You think Disney cares about reviews when it's pulling 1.1BGordonGekko said:VIDEO: Why Captain Marvel's rating COLLAPSED on Rotten Tomatoes Feb 25, 2019
The news just gets worse and worse for Marvel. User ratings have now dropped to just 30% on Rotten Tomatoes as fans increasingly turn against this film's controversial star. Where will it end?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdRBPApeqdA
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/captain_marvel
DIRECT HEADLINE: Rotten Tomatoes Explains Why It Removed Thousands of Audience Reviews on Captain Marvel's Opening Day
"We have identified a bug in the post-release functionality."
By Jim Vejvoda 9 Mar 2019 3:15 pm
https://www.ign.com/articles/2019/03/09/rotten-tomatoes-explains-why-it-removed-thousands-of-audience-reviews-on-captain-marvels-opening-day
DIRECT HEADLINE: Official Captain Marvel 2 Synopsis Makes It Seem Like An Ensemble, Not Brie Larson’s Movie
By Apeksha Bagchi 5/21
https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/brie-larson-captain-marvel-2-synopsis.html
*****
Captain Marvel made a ton of money being caught in the hype and groundswell for the Avengers series. It was in the right place at the right time.
But lots of fans didn't like it. And those who pirated it early panned it in reviews, which were deleted. Kevin Feige was going to hit a dud that was critically panned at some point.
Now the direction is no longer "Captain Marvel", it's been rebranded "The Marvels"
So yes, that's literally an indictment on Brie Larson's bankability and the perception that she just can't carry a large franchise like this.
You think Disney cares about reviews when it's pulling 1.1B
Maybe. But based on the interview with the director this week, Eternals is major for the overall MCU. Also sounds like she took this super seriously.Alrighty! I'd rather not rehash the Captain Marvel story if you don't mind, I don't think anyone is getting swayed by either side of the argument.
Up next is The Eternals, and as I've stated before it is the most fearful of "dud" I've been of any of the Marvel movies. More excited to see Hawkeye especially after the end credit scene for Black Widow.
Wonder what was removed and what got pushed up a week in November 2023 -- Fantastic 4?
I saw some rumors over the weekend that BP2 would be pushed back as they figure out the path they want to take after Boseman's death.
went to bond insteadSo none of you nerds went to see "Eternals?"
We did. There were quite a few there. All the more expensive pods were sold.So none of you nerds went to see "Eternals?"
My daughter and I went yesterday. Nothing like a Monday at 4:15pm and having an empty theater to ourselves.dhockster said:I enjoyed it, but it felt more like a set-up movie, introducing us to characters who will be important in future movies. Definitely on the bottom tier of Marvel movies. That said, I still enjoyed it.
You think Fu Manchu is going to pass muster these days? Don't think so.Shang Chi and the Pokémon……complete disappointment.
should have stuck to the original source material
I am pretty shocked at the audience score for Shang Chi. I thought it was entertaining but better than End Game and the rest? It was campy fun at times but I wouldn’t want to watch it over Guardians of the Galaxy. I liked it but didn’t think it was the best Marvel movie ever.Shang Chi and the Pokémon……complete disappointment.
should have stuck to the original source material
easily if written well. I imagine marvel wanted a bigger scope of picture to fit Shang Chi into the bigger universe when they probably should have done it as a parallel series like spider manMrs. Rannous said:You think Fu Manchu is going to pass muster these days? Don't think so.
Agree with all the comments above and this. I’m not sure Id go with stupid but it wasn’t well flushed out. Almost could have been split into two movies to be honest. If they had continued the first half and maybe put Shang in a Tony Stark almost died situation where he had to come back from that and learn the magic way, that could have been movie 1. Do the magic monster a bit better in movie 2. I mean, the monster could read minds and produce mental images but the fight with it was more Michael Bay than well thought out bad guy.jobarules said:First half of Shang Chi with all the martial arts was awesome. Second half with soul suckers was beyond stupid.
Yep. That’s what threw me. Best rated MCU movie it was not. Enjoyable and better than Black Widow, yes IMHO. Different movies but I enjoyed Shag Chi more. No chance I’d put Shang Chi over Infinity War/End Game, Guardians, Civil War, etc.Spider-Man Trailer
Looks great!
