What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*NBA THREAD* Abe will be missed (9 Viewers)

Jason Lloyd David Lee, Bynum's agent, said he was baffled by the recent Yahoo! report that listed Cleveland as a potential destination for Bynum in free agency. "When I read it online I was in Alaska with Andrew and his family ... I was taken aback by the list considering there is nobody in anybody’s camp he could’ve been talking to. I have no idea where that came about." Jason Lloyd Lee wouldn't comment when asked if Bynum would be open to signing a long-term deal with the #Cavs. "We are not in position to discuss that at this time," he said. Jason Lloyd Andrew Bynum's agent, David Lee, told me he has had zero conversations with #Cavs GM Chris Grant about a possible trade. "I would imagine any team involved in this trade would be smart enough to talk to us," Lee said, referring to the fact Bynum is entering the final year of his deal.
 
'tommyGunZ said:
'timschochet said:
'Abraham said:
My ire with Kobe is probably not of his own doing, but it counts anyway. I HATE the fact that ANYONE thinks he and Michael Jordan belong in the same conversation just because Kobe scores a lot of points and has 5 rings. There is virtually nothing else similar about them and many fans who saw Jordan play can't conceive of how anyone over the age of 30 can place the two of them in the same conversation. Kobe Bryant is a sensational player and undoubtedly one of the top 10-15 players of all time. But all of this nonsense about him being the greatest of all time or how he might be after 2 more rings has to stop.
I don't know any Laker fans who actually believe that Kobe is as good as Michael. I know several Laker fans who enjoy SAYING that Kobe is as good as Michael, because it pisses people like you off. I'm not one of them however.
I'm your huckleberry. Rational minds can disagree. We're talking about the best 2 shooting guards in the history of the NBA. I understand why many think Jordan was better than Kobe; his greatness came when many of us were younger and more impressionable. And Jordan benefitted from having elite athleticism before elite athleticism became the norm for NBA athletes. Kobe's doing almost everything Michael did, but against far better competition with basketball as a whole being on a completely different level than it was in the mid-80s to 90s. I don't fault folks for arguing Jordan was the superior player. But I think that folks who suggest that it isn't even close are being irrational.
It's not close because of efficiency and defense. I don't know what the numbers say, but this is what my eyes tell me.
 
'Notorious T.R.E. said:
Didn't Cleveland say they would never trade Lebron? My memory could be hazy (I drink A LOT), but I thought that was the case.
Technically, they did trade him to Miami. :shrug:
Well yeah, so he could make more cash, right? And at that point the Cavs knew the jig was up...But weren't the Cavs saying the whole time they wouldn't trade him? Didn't that happen?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To recap, the magic aren't interested in the lakers offer ad Cleveland hasn't been consulted. But hey, Dwight's going to lal!

 
'Notorious T.R.E. said:
Didn't Cleveland say they would never trade Lebron? My memory could be hazy (I drink A LOT), but I thought that was the case.
Technically, they did trade him to Miami. :shrug:
Well yeah, so he could make more cash, right? And at that point the Cavs knew the jig was up...But weren't the Cavs saying the whole time they wouldn't trade him? Didn't that happen?
No need to make this a racial thing, GB.
 
'Abraham said:
Rockets actually got a bit more than first reported..

Steve Bulpett: Celtics will send E'Twaun Moore, JaJuan Johnson, Sean Williams and 2nd rd pick in Courtney Lee trade
If they can grab Robbie Hummel away from the TWolves they'll have the core of the Purdue Boilermakers squad, and a lock for the sweet 16 in the NCAA tourney in 2010-11.
 
'scoobus said:
'Abraham said:
Rockets actually got a bit more than first reported..

Steve Bulpett: Celtics will send E'Twaun Moore, JaJuan Johnson, Sean Williams and 2nd rd pick in Courtney Lee trade
So pretty much nothing...
I can't believe nobody was willing to offer up more than a 2nd round pick for Lee? Word is that they are going to cut Moore and trade Johnson. And Sean Williams is useless and has a non guaranteed contract.Good deal for the Celts. Makes for a very nice guard rotation (Rondo, Terry, Bradley, Lee).
 
