What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Michael Turner- Offseason 2008 (1 Viewer)

Rumor has it the guy loves being in SD... likes being LT's backup... wants to resign...If he goes elsewhere, don't expect much more than what Lamont Jordan, Chestor Taylor have shown us... a great backup but can't carry the whole load at RB
Haven't heard that rumor, although we did see Ladell Betts go for a discount to stay put - so you never know. I'm guessing that he senses that this is his first and last chance to get a bigger contract and be the guy, and will go that direction.As for the comparisons with Jordan and Taylor, we've discussed this ad nauseum in other threads. Jordan was a notorious whiner that became a fat cat after getting paid - from most accounts, Turner is much more humble. As for Taylor, he played very well in his only starting season. He just had the misfortune that Peterson slipped in the draft to the Vikes.
Jordan had a top 10 finish his first year as the starter, with almost 1600 yards and 11 TDs (and 70 rec if you get PPR). His numbers were miserable last year, but that has to be attributed at least in part by the cesspool of the Oak offense... he still rushed for the same YPC (a meh 3.8). The is the same offense that saw Randy put up a stellar 42/553/2 season. That whole offense was just a trainwreck and of the games I saw it was not Lamont's fault but squarely on poor QB play. This year, before the back injury, he was actually putting up some great stats. Some bad luck, but I think that was bad luck not a case of not being able to carry the load... as he already showed. Chester Taylor had over 1200 last year and carried the ball 300 times. I'd say that's carrying the load. Now let's look at the numbers from this year a little closer: Peterson - 238/1341/12 (5.6 YPC). 19/268/1 (14.1 YPC)Taylor - 157/844/7 (5.4 YPC). 29/281/0 (9.7 YPC). Peterson is clearly something special, and many are already putting him in the HOF. And yeah, he was a rookie, so that's a little more impressive. So, sure, Peterson is going to be the better RB compared to Chester Taylor but what about that statline suggests that Taylor isn't a more-than-capable starter in this league? And what about his 300 carry season a year earlier suggests he can't carry the load?The simple fact is that we don't know whether Turner will be able to do what he did in limited duty with a full-time duty... but if he does what Chester and Lamont both did, top 12 seasons, I think many of us will be fine with that :goodposting:
 
Has your only exposure to Turner been at the NFL level? Did you ever see him in college?I stated before the NFL draft that he was a sleeper at RB, with potential to be a tpp-10 NFL RB. He has the size, the speed, the moves, the hands, he can block, and learning behind LT has only been GOOD for him. He is a far better running back than Jordan and Taylor.I just get the impression the naysayers really just don't know much about Turner
I think comparing Jordan to Turner is a very fair comparison.Michael Turner-4 seasons, 58 games played228 carries, 1257 yards, 5.5 ypc, 6 TD, 11 rec, 71 yards, 0 TDLamont Jordan-1st 4 seasons (all as a backup w/Jets), 62 games played262 carries, 1277 yards, 4.9 ypc, 10 TD, 50 rec, 417 yards, 1 TDOther than a slightly higher ypc, I'm not sure where Turner is significantly better than Jordan. If I'm not mistaken, Jordan was also highly touted coming out of college at MD. This doesn't mean that Turner will have sign somewhere, have one great year, and than become a bust, but to dismiss comparisons to Jordan seems unwise, IMO.
 
He's overrated on FF forums. He's a career backup.
So were Willie Parker, Earnest Graham, Ryan Grant, Marion Barber (still is), Justin Fargas, Kenny Watson, and Brandon Jacobs.
Grant is a rookie, Parker was a 2nd year player, and Brandon Jacobs was pegged for the starter's job midway through his 2nd year.
:no:
:hot: Ryan Grant is not a rookie... he was undrafted and spent two years on the Giants practice squad.

