What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

No Country for Old Men (1 Viewer)

Definitely a great movie but the ending is a quite unfulfilling...I just do not know what to make of it. Everything up to it is great and certainly one of the top movies. Go out and see it, and u can make of it what you will.

 
Definitely a great movie but the ending is a quite unfulfilling...I just do not know what to make of it. Everything up to it is great and certainly one of the top movies. Go out and see it, and u can make of it what you will.
I thought the same thing at first, but I think that's the whole point. I find myself liking this movie more and more as the days pass since I saw it, especially the ending. I mean, we're all just waiting to die and can't escape that fact. I feel like the movie captured that feeling of regret, helplessness and unfulfillment that must come as you get closer to death.
 
Definitely a great movie but the ending is a quite unfulfilling...I just do not know what to make of it. Everything up to it is great and certainly one of the top movies. Go out and see it, and u can make of it what you will.
Read the whole thread. There are some good ideas brought up.
 
saw it yesterday. Was hoping someone could explain the main theme?

:confused:

mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("

What was with the whole idea of randomness? The flipping of a coin, killer gets in a car crash, etc.

Also I didn't catch the significance at the end of Tommy Lee Jones talking about his dreams with his father *** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("My read on the coin flip was that Chigurh needs a reason to kill, no matter how small it is. He doesn't kill anyone in the movie for absolutely no reason.

As far as the car crash, I didn't get what was up with that. Seemed very tacked on and unnecessary.

I actually loved the last scene with TLJ. In the dream, he said his dad was going down to the valley to make a fire and he knew he was soon going to join him. I thought it was showing that TLJ knew Chigurh would come for him soon and that he would soon "join his dad" in death.

*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("Actually, I just thought of another scene to support the idea that Chiguhr can't kill without reason. When he is driving across the bridge, he randomly decides to shoot the bird on the railing. He misses and hits the bridge. He never misses.

Also, the scene in the gas station may have not meant anything. He had no reason to kill the attendant, coin flip or no coin flip. We know he is a killer, but the attendant does not. Chiguhr never threatens to kill him. That is simply a conclusion we are lead to. The only wager is that the attendant 'would win everything'. Had the coin come up tails, would he have killed him? On the flipside (pun intended), even though he offers a coin flip to the wife, she was dead anyway, because he had promised to do her in anyway, and he sticks to his principles. In my opinion, his decisions were not based on randomness.*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
 
Definitely a great movie but the ending is a quite unfulfilling...I just do not know what to make of it. Everything up to it is great and certainly one of the top movies. Go out and see it, and u can make of it what you will.
I thought the same thing at first, but I think that's the whole point. I find myself liking this movie more and more as the days pass since I saw it, especially the ending. I mean, we're all just waiting to die and can't escape that fact. I feel like the movie captured that feeling of regret, helplessness and unfulfillment that must come as you get closer to death.
:goodposting: Furthermore, I think it all depends on what you want out of a film. Sure, I like to be entertained and inspired by a good movie. But if a movie asks difficult questions and leaves me feeling shocked or depressed, I think those emotions are valid and important.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Definitely a great movie but the ending is a quite unfulfilling...I just do not know what to make of it. Everything up to it is great and certainly one of the top movies. Go out and see it, and u can make of it what you will.
I thought the same thing at first, but I think that's the whole point. I find myself liking this movie more and more as the days pass since I saw it, especially the ending. I mean, we're all just waiting to die and can't escape that fact. I feel like the movie captured that feeling of regret, helplessness and unfulfillment that must come as you get closer to death.
:goodposting: Furthermore, I think it all depends on what you want out of a film. Sure, I like to be entertained and inspired by a good movie. But if a movie asks difficult questions and leaves me feeling shocked or depressed, I think those emotions are valid and important.
:cry: Some times you have to do a little work for a big payoff.
 
