Zow
Footballguy
Let's start some discussions on draft strategy for this years playoffs leagues. For those unfamiliar, generally leagues are limited to a few teams (4-10) and you win by accruing the most points with all your guys by the end of the playoff season with the league winner being the one with the most points. Ill toss out my league's rules as an example: 19 round draft, must roster at least 2 QBS, 1 WR, 1WR, 2 TE, 2 K, 2 DST before drafting other positions - remaining RBs, TEs, WRs with traditional fantasy scoring rules.
For a list of player rankings, Sigmund Bloom did a nice breakdown in his subscriber section. That said, general player strategy is to draft both the best guys and guys that will be able to play in the most games. For example then, I believe Peterson is the best player but may not even rank in the top ten because guys like Brady, Ridley, Moreno, etc. will play more games. My strategy here is usually to try to target 1st round teams with a good chance to play 2 or more games. My choices under this strategy for this year are to grab teams from each conference who I think could make it far - my choices being Green Bay and Houston (who, not coincidentally, have some great fantasy performers on their teams. Accordingly, Rodgers is my top choice with Foster listed as my first RB off the board.
That said, I want to talk about two accepted but competing strategies: cornering the market v. diversification. Regarding the former, the general idea there is to draft guys from multiple positions from the same team(s) you think will go the farthest. This is the strategy Bloom recommends and the move there is to tailor your draft to match players in round: e.g. 1st round Brady, 2nd round Ridley, 3rd round Hernandez and so forth. If you can't completely corner teams then you take guys from just a couple teams: so go Foster. AJ, Wilson, Tate, Seatte D, etc.
However, the natural cut against that is (while I agree the above strategy gives you the best chance to win) you are effectively doing two things: 1) overvaluing certain players and 2) banking hard on teams to advance. Accordingly, it may be a more conservative strategy to try to diversify and simply take the "best" available guy at each pick regardless of how they match up to the rest of your lineup. Here, you could start with a draft like Rodgers, Foster, Peterson, Crabtree and have a ton of pure point guarantee.
Thoughts?
For a list of player rankings, Sigmund Bloom did a nice breakdown in his subscriber section. That said, general player strategy is to draft both the best guys and guys that will be able to play in the most games. For example then, I believe Peterson is the best player but may not even rank in the top ten because guys like Brady, Ridley, Moreno, etc. will play more games. My strategy here is usually to try to target 1st round teams with a good chance to play 2 or more games. My choices under this strategy for this year are to grab teams from each conference who I think could make it far - my choices being Green Bay and Houston (who, not coincidentally, have some great fantasy performers on their teams. Accordingly, Rodgers is my top choice with Foster listed as my first RB off the board.
That said, I want to talk about two accepted but competing strategies: cornering the market v. diversification. Regarding the former, the general idea there is to draft guys from multiple positions from the same team(s) you think will go the farthest. This is the strategy Bloom recommends and the move there is to tailor your draft to match players in round: e.g. 1st round Brady, 2nd round Ridley, 3rd round Hernandez and so forth. If you can't completely corner teams then you take guys from just a couple teams: so go Foster. AJ, Wilson, Tate, Seatte D, etc.
However, the natural cut against that is (while I agree the above strategy gives you the best chance to win) you are effectively doing two things: 1) overvaluing certain players and 2) banking hard on teams to advance. Accordingly, it may be a more conservative strategy to try to diversify and simply take the "best" available guy at each pick regardless of how they match up to the rest of your lineup. Here, you could start with a draft like Rodgers, Foster, Peterson, Crabtree and have a ton of pure point guarantee.
Thoughts?