What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NCAA HOOPS THREAD! -- K petitions to get Maui Jim Maui Invitational moved to Transylvania (2 Viewers)

Who is worse?


  • Total voters
    278
I wouldn't exactly be heartbroken or anything, but if they're in it I would prefer that they win.

I do believe if you have a younger team, an NIT run could be great experience for the next season.

 
These are the upsets I "force-fed" into my warren buffet bracket.

Dayton over Ohio St.

NC State over St. Louis

New Mexico over Kansas

Providence over UNC

Kentucky over Wichita St.

Tennessee over UMass

Tennessee over Duke (pending tonight's game)

Tennessee over Michigan (pending tonight's game)
Very nice picks, curious as to what your elite 8 and final 4 looks like?

 
These are the upsets I "force-fed" into my warren buffet bracket.

Dayton over Ohio St.

NC State over St. Louis

New Mexico over Kansas

Providence over UNC

Kentucky over Wichita St.

Tennessee over UMass

Tennessee over Duke (pending tonight's game)

Tennessee over Michigan (pending tonight's game)
I've got:

SF Austin over VCU

Dayton over tOSU

NM State over SD State

NC State over St. Louis

Harvard over Cincinnati

Tenn over U Mass (pending)

Zona State over Texas

Baylor over Creighton

Tenn over Duke

Tenn over Mich

I use KenPom but not just by straight differential ... I tend to fade teams that really struggle either offensively or defensively, since I think they historically are DOA come tourney time (especially teams that can defend but can't score at all). There are a bunch of one-way teams this year so I'm thinking we'll see a lot of upper-seeds teams hit the skids early.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Man, I am so tired of everybody regurgitating the same stuff. I can't wait for the following:

1. Cincinnati to blow out Harvard.

2. L'ville to lose in the first couple rounds.

3. Umass to advance a few games.

 
Man, I am so tired of everybody regurgitating the same stuff. I can't wait for the following:

1. Cincinnati to blow out Harvard.

2. L'ville to lose in the first couple rounds.

3. Umass to advance a few games.
Cincy is gangsta....I dont doubt Sean Kilpatrick

 
To me, the biggest ? is Iowa St....I love them as a team, but they arent getting regional help after the first weekend, and they lose on the road to good teams compared to almost never at home.

So torn. Have them in the F4 in 1 and MSU in my other but wish I had room for UVA. Theyre easily the sneakiest surprise #1. I dont think the have the offense to hang though.

 
To me, the biggest ? is Iowa St....I love them as a team, but they arent getting regional help after the first weekend, and they lose on the road to good teams compared to almost never at home.

So torn. Have them in the F4 in 1 and MSU in my other but wish I had room for UVA. Theyre easily the sneakiest surprise #1. I dont think the have the offense to hang though.
Iowa State is going to be one of the teams that decides a ton of brackets. F4 possibility who could lose R1.

UVA/MSU game would be a hell of a game. Not sure either team has much of a mismatch in that game. I guess MSU doesn't have a true PF so maybe they can go small and force UVA to go likewise but Mitchell can guard smaller guys. Or can Mitchell guard Payne? Game would likely be a toss up.

 
Here's a second round potential upset alert. 8 seed Memphis over 1 seed Virginia.

Taking 8/9 seeds over the 1 seed in round 2 is a very risky proposition. Historically, 1 seeds are 101-15 against 8/9 seeds in round 2. However, Virginia has the qualities of being a 1 seed upset victim and Memphis has the qualities of 8/9 seed upsetter.

Would love the homer opinion of this potential matchup.
Memphis homer here. While I can't say too much about UVA or GW, I can give the breakdown of Memphis.

Pros: As usual, very athletic team. Four senior guards, including Mizzou transfer Michael Dixon, who has been the Tigers' rock the past few games. Joe Jackson can sprint coast to coast with the ball in transition, Crawford is a streaky 3pt shooter who is the Tigers' only consistent outside threat. Geron Johnson typically draws the toughest defense assignments, & looks to apply on-ball pressure every time. All guards have quick hands on D in hopes of creating TOs & scores in transition (fast break play of the year candidate here). Inside, Soph Shaq Goodwin is has good moves around the basket & looks to get Fr Austin Nichols involved early every game with high-low & inside passes. Nichols has fantastic hands & can score with either hand. Both are good rebounders & shot blockers. Reserves Nick King & GW transfer David Pellom are the only two frontcourt reserves who get significant minutes, and get their points on stickbacks.

