There is zero reason to believe that he will sustain his rate from last season going forward.
		
		
	 
Bayes is backflipping in his grave right now.
		
 
		
	 
Thats rich.  Steamer, Bill James and Oliver all project Chris Carter with a BB% of no greater than 11.4% and a K rate of atleast 25.9%.  Would seem the math is on my side.
		
 
		
	 
Those aren't unreasonable projections. But they also don't preclude a walk-rate against lefties in the 18-20% range. Especially if they're going to run him out there every day against righties.From Houston's perspective, he's not a great fit with Pena and Wallace there, he's going to be a mess in LF. But given that they're not going anywhere in the next couple years, he's obviously more valuable than Lowrie.
		
 
		
	 
An 18% walk rate from one side coupled with a 7% walk rate from the other, you consider that reasonable?  And thats the most favorable I can realistically make the numbers.
		
 
		
	 
Let me back this up:Kevin Youkilis has great walk rates in the minors. Better than Carter. By my count, he had an 18.7% BB rate across all levels.His rookie year in 2004, in which he played 72 games, his walk rate was 13.4%. Very strong for any major league player, and especially strong for a rookie.For 2005, would you think that there was "zero reason" that he could sustain those levels going forward? Was it just a complete fluke that his walk rates for the following years were 14.7% (injured), 13.4%, 12.3%, 10%, 13.1%, 13.3%, etc. Was that magic?Are O-Swing% rates completely arbitrary too?