 
corpcow said:
Rumor has it the guy loves being in SD... likes being LT's backup... wants to resign...If he goes elsewhere, don't expect much more than what Lamont Jordan, Chestor Taylor have shown us... a great backup but can't carry the whole load at RB
Haven't heard that rumor, although we did see Ladell Betts go for a discount to stay put - so you never know. I'm guessing that he senses that this is his first and last chance to get a bigger contract and be the guy, and will go that direction.As for the comparisons with Jordan and Taylor, we've discussed this ad nauseum in other threads. Jordan was a notorious whiner that became a fat cat after getting paid - from most accounts, Turner is much more humble. As for Taylor, he played very well in his only starting season. He just had the misfortune that Peterson slipped in the draft to the Vikes.
Jordan had a top 10 finish his first year as the starter, with almost 1600 yards and 11 TDs (and 70 rec if you get PPR). His numbers were miserable last year, but that has to be attributed at least in part by the cesspool of the Oak offense... he still rushed for the same YPC (a meh 3.8). The is the same offense that saw Randy put up a stellar 42/553/2 season. That whole offense was just a trainwreck and of the games I saw it was not Lamont's fault but squarely on poor QB play. This year, before the back injury, he was actually putting up some great stats. Some bad luck, but I think that was bad luck not a case of not being able to carry the load... as he already showed. Chester Taylor had over 1200 last year and carried the ball 300 times. I'd say that's carrying the load. Now let's look at the numbers from this year a little closer: Peterson - 238/1341/12 (5.6 YPC). 19/268/1 (14.1 YPC)Taylor - 157/844/7 (5.4 YPC). 29/281/0 (9.7 YPC). Peterson is clearly something special, and many are already putting him in the HOF. And yeah, he was a rookie, so that's a little more impressive. So, sure, Peterson is going to be the better RB compared to Chester Taylor but what about that statline suggests that Taylor isn't a more-than-capable starter in this league? And what about his 300 carry season a year earlier suggests he can't carry the load?The simple fact is that we don't know whether Turner will be able to do what he did in limited duty with a full-time duty... but if he does what Chester and Lamont both did, top 12 seasons, I think many of us will be fine with that :thumbup:
:thumbup: I actually think Turner has looked a lot like Lamont (in terms of style) but with better vision and a little better leg drive. Lamont has shown better hands though. I honestly don't think Taylor is as good as either (if all healthy), but I do think Taylor is capable. BTW, it is possible that Lamont did get a little lazy after he got injured?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
QuickSlant said:
The Titans need WRs, not RBs.
Don't agree with you here. Yes, they have RB's on their roster but none are good. White is terrible and the only reason he put up decent #'s was due to the shear number of carries. His 3.6 ypc isn't going to cut it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bayhawks said:
Has your only exposure to Turner been at the NFL level? Did you ever see him in college?I stated before the NFL draft that he was a sleeper at RB, with potential to be a tpp-10 NFL RB. He has the size, the speed, the moves, the hands, he can block, and learning behind LT has only been GOOD for him. He is a far better running back than Jordan and Taylor.I just get the impression the naysayers really just don't know much about Turner
I think comparing Jordan to Turner is a very fair comparison.Michael Turner-4 seasons, 58 games played228 carries, 1257 yards, 5.5 ypc, 6 TD, 11 rec, 71 yards, 0 TDLamont Jordan-1st 4 seasons (all as a backup w/Jets), 62 games played262 carries, 1277 yards, 4.9 ypc, 10 TD, 50 rec, 417 yards, 1 TDOther than a slightly higher ypc, I'm not sure where Turner is significantly better than Jordan. If I'm not mistaken, Jordan was also highly touted coming out of college at MD. This doesn't mean that Turner will have sign somewhere, have one great year, and than become a bust, but to dismiss comparisons to Jordan seems unwise, IMO.
they run/play totally different in my eyes, thats why comparing them is pointless to me. Turner runs over people and runs through tackles, I have not seem lamont do much of this myself...
 
