ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports the Falcons are far less likely to trade Matt Shaub this offseason following the hiring of Bobby Petrino.It doesn't help that D.J. Shockley is next on the depth chart. Schaub is a restricted free agent and will likely be granted the highest-round tender despite barely playing in 2006. There's still a chance Petrino will allow Schaub to compete with Michael Vick in training camp.
I agree the hype is too high, but he has shown tremendous potential at times when given the opportunity. We simply haven't seen enough of him to make an accurate determination. A couple things about Matt Schaub that I do like, and that is his measurables (6'5" 237), and what's between his ears. I think Schaub is very intelligent and appears to have good leadership potential. Is he over hyped? Certainly. Does he have very good potential? Certainly.I guess I'm the only person on earth who doesnt have a rock hard on for Matt Schaub. I just don't see it
Written by: STEVE WYCHE ¦ 2/26/2007Source: www.ajc.comThe Falcons plan to tender restricted free agent quarterback Matt Schaub a one-year qualifying offer of more than $2 million Tuesday, a person with knowledge of the situation told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution Monday. Included in that tender is the requirement that if another team signs the highly regarded backup it must compensate the Falcons with first- and third-round draft picks.The course of action is hardly a surprise. By tendering Schaub the highest possible offer with the attachment of hefty compensation, the Falcons are trying to discourage interest or at least get something in return if a team is willing to part with a hefty ransom to acquire the three-year veteran.Schaub could be viewed by some teams as a starter who does not need to be groomed the way a draft pick would. For Atlanta, the 25-year-old is considered insurance for starter Michael Vick, who started all 16 games last season and 15 games in 2005.In three seasons, Schaub has two starts and has completed 84-of-161 passes for six 1,033 yards with six touchdowns with six interceptions.The NFL's free agency period begins after midnight March 2.
Falcons Will Tender QB Schaub, But How High?Steve Wyche, Atlanta Journal-Constitution - [Full Article]QB Matt Schaub is a restricted free agent who has drawn interest from other teams. The Falcons do not want to lose Schaub and plan to place a one-year contract tender on him, possibly in excess of $2 million, as well as a compensation attachment of a first and/or third-round draft pick. The high ransom could deter some teams, however, a straight trade for a draft pick or a player can't be ruled out. As much as the team wants to keep Schaub, it doesn't want to lose him for nothing after the 2007 season when he's an unrestricted free agent.
Yep, a first round pick seems high to me, and with only one year before he walks, it would seem like other teams would have some leverage with the Falcons, but then again, it only takes two teams for a bidding war to start.http://www.nfl.com/combine/story/10023456
It appears that Schaub can be had for #15 overall in Round 1 or and 2nd rounder next year with some mediocre benchmarks turning it into a #1.
That would kinda change things as far as other teams being interested.
I would agree with this 100%. That guy showed me nothing to make me think he would be the Vikings (or anyone else's) QB of the future.ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports the Falcons are far less likely to trade Matt Shaub this offseason following the hiring of Bobby Petrino.
It doesn't help that D.J. Shockley is next on the depth chart. Schaub is a restricted free agent and will likely be granted the highest-round tender despite barely playing in 2006. There's still a chance Petrino will allow Schaub to compete with Michael Vick in training camp.
Obviously I'm not buying that last sentence. If the price is right Schaub is gone IMO, but I'm not so sure any team will give-up what it would take to get him. We are probably looking at a 1st and 3rd rd pick to get Schaub away from Atlanta. I'm not sure any team would give that, but the Vikings might. I don't think the Vikings view T Jackson as the future QB of their team, but I could be wrong.
The vikes run the KAO. which as near as anyone can tell is run/run/throw short of the sticks/puntdo the vikes run the WCO? If not why would they be interested in schaub?
Volek was benched before he had a chance.Schaub may indeed have better upside, but it kind of reminds me of the hype we saw for Billy Volek a few years back. And we saw how that turned out. Of course, there was also a lot of hype for Jake Delhomme and that did turn out to be basically valid.My guess is that Schaub will wind up somewhere in the middle of those two.
I believe he has a better chance of becoming an above average starter, but that is just my opinion. It also depends on where he ends up.Schaub isn't some bum off the street. He was a third round pick, which is actually quite high. I look for him to eventually become a serviceable starter in the mold of Brad Johnson or Jake Delhomme. He has an outside chance to become an above average starter.
I agree, he is 0-2 as a starter, unproven and has not accomplished enough to warrant this type of attention.I guess I'm the only person on earth who doesnt have a rock hard on for Matt Schaub. I just don't see it
He lost his job to Kerry Collins, despite Collins having been signed right at the end of training camp. I think that says enough.TKO Spikes said:Volek was benched before he had a chance.Schaub may indeed have better upside, but it kind of reminds me of the hype we saw for Billy Volek a few years back. And we saw how that turned out. Of course, there was also a lot of hype for Jake Delhomme and that did turn out to be basically valid.My guess is that Schaub will wind up somewhere in the middle of those two.