'Notorious T.R.E. said:
Didn't Cleveland say they would never trade Lebron? My memory could be hazy (I drink A LOT), but I thought that was the case.
Technically, they did trade him to Miami. :shrug:
Well yeah, so he could make more cash, right? And at that point the Cavs knew the jig was up...But weren't the Cavs saying the whole time they wouldn't trade him? Didn't that happen?
They traded him to aquire assets, not to allow Lebron to make more money, after Lebron decided not to come back.Not sure how they'd have justified not trading him to a fanbase that just got #### on.
 
So, I guess Kobe is going to have to win HIS rings on his own.

The agent for Orlando Magic center Dwight Howard refuted reports that his client has decided he will sign an extension with the Los Angeles Lakers -- if traded to them."Dwight's position has remained unchanged since the end of this past season," said Dan Fegan of LaGardere Unlimited. "He fully intends to explore free agency at the end of next season, regardless of what team trades for him, including Brooklyn."A source said the Nets never insisted Howard commit to an extension as a prerequisite for acquiring him, which Nets president Billy King confirmed in a text message.Howard told the Magic, according to GM Rob Hennigan, he would like to be traded to the Brooklyn Nets above any other team. The Nets made concerted efforts to strike a deal for Howard earlier this month, but were forced to stop when the Charlotte Bobcats threatened to sign their restricted free agent center, Brook Lopez, to an offer sheet.Lopez was expected to be a key part of any deal with the Magic and signing an offer sheet could have preempted including him in any deal, depending on the terms of the offer sheet. The Nets then signed Lopez to a four-year, $61 million deal.Since then, the Lakers have become the primary suitor for Howard, recruiting both the Houston Rockets and Cleveland Cavaliers as potential third-team participants to deliver the salary relief, draft picks and young talent that Orlando is seeking in return for their All-Star center.The longest Howard could sign an extension, according to ESPN Insider's Larry Coon, would be three years, in either an extend-and-trade or after joining his new team.If he waits until his current deal expires, Howard would be eligible to sign a new five-year deal for as much as $108 million.
 
MY early Friday drunken NBA report...

Howard rumors will not stop regardless of his agents comments.

Bulls will still match on Asik. Call me crazy, but their offseason doesn't make sense otherwise. Unless they are talking a long term extension with Taj.

Bynum isn't going to Cleveland and wont be traded.

The Celts are going to be damn good this year if everyone stays healthy.

The Lakers Bench still sucks and they won't make it out of the West as is.

Knicks are a #6 seed in the east.

Jordan >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kobe

1992 >>>>> 2012

I didn't see that coming trade of the week - Rip Hamilton to PHX for a 2nd round pick

 
If the deal to LA doesn't happen for Howard, it won't be because he won't sign an extension (since LAL probably believes that once they get him there, he won't want to leave); it will be because Bynum refuses to sign with Orlando or Cleveland, and you can blame him? Why give up his right to go where he wants, just to help the Lakers trade him to a team he probably wouldn't want to sign with anyway?

 
If the deal to LA doesn't happen for Howard, it won't be because he won't sign an extension (since LAL probably believes that once they get him there, he won't want to leave); it will be because Bynum refuses to sign with Orlando or Cleveland, and you can blame him? Why give up his right to go where he wants, just to help the Lakers trade him to a team he probably wouldn't want to sign with anyway?
I don't believe that's the holdup. Bynum wants max dollars and will go to whoever is willing to pay him. The hold up is Orlando. They are simply doing what Denver did with Carmelo: holding out for as much as they can get. They'll end up trading him before the season starts, but they think the longer they wait, the more they'll get. And they're probably right.
 
