NCAA Week 13 (1 Viewer)

[NixonMask]

Anyone else playing tonight? Im locked in with Johnson and Bouagnon, punting at TE and the WRs seem largely interchangeable, but the second RB position is giving me some trouble. I have Stockton plugged in right now, but really dont like it. Hes the clear #2 rb on his team, and his home/road splits are pretty dramatic. Im not sure if I like Ouellette any more though. The other route I see is Johnson, Bouagnon, Washington, punt TE, punt a WR, and then Smith and Williams. Anyone seeing something Im not?

 

[dbart]

I'll probably throw a few lineups in. With you on Johnson. I'm very tempted to use Chris Warren at min price as it sounds like he may get the bulk of the work against the terrible Texas Tech run D, but with a limited resume & some uncertainty surrounding the status of Gray, he's probably tourney only for me. I'm considering Ouellete, or even stacking Huff w/ Bouagnon. I'm actually having the most trouble with WR. In the top tier, Dieter's been on fire but Lewis also seems poised for a bounce back. There seem to be a lot of great lower priced options as well. Guess that doesn't really help much...

 

[NixonMask]

Yeah I just cant go with any of the Texas guys myself because it could be any of them or all of them out for the game. I dont think I would stack the Northern Illinois RBs, but stacking the Texas Tech guys is interesting, Ill probably throw one of those in. At WR I said the position is interchangeably because all the guys seem to project pretty similarly. Alot of guys with reasonable floors that could hit 4x value if things break their way. Personally I like Smith and Williams because of the price, but any of the BGSU guys, Golladay or Mabon seem like good cash plays tonight. The cheap GPP play Im looking at for tonight is Sadler at WR for Texas Tech. Hes been getting more involved the last few weeks, still min salary, and in a game with an O/U of 75 could far exceed value.

 

[NixonMask]

So sick. That meaningless Henry touchdown cost me an end of year tournament ticket

 

[James Daulton]

Went strictly by FBGs projections and had an ROI of 175%. Thanks FBGs.

 

[BassNBrew]

Went strictly by FBGs projections and had an ROI of 175%. Thanks FBGs.

Same here. Hit 100% on my cash contests using 3 lineups.

Gave most of it back late when a bunch of guys ran me down in a tourney in garbage time. I was up huge with a bunch of quarters left, but Peyton, Samuels, Williams, and other schmuck didn't do much in their 2nd halves.

 

[Devin Knotts]

Went strictly by FBGs projections and had an ROI of 175%. Thanks FBGs.

Good to hear!

 

[BassNBrew]

Went strictly by FBGs projections and had an ROI of 175%. Thanks FBGs.

Good to hear!

Money early, not so much tonite. Dang Andrews donuted again. Kirk and Dupre….ouch.

Who did you're model have all Hogan's production go too?

 

[Devin Knotts]

We were completely wrong on the Stanford game. We had him at 185 yards and 1.8 touchdowns with 27 yards rushing yards with a 20% chance at a rushing touchdown. If you look at an over under of 45 we could have never projected four touchdowns. We had Hooper at a half touchdown, Mccaffrey at .25 touchdowns, then the rest of it was distributed throughout the entire team. Notre Dame prior to this game allowed 189 yards on average.

I was up a lot of money early as I hit on some GPP's and won every early and late cash game. Blowing money on this two game late slate.

Mayfield thankfully ran more than we anticipated which is making up for some of his lack of passing in this game. Big 12 defenses are so poor.

Our night slate projections were definitely better on DraftKings than they were on FanDuel due to the extra games which we loved players from. Goff was our number one quarterback and he's having a huge game. Pumphrey was our #1 running back and he has 100 yards and 2 TD's at half, Fournette was #2 who had 159 and a touchdown, Paul Harris was #3 who has 130 yards and a touchdown at half, Ben Luckett is #4 who is only $4k and has 68 yards at half and should get to 100 yards total.

Wide receivers were hurt because of Lawler being injured which we wrote in the write up if he was injured Treggs was a great play who has 134 yards and a touchdown. Sterling Shepard was our #2 wide receiver who had 10 receptions for 89 yards and a touchdown. Marcus Green at $3,900 was our #3 wide receiver who has 8 points at half. Dupre was disappointing.

 

[BassNBrew]

We were completely wrong on the Stanford game. We had him at 185 yards and 1.8 touchdowns with 27 yards rushing yards with a 20% chance at a rushing touchdown. If you look at an over under of 45 we could have never projected four touchdowns. We had Hooper at a half touchdown, Mccaffrey at .25 touchdowns, then the rest of it was distributed throughout the entire team. Notre Dame prior to this game allowed 189 yards on average.

I was up a lot of money early as I hit on some GPP's and won every early and late cash game. Blowing money on this two game late slate.

Mayfield thankfully ran more than we anticipated which is making up for some of his lack of passing in this game. Big 12 defenses are so poor.

Our night slate projections were definitely better on DraftKings than they were on FanDuel due to the extra games which we loved players from. Goff was our number one quarterback and he's having a huge game. Pumphrey was our #1 running back and he has 100 yards and 2 TD's at half, Fournette was #2 who had 159 and a touchdown, Paul Harris was #3 who has 130 yards and a touchdown at half, Ben Luckett is #4 who is only $4k and has 68 yards at half and should get to 100 yards total.

Wide receivers were hurt because of Lawler being injured which we wrote in the write up if he was injured Treggs was a great play who has 134 yards and a touchdown. Sterling Shepard was our #2 wide receiver who had 10 receptions for 89 yards and a touchdown. Marcus Green at $3,900 was our #3 wide receiver who has 8 points at half. Dupre was disappointing.

LOL…I thought you had him projected for more real life stats. I guess 19.6 points doesn't go that far. I was on him last night because 19.6 points seemed like a lot of points for $7300 and Mayfield because they were playing OSU. In theory I should have been on Prescott. I asked the question because in my mind I thought 19.6 projected into more stats for his WR/TE.

I don't like the way FD is handling the college games. Some games get slated twice and then they don't even carry some of the games they probably should. It's become a pain to use the IVC with the fan duel slates.

Congrats on your big early slate. That seems like a common theme for anyone using your projections yesterday. Seems like if you hit on your lower priced guys such as Williams it pretty much becomes a winning day.