GregR said:
I think a better question though isn't just the magnitude of LT's points, but is he outscoring his peers more than OJ outscored his. It's not as impressive if he scores 400 if the other RBs available are scoring 200, vs if OJ scored the 14 game equivalent of 400 but his peers were scoring in the 160s. And I don't know the answer to that, but that's what I'd consider the truest measure of how good of a fantasy season was it.
Tomlinson this year is averaging 17.5 VBD points per game; Simpson averaged 20.1 in 1975. However, that's not an apples-to-apples comparison, because there are more teams now; there were only 26 in 1975, which means that the baseline player as calculated by profootballreference (RB#24) was one of the weakest players in the league, whereas today he's above the bottom quartile. Adjusting the baseline for league size, if you compare OJ to RB#20 he still had 19.6 VBD points per game, which is still quite good, and somewhat better than Tomlinson this year.However, OJ only scored 4.4 points per game more than the #2 RB (Chuck Foreman), while Tomlinson is scoring 5.3 points per game more than the #2 RB (Larry Johnson). In both cases, the #2 RB is way above the #3 RB, by approximately the same amount (slightly more this year than in 1975).By any measure, Tomlinson's season so far is on par with some of the best seasons in NFL history. We'll see if he can keep it up; Larry Johnson's last 9 games of 2005 were pretty close to Tomlinson's start this year, but 9 games are not the same as 16.