If the deal to LA doesn't happen for Howard, it won't be because he won't sign an extension (since LAL probably believes that once they get him there, he won't want to leave); it will be because Bynum refuses to sign with Orlando or Cleveland, and you can blame him? Why give up his right to go where he wants, just to help the Lakers trade him to a team he probably wouldn't want to sign with anyway?
I don't believe that's the holdup. Bynum wants max dollars and will go to whoever is willing to pay him. The hold up is Orlando. They are simply doing what Denver did with Carmelo: holding out for as much as they can get. They'll end up trading him before the season starts, but they think the longer they wait, the more they'll get. And they're probably right.
True, but I'm very curious to know what "more" is.DEN was negotiating with a team that had multiple young assets. DEN wanted them all, NYK wanted to keep some.Right now, ORL is being offered bad draft picks and cap relief. Are there some good draft picks they are holding out for? I don't know what bad contracts CLE and LAL have offered to take back, but I'd assume they've offered to take back almost all of them already. If not, what else have they offered?At this point, I'm not seenig an ORL-LAL-CLE deal that makes more sense than taking a chance on getting Howard to stay.BTW, It is funny the way Bynum is made out in all of this. "Of course CLE should mortgage the future for Bynum. He'll re-sign because he doesn't give a #### where he plays. He's just there to cash a paycheck". Nothing wrong with that (my beloved Rasheed dropped the "CTC" comment), but it's not a great description of someone you are trading every non-Irving asset for. I agree though, ORL needs to make this deal before the season starts. Bynum just played a full, healthy season. ORL needs to get this deal done before CLE remembers just why that was so shocking to everyone (you know, assuming somebody comes up with something ORL actually wants).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the leverage drops by the day. There are two teams in a position to offer something of value for a rental: Houston (picks and young players) and Lal. I'm pretty sure Houston could take back more crap contracts than the lakers.

At some point one of those two teams is going to say "we are standing pat for now" and all leverage goes out the window.

I imagine the leak that Howard would sign with the lakers came from Howard and then his agent found him and said "quit being an idiot....if you leak this as a way to get to the lakers and then DONT sign right away, you'll ruin your rep even more than you already have.".

Quick side question. If howard does end up in the west, would the nba make bosh or Garnett a center on the all star ballot (and would they make Duncan a forward) or do you think they would be fine with Noah or horford starting the all star game?

 
I think the leverage drops by the day. There are two teams in a position to offer something of value for a rental: Houston (picks and young players) and Lal. I'm pretty sure Houston could take back more crap contracts than the lakers. At some point one of those two teams is going to say "we are standing pat for now" and all leverage goes out the window. I imagine the leak that Howard would sign with the lakers came from Howard and then his agent found him and said "quit being an idiot....if you leak this as a way to get to the lakers and then DONT sign right away, you'll ruin your rep even more than you already have.". Quick side question. If howard does end up in the west, would the nba make bosh or Garnett a center on the all star ballot (and would they make Duncan a forward) or do you think they would be fine with Noah or horford starting the all star game?
ORL doesn't want young players. They want draft picks and to shed bad contracts. Houston and Cleveland both have multiple picks to offer and can take more bad contracts than LA. Cleveland can offer Varejao who could be traded for a pick at the deadline. They also have Gibson and Walton expirings worth about $9-10 mil I believe. Not sure what the Rockets have in that department. Houston is much more willing to rent Howard (or Bynum I assume) than Cleveland. If I were Orlando I would send DH direct to Houston for as much as they can get. Not sure why they want to involve the Lakers, as that requires a third team and I don't think they end up with anything more by going that route. But I won't complain if Cleveland ends up with an extended Bynum or even a Bynum rental if they don't give up too much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rockets can Offer the raptors lottery pick and the mavs pick as long as its not top 20 (iirc). They have Martin expiring (12 million) as well as Patrick Patterson (team option).

I agree that the magic most want to get rid of contracts. I think the constant swirl of a 3 team deal has to do with no one team being able to absorb Howard, Hedo, richardson, Duhon, and bass. Iirc, if Martin is included the rockets could absorb Howard and two others even if Asik is signed.

 
If howard does end up in the west, would the nba make bosh or Garnett a center on the all star ballot (and would they make Duncan a forward) or do you think they would be fine with Noah or horford starting the all star game?
Not sure about Bosh, but Garnett played a huge majority of his minutes at the 5 last year. And I imagine he will play a similar percentage this year.
 
So, I guess Kobe is going to have to win HIS rings on his own.

