Very nice picks, curious as to what your elite 8 and final 4 looks like?These are the upsets I "force-fed" into my warren buffet bracket.
Dayton over Ohio St.
NC State over St. Louis
New Mexico over Kansas
Providence over UNC
Kentucky over Wichita St.
Tennessee over UMass
Tennessee over Duke (pending tonight's game)
Tennessee over Michigan (pending tonight's game)
It's good for these schools. I don't see the harm.I love how they keep telling us that these sh-t teams "just won an NCAA game."
Whatever.
I've got:These are the upsets I "force-fed" into my warren buffet bracket.
Dayton over Ohio St.
NC State over St. Louis
New Mexico over Kansas
Providence over UNC
Kentucky over Wichita St.
Tennessee over UMass
Tennessee over Duke (pending tonight's game)
Tennessee over Michigan (pending tonight's game)
They are allowed to play in them, yes, but like someone theorized, the committee probably won't put them in one.So if these play-in games are always in Dayton does this mean UDayton would never play in one?
The fact that Dayton, Ohio, is the perpetual host of the First Four games is so perfectly ironic as to almost defy description.So if these play-in games are always in Dayton does this mean UDayton would never play in one?
Man, I am so tired of everybody regurgitating the same stuff. I can't wait for the following:
1. Cincinnati to blow out Harvard.
2. L'ville to lose in the first couple rounds.
3. Umass to advance a few games.
Cincy is gangsta....I dont doubt Sean KilpatrickMan, I am so tired of everybody regurgitating the same stuff. I can't wait for the following:
1. Cincinnati to blow out Harvard.
2. L'ville to lose in the first couple rounds.
3. Umass to advance a few games.
Iowa State is going to be one of the teams that decides a ton of brackets. F4 possibility who could lose R1.To me, the biggest ? is Iowa St....I love them as a team, but they arent getting regional help after the first weekend, and they lose on the road to good teams compared to almost never at home.
So torn. Have them in the F4 in 1 and MSU in my other but wish I had room for UVA. Theyre easily the sneakiest surprise #1. I dont think the have the offense to hang though.
Memphis homer here. While I can't say too much about UVA or GW, I can give the breakdown of Memphis.Here's a second round potential upset alert. 8 seed Memphis over 1 seed Virginia.
Taking 8/9 seeds over the 1 seed in round 2 is a very risky proposition. Historically, 1 seeds are 101-15 against 8/9 seeds in round 2. However, Virginia has the qualities of being a 1 seed upset victim and Memphis has the qualities of 8/9 seed upsetter.
Would love the homer opinion of this potential matchup.
So the S-E-C dolts aren't restricted to just football, huh?
Go umass. Clown show...
How are they against presses and zones? GW uses a 1-3-1 trapping defense that if exploited, can lead to easy baskets. GW probably won't take too many dumb shots to lead to fast break opportunities.Memphis homer here. While I can't say too much about UVA or GW, I can give the breakdown of Memphis.Here's a second round potential upset alert. 8 seed Memphis over 1 seed Virginia.
Taking 8/9 seeds over the 1 seed in round 2 is a very risky proposition. Historically, 1 seeds are 101-15 against 8/9 seeds in round 2. However, Virginia has the qualities of being a 1 seed upset victim and Memphis has the qualities of 8/9 seed upsetter.
Would love the homer opinion of this potential matchup.
Pros: As usual, very athletic team. Four senior guards, including Mizzou transfer Michael Dixon, who has been the Tigers' rock the past few games. Joe Jackson can sprint coast to coast with the ball in transition, Crawford is a streaky 3pt shooter who is the Tigers' only consistent outside threat. Geron Johnson typically draws the toughest defense assignments, & looks to apply on-ball pressure every time. All guards have quick hands on D in hopes of creating TOs & scores in transition (fast break play of the year candidate here). Inside, Soph Shaq Goodwin is has good moves around the basket & looks to get Fr Austin Nichols involved early every game with high-low & inside passes. Nichols has fantastic hands & can score with either hand. Both are good rebounders & shot blockers. Reserves Nick King & GW transfer David Pellom are the only two frontcourt reserves who get significant minutes, and get their points on stickbacks.
Cons: Disciplined defense. Gambling, reaching style of defense often leads to easy buckets for opposing teams, and help defense often leads to fouls on bigs who have to switch to help in the lane. Coach Josh Pastner insists on face guarding EVERYONE who leaks outside of the three point line, including bigs who can't shoot. That being said, the Tigers still don't defend against the 3pt very well, and a team with a good shooter will light them up. Memphis is not a good 3pt shooting team themselves & defenses who sag can bait the Tigers into taking wide-open threes that they haven't proven to hit with any consistency. Memphis is also below average in team FT%.
Overall: Memphis matches up well against teams that want to push the tempo, but poorly against half-court offenses that also play smart defense. They are at their best when they get a lead & force teams into missing jumpers that lead to transition points, but struggle when they have to take jumpshots themselves. Good wins against Ok.St, Gonzaga, Louisville (twice), & SMU. Played Florida to a two point loss in a game that could have gone either way. Bad losses to Cincy (twice), UConn (three times), SMU, Houston & Ok.St.
