bulger2holt
Footballguy
Let's hear them. Could be very helpful to some of us guppies
Agreed with your likes. Curious to hear why you dislike the above bolded, especially Gordon and Britt. Both are in my 'do draft list' considering their upside and relatively low ADPs.my top 5 guys at current adp to take
1. Vincent Brown
2. Ronnie Hillman
3. Chris Givens
4. Fred Davis
5. Miles Austin
my top 5 avoid guys at current adp
1. Montee Ball
2. Josh Gordon
3. Vernon Davis
4; Kenny Britt
5. Randall Cobb
I do about 6-8 auctions a year, and I will usually spend more than $20 on a QB in one of them, just to see how that team does, but I generally believe in building strength at RB and WR in an auction, so most of my starter money goes to those positions. And it usually works out well for me.I know right?Do not want:
Any QB that costs more than $20
curious why you don't want Myers?Want
1. Ingram
2. Shorts
3. Vernon Davis
4. Amendola
5. Spiller
Don't
1. DMC
2. Jennings
3. Foster
4. Bradshaw
5. Myers
All the drafts I have done this year so far are rookie or 1.5 ppr for tight ends so take this with a grain of salt. He is going in the 9th round on average and guys like Tate, Ingram and others are still on the board.curious why you don't want Myers?Want
1. Ingram
2. Shorts
3. Vernon Davis
4. Amendola
5. Spiller
Don't
1. DMC
2. Jennings
3. Foster
4. Bradshaw
5. Myers
Hes already going in the early 5th in 12 team ppr mocks, and has been for a week and a half.At this rate Shane Vereen is going to go from priced right to way over priced by the end of the week....
Britt and Gordon for me are in a very large tier with 14 other guys and they are being drafted at the top of that tier while other guys I have in that same tier are being drafted 2/3 rounds later. Guys like Vincent Brown, Kendall Wright, Den. Moore, or Chris Givens.Agreed with your likes. Curious to hear why you dislike the above bolded, especially Gordon and Britt. Both are in my 'do draft list' considering their upside and relatively low ADPs.my top 5 guys at current adp to take
1. Vincent Brown
2. Ronnie Hillman
3. Chris Givens
4. Fred Davis
5. Miles Austin
my top 5 avoid guys at current adp
1. Montee Ball
2. Josh Gordon
3. Vernon Davis
4; Kenny Britt
5. Randall Cobb
Still going mid 6 in the real money drafts, I was looking at.Hes already going in the early 5th in 12 team ppr mocks, and has been for a week and a half.At this rate Shane Vereen is going to go from priced right to way over priced by the end of the week....
If the defense is the worst in the league they are going to need Brees to score early and often. Hard to stick to the run if you are playing in shootouts every weekend.5) Drew Brees: Couple the worst schedule in the NFL for a QB with one of the worst defenses in the league behind him and the fact that most camp reports are saying they are going to run a lot more than last season. I just start to see a Drew Brees that finishes outside the Top 5 this season.
What is wrong with Charles' knee?These are all based on prices I am seeing them go for in auctions...
Want:
Vereen
CJ2K
Givens
Bowe
Charles (if his knee is okay; this one is in limbo)
Do not want:
Ray Rice
Ridley
Torrey Smith (he's going cheap, and I still don't want him)
Alfred Morris (I like him a lot, but he is going for too much this year)
Any QB that costs more than $20
You are factually incorrect, aka wrong. If you remove the top two games from every top 10 RB (standard scoring) Martin finishes as RB5. Not RB7.3) Doug Martin: He's more or less the 1.02 pick on everyone's board right now. I just don't trust it, we have one year of stats to look at and it shows us that he should have finished about RB7 last season if not for two MASSIVE games where he scored over 33% of his yearly production in. If he played to his mean during those games he'd be getting drafted more around 1.05-1.07 this season and I think that's where he should be drafted.