Bayhawks said:
Has your only exposure to Turner been at the NFL level? Did you ever see him in college?I stated before the NFL draft that he was a sleeper at RB, with potential to be a tpp-10 NFL RB. He has the size, the speed, the moves, the hands, he can block, and learning behind LT has only been GOOD for him. He is a far better running back than Jordan and Taylor.I just get the impression the naysayers really just don't know much about Turner
I think comparing Jordan to Turner is a very fair comparison.Michael Turner-4 seasons, 58 games played228 carries, 1257 yards, 5.5 ypc, 6 TD, 11 rec, 71 yards, 0 TDLamont Jordan-1st 4 seasons (all as a backup w/Jets), 62 games played262 carries, 1277 yards, 4.9 ypc, 10 TD, 50 rec, 417 yards, 1 TDOther than a slightly higher ypc, I'm not sure where Turner is significantly better than Jordan. If I'm not mistaken, Jordan was also highly touted coming out of college at MD. This doesn't mean that Turner will have sign somewhere, have one great year, and than become a bust, but to dismiss comparisons to Jordan seems unwise, IMO.
So either you haven't seen Turner play, or you haven't seen Lamont play. Looking at statistics is meaningless when comparing players styles. Turner is a much better RB than Jordan. He is more elusive, and has better vision. He is also far faster than Jordan.
 
So either you haven't seen Turner play, or you haven't seen Lamont play. Looking at statistics is meaningless when comparing players styles. Turner is a much better RB than Jordan. He is more elusive, and has better vision. He is also far faster than Jordan.
I watched most of Jordan's college games, as I am a MD graduate, and I was able to follow him during his early years with the Jets. I'll admit I haven't seen much of him since he went to the Raiders. Furthermore, I haven't seen Turner play much, as I live on the east coast and don't get a lot of SD games. That being said, you have a point in that stats aren't the best way to compare player styles. Since that isn't what I was doing, I have no idea what you are talking about. I merely said it was fair to compare the two. I never mentioned their styles. Both are about 5-10 and 235 lbs. They both were part time/back-up RBs who had some success. Both were/are expected to do good things as the #1, workhorse RB when given the chance. Both had comparable attempt, yards, and ypc. Jordan had better receiving numbers and better TD numbers. Based on what I have seen, read, and know about these two RBs, Turner appears to be the faster runner, more of a breakaway threat, while Jordan is the better receiver and more powerful runner. He runs low the ground and has good leg drive, allowing him to get short-yards and goal-line yards more easily than Turner.You wouldn't want Turner for a more power-oriented running game, and you wouldn't want Jordan for a game predicated on longer runs.
 
Bayhawks said:
Has your only exposure to Turner been at the NFL level? Did you ever see him in college?I stated before the NFL draft that he was a sleeper at RB, with potential to be a tpp-10 NFL RB. He has the size, the speed, the moves, the hands, he can block, and learning behind LT has only been GOOD for him. He is a far better running back than Jordan and Taylor.I just get the impression the naysayers really just don't know much about Turner
I think comparing Jordan to Turner is a very fair comparison.Michael Turner-4 seasons, 58 games played228 carries, 1257 yards, 5.5 ypc, 6 TD, 11 rec, 71 yards, 0 TDLamont Jordan-1st 4 seasons (all as a backup w/Jets), 62 games played262 carries, 1277 yards, 4.9 ypc, 10 TD, 50 rec, 417 yards, 1 TDOther than a slightly higher ypc, I'm not sure where Turner is significantly better than Jordan. If I'm not mistaken, Jordan was also highly touted coming out of college at MD. This doesn't mean that Turner will have sign somewhere, have one great year, and than become a bust, but to dismiss comparisons to Jordan seems unwise, IMO.
So either you haven't seen Turner play, or you haven't seen Lamont play. Looking at statistics is meaningless when comparing players styles. Turner is a much better RB than Jordan. He is more elusive, and has better vision. He is also far faster than Jordan.
:nerd: Turner also is much tougher to tackle. He reminds me of a young Jamal Lewis with more elusiveness and an extra couple of gears. Turner clearly has more talent than Jordan in my opinion, and I think he is going to be a stud as a starter. I never had that same thought about Jordan's talent.
 
