What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

O Dog gets to wear #42 (1 Viewer)

prosopis

Arizona Chupacabra
Notes: Hudson honored to wear No.42

Second baseman chosen for tribute to Jackie Robinson

By Steve Gilbert / MLB.com

"It means a lot," Orlando Hudson said of wearing No. 42. "That's Jackie Robinson, man."

WASHINGTON -- Usually, the words come quickly for Orlando Hudson.

But sitting in front of his locker Thursday afternoon, one day after he found out he would be wearing No. 42 to honor Jackie Robinson on April 15, he spoke slower, his voice filled with emotion.

"It means a lot," he said. "That's Jackie Robinson, man. Four-sport star at UCLA. All the stuff he went through. I don't know if I would have been strong enough to go through the stuff he went through. Back of the bus, different bathrooms, teammates mistreat you, slide into a base and be spit on, be called the 'N' word by some fans."

As a tribute to Robinson, who broke baseball's color barrier on April 15, 1947, Commissioner Bud Selig will allow players to wear Robinson's No. 42. Selig had retired the number throughout baseball on April 15, 1997, the 50th anniversary of Robinson's debut.

D-backs equipment manager Roger Riley approached veteran first baseman Tony Clark on Wednesday while the team was in Denver to ask him if he wanted to wear No. 42. Clark did, but suggested that Hudson do so instead.

"I'd love to wear it," Clark said. "But I told him perhaps 'O' should wear it because I know that number needs to be on the field and I may not be on the field that day."

Hudson has already asked his agent to get him some throwback shoes and he plans on wearing his socks high and pants baggy that day just like Robinson did.

Riley said the club will make an extra No. 42 jersey for Hudson to hang onto, as well as one for Clark.

"And for me to have the honor of wearing his number ... when TC asked me, that's beyond being called up to the big leagues, playing every day in the big leagues," Hudson said. "It's beyond Gold Gloves, beyond All-Star Games. Just for that one day I get to put myself in Jackie Robinson's shoes without the name calling and stuff that went along with it.

"I do want to steal home, though."

:confused:

 
One player or manager from each team will be allowed to wear #42 on April 15th, except for the Dodgers (all of the Dodgers players will wear #42 that day)

Here's the list of players that have been confirmed so far...

Angels - Gary Matthews, Jr.

Cubs - Derrek Lee

Diamondbacks - Orlando Hudson

Dodgers - the entire team

Giants - Barry Bonds

Indians - Josh Barfield

Mariners - Arthur Rhodes or Jason Ellison (still undecided)

Marlins - Dontrelle Willis

Mets - Willie Randolph

Nationals - Dmitri Young

Padres - Mike Cameron

Phillies - Jimmy Rollins

Red Sox - Coco Crisp

Reds - Ken Griffey, Jr.

Rockies - Latroy Hawkins

Tigers - Gary Sheffield

Twins - Torii Hunter

Yankees - Mariano Rivera (he already wears #42)

 
Rangers - Ron Washington

Brewers - Bill Hall

Astros - Carlos Lee

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think they should let everyone, I mean everyone, wear it. A cool sign of racial harmony that started with Jackie. I like what the Dodgers are doing.

 
Gambino said:
LHUCKS said:
prosopis said:
Bonds gets the honor :thumbdown:
he's faced racism all his life...Bonds is more deserving than many.
Yea Barry grew up hard in the mean streets of Riverside, CA :rolleyes:
:11:Right, since you have to grow up in the ghetto to experience racism.
People don't dislike him b/c he's black. They dislike him b/c he's a ########. Much like you, people don't hold your sexual orientation against you, rather your personality. Now that I think about it you and Barry have quite a bit in common, except for the athletic ability thing.
 
The entire Cardinals team is going to wear #42. Demonstrates that we have made significant strides since 1947, considering that St. Louis was one of the teams that had considered striking against Robinson during his first season. Until MLB moved to Kansas City and Atlanta, St. Louis was the most western and most southern big league city ... and for a long time it ranked as the most segregated of the MLB cities.

Tom Alston was the first African American to play for the Cardinals... beginning in 1954. And the primary reason that any black players were initially signed was due to economic considerations.

From David Halberstam's October 1964:

Quote:

... Gussie Busch was stunned to find that the team he had just purchased was all white. Since Budweiser, its executives believed, sold more beer to black people than any other beer company in the country, Busch was nervous for economic reasons about owning a lily-white team. He could easily visulaize a black boycott of his beer, and, to his credit, he also thought it was simply morally wrong to exclude blacks. That first year he visited the team in spring training, he asked his manager and coaches, "Where are our black players?" There was a long silence and one of the coaches finally said, We don't have any." Busch said, How can it be the great American game if blacks can't play?" The silence hung heavily over everyone. "Hell," he added, in words that clearly represented the end of an era, "we sell beer to everyone."

 
First off :thumbup: to Hudson - he has an appreciation for Robinson's career and legacy and clearly is a worthy choice. It's been said often of pro athletes in recent years that they do not have a proper appreciation, respect, and oftentimes even basic knowledge of the players who came before so it's great to see this isn't the case with O-Dog.

Kudos to the Dodgers and Cardinals as well, though I sure as hell wouldn't want to try and be the official scorer that day :confused:

As for Bonds, it's the team's call. And even though he's not popular in most parts (myself included) if it gets some younger fans or other folks that love Barry in SF why he's wearing that different number that day and to hear the story of Jackie Robinson that's still a good thing.

-QG

 
First off :thumbup: to Hudson - he has an appreciation for Robinson's career and legacy and clearly is a worthy choice. It's been said often of pro athletes in recent years that they do not have a proper appreciation, respect, and oftentimes even basic knowledge of the players who came before so it's great to see this isn't the case with O-Dog.Kudos to the Dodgers and Cardinals as well, though I sure as hell wouldn't want to try and be the official scorer that day :confused: As for Bonds, it's the team's call. And even though he's not popular in most parts (myself included) if it gets some younger fans or other folks that love Barry in SF why he's wearing that different number that day and to hear the story of Jackie Robinson that's still a good thing.-QG
You make a valid point here regarding Bonds.
 
First off :thumbup: to Hudson - he has an appreciation for Robinson's career and legacy and clearly is a worthy choice. It's been said often of pro athletes in recent years that they do not have a proper appreciation, respect, and oftentimes even basic knowledge of the players who came before so it's great to see this isn't the case with O-Dog.Kudos to the Dodgers and Cardinals as well, though I sure as hell wouldn't want to try and be the official scorer that day :confused: As for Bonds, it's the team's call. And even though he's not popular in most parts (myself included) if it gets some younger fans or other folks that love Barry in SF why he's wearing that different number that day and to hear the story of Jackie Robinson that's still a good thing.-QG
You make a valid point here regarding Bonds.
Plus there's a Negro League connection via Bonds' godfather
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top