northern exposure
Footballguy
The Oilers D depth chart is still so bad they have to give Schultz $3.9 mill.
The rumor was he was going to sign a short term deal for $4 mill per. So, on the bright side they are only tied to him for one season.The Oilers D depth chart is still so bad they have to give Schultz $3.9 mill.
The rumor was he was going to sign a short term deal for $4 mill per. So, on the bright side they are only tied to him for one season.This is Rudimentarysigning Bickell to a $4MM/year deal or Crawford to a $6MM/year deal seem like bigger issues than than the cap itself.
cap and CBA punishes teams for bad contracts. as it should. otherwise, a team like Toronto could just go out and buy an All Star lineup.
still no extension for Stamkos.why not? it's not a lock Stamkos stays in Tampa at UFA. Toronto is a real possibility.We won't have to worry about that deal anyways because no way in hell Yzerman would do it.
And still no dealstill no extension for Stamkos.why not? it's not a lock Stamkos stays in Tampa at UFA. Toronto is a real possibility.We won't have to worry about that deal anyways because no way in hell Yzerman would do it.
I think Stamkos is waiting for Chicago to clear some cap space.And still no dealstill no extension for Stamkos.why not? it's not a lock Stamkos stays in Tampa at UFA. Toronto is a real possibility.We won't have to worry about that deal anyways because no way in hell Yzerman would do it.
If he comes at a discount to FMV, I think Stan would find a spot for him.I think Stamkos is waiting for Chicago to clear some cap space.And still no dealstill no extension for Stamkos.why not? it's not a lock Stamkos stays in Tampa at UFA. Toronto is a real possibility.We won't have to worry about that deal anyways because no way in hell Yzerman would do it.
of course not. why would he. extension is already a done deal.And still no dealstill no extension for Stamkos.why not? it's not a lock Stamkos stays in Tampa at UFA. Toronto is a real possibility.We won't have to worry about that deal anyways because no way in hell Yzerman would do it.
Everyone here expects him to be signed July 1, 2016.Lol everybody here expects Stammer to be signed before mid-August. It's not even a topic.
Well they are used to disappointment with their hockey team.Everyone here expects him to be signed July 1, 2016.Lol everybody here expects Stammer to be signed before mid-August. It's not even a topic.
3. Ads in the local paper
Shout out to Patrick Sharp and Milan Lucic. They know the score.
If you've ever in your life wanted everyone to talk about what a great guy you are, all you have to do is take an ad out in the paper after you've lived there for a sufficiently long amount of time and say, "I liked it here but now I'm leaving."
Then all you have to do is sit back and wait for the tsunami of praise to come a-rollin' in. Lucic, whose cap hit is $6 million, only needed to take out a quarter-page ad deep in the Boston Globe last week, and people spent a lot of time saying how "classy" he is. Milan Lucic! Ball-spearin', "I'm gonna [expletive]ing kill you"-threatenin', "Do you know who I am?"-sayin' Milan Lucic!
What a move.
2. Freaking out in Tampa
I can't wait to hear nothing but Steven Stamkos To Toronto speculation for the next 11 months. I hope Steve Yzerman doesn't spoil it by signing him this summer or trading him. That wouldn't be fun at all.
LINK1. Not checking the math
Something that's been bugging me for a while now is the Bruins — and their sycophantic media — insisting that what Don Sweeney has done to this point in the summer has been beneficial or at least not-harmful to this team's chances of making the playoffs again next season.
Nowhere has this been exemplified more than what Sweeney himself said yesterday on Boston radio:
This morning on the radio Don Sweeney said it's as simple as Hamilton+Lucic+Smith = 41 goals, Beleskey+Hayes = 41 goals.— Bruins Stats (@bruins_stats) July 14, 2015
This is a silly and undeveloped argument to say the very least.
Yes it's true, Matt Beleskey and Jimmy Hayes combined for 41 goals last year, and that is coincidentally the same number of goals scored by Milan Lucic, Reilly Smith, and Dougie Hamilton. And hey, there's cap savings for the Bruins too (because paying two players costs less than paying three!), so, “Advantage Sweeney!”
But not so fast here, gang. Because let's look at the basic facts. Lucic had a down year, Smith had a down year, and Hamilton is a defenseman on whom you shouldn't be depending for goals. Meanwhile, Beleskey doubled his all-time best goal total (and still only had 22), and Hayes scored 19, which was eight better than his previous best.
That's not to say that both players aren't good and wouldn't be able to contribute playing alongside David Krejci and Patrice Bergeron, of course, but to expect them to keep putting up these comparatively “big-time” numbers — which by the way are still somewhat modest for two guys you're hoping become viable top-six contributors for years to come at 26 and 27 years old — is a lot like wishful thinking.
Here are all these players' goals per 60 by their age at the start of the season.