^FIXED^I thought that too, but why would he be there if he already had it?
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("I'm thinking he had just gotten it. He tried to get it from the room which the sheriff entered initially (evidenced by the open duct, dime etc.), couldn't, got a map of the hotel, went to the other room and removed it from there just as the sheriff arrived to search the first one.

*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
 
^FIXED^I thought that too, but why would he be there if he already had it?
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("I'm thinking he had just gotten it. He tried to get it from the room which the sheriff entered initially (evidenced by the open duct, dime etc.), couldn't, got a map of the hotel, went to the other room and removed it from there just as the sheriff arrived to search the first one.

*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
:thumbup:
 
Just got back from seeing this. Hadn't read the book - have read a couple of McCarthy's books, just not this one. Wasn't all that excited to see it based on the trailer, because frankly, it looked scary and I'm a wimp when it comes to scary movies. It was gory in parts, horrifying in others, hysterical in a few, and suspenseful the whole way.

But what I saw was one of the best movies I've seen this year. The Coen Brothers are hit or miss with me, but I agree with all who have said that there is something so "Coen Brothers" about each of their movies. Same goes here.

I'm enjoying reading some of the posts here because there are parts of the movie that I will be mulling over for days.

The ending? I'm torn. I really, really liked the very end, with TLJ (and really, the entire message he brought to the film), but the 15 minutes leading up to it? Meh.

All in all, I thought it was great.

And it's going to take me an hour and a glass of wine to relax after 2 of the most intense hours of cinema I've seen.

 
I'm not sure what was wrong with the ending. What were those that didn't like it expecting?
I say this as a huge fan of the Coen brothers. A spoiler-free attempt to answer that question:Much of the film seems to build to an inevitable event, and that event does not transpire. And while the film is largely an action thriller, the end is largely existential. That is kind of a shocking shift in the film. So while I love the movie, I can see why the non-traditional, non-Hollywood ending would not be satisfying to some people.
 
I'm not sure what was wrong with the ending. What were those that didn't like it expecting?
I say this as a huge fan of the Coen brothers. A spoiler-free attempt to answer that question:Much of the film seems to build to an inevitable event, and that event does not transpire. And while the film is largely an action thriller, the end is largely existential. That is kind of a shocking shift in the film. So while I love the movie, I can see why the non-traditional, non-Hollywood ending would not be satisfying to some people.
I think thats a liiittle condescending, isn't it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not sure what was wrong with the ending. What were those that didn't like it expecting?
I say this as a huge fan of the Coen brothers. A spoiler-free attempt to answer that question:Much of the film seems to build to an inevitable event, and that event does not transpire. And while the film is largely an action thriller, the end is largely existential. That is kind of a shocking shift in the film. So while I love the movie, I can see why the non-traditional, non-Hollywood ending would not be satisfying to some people.
I think thats a liiittle condescending, isn't it?
Really? I didn't intend that at all. I didn't say that people who don't like the ending are dumb. I said that I can see why they wouldn't like the ending.
 
I'm not sure what was wrong with the ending. What were those that didn't like it expecting?
I say this as a huge fan of the Coen brothers. A spoiler-free attempt to answer that question:Much of the film seems to build to an inevitable event, and that event does not transpire. And while the film is largely an action thriller, the end is largely existential. That is kind of a shocking shift in the film. So while I love the movie, I can see why the non-traditional, non-Hollywood ending would not be satisfying to some people.
I think thats a liiittle condescending, isn't it?
Really? I didn't intend that at all. I didn't say that people who don't like the ending are dumb. I said that I can see why they wouldn't like the ending.
No big deal. It just kinda sounded like you we implying that those who didn't like it, didn't "get it". Something can be non-traditional or non-Hollywood and still be legitimately questionable. In the end though, I like the movie a lot.
 
