This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
As I said when I started this thread, at my company we are still watching emp hours to make sure part-timers don't go over 30 hours per week.
See the word "might"? You "might" want to look that one up. In 2014 the main reason we had an increased enrollment in the individual market is because the President allowed for "transitional plans" or the grandmothering of plans - his attempt to make good on the whole "if you like your plan you can keep your plan" statement that he repeated over and over. Keep in mind that the transitional plans allowance didn't occur until AFTER my above post.
Is that all you got out of that post? Now I fully see that you only read what you want to read.
Not well, but it's not like you will ever admit it.
That's two things he was wrong about.
The first most certainly is, assuming Bass is saying what I believe he's saying. In 2017 fewer people enrolled on exchange (as well as off exchange) onto individual ACA policies than did so in 2016. 2016, or the third and final year of the carrier subsidies and such, looks to have been the high water mark. That's when the carrier exodus really started, as well as the average, weighted, national premium increase of 25.6% for the following year. Ironic, don't you think, that those two things happened exactly when I said they would happen 3 years ago? Crazier still that's the year that the decline in enrollment started?tommyGunZ said:
You should be happy, they are turning over the SHOP marketplace to Agents and Brokers.
I could have been SHOP licensed and appointed the last 4 years. I choose not to then, I doubt I will now.
