gianmarco
Footballguy
fixedOh fudge!!! I have had him in 3 leagues.
fixedOh fudge!!! I have had him in 3 leagues.
This news kills most of my teams this year as well. Aaargh
My Draft Dominatrix told me to get him early . . . and it was great.Aaaarrrrgh. I drafted him in all but 1 of my leagues this year. Including all the Footballguys.com Staff leagues...
Dodds and Wimer.. even the staff are not exempt from this:Aaaarrrrgh. I drafted him in all but 1 of my leagues this year. Including all the Footballguys.com Staff leagues...

Yes the cupboard is bare. But Kent simply isn't ready. He barely made the team. The first time he ever played football was 2005.I don't know how you can say no. The cupboard is bare. It's him or Payne by default until Branch gets back or they sign a free agent.No. Kent is a project. He's a speed guy. He didn't even play high school football and only played 2 years of college football. He was a champion sprinter in college and also played on the basketball team (his dad is Oregon Ducks basketball coach Ernie Kent). He's still learning the game.Can we expect Jordan Kent to step into a starter's role now?
And Moses parted the red sea for Courtney Taylor to do something. Yet, does he do anything?Dodds and Wimer.. even the staff are not exempt from this:Aaaarrrrgh. I drafted him in all but 1 of my leagues this year. Including all the Footballguys.com Staff leagues...![]()

He dropped three balls in one quarter. That's doing something.And Moses parted the red sea for Courtney Taylor to do something. Yet, does he do anything?Dodds and Wimer.. even the staff are not exempt from this:Aaaarrrrgh. I drafted him in all but 1 of my leagues this year. Including all the Footballguys.com Staff leagues...![]()
![]()
The question isn't whether he's ready. The question is whether he steps into the starter's role. By default, the answer is yes.Yes the cupboard is bare. But Kent simply isn't ready. He barely made the team. The first time he ever played football was 2005.I don't know how you can say no. The cupboard is bare. It's him or Payne by default until Branch gets back or they sign a free agent.No. Kent is a project. He's a speed guy. He didn't even play high school football and only played 2 years of college football. He was a champion sprinter in college and also played on the basketball team (his dad is Oregon Ducks basketball coach Ernie Kent). He's still learning the game.Can we expect Jordan Kent to step into a starter's role now?
he did get 5 targets yesterday, and if I remember right, 3 of them were in the end zone, so the QBs (both Hass & Frye in the preseason) are looking his way. He's the big, tall, fast upside-player. However, he didn't show the most aggressiveness going for those balls, moderate ups and w/ zero catches i'd venture to say less-than-average hands.In his defense, Buffalo was in pass coverage, 100%.Yes the cupboard is bare. But Kent simply isn't ready. He barely made the team. The first time he ever played football was 2005.I don't know how you can say no. The cupboard is bare. It's him or Payne by default until Branch gets back or they sign a free agent.No. Kent is a project. He's a speed guy. He didn't even play high school football and only played 2 years of college football. He was a champion sprinter in college and also played on the basketball team (his dad is Oregon Ducks basketball coach Ernie Kent). He's still learning the game.Can we expect Jordan Kent to step into a starter's role now?
=He dropped three balls in one quarter. That's doing something.And Moses parted the red sea for Courtney Taylor to do something. Yet, does he do anything?Dodds and Wimer.. even the staff are not exempt from this:Aaaarrrrgh. I drafted him in all but 1 of my leagues this year. Including all the Footballguys.com Staff leagues...![]()
![]()
in PPD leagues.One name that just popped into my head:Robert FergusonVeteran WR. Doesn't have much of a role on the Vikes. Not a great player, but capable of filling in.All the healthy WR's are projects. Holmgren did mention during his PC something about perhaps looking at guys from the outside that had experience in the system. (Dunno who's out there & qualifies under that)Carlson looks like their best healthy receiver.
One name that just popped into my head:Robert FergusonVeteran WR. Doesn't have much of a role on the Vikes. Not a great player, but capable of filling in.All the healthy WR's are projects. Holmgren did mention during his PC something about perhaps looking at guys from the outside that had experience in the system. (Dunno who's out there & qualifies under that)Carlson looks like their best healthy receiver.

Engram in a PPR.So is Engram or Branch the shark move here....if you can afford to wait a few weeks?Engram had a decent year last year...but Branch played OK when healthy. Rankings and Projections have them close prior to the Burleson injury.
Engram in a PPR.So is Engram or Branch the shark move here....if you can afford to wait a few weeks?Engram had a decent year last year...but Branch played OK when healthy. Rankings and Projections have them close prior to the Burleson injury.
I see he had 134 targets last year, over 8 per game.What system? Just the Seahawks? Does Green Bay still run a similar system?Recent Seahawk WRs:Skyler Fulton (2006)Alex Bannister (2005)Tony Brown (2005)Maurice Mann (2005)Peter Warrick (2005)Jerry Rice (2004)Koren Robinson (2004)Taco Wallace (2004)Jason Willis (2004)Jon Pendergrass (2003)Holmgren did mention during his PC something about perhaps looking at guys from the outside that had experience in the system. (Dunno who's out there & qualifies under that)
Same deal here broWell #### me. I have (had) Brady and Burleson in my big money league. Stick a fork in me, I'm done.

