If he got to 15%, they'd change it to 20%. That's what they do.I’d 100% vote for him over T or B. If only to get the 3rd party the 15% needed to get in to the national debates.
Still waiting for a decent dem candidate. LOL.LOL
Conservatives last chance for a decent candidate Cuban.
LOL
LOLStill waiting for a decent dem candidate. LOL.
Don't think Cuban really wants to do the heavy lifting necessary to run for president.urbanhack said:why hasn't he done it sooner if he just wanted to see his name in the headlines?
Cuban says he is socially a centrist and fiscally a conservative. Cuban has been critical of Trump and supported Clinton in 2016.LOL
Conservatives last chance for a decent candidate Cuban.
LOL
yeah he really went out on a limb there, picking the front runner to win the nominationFor everyone mocking Tim for his predictions just remember he was absolutely right that Biden would be thE Democratic nominee in a crowded field.
Pretty much everyone gives him crap for picking hillary ( even though he had reservations.) And how did that work out?yeah he really went out on a limb there, picking the front runner to win the nomination
It wasn’t rocket science.yeah he really went out on a limb there, picking the front runner to win the nomination
This.I’ve always believed that the basic idea of Trump could be very successful POTUS. A wealthy individual who wouldn’t be reliant on contributions by special interests because they could self-finance. A political outsider who would hire the ‘best people’ rather than career cronies.
Trump was clearly not that person.
Can you elaborate on the bolded? Which specific policies, and how have they been a huge positive for the country?This.
Trump could be very effective if he wasn't such a narcissist, combative jackhole. His anti-establishment policies have been a huge positive for this country. I only wish there were more of those policies. But no one wants to dare talk about those things because they don't want the stink of being perceived as a supporter of his. I continually get labeled a Trump supporter because it's a convenient attack. Yet I never have nor will I ever vote for him. I could care less what party our President comes from since our crappy system ensures he or she has to come from one of the two. I just want to be able to vote for people who I know aren't already bought and paid for.
A good person and a leader who isn't beholden to the special interests of either party, and doesn't have to act at the wishes of their biggest donors would make for an absolutely tremendous President.
If Trump's becoming president creates a viable 3rd party, then those of us that voted him in will go down in history as making the greatest move in US history. My objective was getting him in there to berate and hopefully destroy both parties. A 3rd party would be the next best thing. Go right own the middle and call it the common sense party. Take the best of both sides and you win.knowledge dropper said:I wish there was a viable 3rd Party. If there ever was going to be one it would need a big name to gain traction. Cuban is a big enough name, but like someone said it’s probably too late to get on all the ballots.
Combine that with our awesome "2 party system" and it's been proven nothing more than maybe a way of screwing over one of the 2 candidates. Just like two Mafia families they have each established their territories. Nobody else is getting in.Don't think Cuban really wants to do the heavy lifting necessary to run for president.
Perot didn't either.
Replace "Joe Biden" with "Hillary Clinton" and I am pretty sure you made this exact same post four years ago.timschochet said:Joe Biden will be our next President. Some of you need to get used to that.
I think this is a really tired (and wrong) argument.Tecumseh said:Let Biden stay on the top of the ticket, choose Cuban as his running mate, and vow to only serve one term. I'm frustrated that Biden has locked in to choosing a woman as his running mate as opposed to the best person for the job. A vagina (or a penis for that matter) should not be a qualification.
I can definitely see that argument, and agree to an extent, however I don't think disqualifying 48% of prospective running mates based on nothing other than their gender makes any sense. This isn't Geraldine Ferraro, and having a woman on the ticket isn't novel anymore. McCain, for some reason, wound up choosing a poorly qualified running mate in large measure (only?) because she was a woman. Stacey Abrams name has been thrown around- I sort of like her, and voted for her, but she's not qualified to be president, so is therefore not qualified to be VP. I don't want her to be chosen simply because of race and gender politics. Amy Klobuchar? Sure. But not because she is a woman, but because she is qualified (IMO).I think this is a really tired (and wrong) argument.
The office of the Vice President does not carry with it a set of objective criteria from which you can rank everyone and determine the "best" candidate. There are a group of people who are uniquely, but equally, qualified to be Vice President - in the eyes of the person making that choice.
Being a woman, in this era, is a plus when you have a male at the top of the ticket. First, and foremost, having a female perspective in a leadership role is important on all issues. Second, when you look at the coalition of voters who created the blue wave in 2018 - it was largely a result of suburban women. As a candidate for national office, finding a running mate who can tap into that energy and enthusiasm would be a top qualification for the job - as opposed to angering that group of voters.
The only real question that should be raised here - is the person qualified? After that, there is no rational argument over one person is/was "better" than another.
She is someone who is growing on me - I was not a fan when she was touted as far back as last summer. But, as I learn more about her, I am impressed.Stacey Abrams name has been thrown around- I sort of like her, and voted for her, but she's not qualified to be president, so is therefore not qualified to be VP.
She lost the gubernatorial race by a point and a half and Georgia is two more years closer to being a blue state. It may still be too early, though; one Senate seat is about the most Dems can realistically hope for. But the Atlanta metro area makes up half of the state's population and Georgia is well on its way to being a quadrennially contested state.She is someone who is growing on me - I was not a fan when she was touted as far back as last summer. But, as I learn more about her, I am impressed.
And, one thing she might bring to the table - not just a win in Georgia, but potentially bringing along 1 or 2 senators in Georgia. I know she lost the governor's race, but she has spent a lot of time since then working on voter registration and turnout. Winning a senate race in Georgia - both are up for election - could be the difference in a Dem majority in the senate, or at least 2 years of gridlock. And, both Loeffler and Perdue are ripe for the picking - if Dems can get the turnout they need.
She doesn't agree with this.roadkill1292 said:She lost the gubernatorial race by a point and a half and Georgia is two more years closer to being a blue state. It may still be too early, though; one Senate seat is about the most Dems can realistically hope for. But the Atlanta metro area makes up half of the state's population and Georgia is well on its way to being a quadrennially contested state.
Thats great, hoping NY does the same (I won't hold my breath with Cuomo)Mark Cuban
@mcuban
1m
It's wrong that the Republicans and Democrats do all they can to keep the best candidates off the ballot. They are afraid of the competition It's time Americans and not party elites got to pick who we want as candidates ! This is just the beginning. Check them out !
Quote Tweet
Center for Competitive Democracy
@voterchoice
· 4h
We won emergency relief from Illinois' ballot access requirements in federal court today -- @LPIllinois, @ILGreenParty and independents all benefit from major reductions: http://competitivedemocracy.org/358-2/
Show this thread