I'll be honest I didn't go back to the post where I actually sat down and did the math for it. I was fairly certain he turned out to 6th or 7th when you removed the Top 2 games from each Top 10 RB and then gave them their season average for the other two games. As for the argument that there's no legitimate reason to remove the two best games from players when comparing them, I will disagree highly on that point. It works very well for a lot of scenarios and the 33% of his stats coming in 2 games is something that every professional writer has mentioned several times as a potential precaution. Martin holds a rather high deviation from the average of the Top 10 RBs from last season. The rest of them averaged about 23% (if memory serves) of their overall production from their Top 2 games. A 10% differential from the mean of your peers in a stat that provides a hint towards inconsistency isn't a good thing and not something that should be ignored in my opinion. He had 4 TDs in one game, even if you gave him 1 TD for that game and let him keep the yards he still finishes the season with 9 TDs instead of 12 TDs which is a rather large difference. It's pretty much the difference from him and say... Jamaal Charles.You are factually incorrect, aka wrong. If you remove the top two games from every top 10 RB (standard scoring) Martin finishes as RB5. Not RB7.3) Doug Martin: He's more or less the 1.02 pick on everyone's board right now. I just don't trust it, we have one year of stats to look at and it shows us that he should have finished about RB7 last season if not for two MASSIVE games where he scored over 33% of his yearly production in. If he played to his mean during those games he'd be getting drafted more around 1.05-1.07 this season and I think that's where he should be drafted.
As a rookie. When there's no legitimate reason to arbitrarily remove the two best games from players before comparing them, as if him winning you two matchups by himself is a bad thing. And then there's the fact that he is no longer a rookie, and has upgrades at the Guard position.
Foot. Sorry, my bad.What is wrong with Charles' knee?These are all based on prices I am seeing them go for in auctions...
Want:
Vereen
CJ2K
Givens
Bowe
Charles (if his knee is okay; this one is in limbo)
Do not want:
Ray Rice
Ridley
Torrey Smith (he's going cheap, and I still don't want him)
Alfred Morris (I like him a lot, but he is going for too much this year)
Any QB that costs more than $20
Just so I'm clear, you want to draft the Colts? I feel like I'd be rather depressed if my entire fantasy season hinged on the Colts having a Top 5 offense. Which is really what you're asking for if you're drafting all three of Ballard, Fleener and Hilton.I only play in Best Ball leagues this year so it impacts my thoughts here:
Get:
TY Hilton
Deangelo Williams
Vick Ballard
Coby Fleener
Desean Jackson
Forget:
Montee Ball
Antonio Gates
Any Raiders or Jets Starters
Mike Wallace
Jimmy Graham-someone mentioned he was good value in the 2nd or else he'd wait until the 9th rd. There is no way Graham is 7 rounds of value clear of any other TE. I like Graham, but there is still tons of TE production available later. I'd rather get my RB2 here in the 2nd rd.
I agree with almost all of your wants except Amendola. I've never thought he was much of a talent, definitely not on Welker's level. I personally see Brady's numbers decreasing this season a little bit. I do LOVE Shane Vereen though and I personally see him and not Amendola as the guy who is really going to reap the rewards of Hernandez, Welker and Gronk (? for some time) not being on the field. I'm avoiding Amendola to be honest and he kind of slipped my mind on my list. Ridley, Vereen and Thompkins are the people I want out of New England and that's it.Want:
1. Chris Givens: Givens is coming off of a strong rookie season, but the presence of Austin has caused some owners to lose sight of Givens' tremendous value. I like Givens as the WR1 for what should be a more explosive Rams' offense.
2. Shane Vereen: Vereen's ADP is quickly rising, so his value is losing some of its lustre. I have long been a fan of Vereen; he has solid skills, a workmanlike attitude, and he is a high character player. My biggest concern with Vereen is durability. In a part-time role, Vereen has shown a tendency to be dinged up.
3. LaMichael James: While Vereen has been getting more hype in recent weeks than James, I like James to have a similar ascent this season. James is an electrifying player with the ball in his hands, and with the lack of quality targets for Kaepernick, look for the Niners to find a way to get James invovled.
4. Danny Amendola: Amendola has long been compared to Welker. If he can stay healthy, look for Amendola to put up Welker-like numbers.
5. Ronnie Hillman: I usually avoid platoon RB situations, and I may regret targeting Hillman, but I am not sold on Ball, and Hillman appears to be motivated to prove he can be an every-down back; moreover, Hillman will have value even in a RBBC, especially in PPR formats.
