What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Niners offseason thread (1 Viewer)

AnonymousBob

Footballguy
I noticed there wasn't a Niners thread...if I just missed it then my apologies. I'll just recap some of the moves they've made thus far. There really isn't much structure to this post, just random bits of info mixed in with rumors.

By this time I'm sure everybody knows they didn't bring Martz back. Jimmy Raye is our new offensive coordinator after Linehan and Reeves both rejected the job. I am very, very skeptical of this hiring. His most recent o-coordinator positions was in Oakland 2005.

Sopoaga is moving back to NT...while he isn't anywhere near Hanynesworth level of play, this is a good move. I didn't understand why they ever put him at DE...that was just a terrible match for his skills imo. Of course Sopoaga is on record as saying he prefers playing DE but that was last season just before the switch so who knows if that was just good talk by a team player, if he realizes he's a better DT, or if he's going to be mentally not into his new position along the DL...it's probably too early to call Balmer a bust from last year's draft but I think his promise at this point doesn't look so fantastic...but there's a chance he'll be used as a DE this year so we'll see how he fares as he was a project when drafted.

They signed Brandon Jones to a contract and there is talk if Arnaz Battle loses to Jason Hill in TC he will be cut.

Singletary hired Jason Michaels a couple days ago to be assistant coach...he spent a couple years as the quality control coach for the Jets and Raiders but last year was the TE coach for the University of Tennessee...

Singletary plans to use Lawson in more of a pass rushing position this season and while he hasn't looked so great thus far he's shown potential. I think he's an atheltic guy who can really shine this year. Imo Nolan rarely used him properly and last year's injury didn't help. This year will determine whether he's a good player or another bust like Alex Smith and Vernon Davis.

SF signed Evans (LDE) from Washington...a great signing. He's not a star but a very serviceable guy who should bolster the quality of our DL.

We resigned Takeo Spikes...while he's not an amazing player these days it's a solid resign. We also signed Detriot's FB.

SF has a lot of holes to fill, paticularly along the o-line and at safety. But we do have nine draft picks to work with so they should be able to get some much needed help at those spots and at lb as well.

Overall, I'm not quite sure what this FO is doing. They have a lot of money but they're not doing anything with it...I really hate the Yorks.

Alex Smith is currently on his honeymoon but his agent and SF are in talks to restructure his contract. He's been tossing the ball for a couple of months now (since late January) so rehab seems to be going well.

An interesting rumor is supposedly the Yorks want/wanted Shanahan or Holmgren to be the coach next year and only kept Singletary because he didn't totally screw things up last year and he's a popular fan choice...should be interesting to watch things play out.

There's also been talk (though not lately) that SF is interested in bringing in Vick as our qb.

I've read the Niners and Eric Green are closing in on a deal and haggling over the guaranteed money...depending on the money he's a fine CB to throw into the mix.

Khalif Barnes was a guy they were interested in but they've backed off recently...probably because he wants too much money.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for starting this Anonymous Bob. I'm maybe not THE most informed 49er fan as I reside in Oregon and don't spend the time on SF websites and radio. Regardless, here are a couple of my thoughts:

-I'm with you in being completely underwhelmed by the Ray hiring as OC. Worried we're going to see a replay of the bed and breakfast guy from Oakland a few years back. I suppose, though, as long as he feeds Gore the ball it'll be an improvement.

-Please, please, PLEASE don't overspend (especially at this point) on free agents. The best franchises (NE, Giants, Indy, Pitt) have built through the draft and shrewd, timely investment in free agents...NOT throwing a bunch of money around willy-nilly. I realize the Yorks are seen as far from big spenders anyway, but I'm not sure the Clements signing last year was too wise. Build through the draft. Build through the DRAFT.

-With that being said, please please PLEASE don't draft a QB in Round 1. I could be way off here, and look back a few years later and slap my forehead, but I just don't see Stafford or Sanchez being the answer. I guess this kind of flies in the face of the four franchises I listed above, all of whom have unquestioned franchise guys leading the way, but I don't think this franchise can survive another high-profile QB draftee failure. Go with Shaun Hill, or for that matter a restructured and healthy Alex Smith. Give them some continuity and some weapons and protection on offense, a tough D, and good coaching (RAY?) and see how he/they does/do. I'd rather see them go with one of the OTs - Andre Smith? -, the DT Raji from BC, or an outside playmaker in Crabtree or Macklin if one of them falls.

