What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Most effective way trading of rookies in a rookie draft ? (1 Viewer)

bigreese82

Footballguy
Do you get more value in return by trading the pick(1.1) pre-draft or trading "Adrian P. of the ____" after the draft? Any personal experiences or observations? I'm also assuming if someone wants a shot at Calvin Johnson they need the 1.3. Do they pay more for the 1.3 pre- FF draft ?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trading the pick predraft nets much more in my experience. Only sidenote is the 1.04-1.05 type picks might be worth more post draft if a RB or 2 end up in very favorable situations.

 
I think rookie picks in dynasty hold the greatest value prior to the NFL rookie draft when any player can be drafted anywhere still.

Once the NFL rookie draft is complete there will be some players who rise while others will fall based on which teams draft them. Some time after the rookie draft the honeymoon is over as people begin to wonder if a rookie they highly valued will struggle or not due to holdouts and training camp battles.

Some player do get a huge boost in percieved value based on being drafted into a situation that looks promising however. And dynasty owners will consider these players based off opporunity even if they were not that high on them prior to the rookie draft.

At the same time can't miss prospects prior to the NFL draft can lose a lot of value when they are drafted into less than ideal situations. Which happens pretty commonly. For example Larry Johnson being drafted behind Priest.

People are not going to be as excited about Peterson or Johnson if drafted by the Browns for example which is a very real possibility.

 
Reggie Bush pre-draft was worth MUCH more than Reggie Bush post-draft. Trade the 1.1 to the sucker owner who falls in love with a player in January.

 
I think the best way to trade away picks is definitely pre-draft, but the people trading the picks pre-draft overvalue the picks grossly so usually nothing gets done.

Some examples from personal experience in the past couple weeks.

Guy with 1.1 wanted Maroney AND Fitz for 1.1 plus garbage that would be cut.

Guy with 1.3 wanted Chad Johnson AND Fitz for 1.3 plus trash, i offered CJ straight up for 1.3 and that is what he countered with

Other leagues might be different, but in my experience trading for top rookie picks pre-draft is usually a bad move.

 
Reggie Bush pre-draft was worth MUCH more than Reggie Bush post-draft. Trade the 1.1 to the sucker owner who falls in love with a player in January.
I don't think most of the people who drafted Bush feel like suckers right now. As for the original question, I'd say the perceived value of picks is usually higher before the draft. However, I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm not going to trade it prior to the draft because it's impossible for me to accurately gauge the value of the pick without knowing exactly what I'll have to choose from.
 
Reggie Bush pre-draft was worth MUCH more than Reggie Bush post-draft. Trade the 1.1 to the sucker owner who falls in love with a player in January.
I don't think most of the people who drafted Bush feel like suckers right now.
Hindsight is 20/20 sayeth wise old man Confucius. :lmao: Post-draft Reggie Bush owners were not happy. Focus on the topic grasshoppa, focus and learn something.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Big Daddy Kane said:
EBF said:
Big Daddy Kane said:
Reggie Bush pre-draft was worth MUCH more than Reggie Bush post-draft. Trade the 1.1 to the sucker owner who falls in love with a player in January.
I don't think most of the people who drafted Bush feel like suckers right now.
Hindsight is 20/20 sayeth wise old man Confucius. :mellow: Post-draft Reggie Bush owners were not happy. Focus on the topic grasshoppa, focus and learn something.
You implied that someone who bought the Bush hype last January was a sucker. Even if his value did drop slightly after he landed in New Orleans, people who stuck with him have clearly reaped huge benefits, as he remains an extremely valuable commodity.
 
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.

 
El Asso Wipo said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:shrug: :lmao: :yes:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
El Asso Wipo said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:goodposting: :ph34r: :mellow:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :unsure:
 
El Asso Wipo said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:thumbup: :no: :pics:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :yes:
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
 
El Asso Wipo said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:thumbup: :loco: :pics:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :yes:
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
I do think one of the RB's (Bush or Pittman most likely) could make the 1.03 a tough choice if they have good combines and go to a team they'll start for.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
El Asso Wipo said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:thumbup: :loco: :pics:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :yes:
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
I do think one of the RB's (Bush or Pittman most likely) could make the 1.03 a tough choice if they have good combines and go to a team they'll start for.
Anything can happen. I just feel that there's such a huge talent gap between Johnson/Jarrett and whoever the RB3 is, that it would be a big mistake to make that move. Think Tatum Bell over Roy Williams/Larry Fitzgerald.
 
El Asso Wipo said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:goodposting: :thumbup: :pics:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :yes:
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
I do think one of the RB's (Bush or Pittman most likely) could make the 1.03 a tough choice if they have good combines and go to a team they'll start for.
Anything can happen. I just feel that there's such a huge talent gap between Johnson/Jarrett and whoever the RB3 is, that it would be a big mistake to make that move. Think Tatum Bell over Roy Williams/Larry Fitzgerald.
I know what you are saying, but it could be Rogers over Portis as well. History has shown that RB's that go to good situations usually do well and that should be something to consider. Don't get me wrong, I have the 1.04 and would be hard-pressed to take any of the RB's over Jarrett.
 
El Asso Wipo said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:penalty: :bowtie: :P
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :yes:
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
Jarrett isn't even the 2nd best WR in this class. Maybe not even #3.
 
