What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NHL Off-Season thread:Down goes Kane! (2 Viewers)

signing Bickell to a $4MM/year deal or Crawford to a $6MM/year deal seem like bigger issues than than the cap itself.

cap and CBA punishes teams for bad contracts. as it should. otherwise, a team like Toronto could just go out and buy an All Star lineup.
This is Rudimentary :goodposting:

 
We won't have to worry about that deal anyways because no way in hell Yzerman would do it.
why not? it's not a lock Stamkos stays in Tampa at UFA. Toronto is a real possibility.
still no extension for Stamkos.
And still no deal
I think Stamkos is waiting for Chicago to clear some cap space.
If he comes at a discount to FMV, I think Stan would find a spot for him.

 
3. Ads in the local paper

Shout out to Patrick Sharp and Milan Lucic. They know the score.

If you've ever in your life wanted everyone to talk about what a great guy you are, all you have to do is take an ad out in the paper after you've lived there for a sufficiently long amount of time and say, "I liked it here but now I'm leaving."

Then all you have to do is sit back and wait for the tsunami of praise to come a-rollin' in. Lucic, whose cap hit is $6 million, only needed to take out a quarter-page ad deep in the Boston Globe last week, and people spent a lot of time saying how "classy" he is. Milan Lucic! Ball-spearin', "I'm gonna [expletive]ing kill you"-threatenin', "Do you know who I am?"-sayin' Milan Lucic!

What a move.
2. Freaking out in Tampa

I can't wait to hear nothing but Steven Stamkos To Toronto speculation for the next 11 months. I hope Steve Yzerman doesn't spoil it by signing him this summer or trading him. That wouldn't be fun at all.
1. Not checking the math

Something that's been bugging me for a while now is the Bruins — and their sycophantic media — insisting that what Don Sweeney has done to this point in the summer has been beneficial or at least not-harmful to this team's chances of making the playoffs again next season.

Nowhere has this been exemplified more than what Sweeney himself said yesterday on Boston radio:

This morning on the radio Don Sweeney said it's as simple as Hamilton+Lucic+Smith = 41 goals, Beleskey+Hayes = 41 goals.— Bruins Stats (@bruins_stats) July 14, 2015

This is a silly and undeveloped argument to say the very least.

Yes it's true, Matt Beleskey and Jimmy Hayes combined for 41 goals last year, and that is coincidentally the same number of goals scored by Milan Lucic, Reilly Smith, and Dougie Hamilton. And hey, there's cap savings for the Bruins too (because paying two players costs less than paying three!), so, “Advantage Sweeney!”

But not so fast here, gang. Because let's look at the basic facts. Lucic had a down year, Smith had a down year, and Hamilton is a defenseman on whom you shouldn't be depending for goals. Meanwhile, Beleskey doubled his all-time best goal total (and still only had 22), and Hayes scored 19, which was eight better than his previous best.

That's not to say that both players aren't good and wouldn't be able to contribute playing alongside David Krejci and Patrice Bergeron, of course, but to expect them to keep putting up these comparatively “big-time” numbers — which by the way are still somewhat modest for two guys you're hoping become viable top-six contributors for years to come at 26 and 27 years old — is a lot like wishful thinking.

Here are all these players' goals per 60 by their age at the start of the season.

View photo

.
96848110-2b37-11e5-9f24-eb6eacdcdffd_Screen-Shot-2015-07-15-at-2-00-32-PM.png
Photo via Ryan Lambert

Now, you can clearly say that Hayes is a reasonable replacement for Smith, and no one would argue that he can be expected to put up similar numbers in the near-term, except that he's older, which is a point of concern.

And clearly, Beleskey is on an upswing, mostly driven by a huge personal shooting percentage this season (14.3 percent at 5-on-5) and playing with Ryan Kesler. And the fact that he had to go on a huge upswing in three partial seasons — oh yeah, Beleskey's all-time record for games played is 69, four seasons ago — just to get to Lucic's levels is something that should be quite worrisome.

“We signed a 22-goal-scorer,” is all well and good, but hey, uh, how about the fact that he averaged 7.88 goals per 82 games over the first 263 games? And you gave him five years based on the 22 goals and not the way-less-than-that from before?

