Kwai Chang Caine
Footballguy
Saw this on my MFL page. No link. Thursday he was probable now he's downgraded it seems. Any body got any news on this?
So we're not worried about this? I'm out of town right now and on the west coast so I don't have much access to news and/or time to make changes. My only other option is Chris Ivory or if Michael Bush was really out, I also have Marcel Reece.C'mon Shark Pool - please come thru for me. I need to feel good about this start going into my super bowl tomorrow.
Running back Michael Bush (shoulder) was limited in practice Thursday. However, he should be at full strength for the Chiefs game.<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">“Mike will be fine,” Jackson said. “Mike’s a warrior. He’ll show up and he’ll play well.”<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">Jackson added that Bush shouldn’t be as worn down on the heels of back-to-back games in which he carried the ball fewer than 20 times.<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">“He’s carried the ball quite a bit,” Jackson said. “There was a stretch there where he was averaging 30 attempts a game. At some point in time that catches up to you. He hasn’t carried as much the past couple of weeks. We’ve played some physical teams and he’s been slamming that ball up in there the way you have to run the ball.”<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">Offensive coordinator Al Saunders said the Raiders need to rely upon Bush more than they have the past two games.<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">“Our back has been tagged a little bit as the one to stop going into the games,” Saunders said. “He’s done a terrific job for us. We have to be more of a balanced attack. When we’re passing and running with efficiency, your running game becomes that much better.”
So we're not worried about this? I'm out of town right now and on the west coast so I don't have much access to news and/or time to make changes. My only other option is Chris Ivory or if Michael Bush was really out, I also have Marcel Reece.
C'mon Shark Pool - please come thru for me. I need to feel good about this start going into my super bowl tomorrow.Did you read the thread? The 'downgrade came on the same day that this was posted.If the coach and OC say it's not a problem, and moreover that they are actually looking to lean on Bush more this week, what more could you ask for?
Running back Michael Bush (shoulder) was limited in practice Thursday. However, he should be at full strength for the Chiefs game.<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">“Mike will be fine,” Jackson said. “Mike’s a warrior. He’ll show up and he’ll play well.”<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">Jackson added that Bush shouldn’t be as worn down on the heels of back-to-back games in which he carried the ball fewer than 20 times.<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">“He’s carried the ball quite a bit,” Jackson said. “There was a stretch there where he was averaging 30 attempts a game. At some point in time that catches up to you. He hasn’t carried as much the past couple of weeks. We’ve played some physical teams and he’s been slamming that ball up in there the way you have to run the ball.”<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">Offensive coordinator Al Saunders said the Raiders need to rely upon Bush more than they have the past two games.<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">“Our back has been tagged a little bit as the one to stop going into the games,” Saunders said. “He’s done a terrific job for us. We have to be more of a balanced attack. When we’re passing and running with efficiency, your running game becomes that much better.”
Hipple can you do something about your browser that causes all the formatting instructions to be printed along with your post? I think someone had suggested not to use the quick reply box. On the other hand it is interesting to know that the font family is: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif.So we're not worried about this? I'm out of town right now and on the west coast so I don't have much access to news and/or time to make changes. My only other option is Chris Ivory or if Michael Bush was really out, I also have Marcel Reece.C'mon Shark Pool - please come thru for me. I need to feel good about this start going into my super bowl tomorrow.Did you read the thread? The 'downgrade came on the same day that this was posted.If the coach and OC say it's not a problem, and moreover that they are actually looking to lean on Bush more this week, what more could you ask for?
Running back Michael Bush (shoulder) was limited in practice Thursday. However, he should be at full strength for the Chiefs game.<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">“Mike will be fine,” Jackson said. “Mike’s a warrior. He’ll show up and he’ll play well.”<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">Jackson added that Bush shouldn’t be as worn down on the heels of back-to-back games in which he carried the ball fewer than 20 times.<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">“He’s carried the ball quite a bit,” Jackson said. “There was a stretch there where he was averaging 30 attempts a game. At some point in time that catches up to you. He hasn’t carried as much the past couple of weeks. We’ve played some physical teams and he’s been slamming that ball up in there the way you have to run the ball.”<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">Offensive coordinator Al Saunders said the Raiders need to rely upon Bush more than they have the past two games.<br style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">“Our back has been tagged a little bit as the one to stop going into the games,” Saunders said. “He’s done a terrific job for us. We have to be more of a balanced attack. When we’re passing and running with efficiency, your running game becomes that much better.”