I'm not sure what was wrong with the ending. What were those that didn't like it expecting?
I say this as a huge fan of the Coen brothers. A spoiler-free attempt to answer that question:Much of the film seems to build to an inevitable event, and that event does not transpire. And while the film is largely an action thriller, the end is largely existential. That is kind of a shocking shift in the film. So while I love the movie, I can see why the non-traditional, non-Hollywood ending would not be satisfying to some people.
I think thats a liiittle condescending, isn't it?
Really? I didn't intend that at all. I didn't say that people who don't like the ending are dumb. I said that I can see why they wouldn't like the ending.
No big deal. It just kinda sounded like you we implying that those who didn't like it, didn't "get it". Something can be non-traditional or non-Hollywood and still be legitimately questionable. In the end though, I like the movie a lot.
I never resort to that. I think it'd be quite easy to "get" the ending without liking it. Hell, much as I like the film, I would have loved a more satisfying ending.
 
I'm not sure what was wrong with the ending. What were those that didn't like it expecting?
I say this as a huge fan of the Coen brothers. A spoiler-free attempt to answer that question:Much of the film seems to build to an inevitable event, and that event does not transpire. And while the film is largely an action thriller, the end is largely existential. That is kind of a shocking shift in the film. So while I love the movie, I can see why the non-traditional, non-Hollywood ending would not be satisfying to some people.
I think thats a liiittle condescending, isn't it?
Really? I didn't intend that at all. I didn't say that people who don't like the ending are dumb. I said that I can see why they wouldn't like the ending.
No big deal. It just kinda sounded like you we implying that those who didn't like it, didn't "get it". Something can be non-traditional or non-Hollywood and still be legitimately questionable. In the end though, I like the movie a lot.
I never resort to that. I think it'd be quite easy to "get" the ending without liking it. Hell, much as I like the film, I would have loved a more satisfying ending.
Well there you go.
 
Wife and I just saw got back from seeing this. I have one question though for those who have read the book.

Was the ending of the book similar to the movie?? I am going to be picking up the book this weekend so please no major spoilers if it is different.

 
saw it yesterday. Was hoping someone could explain the main theme?

:tinfoilhat:

mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("

What was with the whole idea of randomness? The flipping of a coin, killer gets in a car crash, etc.

Also I didn't catch the significance at the end of Tommy Lee Jones talking about his dreams with his father *** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("My read on the coin flip was that Chigurh needs a reason to kill, no matter how small it is. He doesn't kill anyone in the movie for absolutely no reason.

As far as the car crash, I didn't get what was up with that. Seemed very tacked on and unnecessary.

I actually loved the last scene with TLJ. In the dream, he said his dad was going down to the valley to make a fire and he knew he was soon going to join him. I thought it was showing that TLJ knew Chigurh would come for him soon and that he would soon "join his dad" in death.

*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("Actually, I just thought of another scene to support the idea that Chiguhr can't kill without reason. When he is driving across the bridge, he randomly decides to shoot the bird on the railing. He misses and hits the bridge. He never misses.

Also, the scene in the gas station may have not meant anything. He had no reason to kill the attendant, coin flip or no coin flip. We know he is a killer, but the attendant does not. Chiguhr never threatens to kill him. That is simply a conclusion we are lead to. The only wager is that the attendant 'would win everything'. Had the coin come up tails, would he have killed him? On the flipside (pun intended), even though he offers a coin flip to the wife, she was dead anyway, because he had promised to do her in anyway, and he sticks to his principles. In my opinion, his decisions were not based on randomness.*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
 
bialczabub said:
saw it yesterday. Was hoping someone could explain the main theme?

:popcorn:

mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("

What was with the whole idea of randomness? The flipping of a coin, killer gets in a car crash, etc.

Also I didn't catch the significance at the end of Tommy Lee Jones talking about his dreams with his father *** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("My read on the coin flip was that Chigurh needs a reason to kill, no matter how small it is. He doesn't kill anyone in the movie for absolutely no reason.

As far as the car crash, I didn't get what was up with that. Seemed very tacked on and unnecessary.