Again, I have little doubt that Beleskey and Hayes will still put up the numbers people roughly expect next season given the quality of forwards they will play with. But what does Beleskey look like, say, three years from now? And what's a more likely outcome? The 1.34 ES goals per 60 he posted in 65 games last season, or the .68 in the five partial seasons prior to?

Better question: How soon does this end up feeling to Bruins fans like the Chris Kelly contract? The money's not a killer, but boy it's not great either, and the term is baffling.
LINK

 
Last edited by a moderator:
2. Freaking out in Tampa

I can't wait to hear nothing but Steven Stamkos To Toronto speculation for the next 11 months. I hope Steve Yzerman doesn't spoil it by signing him this summer or trading him. That wouldn't be fun at all.

LINK
3. Ads in the local paper

Shout out to Patrick Sharp and Milan Lucic. They know the score.

If you've ever in your life wanted everyone to talk about what a great guy you are, all you have to do is take an ad out in the paper after you've lived there for a sufficiently long amount of time and say, "I liked it here but now I'm leaving."

Then all you have to do is sit back and wait for the tsunami of praise to come a-rollin' in. Lucic, whose cap hit is $6 million, only needed to take out a quarter-page ad deep in the Boston Globe last week, and people spent a lot of time saying how "classy" he is. Milan Lucic! Ball-spearin', "I'm gonna [expletive]ing kill you"-threatenin', "Do you know who I am?"-sayin' Milan Lucic!

What a move.

:lmao: :lmao:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
signing Bickell to a $4MM/year deal or Crawford to a $6MM/year deal seem like bigger issues than than the cap itself.

cap and CBA punishes teams for bad contracts. as it should. otherwise, a team like Toronto could just go out and buy an All Star lineup.
too bad the NHL doesn't have the NBA rule where they can "amnesty" one bad contract, get them off the cap, but still pay them. The Hawks would have instantly amestied Bickell.....would allowed the Hawks to resign Oduya and Kruger.

What a bust he is. At least Crawford delivered for the Hawks, even though you would like to have your goalie count less towards the cap.

 
signing Bickell to a $4MM/year deal or Crawford to a $6MM/year deal seem like bigger issues than than the cap itself.

cap and CBA punishes teams for bad contracts. as it should. otherwise, a team like Toronto could just go out and buy an All Star lineup.
too bad the NHL doesn't have the NBA rule where they can "amnesty" one bad contract, get them off the cap, but still pay them. The Hawks would have instantly amestied Bickell.....would allowed the Hawks to resign Oduya and Kruger.

What a bust he is. At least Crawford delivered for the Hawks, even though you would like to have your goalie count less towards the cap.
Teams had the ability to use two compliance buyouts through last summer. It's how Chicago ended up with Richards for $2MM...he will earn $20MM from the Rangers over (now 11) years in salary and deferred bonuses.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Statcruncher said:
Lumping Sharp in with Lucic is pretty weak.
both did the same thing and both got heaped with praise as a result. how is it weak?
Because Sharp really is a classy guy who was well liked
is he though?

http://sportsmockery.com/2015/02/did-patrick-sharp-have-sex-with-teammates-wife/
It's pretty telling that your link is a sports talk show listing rumors from sources that wish to remain anonymous. If it comes out that it's true, then obviously my opinion of him will change. Even then though, Sharp plays the game on the ice the right way, unlike Lucic.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Statcruncher said:
Lumping Sharp in with Lucic is pretty weak.
both did the same thing and both got heaped with praise as a result. how is it weak?
Because Sharp really is a classy guy who was well liked
is he though?

http://sportsmockery.com/2015/02/did-patrick-sharp-have-sex-with-teammates-wife/
Good to see Sharp going to Dallas where he is sure to plug a few holes.

 
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/why-ryan-kesler-s-new-ducks-contract-is-indefensible--trending-topics-154639764.html

Ryan Lambert at Puck Daddy rips the new Kesler deal

Ryan Kesler is, for some reason, now signed in Anaheim until 2022, when he will be 37 years old, and receiving $6.875 million per season against the cap. The future of the ceiling is of course unknowable for a litany of reasons, but it's a safe bet to say that in 2022 — which oh my god that's still seven years from now, because Kesler still has one year left on his current contract — $6.875 million will probably still be a decent chunk of the total limit. Even if the cap goes up to $90 million in that time, an AAV of that size would be worth what about a $5.5 million deal is today.

