YUP!!! and believe it or not he's taken in all 4 leagues I'm in.With R Brown out does this guy look to take the bulk of the load and perhaps be a top 10 rb in the second half of the season.. He sure has looked good when given the oppurtunity.....
I agree a Lemon-Chatman combo isn't overly impressive from an NFL standpoint, but from a fantasy standpoint, some RB has to get those touches. Over the past 5 games, Miami RBs had 146 touches - more than 29 per game. Who will get those touches?Booker, who was inactive this week and has 0 touches on the season? Why would he go from inactive to having a significant role?Rush Yards Y/Game avg TD
2004 San Diego 15 65 392 26.1 6 3
2007 Miami 7 20 117 16.7 5.9 1
Career 48 99 545 11. 5.5 4
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6189/c...WK9aZVxQ6z.uLYF
This guy is supposed to take over R. Browns job, how do you account for not playing for 2 years, If anything Lorenzo Booker benefits or the passing game does Jesse Chatman come on... Lemon Chatman combo.. Dolphins may not win a game this year
I just have a hard time seeing Booker going from 0 touches on the season and inactive last week (and previous weeks?) to having a signficant role like being the main pass catching RB. I think it would be progress just for him to see a live snap.Ronnie's caught 39 of 46 targets as well. Who do you think will benefit the most in this facet of the game? Preseason stats are quite skewed as everyone knows and Chatman only had 7 catches (5 in one game) IIRC. Is he the answer there as well? Does Booker come in on third down to fill that role? Maybe Ricky answers all those questions if he returns to previous form. I don't know.
While I agree with your assessment (basically), many are looking at Chatman OVER another slug they are currently rostering. Be it a Stecker, Faulk (Or any NE RB?), Leonard, GB RB's or Leon Washington. Given injuries and byes, Chatman appears to at least offer a glimmer of hope vs. the guy they currently have. As far as the same numbers, in this case not a chance, therefore I picked him up.Problem people have with their analysis of backup RBs....they are not as good as the 1st string. They can and won't put up the same numbers....sure there are cases where a backup is pretty good, but Chatman is just a slug....
At that size I think he'll get injured pretty quick!Chatman owners are probably hoping he picks up where Ronnie left off. That's doubtful. Let's not forget that Chatman was running against a Pats defense that had mentally boarded the plane by the time he saw action. At 5'8"-123 lbs, (think Maurice Jones-Drew. Or Frodo) let's wait and see how the carries shake out between Chatman and Patrick Cobbs before we go counting on production. That being said I certainly scooped him up.
Man, The Chatman owners come out! I am a Chatman owner and I am nowhere near excited about him. He played earlier in year and he was very, very, average. He took advantage of an unmotivated 2nd string PATS D on Sunday. If you are expecting Ronnie B numbers, forget it. He will not rush for much, but could be valuable catching the ball out of backfield. you rest assured that they will get a look at Booker and anyone else. It will not be a one man show. They are 0-7 and are rebuilding, they will determine what they have.I'm not exactly sure why, but I think Chatman may be the biggest WW pickup of the year. I know there have been a lot of people with love for Ronnie Brown, but I never saw it when he was on the field in the NFL. He just looked average to me. This year, the O-line was supposed to be worse and there was little to no supporting cast and all of a sudden Brown explodes? I may be way off, but I think Cam Cameron had a MAJOR impact in his new-found success. This sounds weird saying it, but I think this was more a product of the Miami system. I think Chatman may be very successful and worth the gamble.
Of course that's a typo, but the 223 lb Chatman has actually lost a lot of weight in the past couple years. Wasn't he like 270 lbs when he was with the Chargers?At that size I think he'll get injured pretty quick!Chatman owners are probably hoping he picks up where Ronnie left off. That's doubtful. Let's not forget that Chatman was running against a Pats defense that had mentally boarded the plane by the time he saw action. At 5'8"-123 lbs, (think Maurice Jones-Drew. Or Frodo) let's wait and see how the carries shake out between Chatman and Patrick Cobbs before we go counting on production. That being said I certainly scooped him up.
This is what I see as well. If they liked what they saw in Booker as a back, why the talk of him playing slot receiver?I just have a hard time seeing Booker going from 0 touches on the season and inactive last week (and previous weeks?) to having a signficant role like being the main pass catching RB. I think it would be progress just for him to see a live snap.Ronnie's caught 39 of 46 targets as well. Who do you think will benefit the most in this facet of the game? Preseason stats are quite skewed as everyone knows and Chatman only had 7 catches (5 in one game) IIRC. Is he the answer there as well? Does Booker come in on third down to fill that role? Maybe Ricky answers all those questions if he returns to previous form. I don't know.
