Living in Cincinnati I can not laugh hard enough about this post. Could have had 2 1sts a couple years ago for Chad OIthinkImgreat and didn't take it. This is more of an I can't pass it up again deal.He's been slow playing the league for years... now is him time to pounce.
This one has been debunked time and time again. It's an urban legend.Living in Cincinnati I can not laugh hard enough about this post. Could have had 2 1sts a couple years ago for Chad OIthinkImgreat and didn't take it.He's been slow playing the league for years... now is him time to pounce.
This one has been debunked time and time again. It's an urban legend.Living in Cincinnati I can not laugh hard enough about this post. Could have had 2 1sts a couple years ago for Chad OIthinkImgreat and didn't take it.He's been slow playing the league for years... now is him time to pounce.
I thought it was a blind squirrel?blind pig finds acorn
And he's right twice a day.I thought it was a blind squirrel?blind pig finds acorn
Just like a broken watch.And he's right twice a day.I thought it was a blind squirrel?blind pig finds acorn
He does deserve some credit, but if Campbell does not get hurt two days before the trade deadline, in the year the Raiders owner passed (who likely would not have made the deal), then he would be stuck with nothing. Personally, I think the deal he deserves credit for is the Ocho one this summer. Getting a fourth back for a diva receiver who is washed up made Belicheck a "genius" last year and you here nere a peep out of people commending Brown on the same deal. That was a calculated move; this was more of a "lucky" situation.The Raiders bailed him out.Bottom line, he would have held onto Palmer in spite bc Palmer reneged on his deal.Brown would have gladly bypassed a second rounder in exchange for forcing Palmer to sit out 2011, and deal him for a 4th next April......In the end, he absolutely looks like a genius, but living in Cincy, I can't give him total credit.
Given the QB youth movement, the relative success those rookie QBs are having and with guys like Garrard in the wings etc, there's no way Brown could have been confident that his strategy was going to work out. I think teams would have serious misgivings about taking Palmer off the shelf, knocking a year of dust off him and getting 1st round value.The Raiders bailed him out.Bottom line, he would have held onto Palmer in spite bc Palmer reneged on his deal.Brown would have gladly bypassed a second rounder in exchange for forcing Palmer to sit out 2011, and deal him for a 4th next April......In the end, he absolutely looks like a genius, but living in Cincy, I can't give him total credit.
OK, I guess you are Right.This one has been debunked time and time again. It's an urban legend.Living in Cincinnati I can not laugh hard enough about this post. Could have had 2 1sts a couple years ago for Chad OIthinkImgreat and didn't take it.He's been slow playing the league for years... now is him time to pounce.
Must every sarcastic post include a smiley?Living in Cincinnati I can not laugh hard enough about this post. Could have had 2 1sts a couple years ago for Chad OIthinkImgreat and didn't take it. This is more of an I can't pass it up again deal.He's been slow playing the league for years... now is him time to pounce.
thats the thing....he would have been fine with letting Palmer ride off into the sunset...this is even more than a "too good to pass up" deal......this is like hitting the lottery for the Bengals....no way is palmer worth 2 1st rounders.....does he really have that much left to justify that trade over the next 5 years.....?couple things I noticed from the pressers yesterday....1. Hue has some serious man love for Palmer.....and I think that combined with the panic mode of losing Campbell just set this franchise back a couple of steps...2. I found Palmer answer interesting when asked what he has been doing the last 6-7 weeks...he specifically mentioned training and being ready prior to the start of the season and then said after that he went into retirement mode.....never mentioned continuing to train at all over the last six weeks.....said he went to bed a retired man....he really dodged the question here and I think you will see the result if they play him too soon..3. can you imagine the pressure on Palmer right now after basically being proclaimed the savior and having the Raiders pay that kind of pricetag....I'm not sure Palmer has the will, desire to play, and the intestinal fortitude to produce at the level they will be expecting....let alone the physical tools at this point....4. also thought he dodged the question a little about is he concerned about a team that likes to stretch the field and one of the major concerns with him before he retired was his arm injury and lack of arm strength....he gave some sort of textbook answer...while I think it was a good move for OAK.....because Palmer may be serviceable for a short time....I think they paid way too much.....and in the long run I see this being just another huge.....I don't see how this justifies his stance at all. If you didn't agree with it before I can't see why this would change your mind. If you did agree with it before than I can't see it changing your mind as well. There is no way he could have forecasted that Campbell would have gotten hurt days before the trading deadline and Oak would be desperate to find a serviceable replacement. It sure worked out, no doubt about it. Had Campbell not gone down though, nothing would have change and no move would have been made.
