That they are completely different issues is actually the point, as is the severity/impact of them. On one hand, you have an infraction of the rules by leaving the sidelines, and making contact with a ref. Stupid? Yes. Malicious and with intent to do harm? I don't think you could convince anyone that that was the case here.
On the other side, you have domestic abuse allegations that were corroborated by dozens of witnesses pertaining to multiple instances of physical violence against a woman.
Can you tell me again which is the more "thug move" here?
The point that people are deriding Lynch over appealing a meaningless and harmless game infraction yet seemingly ok with the laissez faire attitude over the dragging of the feet on enforcing Zeke's suspension is downright strange to me given the disparate impact of what led to these suspensions in the first place.