Cal Poly needs to be known for something other than computer science, engineering, and hot chicks.Raider Nation said:I love how they keep telling us that these sh-t teams "just won an NCAA game."
Whatever.
end of the Tennessee gameSo the S-E-C dolts aren't restricted to just football, huh?
Go umass. Clown show...![]()
Im sticking with Iowa St, but damn they are starting to smell like Mizzou a few years back to me who I was also high on and then lost as a 15 seeded Norfolk State.Iowa State is going to be one of the teams that decides a ton of brackets. F4 possibility who could lose R1.To me, the biggest ? is Iowa St....I love them as a team, but they arent getting regional help after the first weekend, and they lose on the road to good teams compared to almost never at home.
So torn. Have them in the F4 in 1 and MSU in my other but wish I had room for UVA. Theyre easily the sneakiest surprise #1. I dont think the have the offense to hang though.
UVA/MSU game would be a hell of a game. Not sure either team has much of a mismatch in that game. I guess MSU doesn't have a true PF so maybe they can go small and force UVA to go likewise but Mitchell can guard smaller guys. Or can Mitchell guard Payne? Game would likely be a toss up.
A press doesn't bother Memphis much, as they've very good in transition, although tough pressure half-court defense can force them into lazy, telegraphed passes. A 1-3-1 won't give Memphis much trouble, if its attempt is to guard outside shooting (which is a Memphis weakness.) Memphis will try to penetrate & dish inside if allowed to. If GW doesn't do their homework, your description of GW would favor Memphis' style.How are they against presses and zones? GW uses a 1-3-1 trapping defense that if exploited, can lead to easy baskets. GW probably won't take too many dumb shots to lead to fast break opportunities.Memphis homer here. While I can't say too much about UVA or GW, I can give the breakdown of Memphis.Here's a second round potential upset alert. 8 seed Memphis over 1 seed Virginia.
Taking 8/9 seeds over the 1 seed in round 2 is a very risky proposition. Historically, 1 seeds are 101-15 against 8/9 seeds in round 2. However, Virginia has the qualities of being a 1 seed upset victim and Memphis has the qualities of 8/9 seed upsetter.
Would love the homer opinion of this potential matchup.
Pros: As usual, very athletic team. Four senior guards, including Mizzou transfer Michael Dixon, who has been the Tigers' rock the past few games. Joe Jackson can sprint coast to coast with the ball in transition, Crawford is a streaky 3pt shooter who is the Tigers' only consistent outside threat. Geron Johnson typically draws the toughest defense assignments, & looks to apply on-ball pressure every time. All guards have quick hands on D in hopes of creating TOs & scores in transition (fast break play of the year candidate here). Inside, Soph Shaq Goodwin is has good moves around the basket & looks to get Fr Austin Nichols involved early every game with high-low & inside passes. Nichols has fantastic hands & can score with either hand. Both are good rebounders & shot blockers. Reserves Nick King & GW transfer David Pellom are the only two frontcourt reserves who get significant minutes, and get their points on stickbacks.
Cons: Disciplined defense. Gambling, reaching style of defense often leads to easy buckets for opposing teams, and help defense often leads to fouls on bigs who have to switch to help in the lane. Coach Josh Pastner insists on face guarding EVERYONE who leaks outside of the three point line, including bigs who can't shoot. That being said, the Tigers still don't defend against the 3pt very well, and a team with a good shooter will light them up. Memphis is not a good 3pt shooting team themselves & defenses who sag can bait the Tigers into taking wide-open threes that they haven't proven to hit with any consistency. Memphis is also below average in team FT%.
Overall: Memphis matches up well against teams that want to push the tempo, but poorly against half-court offenses that also play smart defense. They are at their best when they get a lead & force teams into missing jumpers that lead to transition points, but struggle when they have to take jumpshots themselves. Good wins against Ok.St, Gonzaga, Louisville (twice), & SMU. Played Florida to a two point loss in a game that could have gone either way. Bad losses to Cincy (twice), UConn (three times), SMU, Houston & Ok.St.
Cincy will beat Harvard easily.Man, I am so tired of everybody regurgitating the same stuff. I can't wait for the following:
1. Cincinnati to blow out Harvard.
2. L'ville to lose in the first couple rounds.
3. Umass to advance a few games.
Hmmm. Last season, Pomeroy dug his heels in pretty deep on predictive value of scoring margin, so I'm surprised to hear he changed his mind about it so soon.Did he post a blog entry on why and how he tweaked his formula?I see a lot of people referencing that kenpom overemphasizes blowouts but he tweaked his formula this year to de-emphasize them.
http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/pomeroy_ratings_version_2.0Hmmm. Last season, Pomeroy dug his heels in pretty deep on predictive value of scoring margin, so I'm surprised to hear he changed his mind about it so soon.Did he post a blog entry on why and how he tweaked his formula?I see a lot of people referencing that kenpom overemphasizes blowouts but he tweaked his formula this year to de-emphasize them.