Cons: Disciplined defense. Gambling, reaching style of defense often leads to easy buckets for opposing teams, and help defense often leads to fouls on bigs who have to switch to help in the lane. Coach Josh Pastner insists on face guarding EVERYONE who leaks outside of the three point line, including bigs who can't shoot. That being said, the Tigers still don't defend against the 3pt very well, and a team with a good shooter will light them up. Memphis is not a good 3pt shooting team themselves & defenses who sag can bait the Tigers into taking wide-open threes that they haven't proven to hit with any consistency. Memphis is also below average in team FT%.

Overall: Memphis matches up well against teams that want to push the tempo, but poorly against half-court offenses that also play smart defense. They are at their best when they get a lead & force teams into missing jumpers that lead to transition points, but struggle when they have to take jumpshots themselves. Good wins against Ok.St, Gonzaga, Louisville (twice), & SMU. Played Florida to a two point loss in a game that could have gone either way. Bad losses to Cincy (twice), UConn (three times), SMU, Houston & Ok.St.

 
Here's a second round potential upset alert. 8 seed Memphis over 1 seed Virginia.

Taking 8/9 seeds over the 1 seed in round 2 is a very risky proposition. Historically, 1 seeds are 101-15 against 8/9 seeds in round 2. However, Virginia has the qualities of being a 1 seed upset victim and Memphis has the qualities of 8/9 seed upsetter.

Would love the homer opinion of this potential matchup.
Memphis homer here. While I can't say too much about UVA or GW, I can give the breakdown of Memphis.

Pros: As usual, very athletic team. Four senior guards, including Mizzou transfer Michael Dixon, who has been the Tigers' rock the past few games. Joe Jackson can sprint coast to coast with the ball in transition, Crawford is a streaky 3pt shooter who is the Tigers' only consistent outside threat. Geron Johnson typically draws the toughest defense assignments, & looks to apply on-ball pressure every time. All guards have quick hands on D in hopes of creating TOs & scores in transition (fast break play of the year candidate here). Inside, Soph Shaq Goodwin is has good moves around the basket & looks to get Fr Austin Nichols involved early every game with high-low & inside passes. Nichols has fantastic hands & can score with either hand. Both are good rebounders & shot blockers. Reserves Nick King & GW transfer David Pellom are the only two frontcourt reserves who get significant minutes, and get their points on stickbacks.

Cons: Disciplined defense. Gambling, reaching style of defense often leads to easy buckets for opposing teams, and help defense often leads to fouls on bigs who have to switch to help in the lane. Coach Josh Pastner insists on face guarding EVERYONE who leaks outside of the three point line, including bigs who can't shoot. That being said, the Tigers still don't defend against the 3pt very well, and a team with a good shooter will light them up. Memphis is not a good 3pt shooting team themselves & defenses who sag can bait the Tigers into taking wide-open threes that they haven't proven to hit with any consistency. Memphis is also below average in team FT%.

Overall: Memphis matches up well against teams that want to push the tempo, but poorly against half-court offenses that also play smart defense. They are at their best when they get a lead & force teams into missing jumpers that lead to transition points, but struggle when they have to take jumpshots themselves. Good wins against Ok.St, Gonzaga, Louisville (twice), & SMU. Played Florida to a two point loss in a game that could have gone either way. Bad losses to Cincy (twice), UConn (three times), SMU, Houston & Ok.St.
How are they against presses and zones? GW uses a 1-3-1 trapping defense that if exploited, can lead to easy baskets. GW probably won't take too many dumb shots to lead to fast break opportunities.

 
Raider Nation said:
I love how they keep telling us that these sh-t teams "just won an NCAA game."