When you look at the best run teams in the league, the Saints, Pats, Packers, Steelers etc- how often do they have problem players? Players that want out get out and the team is little the worse for the wear. Some times they are even miles better off letting the player go ie Reggie Bush this season. If an owner feels compelled to make a stand it is almost always a sign of a ####ty owner, when management dumps a player- even a good player like Lawyer Milloy- and continues on with winning thats the sign of a good organization.no horse in the race one way or the other....but I did have some admiration for Brown standing pat and not letting the players dictate everything......it was probably a very tough stance to take and he got a ton of crap for it, and while it may not have made much business sense, not setting the precedent of having players think they can demand trades goes a long way....personally I think he fleeced the Raiders in this deal, taking advantage of a franchise who just lost their starting QB, their hall of fame owner, and who thinks they can make the playoffs this year with a QB not named Boller.....he held out for a great deal
Players not wanting to leave those teams has nothing to do with the team being one of the "best run", whatever that means. Its because those teams win. Let the Bengals go to the playoffs 3 or 4 yeras in a row and win a couple super bowls like those teams and then see who wants out.When you look at the best run teams in the league, the Saints, Pats, Packers, Steelers etc- how often do they have problem players? Players that want out get out and the team is little the worse for the wear. Some times they are even miles better off letting the player go ie Reggie Bush this season. If an owner feels compelled to make a stand it is almost always a sign of a ####ty owner, when management dumps a player- even a good player like Lawyer Milloy- and continues on with winning thats the sign of a good organization.no horse in the race one way or the other....but I did have some admiration for Brown standing pat and not letting the players dictate everything......it was probably a very tough stance to take and he got a ton of crap for it, and while it may not have made much business sense, not setting the precedent of having players think they can demand trades goes a long way....personally I think he fleeced the Raiders in this deal, taking advantage of a franchise who just lost their starting QB, their hall of fame owner, and who thinks they can make the playoffs this year with a QB not named Boller.....he held out for a great deal
Mike Brown making this stand essentially said "I'm a crap owner- if I let one guy out everyone will leave because everyone knows I am crap".
So you are saying there is no correlation between a well run team and a winning team? The reason the Bengals have sucked for 20 years is their front office.Players not wanting to leave those teams has nothing to do with the team being one of the "best run", whatever that means. Its because those teams win. Let the Bengals go to the playoffs 3 or 4 yeras in a row and win a couple super bowls like those teams and then see who wants out.When you look at the best run teams in the league, the Saints, Pats, Packers, Steelers etc- how often do they have problem players? Players that want out get out and the team is little the worse for the wear. Some times they are even miles better off letting the player go ie Reggie Bush this season. If an owner feels compelled to make a stand it is almost always a sign of a ####ty owner, when management dumps a player- even a good player like Lawyer Milloy- and continues on with winning thats the sign of a good organization.no horse in the race one way or the other....but I did have some admiration for Brown standing pat and not letting the players dictate everything......it was probably a very tough stance to take and he got a ton of crap for it, and while it may not have made much business sense, not setting the precedent of having players think they can demand trades goes a long way....personally I think he fleeced the Raiders in this deal, taking advantage of a franchise who just lost their starting QB, their hall of fame owner, and who thinks they can make the playoffs this year with a QB not named Boller.....he held out for a great deal
Mike Brown making this stand essentially said "I'm a crap owner- if I let one guy out everyone will leave because everyone knows I am crap".
what do you think they could have got for Palmer.....say a week before the season....?....when he saying I am going to retire so you better get something for me...?it would not have been a 1st and a 1st/2nd.....no wayThey took at very visible "stand" sure but at the end of the day, Palmer got his trade. Sure he missed some cheques but what else really?