Avoid:
1. Oft-injured players with high ADPs: I am avoiding the McFaddens, Mathews, MJD's, Murrays and even Trent Richardson, where I can get a more reliable player at that same draft spot.
2. Early Round QBs: I will allow others to grab Brees, Rodgers, Manning, Brady and company, and I will get value later.
3. Early Round TEs: Like with QBs, I will let Graham and Gronk go to someone else early, and I will double up later.
4. Punks: While I am assembling a fantasy roster, not a church choir, I prefer to avoid time-bomb players. When comparing players of relatively similar talent, give me the guy with his head on right.
5. Most Rookies: Rookie hype often far exceeds production.
Being completely serious... can you give me a legitimate reason to not dismiss Foster besides your word? To me all signs point to either a year even less than last season or possible serious injury (he's already slightly hurt) that ends his season early due to being completely over worked the past three season (see MJD).I don't really have an entire list to toss out there but I will mention that, based on where people are likelyt able to draft them, guys like
Wayne
Roddy
Mike Williams
probably warrant felony charges. As usual, all the kids are distracted by the new toys under the tree and forgetting the reliable old toys. Every time I see this happen I think of that 1960's refrigerator my grandpa has in his basement that has been running for 50 years and the 3 new ones I have worked on in the last ten years. They just don't make 'em like they used to as the old folks say.
All the dismissing of Foster. Man, there are going to be a LOT of upset people during this season. Please don't choke the boards up with all the whining about how you just can't understand the woes of your ff team because you passed on Foster. TIA.
I can give you a ton. I have actually posted in another thread or two a lot of different thoughts but in a very short rundown that you can check those threads for the detail behind it:Honestly... can you give me a legitimate reason to not dismiss Foster besides your word?I don't really have an entire list to toss out there but I will mention that, based on where people are likelyt able to draft them, guys like
Wayne
Roddy
Mike Williams
probably warrant felony charges. As usual, all the kids are distracted by the new toys under the tree and forgetting the reliable old toys. Every time I see this happen I think of that 1960's refrigerator my grandpa has in his basement that has been running for 50 years and the 3 new ones I have worked on in the last ten years. They just don't make 'em like they used to as the old folks say.
All the dismissing of Foster. Man, there are going to be a LOT of upset people during this season. Please don't choke the boards up with all the whining about how you just can't understand the woes of your ff team because you passed on Foster. TIA.
2010: 327 Carries, 1616 yards, 16 TDs | 66 Receptions, 604 yards, 2 TDs | Totals: 393 Touches, 2220 yards, 5.64 ypa, 18 TDs (STD Scoring: 330 | PPR Scoring: 396)
2011: 342 Carries, 1506 yards, 12 TDs | 65 Receptions, 759 yards, 3 TDs | Totals: 407 Touches, 2265 yards, 5.56 ypa, 15 TDs (STD Scoring: 316 | PPR Scoring: 381)
2012: 351 Carries, 1424 yards, 15 TDs | 40 Receptions, 217 yards, 2 TDs | Totals: 391 Touches, 1641 yards, 4.19 ypa, 17 TDs (STD Scoring: 266 | PPR Scoring: 306)
So what we see here is a slow decline from 2010 to 2011 and then a rather large decline in 2012. With an extraordinary amount of work for the past three seasons. Do you have any inside information on a reasoning that he won't continue this decline and score even lower this season?
You must have missed the part where I play in best ball leagues. I don't necessarily want every Colt mentioned on every team, but I am targeting them for sure. As for Graham, in best ball, I can get 2-3 TEs later who will give me similar expected production to Graham at his 1st rd cost. I can't do the reverse and get 1st rd production from later RBs that I would by taking the top RB instead of Graham there.Just so I'm clear, you want to draft the Colts? I feel like I'd be rather depressed if my entire fantasy season hinged on the Colts having a Top 5 offense. Which is really what you're asking for if you're drafting all three of Ballard, Fleener and Hilton.I only play in Best Ball leagues this year so it impacts my thoughts here:
Get:
TY Hilton
Deangelo Williams
Vick Ballard
Coby Fleener
Desean Jackson
Forget:
Montee Ball
Antonio Gates
Any Raiders or Jets Starters
Mike Wallace
Jimmy Graham-someone mentioned he was good value in the 2nd or else he'd wait until the 9th rd. There is no way Graham is 7 rounds of value clear of any other TE. I like Graham, but there is still tons of TE production available later. I'd rather get my RB2 here in the 2nd rd.