Whatever.
Cal Poly needs to be known for something other than computer science, engineering, and hot chicks.

 
To me, the biggest ? is Iowa St....I love them as a team, but they arent getting regional help after the first weekend, and they lose on the road to good teams compared to almost never at home.

So torn. Have them in the F4 in 1 and MSU in my other but wish I had room for UVA. Theyre easily the sneakiest surprise #1. I dont think the have the offense to hang though.
Iowa State is going to be one of the teams that decides a ton of brackets. F4 possibility who could lose R1.

UVA/MSU game would be a hell of a game. Not sure either team has much of a mismatch in that game. I guess MSU doesn't have a true PF so maybe they can go small and force UVA to go likewise but Mitchell can guard smaller guys. Or can Mitchell guard Payne? Game would likely be a toss up.
Im sticking with Iowa St, but damn they are starting to smell like Mizzou a few years back to me who I was also high on and then lost as a 15 seeded Norfolk State.

All offense, no defense. I think this ISU team is better all around besides at PG, but ooh wee. ISU is better coached as well, which is something Im buying this year especially.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's a second round potential upset alert. 8 seed Memphis over 1 seed Virginia.

Taking 8/9 seeds over the 1 seed in round 2 is a very risky proposition. Historically, 1 seeds are 101-15 against 8/9 seeds in round 2. However, Virginia has the qualities of being a 1 seed upset victim and Memphis has the qualities of 8/9 seed upsetter.

Would love the homer opinion of this potential matchup.
Memphis homer here. While I can't say too much about UVA or GW, I can give the breakdown of Memphis.

Pros: As usual, very athletic team. Four senior guards, including Mizzou transfer Michael Dixon, who has been the Tigers' rock the past few games. Joe Jackson can sprint coast to coast with the ball in transition, Crawford is a streaky 3pt shooter who is the Tigers' only consistent outside threat. Geron Johnson typically draws the toughest defense assignments, & looks to apply on-ball pressure every time. All guards have quick hands on D in hopes of creating TOs & scores in transition (fast break play of the year candidate here). Inside, Soph Shaq Goodwin is has good moves around the basket & looks to get Fr Austin Nichols involved early every game with high-low & inside passes. Nichols has fantastic hands & can score with either hand. Both are good rebounders & shot blockers. Reserves Nick King & GW transfer David Pellom are the only two frontcourt reserves who get significant minutes, and get their points on stickbacks.

Cons: Disciplined defense. Gambling, reaching style of defense often leads to easy buckets for opposing teams, and help defense often leads to fouls on bigs who have to switch to help in the lane. Coach Josh Pastner insists on face guarding EVERYONE who leaks outside of the three point line, including bigs who can't shoot. That being said, the Tigers still don't defend against the 3pt very well, and a team with a good shooter will light them up. Memphis is not a good 3pt shooting team themselves & defenses who sag can bait the Tigers into taking wide-open threes that they haven't proven to hit with any consistency. Memphis is also below average in team FT%.

Overall: Memphis matches up well against teams that want to push the tempo, but poorly against half-court offenses that also play smart defense. They are at their best when they get a lead & force teams into missing jumpers that lead to transition points, but struggle when they have to take jumpshots themselves. Good wins against Ok.St, Gonzaga, Louisville (twice), & SMU. Played Florida to a two point loss in a game that could have gone either way. Bad losses to Cincy (twice), UConn (three times), SMU, Houston & Ok.St.
How are they against presses and zones? GW uses a 1-3-1 trapping defense that if exploited, can lead to easy baskets. GW probably won't take too many dumb shots to lead to fast break opportunities.
A press doesn't bother Memphis much, as they've very good in transition, although tough pressure half-court defense can force them into lazy, telegraphed passes. A 1-3-1 won't give Memphis much trouble, if its attempt is to guard outside shooting (which is a Memphis weakness.) Memphis will try to penetrate & dish inside if allowed to. If GW doesn't do their homework, your description of GW would favor Memphis' style.

 
I see a lot of people referencing that kenpom overemphasizes blowouts but he tweaked his formula this year to de-emphasize them.

