succesful so far. I believe Rhodes will get some carries, but I envision him getting most, if not all of Fargas' carries and then maybe a little bit more to spell Jordan. I absolutely don't foresee a timeshare (barring injuries).So, let's take some carries away from him in games, that still leaves around 20 carries a game for Jordan. Just like CalBears mentioned, that would still give him top 10 numbers, which I firmly believe is the correct projection at this point.I don't expect LT like numbers, but just like the whole Portis offseason saga, people tend to overanalyze this situation way too much, and are too negative about the whole thing, when really, things aren't as bad as people perceive them to be (as was the case with Portis).

 

[pwtrash]

I've watched all the preseason and regular season Raiders games so far (I'm a Jordan owner), and have been very impressed with his quickness and power, as well as how central he is to the Raiders' game plan overall. If he doesn't produce, they don't have much of a team, Curry notwithstanding.

That said, Sunday was very disconcerting. He had a good game, but he seemed to be hurting pretty badly after every play, taking himself out very frequently. At times it felt like the coaches wanted him to be in the game more than he did. Unless he gets healthy soon, it's difficult to see him sustaining this workload, I still think he is capable of producing against tough defenses - he's that good - but I think his touches will go down once Rhodes gets in, since Rhodes is a more viable option than Fargas. The way it looked Sunday, I think Jordan may be looking forward to that. I still think he's usually a 100-yard per game guy, but not 150, and probably not scoring any more than he is right now.

Maybe I misread what was going on, but he did not look like he was healthy at all.

 

[Texican]

 

[Chaka]

Maybe I misread what was going on, but he did not look like he was healthy at all.

29-121-1 rushing + 2-32 receiving.Looks pretty healthy to me.

 

[Stockwell]

I just traded Braylon Edwards for LaMont. Felt good about it but don't expect LaMont to end up top 5. Top 10 and I'll be VERY happy. Seemed like Edwards and Jordan have simillar tough stretches coming up potentially with rookie QBs. FWIW....

My Team Now 2rb/3wr start

Rivers

Farve(I know same byes & I'm working on it)

SJax

Lamont

AP (Min)

Chester Taylor

Caddy

CJ

TO

A Johnson

S McDonald

D Bowe

Witten

J Reed

Chi

 

[Dt's Mules]

after reading this thread, i'm only sure of one thing: I'm completely unsure about this guy from here on out. Good points on both sides, but I think when he goes up against a good defense, we will all have a clearer picture

 

[Texican]

I was actually thinking about making a trade for him (Bush package deal) with the Deuce owner. Now I am unsure after reading all of this. I think he is definitely performing higher than what his average will be, but how much?

 

[Banger]

nope he's clearly at his peak and you should package him up for an upgrade.

 

[satch]

after reading this thread, i'm only sure of one thing: I'm completely unsure about this guy from here on out. Good points on both sides, but I think when he goes up against a good defense, we will all have a clearer picture

How do you figure? If he goes up against a good defense his numbers would likely and justifiably decline. What would that really clear up?

 

[Leeroy Jenkins]

How is OAK using Fargas this season? I see he has been getting some carries.

 

[bonesman]

Maybe I misread what was going on, but he did not look like he was healthy at all.

29-121-1 rushing + 2-32 receiving.Looks pretty healthy to me.

anything under 200 total yards from an all-purpose back going against the Browns is mediocre.

 

[Big Score]

after reading this thread, i'm only sure of one thing: I'm completely unsure about this guy from here on out. Good points on both sides, but I think when he goes up against a good defense, we will all have a clearer picture

How do you figure? If he goes up against a good defense his numbers would likely and justifiably decline. What would that really clear up?

