What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Marvel Cinematic Universe - Loved Thunderbolts*! - Also Marvel Trivia May 5th at 9 EST on FootballGuys (3 Viewers)

MOON KNIGHT SPOILERS:

My son was getting pissed when the episode ended without finding out the identity or seeing the 3rd personality in action.

At least we got a miniscule look at Jake Lockley in the credits scene.  Feels like a missed opportunity to flesh it out a bit better. I do like the Khonshu being aware of Jake and using him as his avatar angle as kind of a double cross to Mark/Steven and sets up a second season well.

Also LOVED Layla in her suit.  The "are you an Egyptian Superhero" thing with the young girl was pretty cool.  It was a good ending.

I'd put it just under Loki still, but well above Falcon and WS.  The familiarity with Hiddleston as Loki helped that show tremendously instead of a brand new character/actor like Moon Knight.

 
I think I am enjoying these Disney+ shows at some level just because they are well produced, big budget spectacles that are fun to watch at some level.  Not altogether dissimilar to the way I enjoy pouring a drink and watching Fast 9. But outside of Hawkeye and parts of Loki I can’t say I’ve thought much of any of them as quality TV shows. They all seem to be leaning heavily into magic, multiverses, and other comic book nerdery (for lack of a better term) that just isn’t my thing. 

 
Poor writing imo.  Whoever mapped out the plot did not do a good job of anticipating the emotional payoffs.  Whoever did that for WandaVision needs to be in charge of all the high level plot planning.

Acting and effects were top notch and I enjoyed watching this series season.  Will watch the next one.

 
Poor writing imo.  Whoever mapped out the plot did not do a good job of anticipating the emotional payoffs.  Whoever did that for WandaVision needs to be in charge of all the high level plot planning.

Acting and effects were top notch and I enjoyed watching this series season.  Will watch the next one.
I think this pretty much describes where I am at. Everything seemed fine, but it just felt disjointed and like it just wasn’t quite laid out right.

 
I agree, but Sebastian Stan is pretty damn good too.  Too bad he was underutilized in FAWS (and teh broader MCU imo).
Winter Soldier was seriously nerfed in FAWS, big disappointment for me. 

MoonKnight was okay, hard time really caring about anyone in more than a superficial way. 

 
Episodes 4 and 5 were decent but Moon Knight was largely bad.  The finale was ridiculously bad. 

The way they portrayed those Egyptian Gods was just off.  They seemed way too cartoonish.  

5/10 at best for this series

 
The way they portrayed those Egyptian Gods was just off.  They seemed way too cartoonish.  
:mellow: It's a talking hippo, crocodile and some bird skull. They are essentially cartoon characters.

I actually thought Khonshu was very well done and didn't seem too CGI-ish. 

 
MOON KNIGHT SPOILERS:

My son was getting pissed when the episode ended without finding out the identity or seeing the 3rd personality in action.

At least we got a miniscule look at Jake Lockley in the credits scene.  Feels like a missed opportunity to flesh it out a bit better. I do like the Khonshu being aware of Jake and using him as his avatar angle as kind of a double cross to Mark/Steven and sets up a second season well.

Also LOVED Layla in her suit.  The "are you an Egyptian Superhero" thing with the young girl was pretty cool.  It was a good ending.

I'd put it just under Loki still, but well above Falcon and WS.  The familiarity with Hiddleston as Loki helped that show tremendously instead of a brand new character/actor like Moon Knight.
I hadn’t thought about it, but MK being the first D+ show with an entirely new set of characters might have had an impact on my experience. B I still think eternals could have been better as a show, I’m not entirely sure of their thought process.  perhaps eternals would have been better as a show, MK better as a movie. 

 
:mellow: It's a talking hippo, crocodile and some bird skull. They are essentially cartoon characters.

I actually thought Khonshu was very well done and didn't seem too CGI-ish. 
I guess I expect more of my Egyptian Gods than some Jar Jar Binks ripoff, which is what it seemed like

Khonshu was the best of the 3 for sure but still, could have been done a lot better

 
My non-spoilery review of the new Dr Strange film.