The agent for Orlando Magic center Dwight Howard refuted reports that his client has decided he will sign an extension with the Los Angeles Lakers -- if traded to them."Dwight's position has remained unchanged since the end of this past season," said Dan Fegan of LaGardere Unlimited. "He fully intends to explore free agency at the end of next season, regardless of what team trades for him, including Brooklyn."A source said the Nets never insisted Howard commit to an extension as a prerequisite for acquiring him, which Nets president Billy King confirmed in a text message.Howard told the Magic, according to GM Rob Hennigan, he would like to be traded to the Brooklyn Nets above any other team. The Nets made concerted efforts to strike a deal for Howard earlier this month, but were forced to stop when the Charlotte Bobcats threatened to sign their restricted free agent center, Brook Lopez, to an offer sheet.Lopez was expected to be a key part of any deal with the Magic and signing an offer sheet could have preempted including him in any deal, depending on the terms of the offer sheet. The Nets then signed Lopez to a four-year, $61 million deal.Since then, the Lakers have become the primary suitor for Howard, recruiting both the Houston Rockets and Cleveland Cavaliers as potential third-team participants to deliver the salary relief, draft picks and young talent that Orlando is seeking in return for their All-Star center.The longest Howard could sign an extension, according to ESPN Insider's Larry Coon, would be three years, in either an extend-and-trade or after joining his new team.If he waits until his current deal expires, Howard would be eligible to sign a new five-year deal for as much as $108 million.
From what I understand (and I could be wrong), he (and Bynum) aren't going to sign "extensions" with their new teams during the season. Supposedly, for the same reason Chris Paul rejected the Clippers extension offer, it is much better financially to play out the season and then re-sign with your team as a free agent.So, both things could be true. Apparently, Dwight has assured the Lakers that he would remain with them long term. But, that does not mean he will actually sign anything until after the season. Hence, he's not going to "sign an extension."
 
If the deal to LA doesn't happen for Howard, it won't be because he won't sign an extension (since LAL probably believes that once they get him there, he won't want to leave); it will be because Bynum refuses to sign with Orlando or Cleveland, and you can blame him? Why give up his right to go where he wants, just to help the Lakers trade him to a team he probably wouldn't want to sign with anyway?
Bynum is an idiot. Someone can correct me if I am wrong, but from what I've read, it's more beneficial to him to sign post-season. So, that's a good reason for him to refuse to sign an extension with anyone.However, Bynum has played one healthy season. And, that was a shortened (albeit more physically demanding) season. That dude should jump on any max offer that gets put in front of him as soon as possible. He's having a knee procedure this summer. If he needs to have another major surgery next season, he can kiss any max extension goodbye.And, go where he wants? Depends. He's not so stupid that he'll leave a max contract on the table to sign for an MLE. So, he's going to go to a team with cap space? Who are they? Does he want to play in one of those places. The NBA has a salary cap. Unless he's willing to give up $100M, he can't really go wherever he wants.
 
So, I guess Kobe is going to have to win HIS rings on his own.

The agent for Orlando Magic center Dwight Howard refuted reports that his client has decided he will sign an extension with the Los Angeles Lakers -- if traded to them."Dwight's position has remained unchanged since the end of this past season," said Dan Fegan of LaGardere Unlimited. "He fully intends to explore free agency at the end of next season, regardless of what team trades for him, including Brooklyn."A source said the Nets never insisted Howard commit to an extension as a prerequisite for acquiring him, which Nets president Billy King confirmed in a text message.Howard told the Magic, according to GM Rob Hennigan, he would like to be traded to the Brooklyn Nets above any other team. The Nets made concerted efforts to strike a deal for Howard earlier this month, but were forced to stop when the Charlotte Bobcats threatened to sign their restricted free agent center, Brook Lopez, to an offer sheet.Lopez was expected to be a key part of any deal with the Magic and signing an offer sheet could have preempted including him in any deal, depending on the terms of the offer sheet. The Nets then signed Lopez to a four-year, $61 million deal.Since then, the Lakers have become the primary suitor for Howard, recruiting both the Houston Rockets and Cleveland Cavaliers as potential third-team participants to deliver the salary relief, draft picks and young talent that Orlando is seeking in return for their All-Star center.The longest Howard could sign an extension, according to ESPN Insider's Larry Coon, would be three years, in either an extend-and-trade or after joining his new team.If he waits until his current deal expires, Howard would be eligible to sign a new five-year deal for as much as $108 million.
From what I understand (and I could be wrong), he (and Bynum) aren't going to sign "extensions" with their new teams during the season. Supposedly, for the same reason Chris Paul rejected the Clippers extension offer, it is much better financially to play out the season and then re-sign with your team as a free agent.So, both things could be true. Apparently, Dwight has assured the Lakers that he would remain with them long term. But, that does not mean he will actually sign anything until after the season. Hence, he's not going to "sign an extension."
He is quoted as saying he is going to test free agency. That is different than not signing an extension.
 