-Let Singletary be Singletary. There's nothing else super exciting about this team. Let him be intense, scary, and a loon. At least he'll be interesting.

 
Thanks for starting this Anonymous Bob. I'm maybe not THE most informed 49er fan as I reside in Oregon and don't spend the time on SF websites and radio. Regardless, here are a couple of my thoughts:-I'm with you in being completely underwhelmed by the Ray hiring as OC. Worried we're going to see a replay of the bed and breakfast guy from Oakland a few years back. I suppose, though, as long as he feeds Gore the ball it'll be an improvement.-Please, please, PLEASE don't overspend (especially at this point) on free agents. The best franchises (NE, Giants, Indy, Pitt) have built through the draft and shrewd, timely investment in free agents...NOT throwing a bunch of money around willy-nilly. I realize the Yorks are seen as far from big spenders anyway, but I'm not sure the Clements signing last year was too wise. Build through the draft. Build through the DRAFT.-With that being said, please please PLEASE don't draft a QB in Round 1. I could be way off here, and look back a few years later and slap my forehead, but I just don't see Stafford or Sanchez being the answer. I guess this kind of flies in the face of the four franchises I listed above, all of whom have unquestioned franchise guys leading the way, but I don't think this franchise can survive another high-profile QB draftee failure. Go with Shaun Hill, or for that matter a restructured and healthy Alex Smith. Give them some continuity and some weapons and protection on offense, a tough D, and good coaching (RAY?) and see how he/they does/do. I'd rather see them go with one of the OTs - Andre Smith? -, the DT Raji from BC, or an outside playmaker in Crabtree or Macklin if one of them falls. -Let Singletary be Singletary. There's nothing else super exciting about this team. Let him be intense, scary, and a loon. At least he'll be interesting.
Thanks facook. I'm not the most informed fan either but I kept waiting for somebody to start this thread and finally decided to do it myself. I'm new to this team info thread so any feedback would be appreciated...always looking forward to getting better at sharing desired information about my Niners. If you, or anybody else has a question don't hesitate to ask...between myself and the numerous Niner fans we have on this board I've little doubt we'll get you some great info. I live in SoCal but visit some of the SF boards and read the local papers...nonetheless, any Bay Area folk are more than welcome to share the rumors or other pieces they hear about the team. I don't think they should dump money on just anybody but the Niners do have an awful lot of holes to fill...I wouldn't be happy about them spending money on lousy players (I still question them signing Brandon Jones) but I don't have too much of an issue with them dumping some serious coin on quality players. They overpaid for Nate but imo most players are overpaid and he's not a great corner but he's certainly a good one. If they start trying to buy a team like Snyder used to do I'd be pissed but I would like to see them start loosening the pursestrings. SF has close to 30 mil to spend...We do have several players we'll need to extend contracts for but nobody should break the bank in their demands so there's little excuse for not making a bit of a splash. Heck, even if they don't actually sign anybody it's the fact they haven't been bringing people in that really doesn't sit well with me. They brought in Warner to stick it to a division foe and force them to pay more money but other than that there is no reason they haven't brought in some other FA's or at least had some scheduled visits.The last several drafts haven't been all that great. I don't think the GM (the former Seattle guy whose name escapes me) should still have a job but I'm willing to give him one season more...maybe he did draft quality players and Nolan just never used them properly. :thumbup: I don't really think this is the case but quite a few of the young guys did play better once Singletary took over so we'll see.I do completely agree with you about the draft. I really do not want to see them draft a qb. I'd prefer them to not draft a wr but if Crabtree somehow fell I'd be okay with it. Macklin might not be a bad pick either but imo they desperately need to draft a tackle. We could not get any pressure up the middle last season...draft a good DT who isn't a reach and this defense would jump into the ranks of respectability. Raji would be great if he fell to us but I'd draft an OT if I were in charge. It's not a sexy pick that is going to wow anybody but Frank Gore really needs an offensive line to run behind. I realize Alex Smith/Shaun Hill are not the next Manning (Archie, Peyton, or even Eli) but if they're given some time to find open guys one or both of them should be serviceable. The bottom line is this team isn't supposed to be going anywhere for the forseeable future. I can understand the reasoning behind developing a qb this year but I think they're reaching if they take Sanchez/Stafford and it'd be a big mistake especially when there are so many quality OT options. Let's draft a qb next season. We actually have a few good players this team could/should build around.
 
