When he's actually been on the field, he has looked good. He just doesn't get the # of touches to make him anything more than a flex player. Which, unfortunately is not what he was drafted for by most owners.:sigh:Fear The Turtle said:I'm probably the last holdout but I'm still optimistic. I thought he looked darn good during last week's first half.
Yeah, I'm sure Brady is dying.
What did Maroney do with 15 carries against the Colts? Nothing impressive, that is for sure.In a non-ppr league I think he is top 10 possibly top 5 down the stretch:
1. Morris is on IR
2. Finally Healthy
3. Best offense ever
You put that with all the stuff that made him a popular choice this preseason and I think he's a great dark horse to carry some teams down the stretch. You could give Ron Dayne 15 carries a game on this offense and he'd probably be top 10. The lack of touchdowns to this point is bothersome, but there were reasons for that. Most of which, are now aleviated (sp?). Morris was the vulture and Maroney got hurt. Last game Maroney was in on short yardage plays and I can remember him picking up at least one crucial 3rd and short. Yes the Patriots are pass happy, but there was enough to go around to make Morris a viable fantasy option when he was splitting carries with GL touches.
That said, who is Maroney's handcuff now? In non-ppr I'm leaning towards Heath Evans, as I don't think the Patriots will give Faulk double digit carries.
You really want to play that card? Ok then. Not too many guys have done much vs Indy this year. Also, the entire Patriots offense faired far far worse than normal that game. Why? Because Indy's defense is really good.What did Maroney do with 15 carries against the Colts? Nothing impressive, that is for sure.In a non-ppr league I think he is top 10 possibly top 5 down the stretch:
1. Morris is on IR
2. Finally Healthy
3. Best offense ever
You put that with all the stuff that made him a popular choice this preseason and I think he's a great dark horse to carry some teams down the stretch. You could give Ron Dayne 15 carries a game on this offense and he'd probably be top 10. The lack of touchdowns to this point is bothersome, but there were reasons for that. Most of which, are now aleviated (sp?). Morris was the vulture and Maroney got hurt. Last game Maroney was in on short yardage plays and I can remember him picking up at least one crucial 3rd and short. Yes the Patriots are pass happy, but there was enough to go around to make Morris a viable fantasy option when he was splitting carries with GL touches.
That said, who is Maroney's handcuff now? In non-ppr I'm leaning towards Heath Evans, as I don't think the Patriots will give Faulk double digit carries.
for tom brady or for maroney?the rushing defense ranks of his remaining schedule:eom said:I think there's a big chance he produces down the stretch, and I'm saying this as a former sammy owner who had no interest in drafting maroney.
he's been injured and sammy's been there to sap his stats --- then when he gets his first chance to put up some #'s, they play the colts in a tight game and have to throw a lot in the second half.
second half of the season there will be no sammy, nobody will force them to play catch up, he's back healthy off a bye week, and while he might not get 25 carries, I could definitely see them step him up from 14 to 20.
he'll be averaging a fat ypc, and the td's should be there to be had.
for every rushing TD, the patriots have more than 4 passing TDs.and a quarter of the rushing TDs have been by Tom Brady.steelers + ravens I'd be a little leery about, but I think people underestimate belichick's desire to run the ball.
the pats aren't all brady to moss.
and that's exactly what I'm talking about --- I'm not telling you maroney's getting 3 td's every game the rest of the way.and those stats you just quoted are w/maroney basically out all year, and the team playing in good weather.if maroney gets enough touches to pick up 100 yds, and manages to fish one td out of the pile, then I say that's producing.would you have a problem w/that production?the patriots aren't too lopsided in terms of passing attempts versus rushing plays (305 vs 287).
Ouch. This does not sound good at all. I thought previously, David, you were expecting him to come on strong. I guess both can be true.As I mentioned in one of the 48 Maroney threads, I think Maroney will be scrutinized by the Pats' brass the rest of the way, and if he faulters or has more issues staying on the field, I would not be surprised to see the team start looking at other RB options for the 2008 season. So LM will be motivated to keep his job or else he may not be in the team's long-term plans.I know for a fact that internally the team was not happy with the way Maroney fizzled out last year, and I doubt that they would be gushing with praise about his performance this year either. He'll get another mulligan for the first part of this year due to injuries, but if he's not careful he will get the DeShaun Foster label.
