His consistency was his best trait this year. Could almost always rely on him for about 18 to 20 pts/week.I was looking at his stats yesterday and he probably has the least amount of variance of any player this year. His worst game for me in a PPR was 9.4 and his best was 22.8. He may not have been flashy and get those 30+ point games, but he had a pretty high floor all things considered.Yes, he's been my most consistent RB in one of my leagues: (. Usually not flashy but always a good amount of points.
Right, this week you have no idea who to trust. Next week they face Detroit, which is a really tough match-up for RBs. So realistically, you may not feel comfortable starting either of them until Championship Week.Spiller over Hightower IMO, he has a higher ceiling. But you can't use either until after the next week, unless you have donk as starters
I remember hearing back when Hightower was with the Cardinals that he was great at every single skill a RB needed ... except running the football.Put me in the Hightower camp. They don't trust spiller in pass pro so he's simply not going to be on the field enough to make an impact. Hightower is the runner who is most like Ingram.
He can run bw the tackles, pass pro, and is very good in the passing game. He was on his way to a breakout season in wasn't on before he went down. He's got a lot to prove.
He had 11 carries for 40+ yards when Ingram sat briefly during the week 12 game I believe. It was Hightower not spiller who got more play when Ingram was out. Couple that with brees' comments and if I'm a betting man all the evidence points to starting Hightower
I'm unlucky to have lost Ingram in BOTH of my leagues. But I'm very lucky that I have the #1 playoff seed in both leagues and a bye week to watch this shake out without having it affect my playoff hopes.
That said, if I had to choose one of these guys to start in week 14 I'd start Hightower.
I WISH that the Asita would commit to spiller BC in that offense if you give him 18 carries and 7-8 targets in the passing game he would probably lift up the entire league. At least until he gets hurt lol
5th in receiving yards and 4th in receptions among RBs.Synthesizer said:Ranked 14th in carries but 4th in FF scoring at the time of his injury.
He avg 4.5 yards a carry the years he was starting for the Cardinals and also had an 80 yd TD run so he wasn't that bad at runningzftcg said:I remember hearing back when Hightower was with the Cardinals that he was great at every single skill a RB needed ... except running the football.rickyg said:Put me in the Hightower camp. They don't trust spiller in pass pro so he's simply not going to be on the field enough to make an impact. Hightower is the runner who is most like Ingram.
He can run bw the tackles, pass pro, and is very good in the passing game. He was on his way to a breakout season in wasn't on before he went down. He's got a lot to prove.
He had 11 carries for 40+ yards when Ingram sat briefly during the week 12 game I believe. It was Hightower not spiller who got more play when Ingram was out. Couple that with brees' comments and if I'm a betting man all the evidence points to starting Hightower
I'm unlucky to have lost Ingram in BOTH of my leagues. But I'm very lucky that I have the #1 playoff seed in both leagues and a bye week to watch this shake out without having it affect my playoff hopes.
That said, if I had to choose one of these guys to start in week 14 I'd start Hightower.
I WISH that the Asita would commit to spiller BC in that offense if you give him 18 carries and 7-8 targets in the passing game he would probably lift up the entire league. At least until he gets hurt lol
I can swallow the trust part, but not like? Is there an article or beat writer that may have alluded to this? Or is that just pure speculation?Brees does not like or trust Spiller. Hightower is the RB to own
Yeah, I'd like to know too.I can swallow the trust part, but not like? Is there an article or beat writer that may have alluded to this? Or is that just pure speculation?Brees does not like or trust Spiller. Hightower is the RB to own
I hope this is true because spiller has rb1 potential in that offense.
"New Orleans Saints coach Sean Payton said they're trying to figure out how to get running back C.J. Spiller more involved in the offense after he had only five snaps last week"I hope this is true because spiller has rb1 potential in that offense.
I love that in Week 14, they're still "trying to get him more involved". If it hasn't happened to this point, it just isn't going to happen."New Orleans Saints coach Sean Payton said they're trying to figure out how to get running back C.J. Spiller more involved in the offense after he had only five snaps last week"I hope this is true because spiller has rb1 potential in that offense.
Usually, when a head coach has to "figure out" how to get a guy more involved, it's code for "someone in upper management wants to see him play, but I don't think he's that good".
I had Ingram on 2 teams. I picked up Hightower before I read that article. I won't start him this week, but I think Hightower will end up being the volume guy. Maybe next week he's a good play.I love that in Week 14, they're still "trying to get him more involved". If it hasn't happened to this point, it just isn't going to happen."New Orleans Saints coach Sean Payton said they're trying to figure out how to get running back C.J. Spiller more involved in the offense after he had only five snaps last week"Usually, when a head coach has to "figure out" how to get a guy more involved, it's code for "someone in upper management wants to see him play, but I don't think he's that good".I hope this is true because spiller has rb1 potential in that offense.
He says the injury in training camp put him behind and that its all about the confidence and explosion on that knee. Spiller says there isI love that in Week 14, they're still "trying to get him more involved". If it hasn't happened to this point, it just isn't going to happen."New Orleans Saints coach Sean Payton said they're trying to figure out how to get running back C.J. Spiller more involved in the offense after he had only five snaps last week"I hope this is true because spiller has rb1 potential in that offense.