No, I don't own him in a single league. I haven't been very excited about any WW pickups so far this year. This one has peaked my interest considerably.Man, The Chatman owners come out! I am a Chatman owner and I am nowhere near excited about him. He played earlier in year and he was very, very, average. He took advantage of an unmotivated 2nd string PATS D on Sunday. If you are expecting Ronnie B numbers, forget it. He will not rush for much, but could be valuable catching the ball out of backfield. you rest assured that they will get a look at Booker and anyone else. It will not be a one man show. They are 0-7 and are rebuilding, they will determine what they have.I'm not exactly sure why, but I think Chatman may be the biggest WW pickup of the year. I know there have been a lot of people with love for Ronnie Brown, but I never saw it when he was on the field in the NFL. He just looked average to me. This year, the O-line was supposed to be worse and there was little to no supporting cast and all of a sudden Brown explodes? I may be way off, but I think Cam Cameron had a MAJOR impact in his new-found success. This sounds weird saying it, but I think this was more a product of the Miami system. I think Chatman may be very successful and worth the gamble.
But he'll beat the snot out of Maskutney or Matt Suhey or... wait, what's his ID? Oh yeah, matuski!At that size I think he'll get injured pretty quick!Chatman owners are probably hoping he picks up where Ronnie left off. That's doubtful. Let's not forget that Chatman was running against a Pats defense that had mentally boarded the plane by the time he saw action. At 5'8"-123 lbs, (think Maurice Jones-Drew. Or Frodo) let's wait and see how the carries shake out between Chatman and Patrick Cobbs before we go counting on production. That being said I certainly scooped him up.
As high as 280! -- http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2007/09/26/...lost-60-pounds/The official stats from 2004 had Chatman listed favorably at around 245, but he got cut because he couldn't meet playing weight. He's more talented than most folks realize and it appears he finally got the discipline to stay at a good playing weight -- kudos to Jesse. He doesn't have breakaway speed (or at least didn't at 245+) and he's 28 already, so Chatman likely isn't a long-term solution for any team, but the Dolphins shouldn't miss a beat and he'll be a great WW pickup.Of course that's a typo, but the 223 lb Chatman has actually lost a lot of weight in the past couple years. Wasn't he like 270 lbs when he was with the Chargers?
I have a feeling Chatman could put up similar numbers to recent fill-in RBs like Ladell Betts or Samkon Gado (except maybe not as many carries/yards). Cameron seems to like him and I don't see Booker or Cobbs as much of a threat.
I think that Gado (2005) and Ron Dayne (2006) are fair upside comparisons.Downside comparison? Hmm .... Maurice Morris (2006)?Samkon Gado?
I have to agree with this, he has the trust of his coach and is in the shape of his life. Should be interesting.As high as 280! -- http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2007/09/26/...lost-60-pounds/The official stats from 2004 had Chatman listed favorably at around 245, but he got cut because he couldn't meet playing weight. He's more talented than most folks realize and it appears he finally got the discipline to stay at a good playing weight -- kudos to Jesse. He doesn't have breakaway speed (or at least didn't at 245+) and he's 28 already, so Chatman likely isn't a long-term solution for any team, but the Dolphins shouldn't miss a beat and he'll be a great WW pickup.Of course that's a typo, but the 223 lb Chatman has actually lost a lot of weight in the past couple years. Wasn't he like 270 lbs when he was with the Chargers?
That's a relief. I was afraid the Dolphins were gonna win a game.As high as 280! -- http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2007/09/26/...lost-60-pounds/The official stats from 2004 had Chatman listed favorably at around 245, but he got cut because he couldn't meet playing weight. He's more talented than most folks realize and it appears he finally got the discipline to stay at a good playing weight -- kudos to Jesse. He doesn't have breakaway speed (or at least didn't at 245+) and he's 28 already, so Chatman likely isn't a long-term solution for any team, but the Dolphins shouldn't miss a beat and he'll be a great WW pickup.Of course that's a typo, but the 223 lb Chatman has actually lost a lot of weight in the past couple years. Wasn't he like 270 lbs when he was with the Chargers?