As for Graham, he'll probably finish well above the excepted value of any other TE. We're talking a situation where you could see Graham as TE1 at the end of the season with 270 Points and someone like Witten at #2 with 200 points. He is well worth the first round pick. If the Top 5 or 6 RBs are gone and Megatron is gone I don't see how you take anyone but Graham.
Okay, yeah I mean those are all things I understand. I absolutely love Foster, I've had him in 3 different leagues (2 keeper 1 redraft) since his 2010 breakout. This is the first year where I'm REALLY questioning taking him any sooner than 5th. I just feel like you have Peterson as the obvious 1.01, most people are taking Martin at 1.02. Then you hit this block of Foster, Charles, Spiller, Richardson that really makes me scratch my head as to whom to take. Before he tweaked that foot it was Charles by a mile for me but now they've all fallen in line and I'm really not sure who to take there. Foster is on a statistical decline but as you say, the most consistent RB over the past three seasons (and I'm much more of a consistency drafter early on then a risk/reward type). Charles and Spiller should be giants among men if they stay healthy and Richardson has the talent to be RB1 this season if he stays healthy and the team isn't completely awful.I can give you a ton. I have actually posted in another thread or two a lot of different thoughts but in a very short rundown that you can check those threads for the detail behind it:Honestly... can you give me a legitimate reason to not dismiss Foster besides your word?I don't really have an entire list to toss out there but I will mention that, based on where people are likelyt able to draft them, guys like
Wayne
Roddy
Mike Williams
probably warrant felony charges. As usual, all the kids are distracted by the new toys under the tree and forgetting the reliable old toys. Every time I see this happen I think of that 1960's refrigerator my grandpa has in his basement that has been running for 50 years and the 3 new ones I have worked on in the last ten years. They just don't make 'em like they used to as the old folks say.
All the dismissing of Foster. Man, there are going to be a LOT of upset people during this season. Please don't choke the boards up with all the whining about how you just can't understand the woes of your ff team because you passed on Foster. TIA.
2010: 327 Carries, 1616 yards, 16 TDs | 66 Receptions, 604 yards, 2 TDs | Totals: 393 Touches, 2220 yards, 5.64 ypa, 18 TDs (STD Scoring: 330 | PPR Scoring: 396)
2011: 342 Carries, 1506 yards, 12 TDs | 65 Receptions, 759 yards, 3 TDs | Totals: 407 Touches, 2265 yards, 5.56 ypa, 15 TDs (STD Scoring: 316 | PPR Scoring: 381)
2012: 351 Carries, 1424 yards, 15 TDs | 40 Receptions, 217 yards, 2 TDs | Totals: 391 Touches, 1641 yards, 4.19 ypa, 17 TDs (STD Scoring: 266 | PPR Scoring: 306)
So what we see here is a slow decline from 2010 to 2011 and then a rather large decline in 2012. With an extraordinary amount of work for the past three seasons. Do you have any inside information on a reasoning that he won't continue this decline and score even lower this season?
-The Line. If you watch the Texans each and every year, you see what has gone on.
-The production. Despite the theories on this stat slipped, etc, the bottom line is that he has missed a total of 3 games in three years (find me more than 2 other RBs that have been better) and he has finished no worse than top 4 despite those missed games (1, 4, and 3).
-Quality starts-Defined as 150 yards rushing OR 100+ and a TD OR at least 2 Tds in a game. Over the last three years, his quality start production is at 69%. Tops in the league. As a comp, Calvin and Peterson are at 44% or so. Go back and look at his floor.
-The team's offensive philosophy.
There is just simply no reason to manufacture a reason in your head to avoid this guy.
