This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Fishing?
Seriously? No, I'm not fishing. They are like a baked potato that just came out of the oven. :giantfork:
Red, is it ####### guy from Rubechat??? Same guy????
What?
Um, I think you forgot someone.......my prediction Adrian Peterson 21 Cardinals 17
I know you are hoping to hear somebody prop you up here. This isn't that kind of response. You guys do stink. The only chance you have at winning more than 6 games is to dump Chilly and promote Frazier. At that point you put the entire season on the back of ADP and hope he doesn't burn out. What the heck happened to Jared Allen? He owned Green Bay last season, and this year they didn't even try to rush him. The Williams sisters look to be a shell of former glory. This team just lacks any type of mission at all. I think you probably have one of the more talented teams in the conference. You have perhaps the best running back of his generation. But you are starting to look like the Barry Sanders era Lions out there.
And in other news, the Cardinals are starting Derek Anderson against the Vikings.
he should be happy not being suspended for breaking Deanna's heart with his weiner texting and running around on her and sexually harassing massage workers while she was recovering from breast cancer... I wonder if he wore pink during breast cancer awareness month because he is an insult to everything that month stands for with his actions and in all honesty i hope Sterger sings like a canary so that the full two faced fan heart braking nature of his deception will be clear to all and his legacy appropriately adjusted. So farewell tour - who cares -- he should be happy he hasn't been benched or suspended. The streak is a number but his actions are what he is as a man.
Jared Allen made a living off of a rookie, second team tackle and an injured shell of a tackle. I think a few of his sacks also came against a gurd playing tackle. This year, not so much.Sabertooth said:
I'd love to hear your arguments that reasonably conclude that Green Bay is better than Minnesota, Atlanta, Detroit, New England, New York Giants, and Chicago. You got Dallas and San Fran, and every other game will be a war for Green Bay the rest of the way.Bless your heart.
Have you been reading my posts?Serenity Now said:
You can't sacrifice team unity and any shred of organizational integrity and suffer no consequences. However, pretty much every vikes fan on this board was ok with the second (desperate) courtship of Favre, so as far as I'm concerned in for a penny, in for a pound.Considering they've already beaten Minnesota and Detroit once, that's pretty good evidence. I'll also posit that Chicago has regressed since they beat Green Bay.
I laughed at your claim that they will be lucky to get 3 more wins.Arguments to conclude they are better than Minnesota.-they already beat them once.-their QB does not have a broken ankle-their defense is better, can pressure the QB, and is likely getting back a pretty decent corner to help even more.-they didn't trade a 3rd round pick for a 4 week rent-a-decoy-they are not coached by Brad ChildressDetroit...they are getting better and historically have played GB tough at home. I wouldn't call it lucky for GB to beat them.Chicago...at Lambeau...their Oline stinks...they're coaching is terrible and they are in a downfall right now. GB is the better all around team.Yes, the Giants, Atlanta, and New England game will definitely be tough...but not impossible. People said the same thing about the Jets and GB shut them out.Barring injuries to Matthews or Rodgers...3 wins would not be "lucky" as you call it.Id love to hear your argument that 3 wins would be lucky. I guess you can keep your biased view that GB just sucks. But that is not really reasonable at all.I'd love to hear your arguments that reasonably conclude that Green Bay is better than Minnesota, Atlanta, Detroit, New England, New York Giants, and Chicago. You got Dallas and San Fran, and every other game will be a war for Green Bay the rest of the way.
It should be pretty obvious that concluding the overall strength of a team based on only whether they won a game or not (ex: Min, Det) is pretty flawed thinking. Green Bay was already lucky to beat Minnesota (injuries to Brett be-damned) and Detroit, given that Detroit was never out of the game until the final drive. Green Bay shut out Mark Sanchez. That might impress you but it didn't do much for me. 2 fg's and one off a gimme from Rex's arrogance doesn't show me that Green Bay's got an edge over anyone.So yeah, 3 division games that Green Bay will be lucky to end up splitting with Chicago, and add to that obvious losses to Atlanta, NYG, NEP and it is pretty clear that Green Bay is about to be exposed. It's not a biased view that Green Bay just sucks, it's watching Aaron Rodgers play like Tony Romo. Much more hype there than substance. Clay Matthews has been great this year, but he can't do everything by himself.I laughed at your claim that they will be lucky to get 3 more wins.Arguments to conclude they are better than Minnesota.I'd love to hear your arguments that reasonably conclude that Green Bay is better than Minnesota, Atlanta, Detroit, New England, New York Giants, and Chicago. You got Dallas and San Fran, and every other game will be a war for Green Bay the rest of the way.