I know that one of those starts was against the Patriots, and they lost by a game winning field goal. He actually lit it up. I think the fact that the Falcons are so reluctant to give him up is a good sign. Plus he has shown he is prototype.I agree, he is 0-2 as a starter, unproven and has not accomplished enough to warrant this type of attention.I guess I'm the only person on earth who doesnt have a rock hard on for Matt Schaub. I just don't see it
Incorrect. Volek was benched before he got on the field. However, don't be confused: he had a chance and displayed poor work ethic and poor leadership so a decision to bench him was made.TKO Spikes said:Volek was benched before he had a chance.Schaub may indeed have better upside, but it kind of reminds me of the hype we saw for Billy Volek a few years back. And we saw how that turned out. Of course, there was also a lot of hype for Jake Delhomme and that did turn out to be basically valid.My guess is that Schaub will wind up somewhere in the middle of those two.
I agree that he has looked very good at times and has all the measurables you want. That said his career compltion percentage is worse than vick's, his TD - INT ratio is worse than vick's, and he's won none of the games he's started, so IMO he's overrated. I agree he has potential but I can also see him being a bust as a starter. Ppl have already mentioned billy volek as someone who looked good as a backup but didn't get it done as a starter another one is doug johnson who ironically was also a backup for vick.I know that one of those starts was against the Patriots, and they lost by a game winning field goal. He actually lit it up. I think the fact that the Falcons are so reluctant to give him up is a good sign. Plus he has shown he is prototype.I agree, he is 0-2 as a starter, unproven and has not accomplished enough to warrant this type of attention.I guess I'm the only person on earth who doesnt have a rock hard on for Matt Schaub. I just don't see it![]()
You're seriously comparing Schaub's career to Vick's? Talking about a SMALL sample size.FTRWRTR said:I agree that he has looked very good at times and has all the measurables you want. That said his career compltion percentage is worse than vick's, his TD - INT ratio is worse than vick's, and he's won none of the games he's started, so IMO he's overrated. I agree he has potential but I can also see him being a bust as a starter. Ppl have already mentioned billy volek as someone who looked good as a backup but didn't get it done as a starter another one is doug johnson who ironically was also a backup for vick.KoolKat said:I know that one of those starts was against the Patriots, and they lost by a game winning field goal. He actually lit it up. I think the fact that the Falcons are so reluctant to give him up is a good sign. Plus he has shown he is prototype.Phurfur said:I agree, he is 0-2 as a starter, unproven and has not accomplished enough to warrant this type of attention.I guess I'm the only person on earth who doesnt have a rock hard on for Matt Schaub. I just don't see it![]()
If I were him I definitely wouldn't want to sign a contract extension with either of those 2 teams.This is from draftsharks.com,Matt Schaub linked to 2 teamsNFL insider John McClain told us that Falcons QB Matt Schaub "could end up with Oakland or Minnesota" when free agency starts Friday. Schaub, a restricted free agent, was tendered at 1st & 3rd round compensation, but any team can swing a deal with Atlanta directly. There had been rumors that Schaub might be headed to Houston but McClain poo-pooed that one. Have you ever heard of an NFL reserve generating so much buzz? He's only started 2 pro football games!
I'm not comparing career totals, that would be ridiculous. I'm comparing career percentagesYou're seriously comparing Schaub's career to Vick's? Talking about a SMALL sample size.FTRWRTR said:I agree that he has looked very good at times and has all the measurables you want. That said his career compltion percentage is worse than vick's, his TD - INT ratio is worse than vick's, and he's won none of the games he's started, so IMO he's overrated. I agree he has potential but I can also see him being a bust as a starter. Ppl have already mentioned billy volek as someone who looked good as a backup but didn't get it done as a starter another one is doug johnson who ironically was also a backup for vick.KoolKat said:I know that one of those starts was against the Patriots, and they lost by a game winning field goal. He actually lit it up. I think the fact that the Falcons are so reluctant to give him up is a good sign. Plus he has shown he is prototype.Phurfur said:I agree, he is 0-2 as a starter, unproven and has not accomplished enough to warrant this type of attention.I guess I'm the only person on earth who doesnt have a rock hard on for Matt Schaub. I just don't see it![]()
It won't happen.What about Raiders trading for him and giving the #1 to Atlanta. Who then takes CJ as the number one. Raiders get Shaub and Atlanta's #1. Could see this happening??
Reporting this is the sports gossip columist for the Pioneer Press. Don't take everything he says as the gospel truth.I still think (and hope) a trade can be made. I think Atl. tendered him the highest tender to get teams to deal directly with them on a trade that would require lower picks. The Falcons want to see what they can get for him before they lose him next year as a UFA.The price has gotten too high for the Vikings to seriously consider a deal for Atlanta quarterback Matt Schaub.
http://www.twincities.com/mld/pioneerpress...ts/16806562.htm
Which is not necessarily a bad thing. I've held onto him for 2 years, I don't mind holding onto him for another year. At that point, he gets to make the decision where he wants to play.I don't think Schaub is going anywhere.