Why is that exactly?Im down on MJD for a few of the reasons you listed, as well as others. I see him at the lower end of the Top 10 this season... probably around 7.In case you are wondering... no, I wouldnt take him if I had a top 5 pick in a redraft this season
Isn't it the same exact poor offense as last season?I know its preseason and as a owner i'm glad he's not getting any carries . but are any of you conserned that he wont produce like last year because of Garrad and there poor offense? Almost like the S.jackson situation.....Any concerns?
Well, Im very unimpressed with the quarterbacking situation for starters... the WRs do not leave me jaw dropped either... I see JAX playing from behind often this season, which, yes, MJD can catch the ball ... but it's not enough... he did have only 1-2 receiving tds last season if memory serves me rightMJD from week 9 on last season, 'faded', as did MSW (tho not nearly to the same extent)... 11 of his 15 rushing tds came in the first 8 games of the season (1.37/game) as well as 92yds rushing on average per game.in his last 8 weeks, he totalled 5tds (.62/game), and 82yds rushing per game.So, while I do not subscribe that he is only as good as his final 8 weeks of last season, I do believe that this is when JAX 'came back to earth' in terms of total player production in that given system... MJD should be somewhere in the middle range of those numbers (first and last 8 weeks) while on this current JAX squad..Much like SJax, I believe on a better team and system, their potential is no1RB on the season... but for 2010, I am tempering my expectations, as I believe the final 8 weeks are a more realistic impression of what the Jags are really made of.Why is that exactly?Im down on MJD for a few of the reasons you listed, as well as others. I see him at the lower end of the Top 10 this season... probably around 7.In case you are wondering... no, I wouldnt take him if I had a top 5 pick in a redraft this season
The Jacksonville Jaguars finished 2009 at a 3-5 clip in their last eight games; they lost their last four in a row. A big part of that was the statistical decline of Maurice Jones-Drew, who was essentially one of the worst statistical RBs in that period. Jack Del Rio may be misusing his star.
that's a pretty slimy summary considering they only won 1 more game in their first 8 than their last 8... just sayin'ESPN Insider KC Joyner wrote an article raising some "red flags" on MJD - but unfortunately it is an ESPN insider piece, so I wasn't able to read it.The summary for the article is as follows:
The Jacksonville Jaguars finished 2009 at a 3-5 clip in their last eight games; they lost their last four in a row. A big part of that was the statistical decline of Maurice Jones-Drew, who was essentially one of the worst statistical RBs in that period. Jack Del Rio may be misusing his star.
So... you wouldn't take 1300 rushing yds and 10 TDs from your first round pick?in his last 8 weeks, he totalled 5tds (.62/game), and 82yds rushing per game.
perhaps you should reread what I wrote... unless your first round consists of 5 picks, your comment is pretty senselessSo... you wouldn't take 1300 rushing yds and 10 TDs from your first round pick?in his last 8 weeks, he totalled 5tds (.62/game), and 82yds rushing per game.
IIRC there's some deals out there that if you buy the ESPN Mag subscription you get ESPN Insider as a ride-along. I think I found it all for under $5 - maybe even $1.ESPN Insider KC Joyner wrote an article raising some "red flags" on MJD - but unfortunately it is an ESPN insider piece, so I wasn't able to read it.The summary for the article is as follows:
The Jacksonville Jaguars finished 2009 at a 3-5 clip in their last eight games; they lost their last four in a row. A big part of that was the statistical decline of Maurice Jones-Drew, who was essentially one of the worst statistical RBs in that period. Jack Del Rio may be misusing his star.
I just did the math quickly, so it may be wrong, but I got 167 for 654 (just over 3.9 ypc) and 4 rushing TDs along with 23 catches for 163 yards and 1 receiving TD in the last 8 games. Not great, but a far cry from "essentially one of the worst statistical RBs in that period".that's a pretty slimy summary considering they only won 1 more game in their first 8 than their last 8... just sayin'ESPN Insider KC Joyner wrote an article raising some "red flags" on MJD - but unfortunately it is an ESPN insider piece, so I wasn't able to read it.The summary for the article is as follows:
The Jacksonville Jaguars finished 2009 at a 3-5 clip in their last eight games; they lost their last four in a row. A big part of that was the statistical decline of Maurice Jones-Drew, who was essentially one of the worst statistical RBs in that period. Jack Del Rio may be misusing his star.