There is a correlation between who is winning and what fans perceive to be a well run team. My only point is players want to play where the team is winning, regardless of how it is run. Saying that players wan to play for the Patriots doesn't prove that the Patriots are well run, nor does it prove that players care whether it is. It simply proves they are winning.So you are saying there is no correlation between a well run team and a winning team? The reason the Bengals have sucked for 20 years is their front office.Players not wanting to leave those teams has nothing to do with the team being one of the "best run", whatever that means. Its because those teams win. Let the Bengals go to the playoffs 3 or 4 yeras in a row and win a couple super bowls like those teams and then see who wants out.When you look at the best run teams in the league, the Saints, Pats, Packers, Steelers etc- how often do they have problem players? Players that want out get out and the team is little the worse for the wear. Some times they are even miles better off letting the player go ie Reggie Bush this season. If an owner feels compelled to make a stand it is almost always a sign of a ####ty owner, when management dumps a player- even a good player like Lawyer Milloy- and continues on with winning thats the sign of a good organization.no horse in the race one way or the other....but I did have some admiration for Brown standing pat and not letting the players dictate everything......it was probably a very tough stance to take and he got a ton of crap for it, and while it may not have made much business sense, not setting the precedent of having players think they can demand trades goes a long way....personally I think he fleeced the Raiders in this deal, taking advantage of a franchise who just lost their starting QB, their hall of fame owner, and who thinks they can make the playoffs this year with a QB not named Boller.....he held out for a great deal
Mike Brown making this stand essentially said "I'm a crap owner- if I let one guy out everyone will leave because everyone knows I am crap".
OK, I guess you are Right.This one has been debunked time and time again. It's an urban legend.Living in Cincinnati I can not laugh hard enough about this post. Could have had 2 1sts a couple years ago for Chad OIthinkImgreat and didn't take it.He's been slow playing the league for years... now is him time to pounce.
Not sure how much he helped his team...Mike Brown will still be the one drafting players with those picks lolAn oppurtunity to "win" this whole circus fell in his lap, but to his credit he took advantage of it and really helped his football team.
Its not just that itsA. A playoff contenderB. Before the trade deadline (which is way early in football)C. Had no backup to be confident inD. Had a head coach with a lot of familiarity with the playerF. Their starting QB was average anyway so upgrading him for the next 3-4 years was valuableE. It also possibly wouldn't have happened if Al Davis hadn't died the week before.Basically that leavesGB, Chi, Min, Det, Pitt, Bal, Cle, Dal, NYG, PHI, ARI, STL, SEA, ATL, CAR, NO, TB, Ten, Jac, IND, SD, KC, Den, NYJs, Hou, Mia and NE out of itSF- Perhaps. Somewhat similar situation- journeyman type QB playing OK with the team doing well. Was- But they seem happy to try Beck. Basically it had to be Oak or SF QB going down at just the right time for this trade to happen.I think its a bit disingenuous to just call Mike Brown lucky because Campbell went down, and the Raiders were desperate. Not like its never happened before. If you had posted in the wild predictions thread,"I predict a playoff contender loses their starting QB for an extended time", no one would say you went too far out on a limb.
