I really couldn't care less about mocks. They don't tell me anything. They are popular for the casual fan. Nothing wrong with that at all, but the best mockers wind up with 7 or 8 correct. Why a I gonna follow along with an exercise in futility?
I agree, but ifthey're going to essentially turn their rankings into a psuedo-mock, then I'd prefer they separate them out.
To adjust rankings based on rumors, etc. eliminates the credibility of the ranking in the first place IMO.
I agree totally, and I think Mayock was always a bit overrated anyway. I think a lot of draft fans got a bit sick of Kiper and McShay sniping at each other, and Mayock comes along, and sounds very reasonable, and has a background of actually playing, unlike a Kiper, locked into his mom's basement. He was refreshing, and he is much more likable than either Kiper the Baltimore geek, or McShay, the smarmy frat boy.
I think Kiper and Mayock have both lost a bit off their fastball, to be honest. I don't believe that Mayock is really interested in telling us who he doesn't like, just the guys the NFL likes. That has a lot of value pre-draft, it really does, but after round 3, Mayock doesn't do anyone any good. If a player sucks, we'll never say, "Mayock called it!!"
Kiper doesn't even put out a guide anymore. That's fine, he's on the Mt. Rushmore of draftniks with Joel Buschbaum, but it's a bummer. Consider this: When Jeff George wen't 1st overall, Kiper had him ranked 84th overall, and stood by it on ESPN. Now, he's had his misses, but there simply isn't a big name on TV that would make a call like that today.