View photo
.
Photo via Ryan Lambert![]()
Now, you can clearly say that Hayes is a reasonable replacement for Smith, and no one would argue that he can be expected to put up similar numbers in the near-term, except that he's older, which is a point of concern.
And clearly, Beleskey is on an upswing, mostly driven by a huge personal shooting percentage this season (14.3 percent at 5-on-5) and playing with Ryan Kesler. And the fact that he had to go on a huge upswing in three partial seasons — oh yeah, Beleskey's all-time record for games played is 69, four seasons ago — just to get to Lucic's levels is something that should be quite worrisome.
“We signed a 22-goal-scorer,” is all well and good, but hey, uh, how about the fact that he averaged 7.88 goals per 82 games over the first 263 games? And you gave him five years based on the 22 goals and not the way-less-than-that from before?
Again, I have little doubt that Beleskey and Hayes will still put up the numbers people roughly expect next season given the quality of forwards they will play with. But what does Beleskey look like, say, three years from now? And what's a more likely outcome? The 1.34 ES goals per 60 he posted in 65 games last season, or the .68 in the five partial seasons prior to?
Better question: How soon does this end up feeling to Bruins fans like the Chris Kelly contract? The money's not a killer, but boy it's not great either, and the term is baffling.
3. Ads in the local paper2. Freaking out in Tampa
I can't wait to hear nothing but Steven Stamkos To Toronto speculation for the next 11 months. I hope Steve Yzerman doesn't spoil it by signing him this summer or trading him. That wouldn't be fun at all.
LINK
both did the same thing and both got heaped with praise as a result. how is it weak?Statcruncher said:Lumping Sharp in with Lucic is pretty weak.
too bad the NHL doesn't have the NBA rule where they can "amnesty" one bad contract, get them off the cap, but still pay them. The Hawks would have instantly amestied Bickell.....would allowed the Hawks to resign Oduya and Kruger.signing Bickell to a $4MM/year deal or Crawford to a $6MM/year deal seem like bigger issues than than the cap itself.
cap and CBA punishes teams for bad contracts. as it should. otherwise, a team like Toronto could just go out and buy an All Star lineup.
Because Sharp really is a classy guy who was well liked, simply a salary cap victim. Lucic on the other hand, is and has always been a little #####.both did the same thing and both got heaped with praise as a result. how is it weak?Statcruncher said:Lumping Sharp in with Lucic is pretty weak.
Teams had the ability to use two compliance buyouts through last summer. It's how Chicago ended up with Richards for $2MM...he will earn $20MM from the Rangers over (now 11) years in salary and deferred bonuses.too bad the NHL doesn't have the NBA rule where they can "amnesty" one bad contract, get them off the cap, but still pay them. The Hawks would have instantly amestied Bickell.....would allowed the Hawks to resign Oduya and Kruger.signing Bickell to a $4MM/year deal or Crawford to a $6MM/year deal seem like bigger issues than than the cap itself.
cap and CBA punishes teams for bad contracts. as it should. otherwise, a team like Toronto could just go out and buy an All Star lineup.
What a bust he is. At least Crawford delivered for the Hawks, even though you would like to have your goalie count less towards the cap.
is he though?Because Sharp really is a classy guy who was well likedboth did the same thing and both got heaped with praise as a result. how is it weak?Statcruncher said:Lumping Sharp in with Lucic is pretty weak.
It's pretty telling that your link is a sports talk show listing rumors from sources that wish to remain anonymous. If it comes out that it's true, then obviously my opinion of him will change. Even then though, Sharp plays the game on the ice the right way, unlike Lucic.is he though?Because Sharp really is a classy guy who was well likedboth did the same thing and both got heaped with praise as a result. how is it weak?Statcruncher said:Lumping Sharp in with Lucic is pretty weak.
http://sportsmockery.com/2015/02/did-patrick-sharp-have-sex-with-teammates-wife/
Good to see Sharp going to Dallas where he is sure to plug a few holes.is he though?Because Sharp really is a classy guy who was well likedboth did the same thing and both got heaped with praise as a result. how is it weak?Statcruncher said:Lumping Sharp in with Lucic is pretty weak.
http://sportsmockery.com/2015/02/did-patrick-sharp-have-sex-with-teammates-wife/
surprised he got more than Oduya.Flyers re-sign DelZotto to 2/7.75.
Yay.
Those PMD's get paid ya know.surprised he got more than Oduya.Flyers re-sign DelZotto to 2/7.75.
Yay.
Ryan Kesler is, for some reason, now signed in Anaheim until 2022, when he will be 37 years old, and receiving $6.875 million per season against the cap. The future of the ceiling is of course unknowable for a litany of reasons, but it's a safe bet to say that in 2022 — which oh my god that's still seven years from now, because Kesler still has one year left on his current contract — $6.875 million will probably still be a decent chunk of the total limit. Even if the cap goes up to $90 million in that time, an AAV of that size would be worth what about a $5.5 million deal is today.