Usually, when a head coach has to "figure out" how to get a guy more involved, it's code for "someone in upper management wants to see him play, but I don't think he's that good".
I loved it to the tune of a week16 win! Thanks for being worthless C.J. Spiller. Hightower owners thank you.Gotta love how Hightower gets 28 carries as Ingrams replacement. More than double Ingrams average.
Spiller will be gone, and it has zero effect on Ingram. Hightower probably won't make a roster next year.I loved it to the tune of a week16 win! Thanks for being worthless C.J. Spiller. Hightower owners thank you.Gotta love how Hightower gets 28 carries as Ingrams replacement. More than double Ingrams average.
Hightower Wk14-16:
14 @TB 28 85 1
15 DET 13 54 0
16 JAX 27 122 2
68 carries 261 rushing yards 3 rushing TDs 7/88 receiving. How does Hightower's performance affect the future for Ingram/Spiller going forward if any?
That is what I expect as well. I have to declare keeper status next August. I don't think Hightower can perform much better than he has, but even if this last game is another great one from him I don't think his prospects look good, but that might be my bias. If anyone has found out that he earned his way into a larger role be sure to post.Spiller will be gone, and it has zero effect on Ingram. Hightower probably won't make a roster next year.
Not any is how it will impact Ingram/Spiller.Gotta love how Hightower gets 28 carries as Ingrams replacement. More than double Ingrams average.
68 carries 261 rushing yards 3 rushing TDs 7/88 receiving. How does Hightower's performance affect the future for Ingram/Spiller going forward if any?
He is a very safe and steady play. He caught 50 balls in 12 games last year so where one might have thought of him as a standard only guy, he is actually a PPR beast now. He gets GL work on a high scoring offense. Only knock is there seems to be a good chance he will get hurt at some point.Thoughts on him this year? In a ppr how do u compare him to rbs around his ADP like mccoy?
Wow good info thx I think I may take himHe is a very safe and steady play. He caught 50 balls in 12 games last year so where one might have thought of him as a standard only guy, he is actually a PPR beast now. He gets GL work on a high scoring offense. Only knock is there seems to be a good chance he will get hurt at some point.
For standard, over the last 2 years, Ingram has posted <RB2 numbers 36% of the weeks. The only RBs that have been more consistently startable and aren't on a new team, suspended or retired are Peterson, Gurley, and Charles. For standard, last 2 years, he has posted RB1 numbers on 60% of his weeks. There are only 2 RBs not suspended or on a new team that had a better %: Gurley and Charles. Ingram doesn't have many major blow-up games. In standard, he's only broken 20 points in 3 of his last 25 weeks. However, he's a very consistent scorer with a high weekly floor. He has only scored below 9 points in 4 of this last 25 weeks.
He's definitely a heck of a lot cheaper than DJ but for some reason, might be perception, he doesn't seem as "shiny" which is stupid really. As you pointed out, he could score very closely to DJ, so if you combine him with Brown from the 1 and maybe add Allen or Marshall, thats a strong start to a draft.Call me crazy, but what is the difference between David Johnson and Mark Ingram in terms of fantasy outlook? Ingram is more proven, but has the injury history. Ingram is going at a cheaper price. Last year Ingram's 16 game projection was 67 receptions, 1560 yards and 8 TDs. He has room for an even higher TD ceiling as Khiry and Hightower ran for 8.
The Cards and Saints scored the most standard fantasy points at the RB position last year. Card RBs had 2500 yards and 19 TDs. Saints had 2500 yards and 18 TDs. The nice part is the Saints beong one of the highest scoring backfields for fantasy isn't new. 2014 was 2500 and 18. 2013 was 2600 (4th best) and 13 (8th best).
If you have a top 5 pick and are able to land something like Julio/Ingram/Allen or OBJ/Ingram/Sammy, you are off to a heck of a start. Just need to hope Ingram can stay healthy and make sure you own Hightower in case he can't.He's definitely a heck of a lot cheaper than DJ but for some reason, might be perception, he doesn't seem as "shiny" which is stupid really. As you pointed out, he could score very closely to DJ, so if you combine him with Brown from the 1 and maybe add Allen or Marshall, thats a strong start to a draft.
Hightower should be a relatively cheap handcuff too. How do you compare Ingram to the other RB's close to his ADP like Martin and McCoy? Do you feel it's just preference on how to rank them or does one stand out more to you? I like McCoy quite a bit, think he has at least one more big year in him in an offense that might be ready to really take a leap.If you have a top 5 pick and are able to land something like Julio/Ingram/Allen or OBJ/Ingram/Sammy, you are off to a heck of a start. Just need to hope Ingram can stay healthy and make sure you own Hightower in case he can't.