 
I see a lot of people referencing that kenpom overemphasizes blowouts but he tweaked his formula this year to de-emphasize them.
Hmmm. Last season, Pomeroy dug his heels in pretty deep on predictive value of scoring margin, so I'm surprised to hear he changed his mind about it so soon.Did he post a blog entry on why and how he tweaked his formula?

 
I see a lot of people referencing that kenpom overemphasizes blowouts but he tweaked his formula this year to de-emphasize them.
Hmmm. Last season, Pomeroy dug his heels in pretty deep on predictive value of scoring margin, so I'm surprised to hear he changed his mind about it so soon.Did he post a blog entry on why and how he tweaked his formula?
http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/pomeroy_ratings_version_2.0

 
I see a lot of people referencing that kenpom overemphasizes blowouts but he tweaked his formula this year to de-emphasize them.
Hmmm. Last season, Pomeroy dug his heels in pretty deep on predictive value of scoring margin, so I'm surprised to hear he changed his mind about it so soon.Did he post a blog entry on why and how he tweaked his formula?
http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/pomeroy_ratings_version_2.0
Thanks! While he understandably didn't pop the hood, he does explain why the rankings from previous years suddenly changed.

If I'm reading that blog entry right, the tweak doesn't affect the impact of Tennessee's blowout win over Virginia, but might take a little off the power of Tennessee's blowout win over Tennessee State.

That probably makes the ratings more accurate for teams that played tough schedules, but inadvertently introduced more variance to mid-majors who steamrolled their competition like Wichita State and Louisville. Explains why 'Ville is his #1-ranked team right now.

 
I see a lot of people referencing that kenpom overemphasizes blowouts but he tweaked his formula this year to de-emphasize them.
Hmmm. Last season, Pomeroy dug his heels in pretty deep on predictive value of scoring margin, so I'm surprised to hear he changed his mind about it so soon.Did he post a blog entry on why and how he tweaked his formula?
http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/pomeroy_ratings_version_2.0
Thanks! While he understandably didn't pop the hood, he does explain why the rankings from previous years suddenly changed.

If I'm reading that blog entry right, the tweak doesn't affect the impact of Tennessee's blowout win over Virginia, but might take a little off the power of Tennessee's blowout win over Tennessee State.

That probably makes the ratings more accurate for teams that played tough schedules, but inadvertently introduced more variance to mid-majors who steamrolled their competition like Wichita State and Louisville. Explains why 'Ville is his #1-ranked team right now.
Yeah, I think Louisville is also aided by the fact his system has a recency bias. Not that recency isn't important but few top teams get the benefit of beating up on mediocre teams this late. As you mention, Louisville is probably more similar to a mid-major in their schedule this year. And Louisville's press is probably able to beat up on decent teams much like Wicsonsin beat up on absolute horrid teams.

And I took the same thing from the Tennessee/UVA win. Granted it happened a while ago so some of its effect should have worn off in the system. But it makes sense to put a cap on a game like that or even just remove it to see what happens to Tennessee's rating. They'd still grade out well b/c they dominate in their wins and lose closely. Kenpom actually wrote an article about them. http://regressing.deadspin.com/is-a-no-11-seed-actually-among-the-best-teams-in-the-c-1547060812

Either way, Tennessee looks to be a tough match up for Duke, assuming they meet up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Scoresman said:
These are the upsets I "force-fed" into my warren buffet bracket.

Dayton over Ohio St.

NC State over St. Louis

New Mexico over Kansas

Providence over UNC

Kentucky over Wichita St.

Tennessee over UMass

Tennessee over Duke (pending tonight's game)

Tennessee over Michigan (pending tonight's game)
if this all happens we may both be fighting for the top because I've picked those exact upsets too lol.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's a second round potential upset alert. 8 seed Memphis over 1 seed Virginia.

Taking 8/9 seeds over the 1 seed in round 2 is a very risky proposition. Historically, 1 seeds are 101-15 against 8/9 seeds in round 2. However, Virginia has the qualities of being a 1 seed upset victim and Memphis has the qualities of 8/9 seed upsetter.

