This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Its going to leave you pretty thin at RB, but it's such an auto-yes trade I'd say you have to do it. What's your record? Typically depth is less important as it gets later in the year, but given that Fournette is one of your top two I'd be a bit worrid about only having Smith and Davis left behind him.
Its going to leave you pretty thin at RB, but it's such an auto-yes trade I'd say you have to do it. What's your record? Typically depth is less important as it gets later in the year, but given that Fournette is one of your top two I'd be a bit worrid about only having Smith and Davis left behind him.
I would do that one. Elliott > Johnson, Juju > Gordon (in my opinion, others may not agree), and although Kelce > Gronk he's still Gronk, if his back holds out he could be huge, and if he's not then you've still got Doyle.
I would do that one. Elliott > Johnson, Juju > Gordon (in my opinion, others may not agree), and although Kelce > Gronk he's still Gronk, if his back holds out he could be huge, and if he's not then you've still got Doyle.
I don't know why you are including Rodgers in this deal. You don't need him and it will just make your life more difficult trying to pick which QB to play each week. I would look for changing out Rodgers with a different piece that can help you.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.