McNabb inactive? (1 Viewer)

[scott72]

 

[Andy Hicks]

Where are you seeing this.

From NFL.com Inactiives they are stating:

Donovan McNabb QB Inactive McNabb (wrist) will start vs. SD

Which makes no sense.

I'm guessing the Inactive is wrong.

If anyone has anything else to add, confirming or correcting, let us know

 

[scott72]

Nevermind. Bad info from Twitter..

 

[scott72]

Where are you seeing this.From NFL.com Inactiives they are statingonovan McNabb QB Inactive McNabb (wrist) will start vs. SD Which makes no sense.I'm guessing the Inactive is wrong.If anyone has anything else to add, confirming or correcting, let us know

It was swirling around Twitter like crazy. No idea where it originally came from..Feel free to wipe this thread out..

 

[WKTSWAY]

Phil Simms had just said it on CBS during the Pit/Bal game.

 

[Novice2]

His cardio isn't up to the vikings standards.

 

[Andy Hicks]

NFL.com has just corrected to ACTIVE

 

[cholo]

His cardio isn't up to the vikings standards.

Christian Ponder is better at running the 60-minute drill.

 

[coolnerd]

They may have just been anticipating his performance

 

[urbanhack]

This thread should have just been deleted.

Didn't affect me, but this seems pretty irresponsible by FBG staff.

 

[Abraham]

May as well have been.

 

[KGB]

Looked pretty inactive to me

 

[RandyDB]

Where are you seeing this.

From NFL.com Inactiives they are stating:

Donovan McNabb QB Inactive INEFFECTIVE McNabb (wrist) will start vs. SD

Which makes no sense.

I'm guessing the Inactive is wrong.

If anyone has anything else to add, confirming or correcting, let us know

fixed

 

[flapgreen]

Definitely inactive.

 

[Ministry of Pain]

They may have just been anticipating his performance

 

[Daywalker]

This thread should have just been deleted.Didn't affect me, but this seems pretty irresponsible by FBG staff.

It should have been pinned and locked with correct injury status. To have just deleted thread would have left many wondering if the rumored inactive status had reached here.Even after the reading this thread there was still a bit on uncertainty when you had like 5 minutes to make a decision. Had to put Newton in for McNaab for one owner because the conflicting info and just lack of info made it prudent. His opponent wasn't too thrilled.

 

[Reepicheep]

Where are you seeing this.

From NFL.com Inactiives they are stating:

Donovan McNabb QB Inactive INEFFECTIVE McNabb (wrist) will start vs. SD

Which makes no sense.

I'm guessing the Inactive is wrong.

If anyone has anything else to add, confirming or correcting, let us know

fixed

 

[scott72]

Where are you seeing this.

From NFL.com Inactiives they are stating:

Donovan McNabb QB Inactive INEFFECTIVE McNabb (wrist) will start vs. SD

Which makes no sense.

I'm guessing the Inactive is wrong.

If anyone has anything else to add, confirming or correcting, let us know

fixed

 

[atcdav]

Looks like he should have been inactive........

 

[eoMMan]

Nevermind. Bad info from Twitter..

Another reason why twitter is lame.

 

[Jayrod]

This thread should have just been deleted.

Didn't affect me, but this seems pretty irresponsible by FBG staff.

It should have been pinned and locked with correct injury status. To have just deleted thread would have left many wondering if the rumored inactive status had reached here.Even after the reading this thread there was still a bit on uncertainty when you had like 5 minutes to make a decision. Had to put Newton in for McNaab for one owner because the conflicting info and just lack of info made it prudent. His opponent wasn't too thrilled.

No kidding.