So, I guess Kobe is going to have to win HIS rings on his own.

The agent for Orlando Magic center Dwight Howard refuted reports that his client has decided he will sign an extension with the Los Angeles Lakers -- if traded to them."Dwight's position has remained unchanged since the end of this past season," said Dan Fegan of LaGardere Unlimited. "He fully intends to explore free agency at the end of next season, regardless of what team trades for him, including Brooklyn."A source said the Nets never insisted Howard commit to an extension as a prerequisite for acquiring him, which Nets president Billy King confirmed in a text message.Howard told the Magic, according to GM Rob Hennigan, he would like to be traded to the Brooklyn Nets above any other team. The Nets made concerted efforts to strike a deal for Howard earlier this month, but were forced to stop when the Charlotte Bobcats threatened to sign their restricted free agent center, Brook Lopez, to an offer sheet.Lopez was expected to be a key part of any deal with the Magic and signing an offer sheet could have preempted including him in any deal, depending on the terms of the offer sheet. The Nets then signed Lopez to a four-year, $61 million deal.Since then, the Lakers have become the primary suitor for Howard, recruiting both the Houston Rockets and Cleveland Cavaliers as potential third-team participants to deliver the salary relief, draft picks and young talent that Orlando is seeking in return for their All-Star center.The longest Howard could sign an extension, according to ESPN Insider's Larry Coon, would be three years, in either an extend-and-trade or after joining his new team.If he waits until his current deal expires, Howard would be eligible to sign a new five-year deal for as much as $108 million.
From what I understand (and I could be wrong), he (and Bynum) aren't going to sign "extensions" with their new teams during the season. Supposedly, for the same reason Chris Paul rejected the Clippers extension offer, it is much better financially to play out the season and then re-sign with your team as a free agent.So, both things could be true. Apparently, Dwight has assured the Lakers that he would remain with them long term. But, that does not mean he will actually sign anything until after the season. Hence, he's not going to "sign an extension."
He is quoted as saying he is going to test free agency. That is different than not signing an extension.
In what way?If you don't sign an extension, you become a FA. At that point, you are "test[ing] free agency."ETA: Also, from what I've heard, all agents are urging their max-worthy clients to not sign an extension and "test free agency." The reason is that they get a fifth guaranteed year on their max contract re-signing with the team that has their Bird rights (and only the Lakers would have those if he goes to the Lakers) by going that route.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's been all over the radio here that the Lakers don't care what Howard is saying about whether he'll sign now or not - they want to deal for him regardless.

As Gdogg points out, Bynum will end up signing a max deal with whoever he ends up with.

The sticking point is really Orlando and what they're willing to accept in return. They should be making a deal for Bynum, if they unload some salaries as well so much the better, but really the only extremely bad contract they have is Turkoglu and he comes off the books in 2 years anyway.

 
MY early Friday drunken NBA report...

Bulls will still match on Asik. Call me crazy, but their offseason doesn't make sense otherwise. Unless they are talking a long term extension with Taj.
You're crazy! They are talking extension with Taj but I don't think they will agree on anything unless Taj is willing to take much less than he'd be worth on the open market.How doesn't the offseason make sense? It makes total sense. They are trying to pay no luxury tax or, at most, very little. (I think the former.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the deal to LA doesn't happen for Howard, it won't be because he won't sign an extension (since LAL probably believes that once they get him there, he won't want to leave); it will be because Bynum refuses to sign with Orlando or Cleveland, and you can blame him? Why give up his right to go where he wants, just to help the Lakers trade him to a team he probably wouldn't want to sign with anyway?
Bynum is an idiot. Someone can correct me if I am wrong, but from what I've read, it's more beneficial to him to sign post-season. So, that's a good reason for him to refuse to sign an extension with anyone.However, Bynum has played one healthy season. And, that was a shortened (albeit more physically demanding) season. That dude should jump on any max offer that gets put in front of him as soon as possible. He's having a knee procedure this summer. If he needs to have another major surgery next season, he can kiss any max extension goodbye.