That I did, my sincere apologies... carry on and ignore me, lol.You must have missed the part where I play in best ball leagues.
If I can walk out of any league with two of Spiller, Charles, Bryant I'll be dancing naked singing American Pie while pouring beer on myself as I Crip Walk out of the house I'm drafting in at the time.In my auction draft next week I'd love to get 2 of these 3:
Dez Bryant
Charles
Spiller
Also like Shorts and Hilton if the value is there.
Avoid
Any Packers RB
Mike Wallace
McFadden
Monte Ball (draft in WI, so he'll draw interest)
Reggie Wayne
Yes sir, That would be a good "problem" to have if you are looking at any of those guys. When I mention these things, I'm not trying to sound like Foster's agent or anything. I am speaking more from general terms of people saying "avoid", as if they are truly saying to not take this guy in the first or something.Okay, yeah I mean those are all things I understand. I absolutely love Foster, I've had him in 3 different leagues (2 keeper 1 redraft) since his 2010 breakout. This is the first year where I'm REALLY questioning taking him any sooner than 5th. I just feel like you have Peterson as the obvious 1.01, most people are taking Martin at 1.02. Then you hit this block of Foster, Charles, Spiller, Richardson that really makes me scratch my head as to whom to take. Before he tweaked that foot it was Charles by a mile for me but now they've all fallen in line and I'm really not sure who to take there. Foster is on a statistical decline but as you say, the most consistent RB over the past three seasons (and I'm much more of a consistency drafter early on then a risk/reward type). Charles and Spiller should be giants among men if they stay healthy and Richardson has the talent to be RB1 this season if he stays healthy and the team isn't completely awful.I can give you a ton. I have actually posted in another thread or two a lot of different thoughts but in a very short rundown that you can check those threads for the detail behind it:Honestly... can you give me a legitimate reason to not dismiss Foster besides your word?I don't really have an entire list to toss out there but I will mention that, based on where people are likelyt able to draft them, guys like
Wayne
Roddy
Mike Williams
probably warrant felony charges. As usual, all the kids are distracted by the new toys under the tree and forgetting the reliable old toys. Every time I see this happen I think of that 1960's refrigerator my grandpa has in his basement that has been running for 50 years and the 3 new ones I have worked on in the last ten years. They just don't make 'em like they used to as the old folks say.
All the dismissing of Foster. Man, there are going to be a LOT of upset people during this season. Please don't choke the boards up with all the whining about how you just can't understand the woes of your ff team because you passed on Foster. TIA.
2010: 327 Carries, 1616 yards, 16 TDs | 66 Receptions, 604 yards, 2 TDs | Totals: 393 Touches, 2220 yards, 5.64 ypa, 18 TDs (STD Scoring: 330 | PPR Scoring: 396)
2011: 342 Carries, 1506 yards, 12 TDs | 65 Receptions, 759 yards, 3 TDs | Totals: 407 Touches, 2265 yards, 5.56 ypa, 15 TDs (STD Scoring: 316 | PPR Scoring: 381)
2012: 351 Carries, 1424 yards, 15 TDs | 40 Receptions, 217 yards, 2 TDs | Totals: 391 Touches, 1641 yards, 4.19 ypa, 17 TDs (STD Scoring: 266 | PPR Scoring: 306)
So what we see here is a slow decline from 2010 to 2011 and then a rather large decline in 2012. With an extraordinary amount of work for the past three seasons. Do you have any inside information on a reasoning that he won't continue this decline and score even lower this season?
-The Line. If you watch the Texans each and every year, you see what has gone on.
-The production. Despite the theories on this stat slipped, etc, the bottom line is that he has missed a total of 3 games in three years (find me more than 2 other RBs that have been better) and he has finished no worse than top 4 despite those missed games (1, 4, and 3).
-Quality starts-Defined as 150 yards rushing OR 100+ and a TD OR at least 2 Tds in a game. Over the last three years, his quality start production is at 69%. Tops in the league. As a comp, Calvin and Peterson are at 44% or so. Go back and look at his floor.
-The team's offensive philosophy.
There is just simply no reason to manufacture a reason in your head to avoid this guy.