I actually loved the last scene with TLJ. In the dream, he said his dad was going down to the valley to make a fire and he knew he was soon going to join him. I thought it was showing that TLJ knew Chigurh would come for him soon and that he would soon "join his dad" in death.

*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("Actually, I just thought of another scene to support the idea that Chiguhr can't kill without reason. When he is driving across the bridge, he randomly decides to shoot the bird on the railing. He misses and hits the bridge. He never misses.

Also, the scene in the gas station may have not meant anything. He had no reason to kill the attendant, coin flip or no coin flip. We know he is a killer, but the attendant does not. Chiguhr never threatens to kill him. That is simply a conclusion we are lead to. The only wager is that the attendant 'would win everything'. Had the coin come up tails, would he have killed him? On the flipside (pun intended), even though he offers a coin flip to the wife, she was dead anyway, because he had promised to do her in anyway, and he sticks to his principles. In my opinion, his decisions were not based on randomness.*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write(""Doesn't he tell the gas station attendant that he had everything to gain? By flipping the coin, the gas station attendant can believe that he has won, when perhaps there was nothing ever there to win."

Chiguhr was absolutely going to kill the attendant if he lost the coin toss. And the attendant had *everything* to win: his life.

*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
 
****Spoilers Possibly Below!!!****

****Proceed at your own risk****

For those that are saying Chigur doesn't kill without a reason and that the coin flips don't mean anything, I totally disagree. I think if it came up tails, that gas station attendant wouldn't have seen the sunset. And I think if the wife had made a call and it came up her way, she would have lived.

I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :popcorn:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :popcorn:
You might want to put some of that in a spoiler tag, for people who haven't seen it yet. And I disagree with you on the pleasure part.

OK, I edited out the spoiler parts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For those that are saying Chigur doesn't kill without a reason and that the coin flips don't mean anything, I totally disagree. I think if it came up tails, that gas station attendant wouldn't have seen the sunset. And I think if the wife had made a call and it came up her way, she would have lived.

I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :popcorn:
You might want to put some of that in a spoiler tag, for people who haven't seen it yet. And I disagree with you on the pleasure part.
I'm saying if you've gotten this far in the thread and haven't seen the movie yet, you deserve to have stuff ruined.Edit: Updated. :popcorn:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For those that are saying Chigur doesn't kill without a reason and that the coin flips don't mean anything, I totally disagree. I think if it came up tails, that gas station attendant wouldn't have seen the sunset. And I think if the wife had made a call and it came up her way, she would have lived.

I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :popcorn:
You might want to put some of that in a spoiler tag, for people who haven't seen it yet. And I disagree with you on the pleasure part.
Really?
 
I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :kicksrock:
You might want to put some of that in a spoiler tag, for people who haven't seen it yet. And I disagree with you on the pleasure part.
Really?
Yes, really. I don't think he gets any satisfaction out of it, but I don't think it bothers him either. He's kind of a sociopath, who doesn't have a normal persons' sense of right and wrong. What he does have is his personal code, that lays out rules for killing. Now, those are obviously very loose rules, but he never kills anyone who he really doesn't have a reason to. He might have come close with the gas station attendant, but he gave him a choice, and we don't know what would have happened.
 
UNFULLFILLING.

just because you can tell a story in a different way doesn't make it great.

there was no motivation to swith the POV to the sheriff...none.

and ending with a guy talking about his heavy handed dream?

90% a great movie....last 10% was not.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
****Spoilers Possibly Below!!!****

****Proceed at your own risk****

For those that are saying Chigur doesn't kill without a reason and that the coin flips don't mean anything, I totally disagree. I think if it came up tails, that gas station attendant wouldn't have seen the sunset. And I think if the wife had made a call and it came up her way, she would have lived.