You do not want to have 37-year-olds making 7.7 percent of your cap. That's just a general rule.
 
The great NHL expansion bid heist of 2015 sounded like it didn't get as many bidders as they hoped.

Las Vegas and Quebec were the only two applicants that paid and filed for an expansion team. Considering those two were locks to get a team anyway, the process seemed like a waste of time.

 
Alex Prewitt ‏@alex_prewitt

Can confirm the Holtby arb numbers reported by @TimWharnsby: $8 million ask for the goaltender, $5.1 million offer by the Capitals.
Love me some Holtbeast but this sounds like he may be trying to force a longer deal out of the Caps.$8 million per puts him 2nd,I doubt they pay that.Hopefully they settle for longer term in the $6 range.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am completely shuked over their choices of "Vintage Games" on NHLN. Last week it was a seemingly meaningless Ottawa/Buffalo game from a few years ago. Right now, they are showing a preseason game from 9/27/91... NYR @ Kings.

:confused:

 
Las Vegas could be ready to go by the 2016/2017 season, could Quebec as well? At what point would they hold the expansion draft?
Expansion draft would probably be held late June after the draft if they're joining for 16/17. Quebec has a stadium ready, don't see why they wouldn't be good to go. But don't forget about Seattle just yet, despite Gary saying they won't accept any more applications, they setup a meeting with the Seattle group next week assuming they'll still try and get a team there soon.

 
Las Vegas could be ready to go by the 2016/2017 season, could Quebec as well? At what point would they hold the expansion draft?
Expansion draft would probably be held late June after the draft if they're joining for 16/17. Quebec has a stadium ready, don't see why they wouldn't be good to go. But don't forget about Seattle just yet, despite Gary saying they won't accept any more applications, they setup a meeting with the Seattle group next week assuming they'll still try and get a team there soon.
I think they would want an additional beyond Seattle as well. It would be difficult to deal with an odd number of teams.

 
Las Vegas could be ready to go by the 2016/2017 season, could Quebec as well? At what point would they hold the expansion draft?
Expansion draft would probably be held late June after the draft if they're joining for 16/17. Quebec has a stadium ready, don't see why they wouldn't be good to go. But don't forget about Seattle just yet, despite Gary saying they won't accept any more applications, they setup a meeting with the Seattle group next week assuming they'll still try and get a team there soon.
I think they would want an additional beyond Seattle as well. It would be difficult to deal with an odd number of teams.
They want two West teams - Bettman will screw over Quebec even though they actually submitted a bid and find away to get to LV and Seattle.

 
Las Vegas could be ready to go by the 2016/2017 season, could Quebec as well? At what point would they hold the expansion draft?
Expansion draft would probably be held late June after the draft if they're joining for 16/17. Quebec has a stadium ready, don't see why they wouldn't be good to go. But don't forget about Seattle just yet, despite Gary saying they won't accept any more applications, they setup a meeting with the Seattle group next week assuming they'll still try and get a team there soon.
I think they would want an additional beyond Seattle as well. It would be difficult to deal with an odd number of teams.
of course it would be 2 teams.

for geography purposes and based on where the CAN $ has been headed, they will probably push for stupid Las Vegas over Quebec and will hope to get into Seattle.

 
If I was a Leafs fan, I'd be worried about this move.
they still have like 6 other guys who are pseudo-GMs there. Not like he'll be running the show alone as he did in New Jersey.
Yeah, that's why I'd be worried. What the hell is happening there that they felt they needed to bring him in of all people?
he's a smart dude and pretty well respected around the league. I don't think it will hurt at all to add him to the mix.

 
If I was a Leafs fan, I'd be worried about this move.
they still have like 6 other guys who are pseudo-GMs there. Not like he'll be running the show alone as he did in New Jersey.
Yeah, that's why I'd be worried. What the hell is happening there that they felt they needed to bring him in of all people?
Experience. They have an analytics guy in Dubas. They have a player development guy in Hunter. They have the executive in Shanahan, they have the coach input in Babcock. Now they have a guy with years of success and cup wins to put it all together.

They're a ####show on the ice but can't argue a lot with what they've built here. Any of those 5 guys could work for all 30 teams tomorrow if they wanted, this is where Leafs can flex their financial muscles.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top