You do not want to have 37-year-olds making 7.7 percent of your cap. That's just a general rule.
Love me some Holtbeast but this sounds like he may be trying to force a longer deal out of the Caps.$8 million per puts him 2nd,I doubt they pay that.Hopefully they settle for longer term in the $6 range.Alex Prewitt @alex_prewitt
Can confirm the Holtby arb numbers reported by @TimWharnsby: $8 million ask for the goaltender, $5.1 million offer by the Capitals.
Rangers Kings game was outdoors in Vegas.I am completely shuked over their choices of "Vintage Games" on NHLN. Last week it was a seemingly meaningless Ottawa/Buffalo game from a few years ago. Right now, they are showing a preseason game from 9/27/91... NYR @ Kings.
![]()
has he fired Babcock yet?Devils announce Lamoriello steps down as president and two minutes later announced as Leafs GM.
Expansion draft would probably be held late June after the draft if they're joining for 16/17. Quebec has a stadium ready, don't see why they wouldn't be good to go. But don't forget about Seattle just yet, despite Gary saying they won't accept any more applications, they setup a meeting with the Seattle group next week assuming they'll still try and get a team there soon.Las Vegas could be ready to go by the 2016/2017 season, could Quebec as well? At what point would they hold the expansion draft?
I think they would want an additional beyond Seattle as well. It would be difficult to deal with an odd number of teams.Expansion draft would probably be held late June after the draft if they're joining for 16/17. Quebec has a stadium ready, don't see why they wouldn't be good to go. But don't forget about Seattle just yet, despite Gary saying they won't accept any more applications, they setup a meeting with the Seattle group next week assuming they'll still try and get a team there soon.Las Vegas could be ready to go by the 2016/2017 season, could Quebec as well? At what point would they hold the expansion draft?
They want two West teams - Bettman will screw over Quebec even though they actually submitted a bid and find away to get to LV and Seattle.I think they would want an additional beyond Seattle as well. It would be difficult to deal with an odd number of teams.Expansion draft would probably be held late June after the draft if they're joining for 16/17. Quebec has a stadium ready, don't see why they wouldn't be good to go. But don't forget about Seattle just yet, despite Gary saying they won't accept any more applications, they setup a meeting with the Seattle group next week assuming they'll still try and get a team there soon.Las Vegas could be ready to go by the 2016/2017 season, could Quebec as well? At what point would they hold the expansion draft?
they wanted to gauge interest. I think they are realizing there isn't as much as they thought.Why have a deadline then
of course it would be 2 teams.I think they would want an additional beyond Seattle as well. It would be difficult to deal with an odd number of teams.Expansion draft would probably be held late June after the draft if they're joining for 16/17. Quebec has a stadium ready, don't see why they wouldn't be good to go. But don't forget about Seattle just yet, despite Gary saying they won't accept any more applications, they setup a meeting with the Seattle group next week assuming they'll still try and get a team there soon.Las Vegas could be ready to go by the 2016/2017 season, could Quebec as well? At what point would they hold the expansion draft?
Quebec can have the Panthers.They want two West teams - Bettman will screw over Quebec even though they actually submitted a bid and find away to get to LV and Seattle.
they still have like 6 other guys who are pseudo-GMs there. Not like he'll be running the show alone as he did in New Jersey.If I was a Leafs fan, I'd be worried about this move.
Yeah, that's why I'd be worried. What the hell is happening there that they felt they needed to bring him in of all people?they still have like 6 other guys who are pseudo-GMs there. Not like he'll be running the show alone as he did in New Jersey.If I was a Leafs fan, I'd be worried about this move.
he's a smart dude and pretty well respected around the league. I don't think it will hurt at all to add him to the mix.Yeah, that's why I'd be worried. What the hell is happening there that they felt they needed to bring him in of all people?they still have like 6 other guys who are pseudo-GMs there. Not like he'll be running the show alone as he did in New Jersey.If I was a Leafs fan, I'd be worried about this move.
Experience. They have an analytics guy in Dubas. They have a player development guy in Hunter. They have the executive in Shanahan, they have the coach input in Babcock. Now they have a guy with years of success and cup wins to put it all together.Yeah, that's why I'd be worried. What the hell is happening there that they felt they needed to bring him in of all people?they still have like 6 other guys who are pseudo-GMs there. Not like he'll be running the show alone as he did in New Jersey.If I was a Leafs fan, I'd be worried about this move.
Wish they could have the expansion draft now, would be the ideal way to unload Bickell and Versteeg.Las Vegas could be ready to go by the 2016/2017 season, could Quebec as well? At what point would they hold the expansion draft?