I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :unsure:
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("He's not visibly upset when he loses.*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
 
UNFULLFILLING.just because you can tell a story in a different way doesn't make it great.there was no motivation to swith the POV to the sheriff...none.and ending with a guy talking about his heavy handed dream?90% a great movie....last 10% was not.
I too am frustrated when there is a lack of
 
UNFULLFILLING.just because you can tell a story in a different way doesn't make it great.there was no motivation to swith the POV to the sheriff...none.and ending with a guy talking about his heavy handed dream?90% a great movie....last 10% was not.
You have to be aware of the piece as a whole, the film IS TL Jones story, he opens the film with the narration and it simply doubles back.
 
bialczabub said:
saw it yesterday. Was hoping someone could explain the main theme?

:shrug:

mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("

What was with the whole idea of randomness? The flipping of a coin, killer gets in a car crash, etc.

Also I didn't catch the significance at the end of Tommy Lee Jones talking about his dreams with his father *** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("My read on the coin flip was that Chigurh needs a reason to kill, no matter how small it is. He doesn't kill anyone in the movie for absolutely no reason.

As far as the car crash, I didn't get what was up with that. Seemed very tacked on and unnecessary.

I actually loved the last scene with TLJ. In the dream, he said his dad was going down to the valley to make a fire and he knew he was soon going to join him. I thought it was showing that TLJ knew Chigurh would come for him soon and that he would soon "join his dad" in death.

*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("Actually, I just thought of another scene to support the idea that Chiguhr can't kill without reason. When he is driving across the bridge, he randomly decides to shoot the bird on the railing. He misses and hits the bridge. He never misses.

Also, the scene in the gas station may have not meant anything. He had no reason to kill the attendant, coin flip or no coin flip. We know he is a killer, but the attendant does not. Chiguhr never threatens to kill him. That is simply a conclusion we are lead to. The only wager is that the attendant 'would win everything'. Had the coin come up tails, would he have killed him? On the flipside (pun intended), even though he offers a coin flip to the wife, she was dead anyway, because he had promised to do her in anyway, and he sticks to his principles. In my opinion, his decisions were not based on randomness.*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write(""Doesn't he tell the gas station attendant that he had everything to gain? By flipping the coin, the gas station attendant can believe that he has won, when perhaps there was nothing ever there to win."

Chiguhr was absolutely going to kill the attendant if he lost the coin toss. And the attendant had *everything* to win: his life.

*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***

");document.close();
That's what I took from it.
 
****Spoilers Possibly Below!!!****

****Proceed at your own risk****

For those that are saying Chigur doesn't kill without a reason and that the coin flips don't mean anything, I totally disagree. I think if it came up tails, that gas station attendant wouldn't have seen the sunset. And I think if the wife had made a call and it came up her way, she would have lived.

I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :goodposting:
And in the gas station attendant's case, Chigur almost wants to perform an act of mercy. The attendant is so pathetic, Chigur wants to slaughter him like a wounded horse.
 
I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :goodposting:
You might want to put some of that in a spoiler tag, for people who haven't seen it yet. And I disagree with you on the pleasure part.
Really?
Yes, really. I don't think he gets any satisfaction out of it, but I don't think it bothers him either. He's kind of a sociopath, who doesn't have a normal persons' sense of right and wrong. What he does have is his personal code, that lays out rules for killing. Now, those are obviously very loose rules, but he never kills anyone who he really doesn't have a reason to. He might have come close with the gas station attendant, but he gave him a choice, and we don't know what would have happened.
Check out the look on Chigur's face when he strangles that cop. Hard to argue that he didn't get pleasure out of that.
 
I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :shrug:
You might want to put some of that in a spoiler tag, for people who haven't seen it yet. And I disagree with you on the pleasure part.
Really?
Yes, really. I don't think he gets any satisfaction out of it, but I don't think it bothers him either. He's kind of a sociopath, who doesn't have a normal persons' sense of right and wrong. What he does have is his personal code, that lays out rules for killing. Now, those are obviously very loose rules, but he never kills anyone who he really doesn't have a reason to. He might have come close with the gas station attendant, but he gave him a choice, and we don't know what would have happened.
Check out the look on Chigur's face when he strangles that cop. Hard to argue that he didn't get pleasure out of that.
Happy to be getting away.
 