It would be by how much his numbers decline in comparison to what other RB's have done against a solid Defense.Example...Back A goes against Minny Run D & gets 60yds (back A is a pretty good back)Back B goes against Minny Run D & gets 55yds (back B is a pretty good back)Back C goes against Minny Run D & gets 20yds (back C is an average to poor back)Lamont goes against Minny Run D & gets 57ydsClearly Lamont getting only 57yds is a significant decline from his current numbers, but once you compare him to what other backs have done against the same strong run D, it can tell you if he's been getting false numbers against soft D's, or if his numbers have been legit.Reading a RB that way, that I'm not 100% sure about, has worked for me in the past.

 

[Chaka]

One thing that I do find distressing about Jordan is his receiving opportunities. He had a whopping 10 targets in week one and has had a total of 3 in the last two games combined.

That seems odd.

 

[rascal]

I am shocked that I am going to say this but the Raiders offensive line has looked very good, if they keep playing at a high level I seen no reason why Lamont wont make a run at a top 10 finish. The solid O-line play bodes well for the whole Raiders offense.

I said on numerous threads that the Raiders o-line was very underrated but they continued to be ranked dead last or close to it.They made some solid moves during the offseason, and canning Shell and changing the game plan was the best move they made.

 

[thehornet]

after reading this thread, i'm only sure of one thing: I'm completely unsure about this guy from here on out. Good points on both sides, but I think when he goes up against a good defense, we will all have a clearer picture

How do you figure? If he goes up against a good defense his numbers would likely and justifiably decline. What would that really clear up?

since he hasn't seen a great D yet we can't assume Jordan will tank. He has always been a decent back who runs for power. So the Dtmules is correct that we will have a clearer picture when he takes on a better D.

 

[Chaka]

I am shocked that I am going to say this but the Raiders offensive line has looked very good, if they keep playing at a high level I seen no reason why Lamont wont make a run at a top 10 finish. The solid O-line play bodes well for the whole Raiders offense.

I said on numerous threads that the Raiders o-line was very underrated but they continued to be ranked dead last or close to it.They made some solid moves during the offseason, and canning Shell and changing the game plan was the best move they made.

To be fair, they earned their bottom ranking over the past few seasons.

 

[Liquid Tension]

i'm very open to hear reason why people think he will continue to produce at a top 10 level.just sheer number of touches?possible qb transition doesn't worry anyone?or is jordan an elite back who will continue to average 5.1 ypc even when his competition improves?i left out the gb run defense as well.

Jordan probably won't continue to produce at the elite level he has in the first three weeks. But clearly he can produce in the Oakland zone blocking scheme. He's averaging 27 touches per game right now; let's be conservative and say that drops to 20 for the rest of the season. And let's say his 5.1 ypc and 11.0 ypr drops to his career averages of 4.3 and 8.3. That would leave him at the end of the season with something like 1700 total yards. Give him 5 more TDs in 13 games and you're still looking at top-10 RB numbers.And that's with some very conservative assumptions.

I don't see how anyone can say that these numbers above are anything but reasonably conservative numbers the rest of the way. Top 10 is likely if he stays healthy, but that is saying that he may not produce at a top 10 RB the rest of the way (that question/answer is how you become winners or losers)

 

[kensat30]

It's only a matter of time before Russell suits up. And then everything goes down the toilet. Not even mentioning Rhodes is SURE to get playing time when he comes back.

I'd look at Lamont as a midrange RB#2, not a RB#1 like people are suggesting. Value now versus value going forward are two very different things.

 

[thehornet]

It's only a matter of time before Russell suits up. And then everything goes down the toilet. Not even mentioning Rhodes is SURE to get playing time when he comes back.I'd look at Lamont as a midrange RB#2, not a RB#1 like people are suggesting. Value now versus value going forward are two very different things.

I am one to think Lamont's productivity will fall off starting after this week....Not to interject with my own league (because i know you guys dont care) but i just traded Lamont for Reggie Wayne and I am completely stoked to have this trade completed. I like Jordan but his schedule and back issues raise some concerning flags. To go along with his age (on the verge of 30) and Rhodes coming back, I thought it was a wise trade. Now, I am not sure his trade value is this high because I think I got a little lucky with an owner in need of a RB, but it is a point of interest to some people on what value Lamont is returning.