Another interesting tidbit...the Niners defense was second only to the Steelers in giving up 20-40 yard plays, yet we were second to last in giving up 40+ yard plays. Our safeties are downright atrocious. Roy Williams isn't a good cover safety but he's not anything worse than what we currently have and he can at least deliver some big hits...perhaps that would cause opposing wr's to think twice when going across the middle.

Mike Brown would be another solid option...he cannot stay healthy but at this point I'd prefer to have a quality option out there for some of the time than a lousy option all of the time.

Roy or Brown is not the greatest option for this team but both of them are light years ahead of our current guys. I hope the FO is at least checking out the asking price.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
drummer said:
I've been a fan of the 49ers since the late 70's. I've given up hope on them.
This time next year you will have Mike Holmgren as your head coach...don't give up hope yet.
 
Thanks for creating this thread... i was actually thinking of making on myself, but it didnt come to fruition... i read FBG every day and i have never seen a niners dedicated thread so, im pretty sure your in the clear for this one.

Hopefully all the naysayers (non niner fans) will stay the heck out of this thread, so we can talk some real football.

i absolutely hate bieng the hyped team comming out of the off-season so im ok with the naysayers and their opinion, but it just adds unneeded fluff to most threads.

ill chime in tomorow when i have more time to discuss pickups and such!!

cheers!!

BAM

 
CalBear said:
The Niners would have to improve quite a bit to say "hola" to mediocrity.
^^the reason we don't have a Niner thread, this tool pisses in the pool
Six losing seasons in a row (32-64 record over that time span). Offensive points in the bottom 10 five years in a row. Defense points against in the bottom 10 five years in a row. Horrendously ugly team to watch and to follow.You should change your screen name to "5Wins".
 
The Niners would have to improve quite a bit to say "hola" to mediocrity.
They were 7-9 last year...I think you're confusing the Niners with your local team and their 0-16
They were mediocre. The 49ers were 3-7 after ten games, and the 4 wins they had later were against teams that had poor second halves of their respective seasons.EDIT: the 49ers had 3 wins against 2 of two of the worst teams in football last season as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any homers have an inkling as to who the 9ers starting WRs this season? Are they expected to draft a WR early?

 
I've been a fan of the 49ers since the late 70's. I've given up hope on them.
This time next year you will have Mike Holmgren as your head coach...don't give up hope yet.
Id rather see him in a GM type role. Hes not that good of a coach.
He sucked as a GM. As a coach 5 NFC West titles and a SB appearence. If he can do that for Seattle, think what he can do for the 49er's.As far as the division goes, I hope he is your GM, and not a coach.(Hijack of this thread over.Sorry...)
 
I would welcome Holmgren as coach and NOT GM...

IF this season is a bust and Singletary/Ray are swept out. I wouldn't want to see the change just for change's sake - there's been way too little continuity since '01. But if the '09 season stinks to high heaven and the 49ers have to start over anyway, Holmgren would come in, install his WCO, and provide 3-5 years of solid teaching and coaching.

 
Any homers have an inkling as to who the 9ers starting WRs this season? Are they expected to draft a WR early?
Define early. I could see them drafting crabtree if he fell but aside from that i'd be pissed if they took a wr in round one and I don't see them taking macklin or any non-crabtree wr that early.They do need another wr so they'll likely draft someone...how soon depends where the value is. I'd really like to see them draft that kid from unlv.Their current group of of wr's are decent players or young kids with potential as bruce still hasn't decided if he's going to retire.
 
I've been a fan of the 49ers since the late 70's. I've given up hope on them.
This time next year you will have Mike Holmgren as your head coach...don't give up hope yet.
Id rather see him in a GM type role. Hes not that good of a coach.
He sucked as a GM. As a coach 5 NFC West titles and a SB appearence. If he can do that for Seattle, think what he can do for the 49er's.As far as the division goes, I hope he is your GM, and not a coach.(Hijack of this thread over.Sorry...)
I agree with you. He's a terrible GM. If the Yorks bring him in next season I really hope they're not stupid enough to make him anything more than the coach...but these ARE the Yorks we're talking about.
 