Wife and I just saw got back from seeing this. I have one question though for those who have read the book.Was the ending of the book similar to the movie?? I am going to be picking up the book this weekend so please no major spoilers if it is different.
I'm going with Homer here in that if you've read this far you don't care about spoilers. Saw it today.Read the book and really liked it.Coens just copied the book, nearly verbatim. Did not add any of their own spin. I found the movie rather meh...disappointed. Checked the time once and struggled to stay awake.Rambo trailer looked pretty good though.
 
I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :thumbup:
You might want to put some of that in a spoiler tag, for people who haven't seen it yet. And I disagree with you on the pleasure part.
Really?
Yes, really. I don't think he gets any satisfaction out of it, but I don't think it bothers him either. He's kind of a sociopath, who doesn't have a normal persons' sense of right and wrong. What he does have is his personal code, that lays out rules for killing. Now, those are obviously very loose rules, but he never kills anyone who he really doesn't have a reason to. He might have come close with the gas station attendant, but he gave him a choice, and we don't know what would have happened.
Check out the look on Chigur's face when he strangles that cop. Hard to argue that he didn't get pleasure out of that.
Happy to be getting away.
He looked like a music lover listening to Bach while killing that guy. Pure elation. I don't think that was just the joy of new-found freedom.
 
There are 2 very distinct lines of thinking here about Chigurh. One group is using the movie, one is using the movie and the book. It is very interesting to see the difference in deductions from the two groups. The book seems very clear as to what Chigurh represents (especially considering the author and his treatment of other characters in his works). The movie has a different tone to his character. I think that was intentional by the Coen's. Great book. Fantastic adaptation of the book. My wife had totally different views of things because she went into the movie "fresh" while I had all kinds of expectations. Pretty awesome that we both could be so intrigued and have so many thought provoking questions.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are 2 very distinct lines of thinking here about Chigurh. One group is using the movie, one is using the movie and the book. It is very interesting to see the difference in deductions from the two groups. The book seems very clear as to what Chigurh represents (especially considering the author and his treatment of other characters in his works). The movie has a different tone to his character. I think that was intentional by the Coen's. Great book. Fantastic adaptation of the book. My wife had totally different views of things because she went into the movie "fresh" while I had all kinds of expectations. Pretty awesome that we both could be so intrigued and have so many thought provoking questions.
What's the book view? I haven't read it, so anything I took from the movie might be wrong, I'll admit.
 
****Spoilers Possibly Below!!!****

****Proceed at your own risk****

For those that are saying Chigur doesn't kill without a reason and that the coin flips don't mean anything, I totally disagree. I think if it came up tails, that gas station attendant wouldn't have seen the sunset. And I think if the wife had made a call and it came up her way, she would have lived.

I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :excited:
*Spoiler*My impression, after just seeing the movie today, was that Chigur feels like he's a role player, and that he really has no choice in the killings he does. If someone sees him, they die. If they get in his way, they die. If there is some bargain struck, some deal made, he will follow through without thought.

That's what made the exchange with the wife interesting, where she told him that it was HIS choice to kill her or not, it wasn't up to fate. She refused to call heads or tails as though she were defying the idea that it was up in the air. It was his choice, and his alone.

As far as the rest of the movie, I liked the movie, but not in a way I typically like movies. There wasn't really any closure, the "good" guy got killed in almost a real-life sorta way, where he's there one minute and gone another...which was refreshingly different, but still unsatisfying. They do things the way they're typically done for a reason...and that's because people like it.

Anyways, I found it to be an interesting movie intellectually, and fairly gripping at parts, so I liked the movie...it just didn't leave me feeling with the kind of feeling I like from movies I really enjoy.