I got out last night to watch the premier of the latest Phase 4 MCU film, "Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness". The first thing you should know is that this story pulls heavily from the Disney+ series, "WandaVision" and, to a lesser extend, "Loki". Truth be told, if they had called this movie, "WandaVision - The Motion Picture", it would have been equally apt. I found this a little surprising as it was my understanding Disney was going to try and keep the Disney+ series and the films somewhat insulated from one another so moviegoers who don't subscribe to Disney+ won't be lost while watching the films, but that's clearly not the case. Sure, they throw is a few lines of dialogue here and there to briefly explain the concepts and motivations that arise from the series storylines, but I could definitely see how someone unfamiliar with the MCU series would find the film a tad more confusing than someone who's up-to-date on ALL the MCU products. So keep that in mind if you're deciding to go see this film.

This film also continues the current Phase 4 theme of exposing the audience to more and more obscure Marvel characters, locations, items and storylines (see "Shang Chi" and "The Eternals"). There were a number of references made in this film that, as a long time Marvel comic book reader, I caught, but would likely be missed by someone who's only familiar with the MCU products. So again, keep that in mind when evaluating my review. YMMV.

Overall, I enjoyed the movie more than "Shang Chi" or the "Eternals", but significantly less than "Spider-Man - No Way Home" (which shouldn't be considered an insult as I rank it as one of the best MCU films of all time). As much as I enjoyed seeing the characters back in action, I was also pleased to see Sam Raimi back behind the camera. If you're familiar with his work, you will see his fingerprints all over this film. Lots of camera motion and strange angles and innovative visuals. He does not disappoint. The only thing perhaps more impressive was the Danny Elfman score which is given it's own action scene. While not as remarkable as the "backwards through time fight" that occurred in the first "Dr. Strange" film, still stands out as a pretty unique action scene (unless you've ever seen "Kung-Fu Hustle" which did something very similar almost 20 years ago). The MCU continues to show that they know what they're doing when casting these roles. All the performers are excellent and very believable as these unbelievable characters. Fiege and his casting directors deserve more credit for securing the talent they have for these films.

I was somewhat disappointed in the writers dialogue. There's not much in this film that is very quotable or even all that humorous. It moves the story along and does enough to give the characters a little flavor, but overall fell short of what I've come to expect from an MCU film. I'm also not convinced they did the right thing by trying to blend the standard MCU "superhero" theme with a bit of a "horror" theme. It made the film feel a bit uneven to me. I think it would have served the film better had they picked one lane and stuck to it. But it's Raimi. He always tries to be a little light-hearted while he's scaring you or grossing you out. I know it's his style but I felt it undercut some of the more serious/weighty scenes. This film also suffers from another issue I've noticed that is becoming common in the MCU, incongruent power levels. You have characters that can supposedly destroy a mountain with a snap of their fingers, yet it'll take them 5 minutes to fight their way down a corridor against nameless henchmen just so the heroes have enough time to provide some dialogue or secure some McGuffin to move the story along. It's not yet gotten too egregious, but it's starting to happen enough where I want to quote Deadpool and call it "Lazy writing". My other concern is action sequences between characters with these powers is largely CGI light and noise. Flying characters shooting energy beams or eldritch bolts or cosmic rays starts to become redundant after a while, especially in light of my previous criticism about power levels. There are a lot of people getting launched or thrown back by the effects of these attacks instead of being obliterated like they should be. I think there's only one hand-to-hand fight in this film and it was adequate. Nothing remarkable. As an action fan, I was mildly disappointed.

So overall I'd still recommend catching this at the theater. Sam knows how to fill a screen with something that'll hold your attention. It's not the best multiverse movie of the year (I'd still recommend seeing "Everything, Everywhere, All at Once" first), but it was a good sign that the MCU isn't failing and actually feels like it's starting to gain momentum again (Can't wait for "Thor - Love & Thunder!).

 
I should add there are some pleasant "No Way Home" type surprises in this film, but I won't delve into them as to avoid spoiling anything.  Just be aware there is more to this film than I was able to elucidate.

 
(Can't wait for "Thor - Love & Thunder!).
That's the one I'm looking forward to. As far as Wanda they really need to find strong villains for her or turn her into the villain.She pretty much destroyed Thanos minions and kicked Thanos ### twice and ripped ultrons heart out.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My non-spoilery review of the new Dr Strange film.