And I enjoyed Shang-Chi. Something a bit different, like Guardians was when it came out. Best MCU movie? No. But good and worth watching.
It’s funny how people can see things so differently. She was the worst part of the movie for me. She was the Jar Jar Binks of the movie IMO.The character that carried this was Katy,
His father was really the "bad guy", and they did a pretty good job with his character development and arc.
It’s funny how people can see things so differently. She was the worst part of the movie for me. She was the Jar Jar Binks of the movie IMO.
That’s because the bad guy of the story was his dad not the monster. The problem is that they basically treated the monster part like the big dragon in how to train your dragon. You know, the movie where the scrappy underdog and his lovable friend rode a dragon and fought a much bigger dragon that was too strong for anyone else to fight especially without a dragon but he almost didn’t get to join in the fight because he was fighting with his father who didn’t believe in him but then he almost died and his father realized that he was strong after all just in a different way and so he gave our hero his blessing even though it went against generations of his experience as a ruler. Totally different movie obviously but is it reallyAgree with all the comments above and this. I’m not sure Id go with stupid but it wasn’t well flushed out. Almost could have been split into two movies to be honest. If they had continued the first half and maybe put Shang in a Tony Stark almost died situation where he had to come back from that and learn the magic way, that could have been movie 1. Do the magic monster a bit better in movie 2. I mean, the monster could read minds and produce mental images but the fight with it was more Michael Bay than well thought out bad guy.
I just don’t get the audience scores on Rotten Tomatoes. Seems like bad ones were removed based on the comments in here.
I meant she was basically the comic relief - but was more annoying than funny.![]()
Although not sure I'd go as far as saying she's "Jar Jar"... but then again I am not a fan of the actress except in small doses.
Yeah, that’s why I think this movie didn’t need the train your dragon monster (100% thought that while watching). I think they could have just overdone the first half and shelved the dragon for the next movie. I mean the bad dragon was able to put thoughts in his dad’s mind but the battle was underwhelming. Reminded me of Black Widow where the bad guy at times appeared ridiculously powerful (had his own multi-trillion dollar floating fortress and just like that he was introduced and dispatched. Thor Dark World was like that as well and suffered.That’s because the bad guy of the story was his dad not the monster. The problem is that they basically treated the monster part like the big dragon in how to train your dragon. You know, the movie where the scrappy underdog and his lovable friend rode a dragon and fought a much bigger dragon that was too strong for anyone else to fight especially without a dragon but he almost didn’t get to join in the fight because he was fighting with his father who didn’t believe in him but then he almost died and his father realized that he was strong after all just in a different way and so he gave our hero his blessing even though it went against generations of his experience as a ruler. Totally different movie obviously but is it really
It’s not so much that I liked her, and her scenes definitely strained credulity… it really made no sense for her to be the archer who saved the day… and when wong came to get Shang chi at the end he should totally have left her there and closed that circle thing behind him. But she was the only one with a personality. Shang chi could have been played by almost any actor with fighting skills and you wouldn’t notice a change in the movie. If she was jar jar, he was Hayden Chrysanthemum.It’s funny how people can see things so differently. She was the worst part of the movie for me. She was the Jar Jar Binks of the movie IMO.
To me that was one of the few interesting things about him. You met him late in his character arc. In the beginning he was the standard bad guy who wants power and there’s only one thing left he can’t conquer so he wants it more than anything. Then he meets the mom and he sets that aside to be with her. Then he loses her and he wants revenge because she was the most important thing. Then he starts hearing her voice but it’s really the evil monster thing. Then you meet him.One of my gripes with the movie was that the father was never really the "bad guy".
I mean he had potential to be the bad guy, and we were told he was a bad guy, but he gave up his bad guy-ness when he met the mom, and even in the end he ended up being a conflicted character, mostly wanting to reunite with his dead wife, than true evil bad guy.
It was. I started my discussion off about it being good but it wasn’t 98% best reviewed MCU movie good. The rating surprised me.Shang Chi was fun and good. Doesn’t have to be more than that.