The Niners would have to improve quite a bit to say "hola" to mediocrity.
They were 7-9 last year...I think you're confusing the Niners with your local team and their 0-16
They were mediocre. The 49ers were 3-7 after ten games, and the 4 wins they had later were against teams that had poor second halves of their respective seasons.EDIT: the 49ers had 3 wins against 2 of two of the worst teams in football last season as well.
Your point being? They took advantage of scheduling...that's what teams are supposed to do. They still play in a weak division. The Rams, Cardinals, and Seattle should be improved but they're a long ways from being dominant powerhouses that SF can't beat.The bottom is they WERE mediocre last season. 7-9 is not good nor is it bad. It's mediocre. We'll see how this season goes but this time of the offseason is the time for endless optimism for fans of all teams.
 
The bottom is they WERE mediocre last season. 7-9 is not good nor is it bad. It's mediocre.
#22 in points scored and #23 in points against isn't mediocre, it's bad.
We could hijack this thread with a seemingly endless volley of stats, reasons, and wildless speculation but let's just end it here and agree to disagree. The stats were ugly and the record wasn't anything special. If you want to argue next season i'm sure we'll have a lot of fun but this thread is an attempt to put a bigger focus on next season.I know you're a bay area guy so I'm sure you'll be a great contributor to this thread.
 
Is there a consensus on whether Alex Smith has a legit shot to compete in camp? Also, will they draft a QB in the 1st?

I ask because the position seems to be one not talked about much but is imperative with the young receivers.

 
Singletary has stated repeatedly that he wants the offense to go back to the way it was in 2006, which Alex was the starter and took every snap that season. Even though Shaun Hill has a 7-3 record as a starter, Singletary has said there will be a competition between Smith and Hill for the starting job. There are some reports Shaun Hill absolutely sucks in practice. So if their decision is based on how they do in training camp/practice, Smith will be the starter.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What the 49ers need is DeBartolo (Ed, not Denise). Also, please do NOT draft another QB in the first round (ever again). Thank you.

 
Is there a consensus on whether Alex Smith has a legit shot to compete in camp? Also, will they draft a QB in the 1st? I ask because the position seems to be one not talked about much but is imperative with the young receivers.
As derek19 said, Hill supposedly has not looked so great. I know Andy and others have done mocks with San Francisco taking a qb but with so many holes I just don't see that happening.Imo this is Alex Smiths' job to lose. The Yorks want to get something resembling their money's worth. And again, imo, there is some vague, very slight, but real reason to still have some hope for the kid. But with their o-coordinator I'm very skeptical.
 
Jonas Jennings, Mark Roman, and Isaac Bruce have not reported to voluntary camp...Jennings has been told he does not fit into the Niner's future, Roman has been given permission to seek a trade, and Bruce has yet to decide if he's going to retire.

 
Not too upset to see Jonas and Roman go. Would be nice to have Bruce back for another year though.
I'm glad to see Roman leave. Bruce would be a good one year option. I would LOVE to see Jennings play another year if I could be even slightly confident he'd stay healthy...but since he's been with the team he's finshed on the IR EVERY season and has averaged barely over 5 games a year. What a waste of money.I think it's pretty clear they're taking a tackle with their first pick unless there are a couple screwy picks ahead of them.
 
Your point being? They took advantage of scheduling...that's what teams are supposed to do. They still play in a weak division. The Rams, Cardinals, and Seattle should be improved but they're a long ways from being dominant powerhouses that SF can't beat.The bottom is they WERE mediocre last season. 7-9 is not good nor is it bad. It's mediocre. We'll see how this season goes but this time of the offseason is the time for endless optimism for fans of all teams.
The point is the 49ers were really a 5 win team, maybe less. Some missed FG's in BUF (along with BUF not using their best player in goal line situations), and a Rams collapse in the second meeting (the 49ers looked horrible against them most of the game) were two wins that could have gone the other way. The 49ers weren't a good 7-9. They weren't as good as their record indicated.
 
Your point being? They took advantage of scheduling...that's what teams are supposed to do. They still play in a weak division. The Rams, Cardinals, and Seattle should be improved but they're a long ways from being dominant powerhouses that SF can't beat.The bottom is they WERE mediocre last season. 7-9 is not good nor is it bad. It's mediocre. We'll see how this season goes but this time of the offseason is the time for endless optimism for fans of all teams.
The point is the 49ers were really a 5 win team, maybe less. Some missed FG's in BUF (along with BUF not using their best player in goal line situations), and a Rams collapse in the second meeting (the 49ers looked horrible against them most of the game) were two wins that could have gone the other way. The 49ers weren't a good 7-9. They weren't as good as their record indicated.
If your going to add up the games they should have lost then you need to add up the games they should have won. You can start with the Arizona game that they ended up on the 1 yard line with a minute left.
 