I think McCoy and Ingram are close but it's likely Ingram gets a lot more GL touches as he is the GL back, McCoy might not be. Also the Saints are going to be a more high scoring team so I see more TD opps available for Ingram. I am a little more down on Doug because he didn't score TDs or catch a lot of passes last year, but those do seem to be the 3 RBs with the best proven production vs price ration in the draft.Hightower should be a relatively cheap handcuff too. How do you compare Ingram to the other RB's close to his ADP like Martin and McCoy? Do you feel it's just preference on how to rank them or does one stand out more to you? I like McCoy quite a bit, think he has at least one more big year in him in an offense that might be ready to really take a leap.
Just looked it up, you're right, Martin only caught 33 passes while Ingram had 50 and only played 12 games. You figure another 10 or so if he had played the 16 games, 60 catches aint too shabby, doesn't help in standard but that's PPR gold.I think McCoy and Ingram are close but it's likely Ingram gets a lot more GL touches as he is the GL back, McCoy might not be. Also the Saints are going to be a more high scoring team so I see more TD opps available for Ingram. I am a little more down on Doug because he didn't score TDs or catch a lot of passes last year, but those do seem to be the 3 RBs with the best proven production vs price ration in the draft.
Right now FFCal has Martin and Ingram going as the 24th and 25th picks in standard. In almost any other year, I think they would be top 15 picks. PPR, Late round QB, and zero RB has gained so much steam that it has really reshaped drafts. If people were doing this draft with a 2013-14 mindset, I think ADP could be more like: 1. Gurley 2. Peterson 3. DJ 4. Miller 5. Cam 6. Brown 7. Zeke 8. Julio 9. OBJ 10. McCoy 11. Ingram 12. Martin . So if you get the 1st pick in standard and are open to the idea of investing heavy in RBs still, you can start with Brown, Ingram and Martin which is 3 players that one can argue deserve first 1st round grades. It's the best WR in the league and 2 RB1s. I am not inclined to invest in 2 RBs that early, but it is tempting.Just looked it up, you're right, Martin only caught 33 passes while Ingram had 50 and only played 12 games. You figure another 10 or so if he had played the 16 games, 60 catches aint too shabby, doesn't help in standard but that's PPR gold.
I think Martin/Ingram/McCoy are maybe the last of the RB1s that are typically available at the 2/3 turn. After that, you start looking at guys like CJA, Matt Jones, Forte, L.Murray and it doesn't look as rosy. It's like your last chance to really grab an RB1 before they disappear.
He's gonna be my rb1Right now FFCal has Martin and Ingram going as the 24th and 25th picks in standard. In almost any other year, I think they would be top 15 picks. PPR, Late round QB, and zero RB has gained so much steam that it has really reshaped drafts. If people were doing this draft with a 2013-14 mindset, I think ADP could be more like: 1. Gurley 2. Peterson 3. DJ 4. Miller 5. Cam 6. Brown 7. Zeke 8. Julio 9. OBJ 10. McCoy 11. Ingram 12. Martin . So if you get the 1st pick in standard and are open to the idea of investing heavy in RBs still, you can start with Brown, Ingram and Martin which is 3 players that one can argue deserve first 1st round grades. It's the best WR in the league and 2 RB1s. I am not inclined to invest in 2 RBs that early, but it is tempting.
To piggy-back on your idea of starting with WR/RB/RB as an a;ternative to WR/WR/WR or WR/WR/RB, I quite like the idea of going:Right now FFCal has Martin and Ingram going as the 24th and 25th picks in standard. In almost any other year, I think they would be top 15 picks. PPR, Late round QB, and zero RB has gained so much steam that it has really reshaped drafts. If people were doing this draft with a 2013-14 mindset, I think ADP could be more like: 1. Gurley 2. Peterson 3. DJ 4. Miller 5. Cam 6. Brown 7. Zeke 8. Julio 9. OBJ 10. McCoy 11. Ingram 12. Martin . So if you get the 1st pick in standard and are open to the idea of investing heavy in RBs still, you can start with Brown, Ingram and Martin which is 3 players that one can argue deserve first 1st round grades. It's the best WR in the league and 2 RB1s. I am not inclined to invest in 2 RBs that early, but it is tempting.
Also I would include Maclin in that group of 4th/5th round WR target. My only issue is if you miss on those guys, I start to sour on WR quickly. If I start WR/WR/WR, I'm riding it out and still targeting Mac/Deck/Floyd/Moncrief in the 4th and 5th.To piggy-back on your idea of starting with WR/RB/RB as an a;ternative to WR/WR/WR or WR/WR/RB, I quite like the idea of going:
Brown, Ingram+McCoy then maybe M.Floyd+E.Decker at the 4/5 turn.
Not sure that the WR's at the 2/3 turn or early third are that "can't miss". You'd probably feel better with Evans, DT or Keenan Allen rather than Decker or Floyd but to counter that, the RB's at the 4/5 turn make me queasy as compared with Ingram and McCoy. Not fully up on those 2 players specific ADP (Floyd and Decker) but they seem likely to be available there and good value if they are. As a comparison:
Brown/Ingram/McCoy/Floyd/Decker
vs
Brown/Ingram/Evans/Floyd/Duke Johnson
I prefer option 1 for sure.