I got out last night to watch the premier of the latest Phase 4 MCU film, "Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness". The first thing you should know is that this story pulls heavily from the Disney+ series, "WandaVision" and, to a lesser extend, "Loki". Truth be told, if they had called this movie, "WandaVision - The Motion Picture", it would have been equally apt. I found this a little surprising as it was my understanding Disney was going to try and keep the Disney+ series and the films somewhat insulated from one another so moviegoers who don't subscribe to Disney+ won't be lost while watching the films, but that's clearly not the case. Sure, they throw is a few lines of dialogue here and there to briefly explain the concepts and motivations that arise from the series storylines, but I could definitely see how someone unfamiliar with the MCU series would find the film a tad more confusing than someone who's up-to-date on ALL the MCU products. So keep that in mind if you're deciding to go see this film.

This film also continues the current Phase 4 theme of exposing the audience to more and more obscure Marvel characters, locations, items and storylines (see "Shang Chi" and "The Eternals"). There were a number of references made in this film that, as a long time Marvel comic book reader, I caught, but would likely be missed by someone who's only familiar with the MCU products. So again, keep that in mind when evaluating my review. YMMV.

Overall, I enjoyed the movie more than "Shang Chi" or the "Eternals", but significantly less than "Spider-Man - No Way Home" (which shouldn't be considered an insult as I rank it as one of the best MCU films of all time). As much as I enjoyed seeing the characters back in action, I was also pleased to see Sam Raimi back behind the camera. If you're familiar with his work, you will see his fingerprints all over this film. Lots of camera motion and strange angles and innovative visuals. He does not disappoint. The only thing perhaps more impressive was the Danny Elfman score which is given it's own action scene. While not as remarkable as the "backwards through time fight" that occurred in the first "Dr. Strange" film, still stands out as a pretty unique action scene (unless you've ever seen "Kung-Fu Hustle" which did something very similar almost 20 years ago). The MCU continues to show that they know what they're doing when casting these roles. All the performers are excellent and very believable as these unbelievable characters. Fiege and his casting directors deserve more credit for securing the talent they have for these films.

I was somewhat disappointed in the writers dialogue. There's not much in this film that is very quotable or even all that humorous. It moves the story along and does enough to give the characters a little flavor, but overall fell short of what I've come to expect from an MCU film. I'm also not convinced they did the right thing by trying to blend the standard MCU "superhero" theme with a bit of a "horror" theme. It made the film feel a bit uneven to me. I think it would have served the film better had they picked one lane and stuck to it. But it's Raimi. He always tries to be a little light-hearted while he's scaring you or grossing you out. I know it's his style but I felt it undercut some of the more serious/weighty scenes. This film also suffers from another issue I've noticed that is becoming common in the MCU, incongruent power levels. You have characters that can supposedly destroy a mountain with a snap of their fingers, yet it'll take them 5 minutes to fight their way down a corridor against nameless henchmen just so the heroes have enough time to provide some dialogue or secure some McGuffin to move the story along. It's not yet gotten too egregious, but it's starting to happen enough where I want to quote Deadpool and call it "Lazy writing". My other concern is action sequences between characters with these powers is largely CGI light and noise. Flying characters shooting energy beams or eldritch bolts or cosmic rays starts to become redundant after a while, especially in light of my previous criticism about power levels. There are a lot of people getting launched or thrown back by the effects of these attacks instead of being obliterated like they should be. I think there's only one hand-to-hand fight in this film and it was adequate. Nothing remarkable. As an action fan, I was mildly disappointed.

So overall I'd still recommend catching this at the theater. Sam knows how to fill a screen with something that'll hold your attention. It's not the best multiverse movie of the year (I'd still recommend seeing "Everything, Everywhere, All at Once" first), but it was a good sign that the MCU isn't failing and actually feels like it's starting to gain momentum again (Can't wait for "Thor - Love & Thunder!).
MoM is The movie I’ve been looking forward to longest. More than NWH or even Endgame.  So I’m still hopeful. But prepared to be disappointed. Thor looks a lot better after seeing the trailer than I had anticipated. 345 pm tomorrow!

 
Saw Dr Strange with my daughter tonight and I'm conflicted. 
Was the movie good? I guess so. 
Was it well acted? Sure. 
Was it visually stunning? Absolutely. 
I honestly don't know why I didn't like it more. We were both really looking forward to it. I believe it was more that I didn't get what I expected. No spoilers from me though, so I guess I'll just leave it at that.

 
I went in expecting HP Lovecraft meets Wandavision and was not disappointed, quite the opposite. Two thumbs up, 8/10.  Enjoyed it quite a bit. 

There are 2 end credit scenes. Protip: stay for the first, find the second (alllll the way at the end of the credits) online. Juice not worth the squeeze for the second one imo. 