Thanks! While he understandably didn't pop the hood, he does explain why the rankings from previous years suddenly changed.http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/pomeroy_ratings_version_2.0Hmmm. Last season, Pomeroy dug his heels in pretty deep on predictive value of scoring margin, so I'm surprised to hear he changed his mind about it so soon.Did he post a blog entry on why and how he tweaked his formula?I see a lot of people referencing that kenpom overemphasizes blowouts but he tweaked his formula this year to de-emphasize them.
Yeah, I think Louisville is also aided by the fact his system has a recency bias. Not that recency isn't important but few top teams get the benefit of beating up on mediocre teams this late. As you mention, Louisville is probably more similar to a mid-major in their schedule this year. And Louisville's press is probably able to beat up on decent teams much like Wicsonsin beat up on absolute horrid teams.Thanks! While he understandably didn't pop the hood, he does explain why the rankings from previous years suddenly changed.http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/pomeroy_ratings_version_2.0Hmmm. Last season, Pomeroy dug his heels in pretty deep on predictive value of scoring margin, so I'm surprised to hear he changed his mind about it so soon.Did he post a blog entry on why and how he tweaked his formula?I see a lot of people referencing that kenpom overemphasizes blowouts but he tweaked his formula this year to de-emphasize them.
If I'm reading that blog entry right, the tweak doesn't affect the impact of Tennessee's blowout win over Virginia, but might take a little off the power of Tennessee's blowout win over Tennessee State.
That probably makes the ratings more accurate for teams that played tough schedules, but inadvertently introduced more variance to mid-majors who steamrolled their competition like Wichita State and Louisville. Explains why 'Ville is his #1-ranked team right now.
if this all happens we may both be fighting for the top because I've picked those exact upsets too lol.Scoresman said:These are the upsets I "force-fed" into my warren buffet bracket.
Dayton over Ohio St.
NC State over St. Louis
New Mexico over Kansas
Providence over UNC
Kentucky over Wichita St.
Tennessee over UMass
Tennessee over Duke (pending tonight's game)
Tennessee over Michigan (pending tonight's game)
Cincy will beat Harvard easily.Man, I am so tired of everybody regurgitating the same stuff. I can't wait for the following:
1. Cincinnati to blow out Harvard.
2. L'ville to lose in the first couple rounds.
3. Umass to advance a few games.
Extra credit for describing a player as streaky and consistent in the same sentence.Joe Jackson can sprint coast to coast with the ball in transition, Crawford is a streaky 3pt shooter who is the Tigers' only consistent outside threat.Here's a second round potential upset alert. 8 seed Memphis over 1 seed Virginia.
Taking 8/9 seeds over the 1 seed in round 2 is a very risky proposition. Historically, 1 seeds are 101-15 against 8/9 seeds in round 2. However, Virginia has the qualities of being a 1 seed upset victim and Memphis has the qualities of 8/9 seed upsetter.
Would love the homer opinion of this potential matchup.
Fixed. Forgot the U~~~~~~▄▐▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▌
~~~▄▄██▌▌HERE WE GO UALBANY
▄▄▄▌▐██▌.▌
███████▌.▌▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▌
▀(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(O)(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(@)(@)▀▀▘
I think VCU is a great fade. They have the high KenPom ranking and mid-major name recognition from previous runs under Smart pumping up their perceived value, but they have huge injury concerns, maybe bigger than anyone in the tournament other than Kansas with Embiid.Scoresman, why do you think that if VCU beats UCLA, they are likely to upset Florida? And what would a UCLA- VCU matchup be like?
More on VCU- their outstanding defensive efficiency numbers are predicated on three main things- turnovers/steals (#1 in the country), defending the 3 very well (10th), and lucking into a lot of missed free throws (28th). Those are the sort of things that tend to disappear when the level of competition ratchets up.I think VCU is a great fade. They have the high KenPom ranking and mid-major name recognition from previous runs under Smart pumping up their perceived value, but they have huge injury concerns, maybe bigger than anyone in the tournament other than Kansas with Embiid.Scoresman, why do you think that if VCU beats UCLA, they are likely to upset Florida? And what would a UCLA- VCU matchup be like?
I'm not sure UC will win easily, since they are so offensively challenged. But I think they match up very well with Harvard. I'm a little surprised they are such a trendy pick as an upset.Cincy will beat Harvard easily.Man, I am so tired of everybody regurgitating the same stuff. I can't wait for the following:
1. Cincinnati to blow out Harvard.
2. L'ville to lose in the first couple rounds.
3. Umass to advance a few games.![]()
I've since changed my mind on the UCLA/VCU matchup. The numbers show this game as an absolute tossup and VCU has the edge in overall efficiency, but UCLA plays a very offensively efficient game and I see that being a problem for VCU's style of forcing turnovers and playing quick in transition.Scoresman, why do you think that if VCU beats UCLA, they are likely to upset Florida? And what would a UCLA- VCU matchup be like?
I'm tired of my Tar Heels constantly having to face the nation's best free throw defenses every game.Don't underestimate the importance of free throw defense.