For anyone who actually read the letter instead of just saying "crazy man", if you could be civil, not cynical, and just respond in a logical and thoughtful manner, it would be interesting to hear the reasonable responses you know of that truly explain the points on pages 2 and 7-13.
And if we don't want to get into all that, can you answer honestly and truthfully that if you supported a candidate with the same information, would you accept that without question? And that's probably the big issue here that everyone glosses over and NEVER allows: IF ALL sides truly want to ensure secure elections, why was there such adamant resistance to anyone wanting to express questioning of these issues?
I read it. None of his claims are proven and most are already disproven. The entire letter is a laundry list of lies.
Got cha. Because he was never afforded a process to "prove it" (despite literally 6 pages of data-drive facts), it is lies. Very convenient stance to have. So, people who counted numbers and courts that levied decisions (unfortunately way after the fact due to process time), are just lies... Look at what you say you read. How do you explain (other than saying"no, just lies...screw the courts..they lie. "?
I would love to see a scenario where a democrat loses an election in a similar scenario where more votes were counted than there are people registered to vote and just watch the outcry. To this day, Stacey Abrahams is STILL claiming an illegal election in one where she disputes 50k votes....but lost by 55k. Jamie Raskin's very first action in congress was to try to claim Trump's 2016 election was illegitimate. To this day, Hillary still says Trump was an illegitimate president.
It is absolutely remarkable how a democrat can cry foul, get the entire MSM behind them and it's all the most important thing on the earth. But when a republican provides a multitude of issues that any REASONABLE person would at least say "ok, let's have a look a this", that person is a liar. Just like when Harry Reid blew up the filibuster in the senate, you will reap what you sow own this.
In Pennsylvania, as of February 2021, there were 121,240 more votes than voters.
ruling by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, drop boxes that were used in the 2020 Election were found to be illegal. In a concurring opinion, justices stated, “If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government. Such elections are unlawful and their results are illegitimate.”