 
I went in expecting HP Lovecraft meets Wandavision and was not disappointed, quite the opposite. Two thumbs up, 8/10.  Enjoyed it quite a bit. 

There are 2 end credit scenes. Protip: stay for the first, find the second (alllll the way at the end of the credits) online. Juice not worth the squeeze for the second one imo. 
Good advice. 

 
👍🏽👍🏽 Two thumbs up. on par with BW and Shang chi imo, maybe slightly better. 
It’s been said that Raimi didn’t watch the last few episodes of WV, and that kind of makes sense after watching. 
No spoilers, but parts fell hollow while others were great. I laughed out loud once, don’t remember what it was, and overall this is definitely not GotG or Ragnarok. Still very well done.  
the previews seem to include a deleted scene but it didn’t change anything and was probably better off removing it. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I enjoyed it BUT,

The main issue that will come up for me is that this could have been an EPIC Disney plus series. In fact, I agree with whoever said this could have been season 2 of Wandavision.  
 

The characters and universes could have been developed over an hour long 8 episode arc so much more than in the 2 hours. One specific group of characters in mind that could have taken future phases thru the roof. 

One thing bothered me though. In Spider-Man, we had Toby, Andrew and Tom. Makes sense bc they have all played the role. However, in this one every character is acted by the same characters in the multiverse. Just made them look a little different. The other nit pick is that a lot of this was in What if. I almost felt as if I’ve seen a lot of it already. 
 

still enjoyed though. 

 
Only gotten thru a couple episodes of Moon Knight so far and it isn't grabbing me yet. Too repetitive. Also not really familiar at all with his story in the comics so that probably doesn't help.

Saw MoM this afternoon with my daughter. Another awesome A+ home run from Marvel. 

 
My non-spoilery review of the new Dr Strange film.

I got out last night to watch the premier of the latest Phase 4 MCU film, "Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness". The first thing you should know is that this story pulls heavily from the Disney+ series, "WandaVision" and, to a lesser extend, "Loki". Truth be told, if they had called this movie, "WandaVision - The Motion Picture", it would have been equally apt. I found this a little surprising as it was my understanding Disney was going to try and keep the Disney+ series and the films somewhat insulated from one another so moviegoers who don't subscribe to Disney+ won't be lost while watching the films, but that's clearly not the case. Sure, they throw is a few lines of dialogue here and there to briefly explain the concepts and motivations that arise from the series storylines, but I could definitely see how someone unfamiliar with the MCU series would find the film a tad more confusing than someone who's up-to-date on ALL the MCU products. So keep that in mind if you're deciding to go see this film.

This film also continues the current Phase 4 theme of exposing the audience to more and more obscure Marvel characters, locations, items and storylines (see "Shang Chi" and "The Eternals"). There were a number of references made in this film that, as a long time Marvel comic book reader, I caught, but would likely be missed by someone who's only familiar with the MCU products. So again, keep that in mind when evaluating my review. YMMV.

Overall, I enjoyed the movie more than "Shang Chi" or the "Eternals", but significantly less than "Spider-Man - No Way Home" (which shouldn't be considered an insult as I rank it as one of the best MCU films of all time). As much as I enjoyed seeing the characters back in action, I was also pleased to see Sam Raimi back behind the camera. If you're familiar with his work, you will see his fingerprints all over this film. Lots of camera motion and strange angles and innovative visuals. He does not disappoint. The only thing perhaps more impressive was the Danny Elfman score which is given it's own action scene. While not as remarkable as the "backwards through time fight" that occurred in the first "Dr. Strange" film, still stands out as a pretty unique action scene (unless you've ever seen "Kung-Fu Hustle" which did something very similar almost 20 years ago). The MCU continues to show that they know what they're doing when casting these roles. All the performers are excellent and very believable as these unbelievable characters. Fiege and his casting directors deserve more credit for securing the talent they have for these films.