massraider's post is spot on and said much better than the way I tried to say it.....and his last part about Brown sticking to his guns and being in a position to take advantage of the luck is the key......and I think a couple more of those teams above may have been interested if the exact same thing happened to their starter and they were "in the hunt", so to speak.....don't think they would have given up as much, but would have taken a sniff....playoffs aren't out of the question for some of these, not all, but some and if the others were they would take a look....SEA, TEN, JAC, KC, MIA..........for as much of a beating he took.....Brown should get some love here....he got way more for Palmer than he ever would have had he caved in before the season like many though he should...would like to hear what people thought he might have been offered for Palmer before the season started had he been willing to cave in and deal him....?'baconisgood said:Its not just that itsA. A playoff contenderB. Before the trade deadline (which is way early in football)C. Had no backup to be confident inD. Had a head coach with a lot of familiarity with the playerF. Their starting QB was average anyway so upgrading him for the next 3-4 years was valuableE. It also possibly wouldn't have happened if Al Davis hadn't died the week before.Basically that leavesGB, Chi, Min, Det, Pitt, Bal, Cle, Dal, NYG, PHI, ARI, STL, SEA, ATL, CAR, NO, TB, Ten, Jac, IND, SD, KC, Den, NYJs, Hou, Mia and NE out of itSF- Perhaps. Somewhat similar situation- journeyman type QB playing OK with the team doing well. Was- But they seem happy to try Beck. Basically it had to be Oak or SF QB going down at just the right time for this trade to happen.I think its a bit disingenuous to just call Mike Brown lucky because Campbell went down, and the Raiders were desperate. Not like its never happened before. If you had posted in the wild predictions thread,"I predict a playoff contender loses their starting QB for an extended time", no one would say you went too far out on a limb.
Minimum of a 1st rounder.McNabb pulled a 2nd and 4th- he was significantly older and had only 1 year left on his contract.Kolb went for a 2nd and a good player who was worth at least a 2nd himselfSchaub went for 2 2nds.Cutler went for 2 1sts a 3rd and Orton who was worth at least a 4th at the time of the trade.Whitehurst- a 3rd + the option to swap 2nds (I think)Favre- ended up being a 3rd, a torn bicep away from being a 2nd (or even a 1st)Cassel- High 2ndEvery QB- with the exception of McNabb's 2nd trade- has gone for something significant. Backup QBs who have never taken a snap go for a 3rd+. Backup QBs with a few good games go for a 2nd +. The bidding clearly starts with a 1st rounder for Palmer in the off season.would like to hear what people thought he might have been offered for Palmer before the season started had he been willing to cave in and deal him....?
The question is which teams would give up MORE in the middle of the season, or next year, than they would have given up in the preseason this past season? Many teams would have been happy to sniff but there is no gain and probably some loss if Brown tries to shop Palmer to those teams now instead of the off season.and I think a couple more of those teams above may have been interested if the exact same thing happened to their starter and they were "in the hunt", so to speak.....don't think they would have given up as much, but would have taken a sniff
No way that Jac or Ten ponies up a pair of high picks for Palmer with 4 years left on his contract after spending a 1st rounder on Gabbert/Locker this past year. You aren't talking season ending injury for that to happen, your talking career threatening injury (and for Ten that would be after Hass went down first).SEA a maybe, but they pulled out of the Kolb and Orton sweeps early. They wouldn't offer a 3rd for Orton and went with T Jax/Whitehurst combo instead. MIA is 100% out of it and KC is hurting and has a decent enough QB the next 2-3 years anyway. Football players are deteriorating assets in most cases- certainly ones that are 30+ and coming off their two worst seasons are. Every year that Brown held onto Palmer would reduce his market value. It was probably 20-1 or worse that some team would offer up 2 high picks for him 48 hours before the deadline.SEA, TEN, JAC, KC, MIA..........
I think anyone who tries to pull what Palmer did will think twice which is the main thing. Nobody would've gone to the mat the way Mikey Boy did - you know this.Besides Palmer said (oh I'm sorry said through his agent for purposes of plausible deniability) he was retired and never came close to filing the paper work. He also said it wasn't about the money but got some guarantees on his $ for redoing his deal with the Raiders (and he's still set to make a ridiculous $15m in the last year of the deal).-QGMike Brown said he wasn't going to reward Palmer. He said he wasn't going to trade him not I'm going to wait until I get a great offer. He's no more principled than Palmer who said he was retired.