Would love the homer opinion of this potential matchup.
Joe Jackson can sprint coast to coast with the ball in transition, Crawford is a streaky 3pt shooter who is the Tigers' only consistent outside threat.
Extra credit for describing a player as streaky and consistent in the same sentence.

.

 
~~~~~~▄▐▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▌

~~~▄▄██▌▌MARCH MADNESS ROLLIN' IN

▄▄▄▌▐██▌.▌

███████▌.▌▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▌

▀(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(O)(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(@)(@)▀▀▘

 
Last edited by a moderator:
~~~~~~▄▐▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▌

~~~▄▄██▌▌HERE WE GO ALBANY

▄▄▄▌▐██▌.▌

███████▌.▌▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▌

▀(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(O)(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(@)(@)▀▀▘

 
Last edited by a moderator:
~~~~~~▄▐▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▌

~~~▄▄██▌▌HERE WE GO UALBANY

▄▄▄▌▐██▌.▌

███████▌.▌▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▌

▀(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(O)(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(@)(@)▀▀▘
Fixed. Forgot the U

 
Our annual reminder for those participating in this thread... no need to update us on how y'all are doing in your bracket pool. PM your bracket to shuke. He will collect everyone's brackets and update us after each session, either in the thread or by posting the link to a Google Doc after each session. He said that even after the trauma of seeing his hero Aroldis Chapman take that header yesterday, he's still up his role in this FFA tradition.

Thank you, and enjoy MARCH MADNESS!!!

 
Scoresman, why do you think that if VCU beats UCLA, they are likely to upset Florida? And what would a UCLA- VCU matchup be like?

 
Scoresman, why do you think that if VCU beats UCLA, they are likely to upset Florida? And what would a UCLA- VCU matchup be like?
I think VCU is a great fade. They have the high KenPom ranking and mid-major name recognition from previous runs under Smart pumping up their perceived value, but they have huge injury concerns, maybe bigger than anyone in the tournament other than Kansas with Embiid.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Scoresman, why do you think that if VCU beats UCLA, they are likely to upset Florida? And what would a UCLA- VCU matchup be like?
I think VCU is a great fade. They have the high KenPom ranking and mid-major name recognition from previous runs under Smart pumping up their perceived value, but they have huge injury concerns, maybe bigger than anyone in the tournament other than Kansas with Embiid.
More on VCU- their outstanding defensive efficiency numbers are predicated on three main things- turnovers/steals (#1 in the country), defending the 3 very well (10th), and lucking into a lot of missed free throws (28th). Those are the sort of things that tend to disappear when the level of competition ratchets up.

 
Man, I am so tired of everybody regurgitating the same stuff. I can't wait for the following:

1. Cincinnati to blow out Harvard.

2. L'ville to lose in the first couple rounds.

3. Umass to advance a few games.
Cincy will beat Harvard easily.
:hifive:
I'm not sure UC will win easily, since they are so offensively challenged. But I think they match up very well with Harvard. I'm a little surprised they are such a trendy pick as an upset.
 
~~~~~~▄▐▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▌

~~~▄▄██▌▌ HERE WE GO BISON
▄▄▄▌▐██▌.▌ NEXT STOP: ANAHEIM
███████▌.▌▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▌
▀(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(O)(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(@)(@)▀▀▘

 
Scoresman, why do you think that if VCU beats UCLA, they are likely to upset Florida? And what would a UCLA- VCU matchup be like?
I've since changed my mind on the UCLA/VCU matchup. The numbers show this game as an absolute tossup and VCU has the edge in overall efficiency, but UCLA plays a very offensively efficient game and I see that being a problem for VCU's style of forcing turnovers and playing quick in transition.

As for VCU over Florida, that was a strict matchup comparison based on historical matchups between 1s and 5s in the Sweet 16. All of the 5 seeds that won this matchup had these 3 characteristics. Won more than half of their last 10 games, are high scoring, and rely on their guards (close to 80%) for a lot of their points. VCU fits the profile so I initially had that as a sweet 16 upset.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top