Point is we need to get better in all areas and need help at several positions. First job, GET RID OF THE YORKS. I do look for Holmgren to be around in a year or two. I'm not getting my hopes up too much this year but if we improve on last year I'll be satisfied. I hope they don't take a QB in rd.1 which would likely be Sanchez. I'm ok with the Brandon Jones signing as I think he's got potential and will help the Niners. I don't think Bruce will be back unless they sign Holt.

If Bruce doesn't come back this year your starting day 3 receivers are gonna be Brandon Jones, Jason Hill and Josh Morgan. Go ahead and play the young guys and let them get the experience with either Hill or Smith. Look for the franchise QB another year. Unless Jimmy Raye makes huge strides with the O this year you're probably gonna see a new OC next year and MAYBE a new head Coach(cough,Holmgren).

 
mcd said:
drummer said:
Your point being? They took advantage of scheduling...that's what teams are supposed to do. They still play in a weak division. The Rams, Cardinals, and Seattle should be improved but they're a long ways from being dominant powerhouses that SF can't beat.The bottom is they WERE mediocre last season. 7-9 is not good nor is it bad. It's mediocre. We'll see how this season goes but this time of the offseason is the time for endless optimism for fans of all teams.
The point is the 49ers were really a 5 win team, maybe less. Some missed FG's in BUF (along with BUF not using their best player in goal line situations), and a Rams collapse in the second meeting (the 49ers looked horrible against them most of the game) were two wins that could have gone the other way. The 49ers weren't a good 7-9. They weren't as good as their record indicated.
If your going to add up the games they should have lost then you need to add up the games they should have won. You can start with the Arizona game that they ended up on the 1 yard line with a minute left.
That both coaches blew, along with whoever was in the booth giving them advice (Paraag?). That what 49er fans miss.
 
Your point being? They took advantage of scheduling...that's what teams are supposed to do. They still play in a weak division. The Rams, Cardinals, and Seattle should be improved but they're a long ways from being dominant powerhouses that SF can't beat.The bottom is they WERE mediocre last season. 7-9 is not good nor is it bad. It's mediocre. We'll see how this season goes but this time of the offseason is the time for endless optimism for fans of all teams.
The point is the 49ers were really a 5 win team, maybe less. Some missed FG's in BUF (along with BUF not using their best player in goal line situations), and a Rams collapse in the second meeting (the 49ers looked horrible against them most of the game) were two wins that could have gone the other way. The 49ers weren't a good 7-9. They weren't as good as their record indicated.
If your going to add up the games they should have lost then you need to add up the games they should have won. You can start with the Arizona game that they ended up on the 1 yard line with a minute left.
That both coaches blew, along with whoever was in the booth giving them advice (Paraag?). That what 49er fans miss.
I'm not sure 49er fans miss it at all, as much as your trying to argue it both ways. 49ers made terrible coaching decisions = they deserved the loss. Buffalo & St Louis make terrible coaching decisions = 49ers don't deserve the win. They were 7-9, right about where the deserved to be.
 
Point is we need to get better in all areas and need help at several positions. First job, GET RID OF THE YORKS. I do look for Holmgren to be around in a year or two. I'm not getting my hopes up too much this year but if we improve on last year I'll be satisfied. I hope they don't take a QB in rd.1 which would likely be Sanchez. I'm ok with the Brandon Jones signing as I think he's got potential and will help the Niners. I don't think Bruce will be back unless they sign Holt.If Bruce doesn't come back this year your starting day 3 receivers are gonna be Brandon Jones, Jason Hill and Josh Morgan. Go ahead and play the young guys and let them get the experience with either Hill or Smith. Look for the franchise QB another year. Unless Jimmy Raye makes huge strides with the O this year you're probably gonna see a new OC next year and MAYBE a new head Coach(cough,Holmgren).
I think the starting WR's will be, assuming they don't draft a WR, holt and bruce are not on the team; 1. Morgan, 2. Battle, 3. Hill, 4. Jones, 5. Ziegler. Battle is the WR Smith is most comfortable throwing to. Plus, battle is the only consistent WR they have on team. I hope Jason Hill can turn it around but i think he has a lil ways to go.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm thinkin' deal for Cutler now, add Shanahan in 2010.
Hell Yeah!! I'd be happy with Cutler. Hell, we could offer our #10 pick and throw in Smith and Hill,lol. Give the Broncos a bonus and give them the YORKS as well. Please get them the heck away from the 49ers. I think we'd stand a better chance of getting Holmgren than Shanny but either would be fine with me. No disrespect to Mike Singletary cause it's gonna take a lot more than him to take control of this team and turn it around.
 