Minimum of a 1st rounder.McNabb pulled a 2nd and 4th- he was significantly older and had only 1 year left on his contract.Kolb went for a 2nd and a good player who was worth at least a 2nd himselfSchaub went for 2 2nds.Cutler went for 2 1sts a 3rd and Orton who was worth at least a 4th at the time of the trade.Whitehurst- a 3rd + the option to swap 2nds (I think)Favre- ended up being a 3rd, a torn bicep away from being a 2nd (or even a 1st)Cassel- High 2ndEvery QB- with the exception of McNabb's 2nd trade- has gone for something significant. Backup QBs who have never taken a snap go for a 3rd+. Backup QBs with a few good games go for a 2nd +. The bidding clearly starts with a 1st rounder for Palmer in the off season.would like to hear what people thought he might have been offered for Palmer before the season started had he been willing to cave in and deal him....?The question is which teams would give up MORE in the middle of the season, or next year, than they would have given up in the preseason this past season? Many teams would have been happy to sniff but there is no gain and probably some loss if Brown tries to shop Palmer to those teams now instead of the off season.and I think a couple more of those teams above may have been interested if the exact same thing happened to their starter and they were "in the hunt", so to speak.....don't think they would have given up as much, but would have taken a sniffNo way that Jac or Ten ponies up a pair of high picks for Palmer with 4 years left on his contract after spending a 1st rounder on Gabbert/Locker this past year. You aren't talking season ending injury for that to happen, your talking career threatening injury (and for Ten that would be after Hass went down first).SEA a maybe, but they pulled out of the Kolb and Orton sweeps early. They wouldn't offer a 3rd for Orton and went with T Jax/Whitehurst combo instead. MIA is 100% out of it and KC is hurting and has a decent enough QB the next 2-3 years anyway. Football players are deteriorating assets in most cases- certainly ones that are 30+ and coming off their two worst seasons are. Every year that Brown held onto Palmer would reduce his market value. It was probably 20-1 or worse that some team would offer up 2 high picks for him 48 hours before the deadline.SEA, TEN, JAC, KC, MIA..........
so then he is "on" a team with a bunch of guys who he basically walked out on, turned his back on, said you ain't good enough for me, I'm just here for the money, ...how you guys doin'...?....that sounds like fun....Mike Brown is lucky Palmer didn't show up as soon as final cuts were announced. He easily could have and collected his contract/paycheck. I know I would have if I was Palmer
I don't think any of this will have too much bearing on what the next guy will or won't do. They make decisions on what they and their agent think is in their best interest and what they think they can get away with or what they think will work. Too many ego's on both sides.I think anyone who tries to pull what Palmer did will think twice which is the main thing. Nobody would've gone to the mat the way Mikey Boy did - you know this.Besides Palmer said (oh I'm sorry said through his agent for purposes of plausible deniability) he was retired and never came close to filing the paper work. He also said it wasn't about the money but got some guarantees on his $ for redoing his deal with the Raiders (and he's still set to make a ridiculous $15m in the last year of the deal).-QGMike Brown said he wasn't going to reward Palmer. He said he wasn't going to trade him not I'm going to wait until I get a great offer. He's no more principled than Palmer who said he was retired.
Or they would slap him on the back and say "I'm glad someone finally had the guts to stand up to our cheap-### owner."so then he is "on" a team with a bunch of guys who he basically walked out on, turned his back on, said you ain't good enough for me, I'm just here for the money, ...how you guys doin'...?....that sounds like fun....Mike Brown is lucky Palmer didn't show up as soon as final cuts were announced. He easily could have and collected his contract/paycheck. I know I would have if I was Palmer
For all we know, Palmer and Brown could have been partners in this scheme from day one.Palmer: "I promise not to talk trash about you if you agree to trade me within one year."I think anyone who tries to pull what Palmer did will think twice which is the main thing. Nobody would've gone to the mat the way Mikey Boy did - you know this.Besides Palmer said (oh I'm sorry said through his agent for purposes of plausible deniability) he was retired and never came close to filing the paper work. He also said it wasn't about the money but got some guarantees on his $ for redoing his deal with the Raiders (and he's still set to make a ridiculous $15m in the last year of the deal).Mike Brown said he wasn't going to reward Palmer. He said he wasn't going to trade him not I'm going to wait until I get a great offer. He's no more principled than Palmer who said he was retired.