Sammy3469
Footballguy
FWIW, ZonalMarking has some interesting tidbits that I think we'll see again.I thought Portugal looked dangerous early against Germany. Maybe even having the better of play before letting the first goal in and still looking a threat to score before Hummels' header. But once they went 2-0 down and Pepe reminded us that he's Pepe, all bets were off. Of course, that was with Coentrao, and I don't see Portugal having another player they can trust covering Ronaldo (I'd consider playing Ronaldo on the right and benching Nani for Varela, who I think is at least a little better two way player).
Hard to know what the absence of Muntari will do. One reason why I think the criticisms of Bradley from Sunday are weird is that I thought it was obvious that the US really destroyed Portugal's control in the middle of the field. Portugal completed a high percentage of passes, but very few incisive ones. Moutinho was passing sideways all night. Muntari did a great job pressuring Bradley, Lahm and Khadira in the first two games, so its safe to assume he could have taken Moutinho out of his comfort zone. I don't think 2014 Essien has that in him (but I didn't think 2014 Muntari had that in him before the cup, based on his club form).
1. Germany wanted a slow game against Ghana. I assume the same will be true against us
2. Germany's LB is a big weakness. Hummels has to provide continued support out on the left which opens up space. Both of Ghana's goals were exploiting him
3. Lahm doesn't look that comfortable with the international game as a holding MF and may turn the ball over.
4. Ghana was allowing Germany tons of space, so I wouldn't be shocked if Moutinho has a ton of time.
5. The US really exploited Portugal's LB, so I'd expect Ghana will as well.
6. Per points 2 and 5, I'd expect the right side of the US starting 11 to stay the same to exploit the German LB