So either you haven't seen Turner play, or you haven't seen Lamont play. Looking at statistics is meaningless when comparing players styles. Turner is a much better RB than Jordan. He is more elusive, and has better vision. He is also far faster than Jordan.
I watched most of Jordan's college games, as I am a MD graduate, and I was able to follow him during his early years with the Jets. I'll admit I haven't seen much of him since he went to the Raiders. Furthermore, I haven't seen Turner play much, as I live on the east coast and don't get a lot of SD games. That being said, you have a point in that stats aren't the best way to compare player styles. Since that isn't what I was doing, I have no idea what you are talking about. I merely said it was fair to compare the two. I never mentioned their styles. Both are about 5-10 and 235 lbs. They both were part time/back-up RBs who had some success. Both were/are expected to do good things as the #1, workhorse RB when given the chance. Both had comparable attempt, yards, and ypc. Jordan had better receiving numbers and better TD numbers.

Based on what I have seen, read, and know about these two RBs, Turner appears to be the faster runner, more of a breakaway threat, while Jordan is the better receiver and more powerful runner. He runs low the ground and has good leg drive, allowing him to get short-yards and goal-line yards more easily than Turner.

You wouldn't want Turner for a more power-oriented running game, and you wouldn't want Jordan for a game predicated on longer runs.
But that's the point. You can't really compare the two players BASED on their stats. Their stats are comparable, but that doesn't tell you anything about the players at all. Yet you were saying the players were comparable because their numbers were similar... that's just not correct. That's all.As far as what you have seen of the two, I would agree with your conclusions for the most part. The one exception is that Turner would be fine in a power running offense, he is excellent between the tackles, and is hard to bring down.

I was much higher on Turner entering the NFL than Jordan, as I expected Jordan to be a career backup, and Turner to be a star... I guess I was somewhat wrong on Jordan so far, and we'll see this year I hope on Turner

 
I don't know if anybody said it but im throwing Carolina into the mix... im not really sold on foster.. and i don't believe that D Will can handle a full load... he's a great running back but im not sure he can carry the ball 20+ a game and stay healthy and maintain that speed... D Will and Turner would make a great running back tandem.

 
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...bears-headlines

On the other end of the phone is a voice from Chicago and Michael Turner knows what that means.

This time it's a reporter asking the San Diego Chargers running back whether he thinks about playing for the Bears once he becomes a free agent after the playoffs end.

But the question just as easily could have come from one of Turner's five brothers still in the area. Or some boyhood pals from North Chicago. Maybe a Northern Illinois buddy whose dream Bears backfield is Garrett Wolfe backing up Turner, like the good ol' days in DeKalb.

"I hear it all the time from people back home," Turner said the other day after practice preparing for Sunday's AFC playoff game against the Indianapolis Colts at the RCA Dome.

As the backup to All-Pro running back LaDainian Tomlinson, Turner may not get a single carry against the Colts yet no player in the playoffs this weekend merits closer watch for NFL fans in his hometown.

The Bears need to find a No. 1 running back this off-season, a fact many at Halas Hall have made clear. Turner will need a home and figures to be the best available in free agency.

You don't have to be a hopeless romantic to think this football marriage might deserve a shot. Posed the scenario he has heard often, the lifelong Bears fan chuckled.

"I can't control that stuff," Turner said. "I don't even know if the Bears would be interested. I can't afford to think about free agency right now. My focus is on the Indianapolis Colts."

That's the only answer his head can allow. It might sound different if Turner let his heart comment.

"I know he wouldn't mind coming back to Chicago because he has so much family and so many friends here and I think he's a little homesick out there," said Keith Turner, 23, Michael's younger brother.

He and twin brother Kevin work as assistant football coaches at North Chicago High School where "everybody talks about him coming home." The brothers will be among the 20 Turner family members making the trip down I-65 Sunday for the Chargers-Colts game.