Are you serious here? I am almost at a loss for words. Hopefully I understand this correctly. Maroney is somehow in danger of losing his job? Mainly due to a poor playoff performance as a Rookie?!? I slightly understand the injury concerns, but he has only missed 5 games over two seasons. And IIRC it was stated that if "it was a playoff game, he would be in there" for 1 or 2 this season.I am just in total shock reading this. The guy has averaged over 5 yards a carry in 4 of his 6 games this season. Plus he put up great numbers in a time share with Dillion last season.I have to a bigAs I mentioned in one of the 48 Maroney threads, I think Maroney will be scrutinized by the Pats' brass the rest of the way, and if he faulters or has more issues staying on the field, I would not be surprised to see the team start looking at other RB options for the 2008 season. So LM will be motivated to keep his job or else he may not be in the team's long-term plans.I know for a fact that internally the team was not happy with the way Maroney fizzled out last year, and I doubt that they would be gushing with praise about his performance this year either. He'll get another mulligan for the first part of this year due to injuries, but if he's not careful he will get the DeShaun Foster label.
I think you are misreading what I wrote and/or we are not on the same page.The Pats were disappointed that Maroney was effectively shelved or not very productive from roughly the halfway point of the season last year. This really isn't covering any new ground (4 regular season games with single digit carries, 2 missed games, much lower ypc, mostly ineffective in the playoffs).This year Maroney has also clearly sruggled with old and new injuries and also has not evolved into a workhorse back. From what I can tell, Sammy Morris was brought in as a decent role player and someone who could see some work each year in a supporting role. With Maroney not really able to go, Morris got a much bigger workload than most would have anticipated.Again from what I can tell, here were are in Week 11 of the season and Maroney really hasn't been healthy for any game this year. Having missed so much time, he's had to continue learning on the fly and did not have much work in training camp or as the season progressed (which be extension has slowed his development).I have been suggesting that the plan this year has been to get Maroney more integrated into the offense as the year progresses (in fact I have been told that directly from people who are paid to know things like that). That's all well and good and I still think that that will happen.HOWEVER . . .If Maroney gets nicked up again or stumbles and is not really all that effective, given the way the Pats operate, it may not be a stretch that they start thinking about a Plan B at running back (or at the least another option if they can't rely on Maroney).So the "disappointment factor" would hinge on Maroney struggling to stay on the field the rest of the way or basically not being productive.If nothing else, I am curious as to whether NE thinks he will evolve into a heavy duty back or if they now envision him as someone they will constantly need to rotate in because he may not be able to handle the workload.I suspect the Pats management is sort of like Maroney fantasy owners. He's been a bit of a disappointment but they at this stage have hopes and aspirations of good things to come. The question is at what point due people actually start wondering if he will be who they thought he would be.I hope that this is a clearer picture . . .Are you serious here? I am almost at a loss for words. Hopefully I understand this correctly. Maroney is somehow in danger of losing his job? Mainly due to a poor playoff performance as a Rookie?!? I slightly understand the injury concerns, but he has only missed 5 games over two seasons. And IIRC it was stated that if "it was a playoff game, he would be in there" for 1 or 2 this season.I am just in total shock reading this. The guy has averaged over 5 yards a carry in 4 of his 6 games this season. Plus he put up great numbers in a time share with Dillion last season.I have to a bigAs I mentioned in one of the 48 Maroney threads, I think Maroney will be scrutinized by the Pats' brass the rest of the way, and if he faulters or has more issues staying on the field, I would not be surprised to see the team start looking at other RB options for the 2008 season. So LM will be motivated to keep his job or else he may not be in the team's long-term plans.I know for a fact that internally the team was not happy with the way Maroney fizzled out last year, and I doubt that they would be gushing with praise about his performance this year either. He'll get another mulligan for the first part of this year due to injuries, but if he's not careful he will get the DeShaun Foster label.to the Pats for not being happy with the Production of Maroney in his limited chances.