And, go where he wants? Depends. He's not so stupid that he'll leave a max contract on the table to sign for an MLE. So, he's going to go to a team with cap space? Who are they? Does he want to play in one of those places. The NBA has a salary cap. Unless he's willing to give up $100M, he can't really go wherever he wants.
Bold is correct. Right now Bynum and Howard can only sign 3 year extensions. After this season they can sign 5 year max deal.After this season Dallas will have cap space for a max player.

 
I realize the Lakers can offer Bynum, but after playing around with the trade machine it looks like they can't take back Hedo (much less Richardson, Duhon, or Bass as well) without getting another team involved or adding in their own undesirable contracts. They would have to move out contracts with two years on them (Black, MWP) to get back Hedo's deal that also has 2 years. Makes no sense for Orlando. A one-for-one deal of Bynum for Howard works, but I don't see that getting done. However, THIS trade would work....

LAL sends Gasol and Bynum

Magic sends Howard, HEdo, Richardson, Duhon

Houston sends Martin, Tony Douglas, and the Mavs pick

LAL gets Howard, Hedo, and Richardson

Magic get Bynum, Kevin Martin, and Toney Douglas and the Mavs pick

Rockets get Gasol.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I realize the Lakers can offer Bynum, but after playing around with the trade machine it looks like they can't take back Hedo (much less Richardson, Duhon, or Bass as well) without getting another team involved or adding in their own undesirable contracts. They would have to move out contracts with two years on them (Black, MWP) to get back Hedo's deal that also has 2 years. Makes no sense for Orlando. A one-for-one deal of Bynum for Howard works, but I don't see that getting done. However, THIS trade would work....LAL sends Gasol and BynumMagic sends Howard, HEdo, Richardson, DuhonHouston sends Martin, Tony Douglas, and the Mavs pickLAL gets Howard, Hedo, and RichardsonMagic get Bynum, Kevin Martin, and Toney Douglas and the Mavs pickRockets get Gasol.
That trade makes the Lakers worse. Rejected.
 
I realize the Lakers can offer Bynum, but after playing around with the trade machine it looks like they can't take back Hedo (much less Richardson, Duhon, or Bass as well) without getting another team involved or adding in their own undesirable contracts. They would have to move out contracts with two years on them (Black, MWP) to get back Hedo's deal that also has 2 years. Makes no sense for Orlando. A one-for-one deal of Bynum for Howard works, but I don't see that getting done. However, THIS trade would work....LAL sends Gasol and BynumMagic sends Howard, HEdo, Richardson, DuhonHouston sends Martin, Tony Douglas, and the Mavs pickLAL gets Howard, Hedo, and RichardsonMagic get Bynum, Kevin Martin, and Toney Douglas and the Mavs pickRockets get Gasol.
All of these trades seem to hinge on someone having an actual gun to the heads of Lakers management.
 
Maybe. But someone is eating contracts and it's likely to be the team that gets Howard.
Then, that team won't be the Lakers. Why would they trade both Pau and Bynum to get Howard? That deal makes no sense at all.The reports out there are that the Lakers would be amenable to taking on Richardson with Howard, but not Hedo. Start the trade machine with the premise that Howard, Gasol and Richardson are Lakers, and Bynum is not and you're off.Not to mention, the Rockets in that deal are making out like bandits. They give up Martin and Douglas and a crappy pick, but get back Gasol, while the Lakers are giving up not just Bynum, but also Gasol and the Magic are giving up Howard. Come on...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I realize the Lakers can offer Bynum, but after playing around with the trade machine it looks like they can't take back Hedo (much less Richardson, Duhon, or Bass as well) without getting another team involved or adding in their own undesirable contracts. They would have to move out contracts with two years on them (Black, MWP) to get back Hedo's deal that also has 2 years. Makes no sense for Orlando. A one-for-one deal of Bynum for Howard works, but I don't see that getting done. However, THIS trade would work....