-they already beat them once.
-their QB does not have a broken ankle
-their defense is better, can pressure the QB, and is likely getting back a pretty decent corner to help even more.
-they didn't trade a 3rd round pick for a 4 week rent-a-decoy
-they are not coached by Brad Childress
Detroit...they are getting better and historically have played GB tough at home. I wouldn't call it lucky for GB to beat them.
Chicago...at Lambeau...their Oline stinks...they're coaching is terrible and they are in a downfall right now. GB is the better all around team.
Yes, the Giants, Atlanta, and New England game will definitely be tough...but not impossible. People said the same thing about the Jets and GB shut them out.
Barring injuries to Matthews or Rodgers...3 wins would not be "lucky" as you call it.
Id love to hear your argument that 3 wins would be lucky. I guess you can keep your biased view that GB just sucks. But that is not really reasonable at all.
never mind.I'd love to hear your arguments that reasonably conclude that Green Bay is better than Minnesota, Atlanta, Detroit, New England, New York Giants, and Chicago. You got Dallas and San Fran, and every other game will be a war for Green Bay the rest of the way.
At this point it is difficult to say what Green bay is, over than an extremely injured team putting out a patchwork lineup from week to week.It does appear that Green Bay may be getting healthier, though they will not be getting back Finley, Barnett, Grant, Morgan, Poppinga, Neal and others. Still, they will be getting back Pickett. They will be getting Cullen Jenkins hand back. they may have an influx from Harris, Bigby, and Starks. Their pending buy may get Driver and Quarless and Lee healthier.If the Packers can get healthy and have some stability they can easily be improved after their buy.Lots of "ifs", sure, but they have shown the character to struggle through great adversity this year so tht coupled with a little prosperity may do wonders. By the same token, but the obverse side, any additional adversity may be the straw that breaks this camels back.I'd love to hear your arguments that reasonably conclude that Green Bay is better than Minnesota, Atlanta, Detroit, New England, New York Giants, and Chicago. You got Dallas and San Fran, and every other game will be a war for Green Bay the rest of the way.
That's a short sentence with TWO misspellings in it.
They were "lucky" to beat Minny because you say so (given your own bias there, that is funny).It impresses me given how they did it (shutting down the run) and the FACT that your dislike for Sanchez or not, that was a pretty solid offense going into that game. Given the injuries to the Dline...its a pretty solid thing to go on.
That short sentence ending with a prepositional phrase is nonsense up with which I shall not put!
Frazier. The guy who is running the defense that hasn't had a sack in three games. The defense that can't get a critical stop EVER. That guy should be promoted. And that's somehow going to make the team better.I keep hearing this and I don't get it.Sabertooth said:
Well, me and the fact that the refs apologized to Childress for screwing the game up.
And the fact that even with those changes...the Vikings still may have lost.But you keep thinking that if those 2 went the Vikings way, they automatically win if you would like.
No. It's unlucky.
No...its called crappy play and crappy coaching. I don't see either changing all that soon.
Amen brother
Both teams suck. When the Lions can hang with you guys in your own stadium its time to stop thinking your team is Super Bowl bound. The trip to Detroit isn't going to be cake walk.
Are you nuts? The Cards are a juggernaut compared to us. Cards 40, Vikes 10 (new prediction)
Nice thread. A couple of Vikes fans with absolutely no hope left and one bitter fan lashing out at all the other North Division teams.
I never said a negative thing about Detroit, in fact I believe they will defeat Green Bay because Green Bay...is overrated and was lucky to beat them the first time, just as Chicago was lucky to beat Detroit. I'll lash out against Chicago and Green Bay without batting an eyelash, though.
Bless your heart.