Thanks for the clarification. I can see a little more where the pats are coming from, but I still have a hard time grasping the fact that his job is in jepordy. If can't handle the full load, I understand the line of thinking to aquire a new back. I do think the sample size we are going off of is still too small. I think Maroney is a great talent. And being a Bears fan, hearing a team be unhappy with his type of production is just mind-boggling.David Yudkin said:I think you are misreading what I wrote and/or we are not on the same page.The Pats were disappointed that Maroney was effectively shelved or not very productive from roughly the halfway point of the season last year. This really isn't covering any new ground (4 regular season games with single digit carries, 2 missed games, much lower ypc, mostly ineffective in the playoffs).This year Maroney has also clearly sruggled with old and new injuries and also has not evolved into a workhorse back. From what I can tell, Sammy Morris was brought in as a decent role player and someone who could see some work each year in a supporting role. With Maroney not really able to go, Morris got a much bigger workload than most would have anticipated.Again from what I can tell, here were are in Week 11 of the season and Maroney really hasn't been healthy for any game this year. Having missed so much time, he's had to continue learning on the fly and did not have much work in training camp or as the season progressed (which be extension has slowed his development).I have been suggesting that the plan this year has been to get Maroney more integrated into the offense as the year progresses (in fact I have been told that directly from people who are paid to know things like that). That's all well and good and I still think that that will happen.HOWEVER . . .If Maroney gets nicked up again or stumbles and is not really all that effective, given the way the Pats operate, it may not be a stretch that they start thinking about a Plan B at running back (or at the least another option if they can't rely on Maroney).So the "disappointment factor" would hinge on Maroney struggling to stay on the field the rest of the way or basically not being productive.If nothing else, I am curious as to whether NE thinks he will evolve into a heavy duty back or if they now envision him as someone they will constantly need to rotate in because he may not be able to handle the workload.I suspect the Pats management is sort of like Maroney fantasy owners. He's been a bit of a disappointment but they at this stage have hopes and aspirations of good things to come. The question is at what point due people actually start wondering if he will be who they thought he would be.I hope that this is a clearer picture . . .Max Power said:Are you serious here? I am almost at a loss for words. Hopefully I understand this correctly. Maroney is somehow in danger of losing his job? Mainly due to a poor playoff performance as a Rookie?!? I slightly understand the injury concerns, but he has only missed 5 games over two seasons. And IIRC it was stated that if "it was a playoff game, he would be in there" for 1 or 2 this season.I am just in total shock reading this. The guy has averaged over 5 yards a carry in 4 of his 6 games this season. Plus he put up great numbers in a time share with Dillion last season.I have to a bigAs I mentioned in one of the 48 Maroney threads, I think Maroney will be scrutinized by the Pats' brass the rest of the way, and if he faulters or has more issues staying on the field, I would not be surprised to see the team start looking at other RB options for the 2008 season. So LM will be motivated to keep his job or else he may not be in the team's long-term plans.I know for a fact that internally the team was not happy with the way Maroney fizzled out last year, and I doubt that they would be gushing with praise about his performance this year either. He'll get another mulligan for the first part of this year due to injuries, but if he's not careful he will get the DeShaun Foster label.to the Pats for not being happy with the Production of Maroney in his limited chances.
I guess the main question the Pats have stems from Maroney's durability. I do know that they would be overjoyed if he stopped dancing in the backfield and would prefer that he lowered his shoulder (his good one I guess) and tried to move the pile. NE would rather he drove forward and took a 2-3 yard game rather than trying to wait for a hole to develop and eat a 4 yard loss.My question, given where Maroney is at this stage, is how much difference is there between Maroney and say someone like Julius Jones. I know most people will say Maroney is more talented, but their numbers (and roles) are really not all that far apart.Thanks for the clarification. I can see a little more where the pats are coming from, but I still have a hard time grasping the fact that his job is in jepordy. If can't handle the full load, I understand the line of thinking to aquire a new back. I do think the sample size we are going off of is still too small. I think Maroney is a great talent. And being a Bears fan, hearing a team be unhappy with his type of production is just mind-boggling.David Yudkin said:I think you are misreading what I wrote and/or we are not on the same page.The Pats were disappointed that Maroney was effectively shelved or not very productive from roughly the halfway point of the season last year. This really isn't covering any new ground (4 regular season games with single digit carries, 2 missed games, much lower ypc, mostly ineffective in the playoffs).This year Maroney has also clearly sruggled with old and new injuries and also has not evolved into a workhorse back. From what I can tell, Sammy Morris was brought in as a decent role player and someone who could see some work each year in a supporting role. With Maroney not really able to go, Morris got a much bigger workload than most would have anticipated.Again from what I can tell, here were are in Week 11 of the season and Maroney really hasn't been healthy for any game this year. Having missed so much time, he's had to continue learning on the fly and did not have much work in training camp or as the season progressed (which be extension has slowed his development).I have been suggesting that the plan this year has been to get Maroney more integrated into the offense as the year progresses (in fact I have been told that directly from people who are paid to know things like that). That's all well and good and I still think that that will happen.HOWEVER . . .If Maroney gets nicked up again or stumbles and is not really all that effective, given the way the Pats operate, it may not be a stretch that they start thinking about a Plan B at running back (or at the least another option if they can't rely on Maroney).So the "disappointment factor" would hinge on Maroney struggling to stay on the field the rest of the way or basically not being productive.If nothing else, I am curious as to whether NE thinks he will evolve into a heavy duty back or if they now envision him as someone they will constantly need to rotate in because he may not be able to handle the workload.I suspect the Pats management is sort of like Maroney fantasy owners. He's been a bit of a disappointment but they at this stage have hopes and aspirations of good things to come. The question is at what point due people actually start wondering if he will be who they thought he would be.I hope that this is a clearer picture . . .Max Power said:Are you serious here? I am almost at a loss for words. Hopefully I understand this correctly. Maroney is somehow in danger of losing his job? Mainly due to a poor playoff performance as a Rookie?!? I slightly understand the injury concerns, but he has only missed 5 games over two seasons. And IIRC it was stated that if "it was a playoff game, he would be in there" for 1 or 2 this season.I am just in total shock reading this. The guy has averaged over 5 yards a carry in 4 of his 6 games this season. Plus he put up great numbers in a time share with Dillion last season.I have to a bigAs I mentioned in one of the 48 Maroney threads, I think Maroney will be scrutinized by the Pats' brass the rest of the way, and if he faulters or has more issues staying on the field, I would not be surprised to see the team start looking at other RB options for the 2008 season. So LM will be motivated to keep his job or else he may not be in the team's long-term plans.I know for a fact that internally the team was not happy with the way Maroney fizzled out last year, and I doubt that they would be gushing with praise about his performance this year either. He'll get another mulligan for the first part of this year due to injuries, but if he's not careful he will get the DeShaun Foster label.to the Pats for not being happy with the Production of Maroney in his limited chances.