"I get questions myself and I just say I don't know if the Bears would be interested," Keith Turner said. "It's wishful thinking."

The Bears have yet to establish an off-season wish list of free agents but it would be surprising if they at least didn't explore whether they could afford Turner. They are expected to have as much as $20 million to spend under the salary cap and general manager Jerry Angelo has hinted that finding a running back with big-play ability rates a bigger priority than revamping the offensive line.

Similar to a draft choice, the buzz revolves around Turner's potential more than his production. He only has gained 1,257 yards in four NFL seasons—78 fewer than Thomas Jones gained for the Bears in 2005 alone. But a career yards-per-carry average of 5.5 makes many a GM wonder what the 5-foot-10-inch, 237-pound runner with 4.4 speed in the 40-yard dash might do with 20 touches a game.

Rest assured one NFL team will pay Turner handsomely to find out.

In a relatively weak free-agent crop of running backs last year, Ahman Green signed with the Houston Texans for $23 million over four years with $6.5 million guaranteed and Dominic Rhodes signed with the Oakland Raiders for $7.5 million over two years. Turner, represented by Bus Cook, could be more expensive because teams like the Bears who similarly need a running back such as the Falcons, Texans, Raiders likely will inflate the market price. Among other running backs on the unrestricted free-agent list, Turner would be considered a bigger impact signing than, say, Julius Jones or Chris Brown.

He also will head to his next team with legs that are fresh and a hunger still not sated. "I've been ready," Turner said of the chance to be a feature back in an offense. "It's just a matter of being patient, disciplined. If you had asked me a few years ago, I'd have said I was ready too."

If Turner had not been backing up the best running back in the NFL, he might have been asked to prove it. But you might say "Burner Turner," has been on the back burner as a pro since getting that catchy nickname during his record-setting NIU career.

Tomlinson's durability only allowed for Turner carrying the ball either for short spells to give him a breather or late after the outcome was decided. Of Turner's 71 carries for 316 yards this season, for example, 39 came in the fourth quarter and 49 came with the Chargers leading by eight or more points, according to STATS.

"We actually tease him about it sometimes, like, 'Why do you even dress for games?' " Keith Turner said. "He takes it well and has never complained. He jokes that he doesn't get the ball a lot but still is considered an important part of the offense."

The Chargers deemed Turner important enough to tender him at the highest level last off-season to guarantee they would receive a first- and third-round draft choice from any team who signed him as a restricted free agent. Six teams talked to the Chargers about trading for Turner, who visited Tennessee and Buffalo.

In the end, Turner signed the one-year qualifying offer worth $2.35 million and returned to be Tomlinson's insurance policy. With the Chargers struggling early and Tomlinson finishing the season with the second-fewest number of carries in his career (315), Turner's workload also decreased.

His best game came Oct. 7 against Denver when he carried 10 times for 147 yards, including a 74-yard touchdown commemorated on YouTube for the type of game-breaking ability the Bears—and many other teams—crave.

"I really can't describe my role," said Turner, who also plays on punts and kickoffs. "I'm just another back on the team, one snap away. I was in a similar situation at Northern Illinois, having to wait [behind Thomas Hammock] before I got a chance. This is just a bigger stage in the NFL."

With the stage bigger than ever Sunday at the RCA Dome, Turner hopes this isn't his last appearance as Tomlinson's understudy. As much as he has prepared for the role, being cast as a star somewhere else can wait a few more weeks so the Chargers can thicken the AFC playoff plot.

"It's going to be tough leaving these guys because I have built great relationships in four years," Turner said. "But I guess moving on is all part of the business."

 
Michael Turner-4 seasons, 58 games played228 carries, 1257 yards, 5.5 ypc, 6 TD, 11 rec, 71 yards, 0 TDLamont Jordan-1st 4 seasons (all as a backup w/Jets), 62 games played262 carries, 1277 yards, 4.9 ypc, 10 TD, 50 rec, 417 yards, 1 TDOther than a slightly higher ypc, I'm not sure where Turner is significantly better than Jordan.
Turner is faster and more powerful than Jordan. (Which is not a knock on Jordan.)
 