I wasn't paying too close attention -- whether he meant a former Seahawk/Packer (I was assuming Seahawk but who knows). He also mentioned Mankus (?) [might not even be the correct last name -- sounded like he was currently on the PS]. When I get the chance, I'll look up the correct last name (if that's not it)-------Edit: I was off a little on the last name. It was Michael Bumpus Holmgren mentioned.What system? Just the Seahawks? Does Green Bay still run a similar system?Recent Seahawk WRs:Skyler Fulton (2006)Alex Bannister (2005)Tony Brown (2005)Maurice Mann (2005)Peter Warrick (2005)Jerry Rice (2004)Koren Robinson (2004)Taco Wallace (2004)Jason Willis (2004)Jon Pendergrass (2003)Holmgren did mention during his PC something about perhaps looking at guys from the outside that had experience in the system. (Dunno who's out there & qualifies under that)
I've never been high on Matt Jones (pun intended) but if he's healthy and starting then I'd rather have him than Branch. Seems to me that Branch just can't stay healthy.So as an owner with no injuries currently on my roster, do you guys think it would be a smart move to get Branch off waivers and put him on my IR? Or would picking up Matt Jones (also WW) be a better bet long term? Keep in mind this is in light of the Burleson injury (and in the interest of not creating yet another thread).
lolStart hiding WR's.
Not so much bad blood as it was recognized that he was worthless. The Seahawks got a fourth round pick they used on Mansfield Wrotto. They got the better end of the deal.After tonight, Darrel Jackson goes back to being depth. Any bad blood there from his trade to San Fran?
OU#1 said:Brady=CakeBurleson=IcingThank god I drafted tons of depth...
Me too. My team looked rock solid to start. My only hole was WR3, where I had Burelson plugged in and I was going to grab Engram/Branch when healthy (small rosters). I knew Burelson would put up good numbers as the only thing there for now and of course he did and then is gone. Oh well, here's to some good waiver wire pickups. 
No.Anyone think Branch comes back early and plays in week 2?
was thinking the same thing. not sure how mora feels about him.Team Legacy said:paging Joe Horn...
Good call. Was just thinking the same thing as Royal lights things up. Darrell Jackson & Koren Robinson (is he employed?) reunion.Orgazmo said:After tonight, Darrel Jackson goes back to being depth. Any bad blood there from his trade to San Fran?

Why not? Wasnt there some thoughts that he could play on week 1? When is Branch's predicted return? Who is going to catch the ball in Seattle?No.Anyone think Branch comes back early and plays in week 2?
Lelie is in uniform and caught a pass for the Raiders tonite, take him off the list. at least for tonite.Jeff Haseley said:I targeted Burleson in nearly every league. Luckily I only have him in the 35k contest. Branch and Engram will be the kingpins of this offense - once they are healthy. Who will come in for a workout?Chad Jackson?Ashley Lelie?![]()
Why not? Because he can't cut yet. Wasnt there some thoughts that he could play on week 1? Not really. When is Branch's predicted return? After the week 4 bye. Who is going to catch the ball in Seattle? Finally, a good question.No.Anyone think Branch comes back early and plays in week 2?
You know it could be a good fit. If nothing else he at least can help teach the youngsters the system, and he can return kicks. Won't cost much and isn't any worse than those out on the field. If he's good with his sobriety, and I've heard nothing to suggest he isn't (of course he hasn't been newsworthy for awhile) then he's a better choice than anyone else I can think of. In general I would hate the idea, but for right now there are just no choices whatsoever. Even Koro didn't have any games as bad as Taylor. This wouldn't be a Chris Henry type of situation , KR's transgressions are a bit different in nature and he's also done his pennance and changed his life around. Worse thing is he gets cut after a few weeks, upside is a possibly solid speedy WR/returner that helps out a team with it's top 4 WRs injured.Lots of talk about Koren Robinson on local radio.
If he's in game shape, he could be a decent stop-gap until Engram and Branch return. Apparently, the guy's turned his life around to the point that the NFL has him lecturing to incoming rookies about lifestyle and the mistakes he made.I'm more afraid that with no decent running game to keep teams honest and no receivers worthy of a double-team, defenses are going to be constantly bringing everyone--and Hasselbeck's back is only going to take so many hits. I think they should consider starting Frye until after the bye week to let everyone get healthy.You know it could be a good fit. If nothing else he at least can help teach the youngsters the system, and he can return kicks. Won't cost much and isn't any worse than those out on the field. If he's good with his sobriety, and I've heard nothing to suggest he isn't (of course he hasn't been newsworthy for awhile) then he's a better choice than anyone else I can think of. In general I would hate the idea, but for right now there are just no choices whatsoever. Even Koro didn't have any games as bad as Taylor. This wouldn't be a Chris Henry type of situation , KR's transgressions are a bit different in nature and he's also done his pennance and changed his life around. Worse thing is he gets cut after a few weeks, upside is a possibly solid speedy WR/returner that helps out a team with it's top 4 WRs injured.Lots of talk about Koren Robinson on local radio.