In all fairness though the Colts have made a commitment to Addai as the feature back whereas Maroney is pulled every other down for Faulk or Morris or whoever. There is still time for LM to gain the trust of BB and the coaching staff to feed him the ball, but how much time is anyones guess.Patriots sure are wishing they had Joseph Addai right now. Funny how in retrospect everyone said Maroney would be the stud and Addai would be the bust. Addai is EVERYTHING a RB should be - great receiver, great blocker, great runner, durable. Maroney is a great runner, but he is mediocre in all other departments...
And you think teams will still respect the run? my $$$ is on the D shadowing the TE, even a double on Moss.Things will open upI honestly don't see Maroney "going off" rest of the year. NE game plan completely changes in the red zone to a play action team. And they always bring in Faulk for play action. The WRs sprint towards the endzone to stretch opposing defense, Brady dumps off to Faulk, and he tries to run it in.With Brady having such a magical year. BB would rather let his MVP QB make the plays instead of a 2nd year RB.
But NE Red Zone offense is a "pass first" offense. When Brady can't find his receivers it gets dumped off to Faulk.And you think teams will still respect the run? my $$$ is on the D shadowing the TE, even a double on Moss.Things will open upI honestly don't see Maroney "going off" rest of the year. NE game plan completely changes in the red zone to a play action team. And they always bring in Faulk for play action. The WRs sprint towards the endzone to stretch opposing defense, Brady dumps off to Faulk, and he tries to run it in.With Brady having such a magical year. BB would rather let his MVP QB make the plays instead of a 2nd year RB.
In Dynasty league I would have patience. I don't think NE will have the same WR threat next year. They will have to build some kind of offense around the RB position. Remember Moss is a FA after 2007.My question is this: In a dynasty league, is Maroney someone to have more patience with, or someone to cut bait on?
While they "have" Stallworth, he is due $8 million in roster bonuses before the season starts next year and will have a $3 million base salary. NO WAY does Donte Stallworth see that money, so unless he tears up his contract, he won't be a Patriot next season.dude, you know moss is signing w/the pats.and even if he doesn't, they still have stallworth and welker.
that may be so, but only if they don't sign moss.if they don't sign moss, I think they'd sign stallworth, although they might redo his contract.of course, I don't see why they wouldn't resign moss, and when they do stallworth is irrelevant.While they "have" Stallworth, he is due $8 million in roster bonuses before the season starts next year and will have a $3 million base salary. NO WAY does Donte Stallworth see that money, so unless he tears up his contract, he won't be a Patriot next season.dude, you know moss is signing w/the pats.and even if he doesn't, they still have stallworth and welker.
I think Moss is as good as signed and I think they will still try to get Stallworth to sign a reasonable deal. However, if Stallworth gets a ring his incentive to stick around for lower dollars will be gone.that may be so, but only if they don't sign moss.if they don't sign moss, I think they'd sign stallworth, although they might redo his contract.of course, I don't see why they wouldn't resign moss, and when they do stallworth is irrelevant.While they "have" Stallworth, he is due $8 million in roster bonuses before the season starts next year and will have a $3 million base salary. NO WAY does Donte Stallworth see that money, so unless he tears up his contract, he won't be a Patriot next season.dude, you know moss is signing w/the pats.and even if he doesn't, they still have stallworth and welker.
I'd sit on him in a dynasty league. He shows signs of being a good runner. NE can't pass for ever. They'll eventually go for a more balanced attack.My question is this: In a dynasty league, is Maroney someone to have more patience with, or someone to cut bait on?