Nate Burleson, Andre Johnson, and Roy Williams are (1 Viewer)

[jwvdcw]

Week 3:

Burleson - Injured

AJ - Bye

Roy - Bye

Clayton - 5/44/0

Season:

Burleson - 6/93/0

AJ - 7/38/0

Roy - 7/109/1

Clayton - 15/185/1

vs.

Week 3:

D. Jackson - 8/131/0

Driver - 6/105/1

S. Smith - 4/34/0

Boldin - 8/119/0

Season:

D. Jackson - 22/321/1

Driver - 12/202/1

S. Smith - 23/342/4

Boldin - 18/269/0

Total stats for Burleson, AJ, Roy, Clayton vs. DJax, Driver, Smith and Boldin:

35/425/1 vs. 75/1134/6

Your stats for Smith's week 3 are off I think.And great thread...wish I would've seen it a few weeks ago.

 

[cstu]

Your stats for Smith's week 3 are off I think.

And great thread...wish I would've seen it a few weeks ago.

Fixed them. The total was right but the week 3 was the same as week 2.

 

[BassNBrew]

Have you taken into consoideration the FACT that the NFL is more Pass Happy than ever before with the New 5 yard rules and such? Did you calculate that into why maybe the 24 year olds suck?

There is so much wrong with the logic in this thread that it surprises me.

Any FF'er who would take a WR corps of :

D. Jackson

Driver

S. Smith

Boldin

Over

AJ

Burleson

Clayton

Roy

Because of AGE is seriously flawed in their thinking. I know your argument started out that these guys are going too high in most drafts, but if you think you're going to find value with RB's in the spots these guys are going, then enjoy your Yahoo League. I'd rather take any of these 4 younger WR's with UPSIDE than the 4 you listed.

It's funny how you leave risk out of the equation also. Haven't all 4 of the WR's you listed as "Better" missed significant time in the last 3 years with a SERIOUS injury?

Isn't Steve Smith STILL 5'9"?

So, what's the bet then? That these 4 will not live up to their Draft position or that these 4 YOUNGER WR's will outscore the 4 you listed?

Because I'd be willing to bet up tp $100 your WRONG on that.

Hey, wait your turn!! I'm first to milk him outta some bling.

What did you guys milk him out of again???

 

[cstu]

I've left this one alone for awhile, but I think the verdict is in.

 

[AnonymousBob]

These guys will outproduce those four:

D. Jackson

Driver

S. Smith

Boldin

******************************************************************

You think those four will outproduce Burleson, A. Johnson, M. Clayton and R. Williams?

If so, what's the bet? You're on for anything short of my home.

PS - We're talking aggregate score, correct?

Wow, somebody got creamed in this bet.

 

[BassNBrew]

I've left this one alone for awhile, but I think the verdict is in.

How about some season totals???

 

[BassNBrew]

What *would* be meaningful is if the OP showed the FBG top 15, compared his ranking of each of these 3, and explained why he has them ranked lower (and if the answer is "they are 24", we can all stop reading right there) and who he moved ahead of them and why.

I asked that question several posts back and have yet to receive an answer. To me, this is an extremely pertinent question. Since all of the WRs in question are being drafted as Top 15 WRs in most drafts than who is going to replace them in the Top 15 if they fall? It's one thing to say Player X, Y and Z may not live up to their billing; it's another to step up and identify which players are going to represent stronger Top 15 value.

BranchBoldin

Smith

Driver

Lelie

bassnbrewrules

Excluding ROY nipping Lelie by one spot, all 5 of the guys I listed have performed better. 3 in the top 15, 4 in the top 18.

 

[cstu]

I've left this one alone for awhile, but I think the verdict is in.

How about some season totals???

Season:Nate Burleson - 30/328/1 (WR #93)

Andre Johnson - 63/688/2 (WR #47)

Roy Williams- 45/687/8 (WR #30)

Michael Clayton - 32/372/0 (WR #94)

Season:

Darrell Jackson - 38/482/3 (WR #63)

Donald Driver - 86/1221/5 (WR #13)

Steve Smith - 103/1563/12 (WR #1)

Anquan Boldin - 102/1402/7 (WR #9)

Total stats for:

Burleson, AJ, Roy, Clayton: 170/2075/11

vs.

DJax, Driver, Smith and Boldin: 329/4668/27