LAL sends Gasol and Bynum

Magic sends Howard, HEdo, Richardson, Duhon

Houston sends Martin, Tony Douglas, and the Mavs pick

LAL gets Howard, Hedo, and Richardson

Magic get Bynum, Kevin Martin, and Toney Douglas and the Mavs pick

Rockets get Gasol.
All of these trades seem to hinge on someone having an actual gun to the heads of Lakers management.
You're right, it does seem heavy handed against them. But I simply can not imagine a scenario where Orlando trades Howard without getting rid of most/all of Hedo, Richardson, Duhon, and Bass. Losing a player of Howard's caliber means blowing up the whole system and those contracts are so onerous (without a star player in tow) that I think the reason the Nets deal didn't happen and no deal has happened to date is that Orlando will not be parting with Howard without shedding a ton of salary. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that the final trade - whether it be today or at the trade deadline - will look very lopsided against the Magic in terms of the talent and picks they receive.
 
I realize the Lakers can offer Bynum, but after playing around with the trade machine it looks like they can't take back Hedo (much less Richardson, Duhon, or Bass as well) without getting another team involved or adding in their own undesirable contracts. They would have to move out contracts with two years on them (Black, MWP) to get back Hedo's deal that also has 2 years. Makes no sense for Orlando. A one-for-one deal of Bynum for Howard works, but I don't see that getting done. However, THIS trade would work....

LAL sends Gasol and Bynum

Magic sends Howard, HEdo, Richardson, Duhon

Houston sends Martin, Tony Douglas, and the Mavs pick

LAL gets Howard, Hedo, and Richardson

Magic get Bynum, Kevin Martin, and Toney Douglas and the Mavs pick

Rockets get Gasol.
All of these trades seem to hinge on someone having an actual gun to the heads of Lakers management.
You're right, it does seem heavy handed against them. But I simply can not imagine a scenario where Orlando trades Howard without getting rid of most/all of Hedo, Richardson, Duhon, and Bass. Losing a player of Howard's caliber means blowing up the whole system and those contracts are so onerous (without a star player in tow) that I think the reason the Nets deal didn't happen and no deal has happened to date is that Orlando will not be parting with Howard without shedding a ton of salary. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that the final trade - whether it be today or at the trade deadline - will look very lopsided against the Magic in terms of the talent and picks they receive.
Orlando's running out of options. And regardless of the ticking clock against them, LA isn't going to do something stupid to make room for them.
 
'Abraham said:
'Good said:
'Abraham said:
I realize the Lakers can offer Bynum, but after playing around with the trade machine it looks like they can't take back Hedo (much less Richardson, Duhon, or Bass as well) without getting another team involved or adding in their own undesirable contracts. They would have to move out contracts with two years on them (Black, MWP) to get back Hedo's deal that also has 2 years. Makes no sense for Orlando. A one-for-one deal of Bynum for Howard works, but I don't see that getting done. However, THIS trade would work....

LAL sends Gasol and Bynum

Magic sends Howard, HEdo, Richardson, Duhon

Houston sends Martin, Tony Douglas, and the Mavs pick

LAL gets Howard, Hedo, and Richardson

Magic get Bynum, Kevin Martin, and Toney Douglas and the Mavs pick

Rockets get Gasol.
All of these trades seem to hinge on someone having an actual gun to the heads of Lakers management.
You're right, it does seem heavy handed against them. But I simply can not imagine a scenario where Orlando trades Howard without getting rid of most/all of Hedo, Richardson, Duhon, and Bass. Losing a player of Howard's caliber means blowing up the whole system and those contracts are so onerous (without a star player in tow) that I think the reason the Nets deal didn't happen and no deal has happened to date is that Orlando will not be parting with Howard without shedding a ton of salary. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that the final trade - whether it be today or at the trade deadline - will look very lopsided against the Magic in terms of the talent and picks they receive.
The Magic are trying to hit the reset button. I don't think they take back Bynum. They have to give him a max extension. Taking Bynum limits the other assets they might acquire. That's why there is inclusion of another team. They need someone who has the assets that the Magic want (picks, cheap, young talent contracts and someone to take on their bad contracts).

It's why Cleveland has come up. The Cavs, reportedly, are very interested in Bynum. Bynum, supposedly, is interested in them with Kyrie Irving. They have the ability to trade Varajao and others (Thompson) + picks to get Bynum. Those assets are more attractive to the Magic than Bynum because it allows them to rebuild without albatross contracts on the books.

The Magic are holding out for the best combo of picks, small contracts on young players and the deal that will allow them to unload the most onerous of their contracts, including Richardson and Hedo.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Orlando gets three expiring contracts (Kevin Martin, Josh McRoberts, Andrew Goudelock), two rookies (Jeremy Lamb and Royce White) and two 2013 no. 1s (Toronto and Houston).