 
Definitely a great movie but the ending is a quite unfulfilling...I just do not know what to make of it. Everything up to it is great and certainly one of the top movies. Go out and see it, and u can make of it what you will.
I thought the same thing at first, but I think that's the whole point. I find myself liking this movie more and more as the days pass since I saw it, especially the ending. I mean, we're all just waiting to die and can't escape that fact. I feel like the movie captured that feeling of regret, helplessness and unfulfillment that must come as you get closer to death.
:goodposting: Furthermore, I think it all depends on what you want out of a film. Sure, I like to be entertained and inspired by a good movie. But if a movie asks difficult questions and leaves me feeling shocked or depressed, I think those emotions are valid and important.
:goodposting: Some times you have to do a little work for a big payoff.
The more and more I think about it, I like it even more, the dialogue between the characters are so great. Each character was important to the movie and makes the best out of it. To be honest, now that I've discussed the movie with my friend, we couldn't come up with a different ending.
 
This is how I think you should look at the ending (I went and saw it again with this understanding and the ending was chilling to me):

 
There are 2 very distinct lines of thinking here about Chigurh. One group is using the movie, one is using the movie and the book. It is very interesting to see the difference in deductions from the two groups. The book seems very clear as to what Chigurh represents (especially considering the author and his treatment of other characters in his works). The movie has a different tone to his character. I think that was intentional by the Coen's. Great book. Fantastic adaptation of the book. My wife had totally different views of things because she went into the movie "fresh" while I had all kinds of expectations. Pretty awesome that we both could be so intrigued and have so many thought provoking questions.
What's the book view? I haven't read it, so anything I took from the movie might be wrong, I'll admit.
If I told you "what the book says"...it wouldn't (or at least, it shouldn't) change your view of anything. That was the point of my post. It's not "wrong". At all. It's very rare that you can go to a movie that is based so heavily on a book and come away with differing views that are justifiable and meaningful. Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is another book/movie that I feel has this quality. The book is much darker and more damning. The movie makes the drug use look like a circus of funny and crazy anecdotes. Both are legit ways to take the meaning of the story.

 
Definitely a great movie but the ending is a quite unfulfilling...I just do not know what to make of it. Everything up to it is great and certainly one of the top movies. Go out and see it, and u can make of it what you will.
I thought the same thing at first, but I think that's the whole point. I find myself liking this movie more and more as the days pass since I saw it, especially the ending. I mean, we're all just waiting to die and can't escape that fact. I feel like the movie captured that feeling of regret, helplessness and unfulfillment that must come as you get closer to death.
Agreed. That's what the ending was about. TLJ was dealing with retiring and waiting for death. The story about his dream was just a fantastic way to end this.Amazing dialogue and acting. Loved this movie.

 
****Spoilers Possibly Below!!!****

****Proceed at your own risk****

For those that are saying Chigur doesn't kill without a reason and that the coin flips don't mean anything, I totally disagree. I think if it came up tails, that gas station attendant wouldn't have seen the sunset. And I think if the wife had made a call and it came up her way, she would have lived.

I don't think he's looking for a reason to kill...he wants to kill. It gives him pleasure. But I think the coin toss thing makes it more interesting for him...kind of like a gambling thing, where he's not only going to get off if he wins, but he's getting off on the game itself (which is how us true gamblers feel about it).

He's not looking for a reason not to kill. He's digging the game. And he wants to kill...he lost at the gas station. :kicksrock:
*Spoiler*My impression, after just seeing the movie today, was that Chigur feels like he's a role player, and that he really has no choice in the killings he does. If someone sees him, they die. If they get in his way, they die. If there is some bargain struck, some deal made, he will follow through without thought.

That's what made the exchange with the wife interesting, where she told him that it was HIS choice to kill her or not, it wasn't up to fate. She refused to call heads or tails as though she were defying the idea that it was up in the air. It was his choice, and his alone.
*Spoiler*This is what I got out of the book (haven't seen the movie yet). The coin flip was not of consequence because that persons fate was already decided. It's almost as if he knew the wife was going to die and that he knew the coin flip would dictate this.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top