El Asso Wipo said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:thumbdown: :shrug: :pics:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :yes:
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
I do think one of the RB's (Bush or Pittman most likely) could make the 1.03 a tough choice if they have good combines and go to a team they'll start for.
Anything can happen. I just feel that there's such a huge talent gap between Johnson/Jarrett and whoever the RB3 is, that it would be a big mistake to make that move. Think Tatum Bell over Roy Williams/Larry Fitzgerald.
I know what you are saying, but it could be Rogers over Portis as well. History has shown that RB's that go to good situations usually do well and that should be something to consider. Don't get me wrong, I have the 1.04 and would be hard-pressed to take any of the RB's over Jarrett.
I understand what you're saying, but Rogers had character flaws which we knew about, but many overlooked. CJ doesn't have those problems, at least from what I've seen and heard.In my leagues, it's more likely to see CJ overtaking Lynch or AD than drop to 4, but WRs are more valuable in those leagues. Not only PPR, but lineups make a key difference, if you start 1-2 RBs and 3-4 WRs, I'd take CJ top 3 without a doubt. FWIW, I find trading picks during the FF draft or before to be a better move than later, unless you wait until camp and you picked right. ;) In rough order of value:1. Picks before the NFL draft (with some exceptions, usually picks 4-7 or so can increase in value)2. Picks during the FF draft (players drop to your pick who others want)3. picks before the FF draft, but after NFL draft4. after you made the pick (you're limiting the other team's options)
 
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
Jarrett isn't even the 2nd best WR in this class. Maybe not even #3.
I, and it appears many, disagree with you here, but maybe.
 
Ramblin Wreck said:
EBF said:
Chaos Commish said:
coolnerd said:
El Asso Wipo said:
Ramblin Wreck said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:goodposting: :goodposting: :lmao:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :yes:
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
Jarrett isn't even the 2nd best WR in this class. Maybe not even #3.
Even if that's true, I'd bet pretty good money that he'll still be chosen 15-20 spots ahead of any RB not named Peterson or Lynch. He's a much better NFL prospect than any of the second tier RBs.
 
Ramblin Wreck said:
EBF said:
Chaos Commish said:
coolnerd said:
El Asso Wipo said:
Ramblin Wreck said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:penalty: :thumbup: :pics:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :yes:
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
Jarrett isn't even the 2nd best WR in this class. Maybe not even #3.
Even if that's true, I'd bet pretty good money that he'll still be chosen 15-20 spots ahead of any RB not named Peterson or Lynch. He's a much better NFL prospect than any of the second tier RBs.
Where on is picked in the NFL Draft has nothing to do with dynasty value.Would you rather have Chad Jackson or Maurice Jones-Drew?
 
Ramblin Wreck said:
EBF said:
Chaos Commish said:
coolnerd said:
El Asso Wipo said:
Ramblin Wreck said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:goodposting: :thumbup: :pics:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :yes:
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
Jarrett isn't even the 2nd best WR in this class. Maybe not even #3.
Even if that's true, I'd bet pretty good money that he'll still be chosen 15-20 spots ahead of any RB not named Peterson or Lynch. He's a much better NFL prospect than any of the second tier RBs.
Where on is picked in the NFL Draft has nothing to do with dynasty value.Would you rather have Chad Jackson or Maurice Jones-Drew?
Poor example. Jackson was a poor WR prospect whereas Jarret is top-flight. The 2nd tier RB's this year are terrible compared to last year.And if you want, I can cherry pick names too: Would you rather have Mark Clayton or JJ Arrington? Roy Williams or Greg Jones?Edit: "Poor" as in compared to most years. The WR's last year were dismal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
El Asso Wipo said:
Calvin won't go top 3. Peterson and Lynch are 1-2. And any RB that goes to a good situation will fall in behind them before Calvin or any other WR, or QB.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :yawn:
This is very dependent on the league scoring system and the needs/philosophy of the teams involved. Example in a contract league I hold the number 3 overall. Assuming nobody ofers me something silly for the pick , I am taking any of three remaining even though this league is not that WR freindly. I think the drop off in talent is that huge between 3 and mediocore prospects like Hunt , Irons, Bush and anyone else you think arrives in a favorable situation.
Agreed. Hard to imagine a situation where Calvin falls to the 4th spot as I have them rated. It's much easier to see him move up from 3rd. :yes:
Yep. In a PPR, only a fool would take Irons/Pittman/Bush/Hunt over Calvin. I would even say that Dwayne Jarrett should be drafted before those guys. I have 1.01 in one of my leagues and I'm still considering CJ.
Jarrett isn't even the 2nd best WR in this class. Maybe not even #3.
Even if that's true, I'd bet pretty good money that he'll still be chosen 15-20 spots ahead of any RB not named Peterson or Lynch. He's a much better NFL prospect than any of the second tier RBs.
Where on is picked in the NFL Draft has nothing to do with dynasty value.Would you rather have Chad Jackson or Maurice Jones-Drew?
Poor example. Jackson was a poor WR prospect whereas Jarret is top-flight. The 2nd tier RB's this year are terrible compared to last year.And if you want, I can cherry pick names too: Would you rather have Mark Clayton or JJ Arrington? Roy Williams or Greg Jones?Edit: "Poor" as in compared to most years. The WR's last year were dismal.
Okay. I betcha Calvin still doesn't become the consensus #3 pick in rookie drafts. And I love the guy; just look at my username.
 
Where on is picked in the NFL Draft has nothing to do with dynasty value.
That's not true. In general, first round picks succeed more frequently than second round picks. Second round picks succeed more frequently than third round picks. Third round picks succeed more frequently than fourth round picks. And so on. That doesn't mean there won't sometimes be a sixth round pick who becomes more valuable than a first round pick, but it's against the odds on average.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top