Why?rather have gore
worried about jax oline, lack of WR, offense in general. Plus love Gore schedule, especially playoff time.Why?rather have gore
What about Gore's lack of TD's, now Westbrook, and more injuries than MJD.worried about jax oline, lack of WR, offense in general. Plus love Gore schedule, especially playoff time.Why?rather have gore
westbrook is one concussion from retirement, not that concern. 49ers will commit to the run.What about Gore's lack of TD's, now Westbrook, and more injuries than MJD.worried about jax oline, lack of WR, offense in general. Plus love Gore schedule, especially playoff time.Why?rather have gore
Seems like a crapshoot between MJD, Rice, and I guess Gore as well.westbrook is one concussion from retirement, not that concern. 49ers will commit to the run.What about Gore's lack of TD's, now Westbrook, and more injuries than MJD.worried about jax oline, lack of WR, offense in general. Plus love Gore schedule, especially playoff time.Why?rather have gore
perhaps you should reread what I wrote... unless your first round consists of 5 picks, your comment is pretty senselessSo... you wouldn't take 1300 rushing yds and 10 TDs from your first round pick?in his last 8 weeks, he totalled 5tds (.62/game), and 82yds rushing per game.
Kinda what i was thinking but this does not burst the projections up too much in my book. If McGahee is there he gets 10-12 total tds, if not 11-13. McLain will get more an increase in tds than Rice. Were Rice will get more a hike is in number of carries and yds. All this talk about Parmale scares me too though.MJD, Rice if McGahee gets traded.
I won't argue that he's not solid, but I could see him taking enough of a hit this year so that guys like Gore and Turner end up finishing above him. That's all I'm saying.Jacksonville just doesn't appear to be moving in the right direction as a team. The rest of their division is improving while they're getting worse. Del Rio doesn't appear to be a very good coach. So, is MJD going to fall of the map? No, but I wouldn't be surprised if he finished behind Gore and Turner. That's my argument. He's still a first round pick.yeah, I don't get this whole "their QB situation isn't good, their WRs aren't good, their OL isn't good". Ok, great. So...just like the last 4 years then, right?gentlemen, the only thing about that team offensively that's changed over the last 4 years is that MJD is now the absolute focus of the offense. he was like that last season and put up his standard 15(ish) TDs, 50(ish) receptions and now that he got a 300 carry load, he put up, what, 1300(ish) rushing yards to go with his 350-400 receiving yards?guy has averaged 14 TDs per season for his career. He's solid.
Since we're talking about your money, do you see this happening in PPR?Having a successful year means projecting what 5 backs move into the top ten that wern't there the year before, and what 5 backs will take thier place.For my money I could see Gore, Turner, Best, and Mathews all finishing ahead of MJD
Not speaking for Yellow Line, but one would think Gore and Best still have a chance in PPR, maybe less so for Turner and Matthews.Since we're talking about your money, do you see this happening in PPR?Having a successful year means projecting what 5 backs move into the top ten that wern't there the year before, and what 5 backs will take thier place.For my money I could see Gore, Turner, Best, and Mathews all finishing ahead of MJD
Dear Inspector Clouseau,how am I avoiding your point? I responded CLEARLY to what you asked. I said earlier I would NOT take him with a top 5 pick... so that leaves open the possibility of me taking him 6th overall in THE FIRST ROUND.quit trying to be a smartass and clearly failing at it. it's agitating that your nitpicking about things I NEVER stated than trying to have a logical discussion. Do you play in a 5 man league??? if so, then you win this battle, clearly.. because then yes, MJD would be a second round player in my eyes, this season.So, again... how was I avoiding your point?Thanks in advance.perhaps you should reread what I wrote... unless your first round consists of 5 picks, your comment is pretty senselessSo... you wouldn't take 1300 rushing yds and 10 TDs from your first round pick?in his last 8 weeks, he totalled 5tds (.62/game), and 82yds rushing per game.I think you're purposely avoiding my point.