I was somewhat disappointed in the writers dialogue. There's not much in this film that is very quotable or even all that humorous. It moves the story along and does enough to give the characters a little flavor, but overall fell short of what I've come to expect from an MCU film. I'm also not convinced they did the right thing by trying to blend the standard MCU "superhero" theme with a bit of a "horror" theme. It made the film feel a bit uneven to me. I think it would have served the film better had they picked one lane and stuck to it. But it's Raimi. He always tries to be a little light-hearted while he's scaring you or grossing you out. I know it's his style but I felt it undercut some of the more serious/weighty scenes. This film also suffers from another issue I've noticed that is becoming common in the MCU, incongruent power levels. You have characters that can supposedly destroy a mountain with a snap of their fingers, yet it'll take them 5 minutes to fight their way down a corridor against nameless henchmen just so the heroes have enough time to provide some dialogue or secure some McGuffin to move the story along. It's not yet gotten too egregious, but it's starting to happen enough where I want to quote Deadpool and call it "Lazy writing". My other concern is action sequences between characters with these powers is largely CGI light and noise. Flying characters shooting energy beams or eldritch bolts or cosmic rays starts to become redundant after a while, especially in light of my previous criticism about power levels. There are a lot of people getting launched or thrown back by the effects of these attacks instead of being obliterated like they should be. I think there's only one hand-to-hand fight in this film and it was adequate. Nothing remarkable. As an action fan, I was mildly disappointed.

So overall I'd still recommend catching this at the theater. Sam knows how to fill a screen with something that'll hold your attention. It's not the best multiverse movie of the year (I'd still recommend seeing "Everything, Everywhere, All at Once" first), but it was a good sign that the MCU isn't failing and actually feels like it's starting to gain momentum again (Can't wait for "Thor - Love & Thunder!).
Interesting comparison to the last Spidey movie. I like this one quite a bit more than that one actually. Spidey was good but I really didn't care that much for the main storyline where he was trying to give all the bad guys a second chance. The alt universe Spideys were unfortunately a little lame too.. I actually never saw the Andrew Garfield ones and his moments in that film didn't make me think I was missing much. The end was good with everyone forgetting and MJ etc though. Anyways, back to MoM. Great action. Really hope a certain character in another universe is played by the same actor in the 616.

 
Moon Knight was okay. I felt like half the time I didn’t know what was going on.  The blackouts and cutaways were annoying.  I don’t get the council of the gods and why they were so lame/weak. I enjoyed it more than FAWS but that’s about it. 
 

MoM - it was fine. I was able to follow along.  Surprised how much it tied into WandaVision.  I’m not sure one would know what the heck was going on if you hadn’t watched that show.  The cameos were nice; hopefully that means some new characters in the MCU.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really liked MoM especially how it got into horror by Raimi. Excellent job. My biggest complaint is the undertone of teaching us social lessons. There were things in there that made no difference to the film and there was no reason for them. I was never a Dr Strange guy as a kid. I knew who he was but did not follow it regularly. Was there really a character named America in the comics or was that more social BS being pushed?

 
BTW while I enjoyed the movie, this whole multiverse thing is ruining the MCU IMO. First of all, it's confusing as hell. Secondly, there's no consequences for actions anymore. I get why they did it and it served its purpose in No Way Home but I think they need to move on from it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
BTW while I enjoyed the movie, this whole multiverse thing is ruining the MCU IMO. First of all, it's confusing as hell. Secondly, there's no consequences for actions anymore. I get why they did it and it served its purpose in No Way Home but I think they need to move on from it.
Yep. Especially here where we see a few things we’ve been looking forward to and then there’s no emotional tie or repercussions. 
i hope the multiverse is United in the next few years. DC (CW) did something similar a couple years ago. Horrible writing but the concept was fair enough. For a while they had flash and supergirl in different universes, they merged eventually. 

I really liked MoM especially how it got into horror by Raimi. Excellent job. My biggest complaint is the undertone of teaching us social lessons. There were things in there that made no difference to the film and there was no reason for them. I was never a Dr Strange guy as a kid. I knew who he was but did not follow it regularly. Was there really a character named America in the comics or was that more social BS being pushed?
America has only been a character for 11 years and you could argue she’s part of the comics pushing inclusivenesses / “wokeness”. I didn’t know about her, as I haven’t followed comics since the 90s but she’s “real”.  I thought they handled her background about as well as they could without ignoring it. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Finally saw Spiderman no way home.  I don't know if I'll pay for MoM based on some of the reviews I'm hearing. What a fall from grace for the MCU franchise.  

 
Random MCU thoughts:

MoM:

Enjoyed it. Felt very Sam Raimi and that's a good thing for those of us who enjoy his work.

In the absence of Stan Lee, I'd like to see Bruce Campbell be given a random cameo in every MCU movie going forward. No logic to that notion. I just think it'd be fun.