Michael Turner-4 seasons, 58 games played228 carries, 1257 yards, 5.5 ypc, 6 TD, 11 rec, 71 yards, 0 TDLamont Jordan-1st 4 seasons (all as a backup w/Jets), 62 games played262 carries, 1277 yards, 4.9 ypc, 10 TD, 50 rec, 417 yards, 1 TDOther than a slightly higher ypc, I'm not sure where Turner is significantly better than Jordan.
Turner is faster and more powerful than Jordan. (Which is not a knock on Jordan.)
This is true. Plus Turner doesn't seem to have a weight problem like Jordan. Jordan looks a lot more like former San Diego star Tony Gwynn than Michael Turner.
 
My three top places I believe MT will end up:

Miami: With uncertainty at Brown's comeback, and Booker not being a "pounding" type of RB, Parcells will want to bring in a RB like he had in Dallas. MBIII is that type of back. I think the Dolphins make a push for Turner as part of their rebuild.

Chicago: Already gone through the reasons in this thread. I agree with Chicago being a player.

NYJets: Long shot here, but i think the Jets would like to go into next season with more than just Jones and Washington on their roster. A combination of two of those three would setup a great running game until their QB play came around...

imho....

 
My three top places I believe MT will end up: Miami: With uncertainty at Brown's comeback, and Booker not being a "pounding" type of RB, Parcells will want to bring in a RB like he had in Dallas. MBIII is that type of back. I think the Dolphins make a push for Turner as part of their rebuild.Chicago: Already gone through the reasons in this thread. I agree with Chicago being a player. NYJets: Long shot here, but i think the Jets would like to go into next season with more than just Jones and Washington on their roster. A combination of two of those three would setup a great running game until their QB play came around...imho....
I'd love Turner in Houston. I think the Bears will end up being his destination, but I'd prefer the Texans.
 
My three top places I believe MT will end up:

Miami: With uncertainty at Brown's comeback, and Booker not being a "pounding" type of RB, Parcells will want to bring in a RB like he had in Dallas. MBIII is that type of back. I think the Dolphins make a push for Turner as part of their rebuild.

Chicago: Already gone through the reasons in this thread. I agree with Chicago being a player.

NYJets: Long shot here, but i think the Jets would like to go into next season with more than just Jones and Washington on their roster. A combination of two of those three would setup a great running game until their QB play came around...

imho....
I'd love Turner in Houston. I think the Bears will end up being his destination, but I'd prefer the Texans.
Miami: He will most likely go somewhere we he can be a starter. Even with Brown questionable, they won't be able to guarantee he'll be the start when Brown gets back.Chicago: Its been written in the Chicago papers that they are interested "in bringing in some competition: at the RB position and that Turner's name has been mentioned. Again, without a guarantee of being the starter, its questionable he would sign (though rom a Bears fan perspective, I hope he does). The Bears would then have TWO RBs from Northern Illinois. Strange. Another thunder & lightning? One plus is that he's fomr here and his brother states that Turner is also interested.

NYJ: Can't see this happening. I think they give Jones one more chance and draft a RB in the later rounds.

Houston: A nice fit from both a FF and NFL point of view. If not Chicago, I wouldn't mind seeing him come here. Its a tough divisoin they're in and he would help them be more competative and maybe get them out of their perennial cellar.

Seattle: I wouldn't count them out. They can use some help in the running game, but what do they do with Alexander? He's not completely done and I can't see the Seahawks just releasing him. Maybe Alxander and Morris may be enough next year since I think a lot of their probelms were the O line, not just the RBs.

Oakland: Possibility of them starting fresh. They may lose Fargas to free agency and they are down on Jordan. One wildcard is Bush. May still happen.

Atlanta: Too many other needs here, starting with HC. Until they fill that everything takes a back seat. Then theres QB., thats next. Still have Dunn (havent heard anything about him not being there next year) and Norwood. Doubt this happens.

