What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New England at Pittsburgh (4 Viewers)

Big Ben is an idiot. No one is falling for a fake spike on 3rd down with that much time left. He had plenty of time to call a real play. 

 
I don't know what league you guys that are arguing about the no-catch call have been watching for the last decade. Apparently not the NFL or NCAA.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seriously complaining about calls?  The refs have pretty much stayed out of the game.  That's what you want when your team is outphysicalling the other team badly.  If the refs were ticky tack that helps the team that isn't playing tough.
aaaaaaaaand....how' about now?

16 years of this garbage for this franchise

 
He broke the effing plane of the goal line, case closed TD. The league has turned into a complete joke
Nope...not the rule.  It wasn’t a catch by the rules nor should it be.  He didn’t control the ball throughout the catch. His own fault for reaching.

 
I have no dog in the fight. Those crying about the call, you're wrong. The ball clearly rotated and was on the ground. Easy no catch call. 

 
That was definitely not a catch.  Not playing the conspiracy card.  But god you have to know the situation and Ben didn't have a clue.   It was like overtime was not even an option

 
I dislike the Pats as much as anyone but the call was correct, he did not compete the catch. Ben followed it up  with a horribly bad decision. He'll be thinking about that one for awhile.

 
I'm firmly aware of the rules, but that was still a BS call in my book. Yes, one hand came off the ball, but he still had enough of the other hand under the ball to be given the benefit of the doubt, especially since it was ruled a TD on the field. I saw no conclusive evidence to overturn that one.

 
I'm firmly aware of the rules, but that was still a BS call in my book. Yes, one hand came off the ball, but he still had enough of the other hand under the ball to be given the benefit of the doubt, especially since it was ruled a TD on the field. I saw no conclusive evidence to overturn that one.
Disagree ball Moved  too much

 
I'm firmly aware of the rules, but that was still a BS call in my book. Yes, one hand came off the ball, but he still had enough of the other hand under the ball to be given the benefit of the doubt, especially since it was ruled a TD on the field. I saw no conclusive evidence to overturn that one.
No he didn’t...the ball moved as he went to the ground and he didn’t control it.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top