I'm thinkin' deal for Cutler now, add Shanahan in 2010.
As great as it would be to see them land Cutler, the Yorks have already dumped a lot of money into Alex Smith and Shaun Hill...I just don't see them paying close to ten mil for them to ride the bench. Instead we'll have to hope they finally have a great draft.
 
I'm thinkin' deal for Cutler now, add Shanahan in 2010.
Hell Yeah!! I'd be happy with Cutler. Hell, we could offer our #10 pick and throw in Smith and Hill,lol. Give the Broncos a bonus and give them the YORKS as well. Please get them the heck away from the 49ers. I think we'd stand a better chance of getting Holmgren than Shanny but either would be fine with me. No disrespect to Mike Singletary cause it's gonna take a lot more than him to take control of this team and turn it around.
Thats wishful thinking lol...If the broncos are serious about trading Cutler, there are probably 3 teams that would be willing to pay more than the 9ers. Jets, Detroit, bucs, possibly the Titans and Panthers.
 
Your point being? They took advantage of scheduling...that's what teams are supposed to do. They still play in a weak division. The Rams, Cardinals, and Seattle should be improved but they're a long ways from being dominant powerhouses that SF can't beat.The bottom is they WERE mediocre last season. 7-9 is not good nor is it bad. It's mediocre. We'll see how this season goes but this time of the offseason is the time for endless optimism for fans of all teams.
The point is the 49ers were really a 5 win team, maybe less. Some missed FG's in BUF (along with BUF not using their best player in goal line situations), and a Rams collapse in the second meeting (the 49ers looked horrible against them most of the game) were two wins that could have gone the other way. The 49ers weren't a good 7-9. They weren't as good as their record indicated.
If your going to add up the games they should have lost then you need to add up the games they should have won. You can start with the Arizona game that they ended up on the 1 yard line with a minute left.
That both coaches blew, along with whoever was in the booth giving them advice (Paraag?). That what 49er fans miss.
I'm not sure 49er fans miss it at all, as much as your trying to argue it both ways. 49ers made terrible coaching decisions = they deserved the loss. Buffalo & St Louis make terrible coaching decisions = 49ers don't deserve the win. They were 7-9, right about where the deserved to be.
What you are missing here is this: BUF last 8 games: 2-6STL last 8 games: 0-8Yeah, that's what you're missing.
 
Seriously? The 49ers should be happy with mediocrity this year. Do you guys think SF will be an elite team next year or something? LOL.

 
Seriously? The 49ers should be happy with mediocrity this year. Do you guys think SF will be an elite team next year or something? LOL.
Beat it, buddy. This is a place for eternal offseason optimism and baseless speculation of them producing a winning season in a weak division lead by the fiery Singletary. :rant: :wall: :X Naysayers are not welcome on this bandwagon. :boxing: ;)
 
I'm thinkin' deal for Cutler now, add Shanahan in 2010.
As great as it would be to see them land Cutler, the Yorks have already dumped a lot of money into Alex Smith and Shaun Hill...I just don't see them paying close to ten mil for them to ride the bench. Instead we'll have to hope they finally have a great draft.
They were at least pretending to be interested in paying Warner an extra $10m to let Smith and Hill ride the bench. If the Niners have anything Denver is interested in, I'd expect SF to be aggressive in pursuing Cutler.
 
Is there a consensus on whether Alex Smith has a legit shot to compete in camp? Also, will they draft a QB in the 1st? I ask because the position seems to be one not talked about much but is imperative with the young receivers.
As derek19 said, Hill supposedly has not looked so great. I know Andy and others have done mocks with San Francisco taking a qb but with so many holes I just don't see that happening.Imo this is Alex Smiths' job to lose. The Yorks want to get something resembling their money's worth. And again, imo, there is some vague, very slight, but real reason to still have some hope for the kid. But with their o-coordinator I'm very skeptical.
I have trouble seeing this. How will fans/observers/teammates react if Smith gets off to a bad start (again)? Hill has led the team to strong finishes each of the last two years. I think it'd be hard to justify at least not giving Hill the first crack at the job. Smith won't have enough credibility with the team to come in until it's been proven Hill can't do the job.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top