Final cut of MoM was supposedly reduced by roughly 30 minutes from Raimi's initial version. I would like to see the more meaty version as I would suspect (hope) that we get more development on Wanda's rationalization for her actions. As is, we get the shortened: "because this, then this" -- and I know there's a convenient argument regarding the Darkhold's impact -- but based on Wanda's full character development to this point in the MCU, it felt like we should have seen some more internal conflict.

Wong is a joy. And I want to know why he was training Abomination in Shang Chi. Seriously. If he has access to a Hulk-level super soldier, why not sparky-circle Abomination into the fight with the big bad in MoM?

Earlier discussion on power level convenience is spot on. The disparity in power levels between Captain Marvel & Wanda (& Thor) vs the vast majority of the MCU is massive and becomes problematic in storytelling. [It's the age old Superman problem. "Let's have Supe fight ___ this issue." "Okay, so what happens on Page 2?"] I think they handle it as well as possible. It's just a challenge for writers.

Moon Knight:

Very enjoyable. Below Loki and WandaVision, but considerably above FAWS (the disappointing dredge of the MCU). 

Oscar Isaac is fantastic. Ethan Hawke also excellent.

Grateful for the post-credits capper of the series. Felt like a massive hole until the final 30 seconds where you can say, "okay, glad they finally addressed that."

Thor LaT:

Bring it on.

 
Kid saw MoM a second time with some friends.  She still enjoyed it but didn't find anything new with the reveals being what they were.

I also wonder if some of the lower scores are due to the expectations going in on what direction things were going to go, rumored cameos and how it all links to the larger universe.  Like a lack of Mephisto in WandaVision getting people upset.

Kid is excited for Ms Marvel on D+.  She didn't watch Moon Knight.

 
I watched MoM last night and thought it was great. It is in the second tier of Marvel movies only below the Deadpools for me.

Spoilers below.

I will rewatch Wandavision and then MoM when the extended version of MoM is released. I want to see if the complaints are valid about Wanda's character arc. Supposedly Olsen did not even know she was going to be a villain until filming of Wandavision was almost complete.

Having Wanda tear apart the Illuminati was a good scene. Even though she did what she did in "House of M", she has never been a very strong fighter in the comics. It was a good demonstration of the power of the book. Quickly thrashing a captain marvel and then killing professor in a battle of the wits and led team is not something that I think they will have many characters do in the future. All of the power and evil was driven by the book and is why I do not mind that she flipped evil so quickly.  :nerd:

The problem is I am not very excited for the next few movies, we will see I guess.

 
I watched MoM last night and thought it was great. It is in the second tier of Marvel movies only below the Deadpools for me.

Spoilers below.

I will rewatch Wandavision and then MoM when the extended version of MoM is released. I want to see if the complaints are valid about Wanda's character arc. Supposedly Olsen did not even know she was going to be a villain until filming of Wandavision was almost complete.

Having Wanda tear apart the Illuminati was a good scene. Even though she did what she did in "House of M", she has never been a very strong fighter in the comics. It was a good demonstration of the power of the book. Quickly thrashing a captain marvel and then killing professor in a battle of the wits and led team is not something that I think they will have many characters do in the future. All of the power and evil was driven by the book and is why I do not mind that she flipped evil so quickly.  :nerd:

The problem is I am not very excited for the next few movies, we will see I guess.
The character arc made no sense because she redeemed herself at the end of WV

 
Elizabeth Olsen taking herself a little too seriously.  She's following the path blazed by Emilia Clarke.
I have no idea where you are getting this from.  She was completely cheerful in the interview I watched.  Her only complaint seemed to be that the flying in costume apparatus isn't exactly comfortable.

 
Been on vacation for a week.  Saw MoM, and I'd give it a B-.  Some of the CGI at the beginning I thought was seriously below par for a Marvel movie, they did have some shots later that made up for it. The acting was great, but I thought the storyline really suffered. For those who worried about the D+ shows having too much sway over the MCU I think your fears should be gone. They referenced WandaVision, but they left a lot on the table. I thought Loki would play a major role in this, and it was a shutout. The Multiverse as displayed actually contradicted What If in a few spots. It had it's moments but I was somewhat let down.

Speaking of being let down, Moon Knight was a letdown. Again I think Oscar Isaac is incredible, but the storyline and pacing of the series was not good. I'd give this probably a C+ and rank it a little above Falcon and the Winter Soldier.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top