It was like 15% of the vote total and the difference between the candidates is roughly 16,000 votes.In before no evidence of voter fraud and statistically insignificant bots post
And by all reports thus far is an error and not fraud.It was like 15% of the vote total and the difference between the candidates is roughly 16,000 votes.
And also was caught, and that's the whole point!And by all reports thus far is an error and not fraud.
Caught by a candidate. Not by the election officials.And also was caught, and that's the whole point!
Right over some people's heads...
you think ?its almost like they werent getting the results they wanted.
The candidate notices something and they figured it out...they probably noticed it too. I didn't see a timeline. It's exactly how the system is supposed to work.Caught by a candidate. Not by the election officials.
They had one jobAnd by all reports thus far is an error and not fraud.
NYC released the numbers. Youd think they'd notice something was off before posting them. I guess we're asking too much.The candidate notices something and they figured it out...they probably noticed it too. I didn't see a timeline. It's exactly how the system is supposed to work.
Especially considering they are moving to rank ballot.
Well not exactly how it's supposed to work. There's not supposed to be 135k "test" votes already in the database.The candidate notices something and they figured it out...they probably noticed it too. I didn't see a timeline. It's exactly how the system is supposed to work.
Especially considering they are moving to rank ballot.
Fair enough, but the system caught it. They looked and they corrected it.Well not exactly how it's supposed to work. There's not supposed to be 135k "test" votes already in the database.
Again the system didn't catch it. It wasn't until the candidate questioned it that they looked and "found" the extra votes. If the candidate never spoke up, what would have happened to those "test" votes?Fair enough, but the system caught it. They looked and they corrected it.
Errors happen and they were caught. Good on everyone for figuring it out. It was also rectified very quickly.
The bungle was a black mark on New York City’s first major foray into ranked choice voting and seemed to confirm worries that the city’s Board of Elections, which is jointly run by Democrats and Republicans, was unprepared to implement the new system.Mind you this is a Democrat Primary in a major US city (aka the actual election for mayor). There are no republicans to blame for this one.
Lol ok. Guess it's their fault after all.The bungle was a black mark on New York City’s first major foray into ranked choice voting and seemed to confirm worries that the city’s Board of Elections, which is jointly run by Democrats and Republicans, was unprepared to implement the new system.
That board also apparently has a history of mistakes over the years.The bungle was a black mark on New York City’s first major foray into ranked choice voting and seemed to confirm worries that the city’s Board of Elections, which is jointly run by Democrats and Republicans, was unprepared to implement the new system.
I just quoted from your link. I'm not assigning any blame. But you were quick to blame the Dems when in reality both parties run the BOE.Lol ok. Guess it's their fault after all.
It's a Democrat Mayoral Primary run in NYC. I forgot that is a traditionally strong Republican run territory.I just quoted from your link. I'm not assigning any blame. But you were quick to blame the Dems when in reality both parties run the BOE.
It's a Democrat Mayoral Primary run in NYC. I forgot that is a traditionally strong Republican run territory.
Heck, we're still waiting for the Democratic Iowa caucus to be figured out. (If I remember they gave up).YOU'RE assigning blame to one party. But both run the BOE which made the mistake. I guess it was only the Dems on the board that screwed up. Maybe.
Its incompetence. It doesn't give anyone the warm and fuzzy they are doing everything else right behind the scene.Is there anyone here who believes this was deliberate? If so just come out and say it, don’t #####foot around.
In what way does this show how easy it is to tamper with an election?Great post and topic. Just goes to show how easy it is to tamper with our elections. Forensic audits will be a great safeguard.
Do we know what the distribution of votes was by all the test ballots?Is there anyone here who believes this was deliberate? If so just come out and say it, don’t #####foot around.
Throw in a bunch of extra ballots and they get counted. It only becomes an issue if one of the contestants complains.In what way does this show how easy it is to tamper with an election?
They weren’t thrown in and not by outside sources.Throw in a bunch of extra ballots and they get counted. It only becomes an issue if one of the contestants complains.
Hmmm….sounds familiar…
Not to my knowledge, but this has potential to be a major issueDo we know what the distribution of votes was by all the test ballots?
And yet it happened….They weren’t thrown in and not by outside sources.
No this does not sound familiar
Sure. Just not fraud…no evidence of tampering and quickly found and rectified.And yet it happened….![]()
Where? American idol? You a Sanjaya fan? I know there was a push years ago to get Sanjaya to win as a joke but it ultimately fell short. Still upset about that I guess? Can’t blame you really, it was funny.Throw in a bunch of extra ballots and they get counted. It only becomes an issue if one of the contestants complains.
Hmmm….sounds familiar…
this phrase hasn't been cancelled yet?The bungle was a black mark on New York City’s first major foray into ranked choice voting and seemed to confirm worries that the city’s Board of Elections, which is jointly run by Democrats and Republicans, was unprepared to implement the new system.
Yes thats exactly how it works. Its so much easier to screw republicansWell not exactly how it's supposed to work. There's not supposed to be 135k "test" votes already in the database.
Are you saying they cheated to have a candidate win?Mind you this is a Democrat Primary in a major US city (aka the actual election for mayor). There are no republicans to blame for this one.
Where did this happen in the 2020 presidential election?Yes thats exactly how it works. Its so much easier to screw republicans
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/us/politics/what-happened-iowa-caucuses.amp.htmlWhat the bloody hell did happen in Iowa? You all just reminded me of it.
Meh, it's just Iowa.What the bloody hell did happen in Iowa? You all just reminded me of it.