L.A. gets Howard and turkoglu

Houston gets Bynum, Glen Davis, Jason Richardson and Steve Blake.

So Orlando chops $22-24 million in 2012-13 salary (plus the 2014 and 2015 savings), Houston adds about $20 million, and the Lakers add $7.5 million (plus tax penalties).

Sportsguy's idea.

 
Orlando gets three expiring contracts (Kevin Martin, Josh McRoberts, Andrew Goudelock), two rookies (Jeremy Lamb and Royce White) and two 2013 no. 1s (Toronto and Houston).L.A. gets Howard and turkoglu Houston gets Bynum, Glen Davis, Jason Richardson and Steve Blake. So Orlando chops $22-24 million in 2012-13 salary (plus the 2014 and 2015 savings), Houston adds about $20 million, and the Lakers add $7.5 million (plus tax penalties).Sportsguy's idea.
So Houston gives Kevin Martin, 2 dudes just drafted in the first and 2 more firsts for Bynum?Edit: Seems like they'd just be better off getting Howard.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Would Jeremy Lin make $5m more in endorsements in nyc than he would in houston? If so, bad idea signing that.
Doubtful. For starters, he isn't exactly shilling for a furniture store. He's going to get many/most of the same endorsements anyway. Secondly, the new York market is huge but there are also a number of sports stars there already (Jeter, eli, tebow, Carmelo). Lin is now the guy in houston. That said, I don't think it ever occurred to him that he wouldn't be back in new York.
 
Would Jeremy Lin make $5m more in endorsements in nyc than he would in houston? If so, bad idea signing that.
Doubtful. For starters, he isn't exactly shilling for a furniture store. He's going to get many/most of the same endorsements anyway. Secondly, the new York market is huge but there are also a number of sports stars there already (Jeter, eli, tebow, Carmelo). Lin is now the guy in houston. That said, I don't think it ever occurred to him that he wouldn't be back in new York.
It seems that the issue was Lin had an offer from Houston. Nyk wanted him to get an offer to set the market. Lin told nyk the offer and nyk said they'd match. The Lin goes back to houston and they up the poison pill. Nyk didnt like that he went back to squeeze more money out of hou/nyk.
 
I'm not sure there was any squeezing on Lins part. I think the rockets got the message (from Lin) that the knicks would match. He hadn't signed a deal yet. They changed their offer. Lin was left with the option of walking away from an offer worth more money (and thus having no offers on the table at all) or signing the new deal - the new more lucrative deal - placed in front of him. Is it possible he figured the knocks would still match? Probably.

 
'Abraham said:
'Good said:
'Abraham said:
I realize the Lakers can offer Bynum, but after playing around with the trade machine it looks like they can't take back Hedo (much less Richardson, Duhon, or Bass as well) without getting another team involved or adding in their own undesirable contracts. They would have to move out contracts with two years on them (Black, MWP) to get back Hedo's deal that also has 2 years. Makes no sense for Orlando. A one-for-one deal of Bynum for Howard works, but I don't see that getting done. However, THIS trade would work....

LAL sends Gasol and Bynum

Magic sends Howard, HEdo, Richardson, Duhon

Houston sends Martin, Tony Douglas, and the Mavs pick

LAL gets Howard, Hedo, and Richardson

Magic get Bynum, Kevin Martin, and Toney Douglas and the Mavs pick

Rockets get Gasol.
All of these trades seem to hinge on someone having an actual gun to the heads of Lakers management.
You're right, it does seem heavy handed against them. But I simply can not imagine a scenario where Orlando trades Howard without getting rid of most/all of Hedo, Richardson, Duhon, and Bass. Losing a player of Howard's caliber means blowing up the whole system and those contracts are so onerous (without a star player in tow) that I think the reason the Nets deal didn't happen and no deal has happened to date is that Orlando will not be parting with Howard without shedding a ton of salary. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that the final trade - whether it be today or at the trade deadline - will look very lopsided against the Magic in terms of the talent and picks they receive.
You can't envision Orlando dealing Howard without unloading bad contracts. So your conclusion is that the Rockets will make out like bandits. Makes sense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top