Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
What? I can't give an opinion?Funky, how can you challenge Andy Dufresne?? He knows it all.![]()
I hope I'm wrong but Spielmans record on drafting O-Lineman is poor.
Last edited by a moderator:
What? I can't give an opinion?Funky, how can you challenge Andy Dufresne?? He knows it all.![]()
Not going to argue with you about his track record, but that doesn't mean you stop trying...What? I can't give an opinion?
I hope I'm wrong but Spielmans record on drafting O-Lineman is poor.
Antonio Garcia?What next with their remaining third rounder? Cant imagine them not going defense again.
Depends on talent drop off from 86 to 104.That was a good trade!
I think the drop off is minimal, plus they get the extra fourth back so if they really covet someone early tomorrow they have plenty of ammo to go get him...to me anything in the mid third through the fifth is really about the same in talent - just a matter of preference of players, so stockpiling and rolling the dice is the safest bet.Depends on talent drop off from 86 to 104.
He has actually done pretty well in the 7th round the past few years:I want the Vikings to draft Alek Torgersen with one of there 7th rounders. Has Spielman ever drafted a 7th rounder that has made the team?
Yes we should keep trading back to load up on this kinda of talent.He has actually done pretty well in the 7th round the past few years:
- Shamar Stephen
- Jayron Kearse
- Stephen Weatherly
- Jabari Price
- Edmond Robinson
- Michael Mauti
- Audie Cole
Chase Stewart has done this before I am not sure about recently.Noticed something interesting looking at these trades on the NFL Trade Value Charts posted online in many places. Specifically, those charts clearly do not align with how teams are actually valuing picks. To wit, here are the three main transactions by the Vikings and their supposed trade value:
1. Gave up 4th (128) to move up 7 spots in 2nd to get Dalvin Cook
2. Gave up 5th (160) to move up 9 spots in the 3rd to get Pat Elflein
3. Gave up 3rd (86) for 4th (109-Johnson), 2 in 5th (170, 180) and 3 in 7th (219, 230, 245)--This was actually a series of trade downs summarized into one.
Trade 1 above suggests a net gain of 26 value points (moving up from 48 to 41 worth 70 points; pick 128 worth 44 points)
Trade 2 above suggests a net gain of 18 value points (moving up from 79 to 70 worth 45 points; pick 160 worth 27 points)
Trade 3 (actually many trades) suggests a net loss of 33.4 value points (pick 86 valued at 160 points; picks 109, 170, 180, 219, 230, 245 combine for 126.6)
Given that every trade above suggests the teams that trade up gained value (and teams trading down lost value), I think the "real" draft pick values used by teams must consistently give more value to late/extra picks than the NFL Trade Value Charts suggest. Someone ought to put all of the real trades executed over the last few years in as data points to infer the real pick values being used. An update is clearly needed.
X2I thought the Vikings had the best draft of any team in the NFL. I don't think they had a single reach, and had at least 4 major steals in Cook, Elflein, Johnson and Hodges.
Spoken like a true vikes fan! I hope Cook is as elusive as they say, because he has no one to block.I thought the Vikings had the best draft of any team in the NFL. I don't think they had a single reach, and had at least 4 major steals in Cook, Elflein, Johnson and Hodges.
Not sure I've ever been called a Vikings fan before. I'm a Bears fan who would have happily traded front offices with Minnesota.Spoken like a true vikes fan! I hope Cook is as elusive as they say, because he has no one to block.
A lot of Vikings fans are pretty die hard, go 3-13 and keep right on talking smack, so I figured "best draft of any team" was par for the course. A grand opinion from a rival, feel good vikes fans!Not sure I've ever been called a Vikings fan before. I'm a Bears fan who would have happily traded front offices with Minnesota.
Reiff-Boone-Berger-Elflein-Remmers is one hell of an upgrade from last season, Clemmings is a much more useful swing tackle than starting left tackle.
That Murray signing looks pretty rough right now, he's a much more expensive Asiata at this point. I'm expecting Cook to start, and McKinnon to stay in his change of pace 3rd down role. That leaves short yardage for Murray and backing up Cook.
I think I rather have the team draft Garcia than Cook. PFF graded the Reiff signing as a "D" and yet we are paying him like a franchise tackle.I am speculating that the Patriots were concerned the Vikings or another team would select Antonio Garcia and maybe the Vikings would have, maybe they wouldn't. But with NE selecting him ahead of them (and them knowing this beforehand) they made a trade with KC as no essential player on our board at this point.
Maybe not. It just seemed like the timing was NE moved up to pick 85 and shortly after that the Vikings traded down with KC.
Why? Garcia is not a better football player than Dalvin Cook. Remember how Peterson would make the offensive line look better than it actually was? Cook can do that too.I think I rather have the team draft Garcia than Cook.
Reiff did not play well as a RT last yeah with the Lions. According to PFF he has been declining in their grades for a few years now IIRC. I believe we discussed this earlier in the thread.PFF graded the Reiff signing as a "D" and yet we are paying him like a franchise tackle.
The good folks at Pro Football Focus graded out Reiff as the 16th-best left tackle in the NFL in 2015, and 28th overall tackle out of 76 qualifiers. Go back a year and he was 17th at left tackle, out of 38 qualifiers who started at least 4 games on the left side. Granted some of those below in either year didn’t play full seasons, and some are just wretched (hello ex-Lion Jason Fox!). Also, his overall +1.4 grade in 2015 shows a very real dichotomy between run blocking (6th for left tackles) and pass protection (19th at his position). LINK
Please note that both Reiff and Remmers graded better in 2016 (above 60) than Kalil in 2015 (47). So it is an improvement from Kalil. It is a HUGE improvement from TJ Clemmings (37) who makes Kalil look good.Left tackle Matt Kalil (47.1) has been largely a disappointment since his wonderful rookie year of 2012, bottoming out in 2014, where his 55 pressures allowed were the second-most in the league among tackles. He improved slightly in 2015, where his 44 pressures allowed were just 18th in the league. Nonetheless, the Vikings are getting below-average production from their former top-five draft pick at a very important position in the development of quarterback Teddy Bridgewater (77.4).
What? Who thought this? You are funny.Smith got injured and barely played. Boone wasn't great but he is ok. 2nd best lineman the Vikings had healthy in 2016 after Berger.We signed Smith and Boone for big money last season and apparently all our protection problems were solved.
What is the question they are supposed to answer?So I am not buying that Reiff and Remmers are the answer this season. I would like a plan B but Spielman is the king of wishful thinking. I can't believe the only tackle he choose to add was an undrafted free agent.
Brothers seems more of a 2 down MLB than a weak side LB.There has been plenty of speculation as to how the Vikings linebackers will be lined up with the retirement of Greenway and the opening of a starting spot for a weakside linebacker in the Vikings’ base 4-3 setup. Atop that speculation has been that Kendricks might move outside and Brothers would be in contention to fight for the starting middle linebacker spot.