Arizona: Nice fit here too but I doubt they move Edge. If this was next year, then maybe. This year? I don't think so.

Not a long list but I think everyone else is pretty much set at RB.

 
This is Turner's one and only big payday in all reality (he is almost 26) ... he will go where the most dough is ...

 
This is Turner's one and only big payday in all reality (he is almost 26) ... he will go where the most dough is ...
I would tend to agree.It's a nice story for him to go home to Chicago, but I don't see him taking a hometown discount.ETA: don't rule out Denver, who has seem him up and close several times. There's already buzz about Henry needing to take a pay cut, and they don't seem sold on Young being an everydown back.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also, I think RB is the one position where the unexpected tends to happens. a team that does not "need" one will make a FA or draft move.
:thumbup: A team no one is talking about that would be smart to make a play for Turner: New Orleans.Reggie Bush isn't the future feature back, and Deuce McAllister has just sustained too many injuries.
That would be sweet and the most sense, but N.O. will not part with Deuce. They love him there, and he's too much a part of that community. He will take a pay cut and stay in N.O....It would be sick if they did get him though.... N.O. would be my new favorite team.... Dolphins fan since '84, might be time to switch. :mellow:
 
I think some folks will allow the nonsense that infected this board to cloud their opinions about what happens with Turner.

He has very low mileage, and the kind of body and style NFL teams crave in their running backs. He's thick, runs low, and has breakaway speed. There's no red flags that suggest he can't handle a heavy workload, and has done well against NFL teams, unlike every kid in college. He's gotten less action this year, but has his stock dropped? I dunno.

But it only takes one team to fall in love for him to get a big deal. And I don't think price will be as much of an issue. Almost every NFL team is in good shape, cap-wise.

I think only a few teams will make serious offers, but I think many teams will at least make a phone call.

Oakland? This Raider fan would love it, but I think they'll look elsewhere.

Cleveland? If I was Cleveland, I'd do it, I'm not a believer in Jamal.

Tennessee? They should. IMO.

Green Bay? Is Ryan Grant the answer? Either way, they have very little salary in the RB position.

Chicago? Probably not ready to give up on Ced.

Arizona? Why not? Should at least discuss it. I am unaware of Edge's contract status.

Atlanta? For sure. they need a proven back right away.

Denver? Again, I think they should look at him, but i don't think they will.
Interesting. Here's contract info on James. He might be an affordable cut.A couple of other teams: Miami (depending on Brown's injury)? Carolina? Williams has looked good in limited carries, but maybe there's actually a good reason Carolina limits his carries, since they otherwise give them to an ineffective Foster.
Carolina would be interesting.... but I don't see them making a splash and doing it.
 
Also, I think RB is the one position where the unexpected tends to happens. a team that does not "need" one will make a FA or draft move.
:confused: A team no one is talking about that would be smart to make a play for Turner: New Orleans.Reggie Bush isn't the future feature back, and Deuce McAllister has just sustained too many injuries.
That would be sweet and the most sense, but N.O. will not part with Deuce. They love him there, and he's too much a part of that community. He will take a pay cut and stay in N.O....It would be sick if they did get him though.... N.O. would be my new favorite team.... Dolphins fan since '84, might be time to switch. :coffee:
I've been on this one before, but I actually do think there's a decent chance that Deuce isn't there next year. There are a lot of similarities between this and the Joe Horn situation, who was also a big New Orleans community guy. If Deuce doesn't "restructure" then he could very well be let go. That said, I don't expect them to pay for Turner either. I'm putting my money on a late day 1 RB draft choice, even though I'd love to see Turner there for **many** reasons, not the least of which is so Loomis doesn't have a reason to think about anything but defense in the draft.
 
I believe this year's rookie RB class will hurt Turner. No question, IMO. I'm not saying he won't get an offer to become a starter, but his oppurtunities will definitely be limited (maybe severly so) by the numerous day-1 RBs.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top